Clifford D. Miles

Is Bacteremic Sepsis Associated With Higher Mortality in Transplant Recipients Than in Nontransplant Patients? A Matched Case-Control Propensity-Adjusted Study

BACKGROUND Sepsis is a serious complication of solid organ transplant (SOT). Evidence on survival differences between SOT recipients and non-SOT patients with sepsis is lacking. METHODS This was a matched, case-control propensity-adjusted study. Conditional logistic regression was performed for risk factor analysis, and Cox proportional hazards regression for survival analysis. RESULTS Three hundred sixty-nine patients (123 cases; 246 controls) diagnosed with blood culture-proven sepsis were matched 1:2 by age, sex, and hospital location. The distribution of allografts was 36.6% kidney, 34.1% liver, 13% kidney-pancreas, 7.3% small bowel/liver, 5.7% heart/lung, and 3.3% multivisceral. The conditional logistic regression showed that the following factors were significantly more frequently associated with SOT compared to non-SOT: higher number of comorbidities (odds ratio [OR] = 8.2 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.48-45.44], P = .016); higher Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score (OR = 1.2 [95% CI, 1.07-1.32], P = .001); presence of nosocomial infection (OR = 36.3 [95% CI, 9.71-135.96], P < .0001); appropriate initial antibiotics (OR = 0.04 [95% CI, .006-.23], P < .0001); and lower white blood cell count (OR = 0.93 [95% CI, .89-.97], P < .0001). Cox proportional hazards regression showed that after all adjustments for clinical presentation, severity of illness, and types of infection, SOT recipients with sepsis had a significantly lower risk of death at 28 days (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.22 [95% CI, .09-.54], P = .001) and at 90 days (HR = 0.43 [95% CI, .20-.89], P = .025). CONCLUSIONS The 28-day and 90-day mortality were significantly decreased for transplant recipients compared with nontransplant patients. These findings suggest that the immunosuppression associated with transplantation may provide a survival advantage to transplant recipients with sepsis through modulation of the inflammatory response.

What do we know about adenovirus in renal transplantation

Adenoviruses are common pathogens that have the potential to cause opportunistic infections with significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised hosts. The significance of adenoviral infection and disease is incompletely known in the setting of kidney transplantation. Reported adenovirus infections in renal transplant recipients have typically manifested as hemorrhagic cystitis and tubulointerstitial nephritis, less severe diseases than often seen in other solid organ transplant recipients (i.e. pneumonia, hepatitis and enteritis). The prevalent adenovirus subgroups associated with cystitis and nephritis are B1 and B2 with the serotypes 7, 11, 34, 35. However, disseminated or severe adenovirus infections, including fatal cases, have been described in renal transplant recipients. There is uncertainty regarding monitoring of and treatment of this virus. Although not supported by randomized clinical trials, cidofovir is used for the treatment of adenovirus disease not responding to reduction of immunosuppression.

The role of donor-recipient relationship in long-term outcomes of living donor renal transplantation.

Background. Graft failure related to acute and chronic rejection remains an important problem in transplantation. An association has been reported between microchimerism and the development of tolerance. Since it has been established that cells of fetal origin can be found in maternal tissues long after parturition, and cells of maternal origin may persist for years in offspring, we hypothesized that this fetal-maternal microchimerism may confer tolerance and thus less graft loss for kidneys transplanted between mothers and their offspring. Methods. We used data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to compare death-censored graft survival among recipients of living-related renal transplants sharing at least one human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotype with their donor. A total of 23,064 such transplants were reported from 1995 to 2004. A Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to compare death-censored graft survival among the following donor-recipient pairings: child-to-mother, child-to-father, mother-to-child, father-to-child, 1-haplotype matched siblings, and HLA-identical siblings. Results. HLA-identical sibling recipients had the best survival, but results for the child-to-father group were not significantly worse (hazard ratio=1.07, P=0.47). Mother-to-child transplants had the poorest graft survival (hazard ratio=2.61, P<0.0001). We found no evidence of tolerance to kidneys transplanted between mothers and offspring. Conclusions. Our analysis of 1-haplotype matched living-related renal transplants argues against tolerance to organs based on fetal-maternal microchimerism. Mechanistic studies examining the relationship between chimerism and immune sensitization would be useful to explore our results, and may contribute to a better understanding of tolerance.

Single-dose rATG induction at renal transplantation: superior renal function and glucoregulation with less hypomagnesemia.

Stevens RB, Lane JT, Boerner BP, Miles CD, Rigley TH, Sandoz JP, Nielsen KJ, Skorupa JY, Skorupa AJ, Kaplan B, Wrenshall LE. Single‐dose rATG induction at renal transplantation: superior renal function and glucoregulation with less hypomagnesemia. 
Clin Transplant 2012: 26: 123–132. 
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

A Randomized 2×2 Factorial Trial, Part 1: Single-Dose Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Induction May Improve Renal Transplantation Outcomes

Background We conducted a randomized and unblinded 2×2 sequential-factorial trial, composed of an induction arm (part 1) comparing single-dose (SD) versus divided-dose rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG), and a maintenance arm (part 2) comparing tacrolimus minimization versus withdrawal. We report the long-term safety and efficacy of SD-rATG induction in the context of early steroid withdrawal and tacrolimus minimization or withdrawal. Methods Patients (n=180) received 6 mg/kg rATG, SD or four alternate-day doses (1.5 mg/kg/dose), with early steroid withdrawal and tacrolimus or sirolimus maintenance. After 6 months targeted maintenance levels were tacrolimus, 2 to 4 ng/mL and sirolimus, 4 to 6 ng/mL or, if calcineurin inhibitor–withdrawn, sirolimus 8 to 12 ng/mL with mycophenolate mofetil 2 g two times per day. Primary endpoints were renal function (abbreviated modification of diet in renal disease) and chronic graft histopathology (Banff). Secondary endpoints included patient survival, graft survival, biopsy-proven rejection, and infectious or noninfectious complications. Results Follow-up averaged longer than 4 years. Tacrolimus or sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil exposure was identical between groups. The SD-rATG associated with improved renal function (2-36 months; P<0.001) in deceased donor recipients. The SD-rATG associated with quicker lymphocyte, CD4 T cell, and CD4-CD8 recovery and fewer infections. Cox multivariate hazard modeling showed divided-dose–rATG (P=0.019), deceased donor (P=0.003), serious infection (P=0.0.018), and lower lymphocyte count (P=0.001) associated with increased mortality. Patients with all four covariates showed a 27-fold increased likelihood of death (P=0.00002). Chronic graft histopathology, rejection rates, and death-censored graft survival were not significantly different between groups. Conclusion The SD-rATG induction improves the 3-year renal function in recipients of deceased donor kidneys. This benefit, along with possibly improved patient survival and fewer infections suggest that how rATG is administered may impact its efficacy and safety.

Albuminuria after Renal Transplantation: Maintenance with Sirolimus/Low-Dose Tacrolimus vs. Mycophenolate Mofetil/High-Dose Tacrolimus

Miles CD, Skorupa JY, Sandoz JP, Rigley TH, Nielsen KJ, Stevens RB. Albuminuria after renal transplantation: maintenance with sirolimus/low‐dose tacrolimus vs. mycophenolate mofetil/high‐dose tacrolimus. 
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 898–904.

A Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Flexible-Design Randomized Multicenter Trial: Early Safety of Single- Versus Divided-Dose Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin Induction in Renal Transplantation

A previous nonblinded, randomized, single‐center renal transplantation trial of single‐dose rabbit anti‐thymocyte globulin induction (SD‐rATG) showed improved efficacy compared with conventional divided‐dose (DD‐rATG) administration. The present multicenter, double‐blind/double‐dummy STAT trial (Single dose vs. Traditional Administration of Thymoglobulin) evaluated SD‐rATG versus DD‐rATG induction for noninferiority in early (7‐day) safety and tolerability. Ninety‐five patients (randomized 1:1) received 6 mg/kg SD‐rATG or 1.5 mg/kg/dose DD‐rATG, with tacrolimus‐mycophenolate maintenance immunosuppression. The primary end point was a composite of fever, hypoxia, hypotension, cardiac complications, and delayed graft function. Secondary end points included 12‐month patient survival, graft survival, and rejection. Target enrollment was 165 patients with an interim analysis scheduled after 80 patients. Interim analysis showed primary end point noninferiority of SD‐rATG induction (p = 0.6), and a conditional probability of <1.73% of continued enrollment producing a significant difference (futility analysis), leading to early trial termination. Final analysis (95 patients) showed no differences in occurrence of primary end point events (p = 0.58) or patients with no, one, or more than one event (p = 0.81), or rejection, graft, or patient survival (p = 0.78, 0.47, and 0.35, respectively). In this rigorously blinded trial in adult renal transplantation, we have shown SD‐rATG induction to be noninferior to DD‐rATG induction in early tolerability and equivalent in 12‐month safety. (Clinical Trials.gov #NCT00906204.)

Risk of serious opportunistic infections after solid organ transplantation: interleukin-2 receptor antagonists versus polyclonal antibodies. A meta-analysis

Background: We aimed to evaluate and quantify the risk of serious opportunistic infections after induction with polyclonal antibodies versus IL-2 receptor antagonists (IL-2RAs) in randomized clinical trials. Methods: PRISMA guidelines were followed and random-effects models were performed. Results: 70 randomized clinical trials (10,106 patients) were selected: 36 polyclonal antibodies (n = 3377), and 34 IL-2RAs (n = 6729). Compared to controls, polyclonal antibodies showed higher risk of serious opportunistic infections (OR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.34–2.80; p < 0.0001); IL-2RAs were associated with lower risk of serious opportunistic infections (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.68–0.94; p = 0.009). Polyclonal antibodies were associated with higher risk of bacterial (OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.00–2.50; p = 0.049) and viral infections (OR: 2.37, 95% CI: 1.60–3.49; p < 0.0001), while IL-2RAs were associated with lower risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.56–0.97; p = 0.032). Adjusted indirect comparison: compared to polyclonal antibodies, IL-2RAs were associated with lower risk of serious opportunistic infections (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.34–0.49; p < 0.0001), bacterial infections (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.39–0.67; p < 0.0001) and CMV disease (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.34–0.98; p = 0.043). Results remained consistent across allografts. Conclusion: The risk of serious opportunistic infections, bacterial infections and CMV disease were all significantly decreased with IL-2RAs compared to polyclonal antibodies.

A Randomized 2x2 Factorial Clinical Trial of Renal Transplantation: Steroid-Free Maintenance Immunosuppression with Calcineurin Inhibitor Withdrawal after Six Months Associates with Improved Renal Function and Reduced Chronic Histopathology

Introduction The two most significant impediments to renal allograft survival are rejection and the direct nephrotoxicity of the immunosuppressant drugs required to prevent it. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), a mainstay of most immunosuppression regimens, are particularly nephrotoxic. Until less toxic antirejection agents become available, the only option is to optimize our use of those at hand. Aim To determine whether intensive rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) induction followed by CNI withdrawal would individually or combined improve graft function and reduce graft chronic histopathology–surrogates for graft and, therefore, patient survival. As previously reported, a single large rATG dose over 24 hours was well-tolerated and associated with better renal function, fewer infections, and improved patient survival. Here we report testing whether complete CNI discontinuation would improve renal function and decrease graft pathology. Methods Between April 20, 2004 and 4-14-2009 we conducted a prospective, randomized, non-blinded renal transplantation trial of two rATG dosing protocols (single dose, 6 mg/kg vs. divided doses, 1.5 mg/kg every other day x 4; target enrollment = 180). Subsequent maintenance immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, a CNI, and sirolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor. We report here the outcome of converting patients after six months either to minimized tacrolimus/sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil/sirolimus. Primary endpoints were graft function and chronic histopathology from protocol kidney biopsies at 12 and 24 months Results CNI withdrawal (on-treatment analysis) associated with better graft function (p <0.001) and lower chronic histopathology composite scores in protocol biopsies at 12 (p = 0.003) and 24 (p = 0.013) months, without affecting patient (p = 0.81) or graft (p = 0.93) survival, or rejection rate (p = 0.17). Conclusion CNI (tacrolimus) withdrawal at six months may provide a strategy for decreased nephrotoxicity and improved long-term function in steroid-free low immunological risk renal transplant patients. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00556933

Renal allograft pyelonephritis and fungemia due to Candida krusei

A 61-year-old female was admitted for fever and acute renal failure 6 weeks after receiving a kidney transplant. Her past medical history was notable for CKD stage 5 due to chronic idiopathic tubulointerstitial nephritis. This was diagnosed in 1998 when she presented with an elevated creatinine, sterile pyuria and proteinuria, and underwent native kidney biopsy confirming the diagnosis. She was initially treated with corticosteroids and remained on 5 mg daily of prednisone up until the date of her pre-emptive living related kidney transplant. She had a low-risk immunologic profile with a negative T and B cell crossmatch prior to transplant. Per our center protocol, she received basiliximab for induction, and was maintained on tacrolimus, mycophenolate and prednisone for immunosuppression, with trough FK506 levels ranging between 8 and 12 ng/mL. She was discharged on a standard antimicrobial prophylaxis regimen of trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole and valacyclovir and had a nadir serum creatinine of 1.2 mg/dL following her transplant. Her post-operative course was uneventful until her presentation to the hospital, when she complained of fevers, nausea and vomiting. Her physical examination and