Clorindo Pagliarulo

Prognostic role of amenorrhea induced by adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer.

The prognostic role of drug-induced amenorrhea (DIA) was restrospectively evaluated in 221 out of 254 consecutive premenopausal patients treated with adjuvant CMF or a CMF-containing regimen; 33 patients were eliminated because of lack of menstrual data. All patients had metastatic axillary nodes; drug regimens were: CMF x 9 courses +/- Tamoxifen (TM) and CMF x 6 courses; median age was 43 (range 26-54). Premenopausal status was defined as last normal menses within the 6 weeks preceding initiation of chemotherapy: DIA as cessation of menses for at least 3 months not later than 3 months from the end of chemotherapy. DIA occurred in 166,221 (75.1%) patients and was strictly related to the age of the patients; also, the older the patients the shorter the time required to develop DIA. At median follow up of 69 months, Mantel-Byar analysis showed a longer disease free survival (DFS) for patients who developed DIA as compared with non amenorrheic women (P less than 0.001). DIA prognostic value was independent of age, number of involved nodes, tumour size and number of CMF cycles, as assessed by the Cox model (RH 0.43, 95% C.I. 0.24-0.77), in which DIA was entered as a time dependent covariate.

ADJUVANT THERAPY WITH TAMOXIFEN IN OPERABLE BREAST CANCER: 10 year results of the Naples (GUN) study

Treatment with tamoxifen (TM), alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF), was used as an adjuvant to surgery in 433 patients with stage I, II, or III(T3a) breast cancer. Oestrogen receptors (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptors were assayed in most cases. 308 premenopausal node-negative and postmenopausal node-negative or node-positive patients were randomised to receive TM, 30 mg daily for 2 years, or no further therapy. 125 premenopausal node-positive patients were randomised to receive either CMF for nine courses plus TM or CMF alone. After a median follow-up of 63 months TM significantly reduced the incidence of relapses and deaths compared with no therapy. A significant interaction between treatment effect and ER/PgR status was seen. Disease-free and overall survival were similar after treatment with CMF+ TM or CMF.

A prospective randomized trial of doxorubicin versus idarubicin in the treatment of advanced breast cancer

Seventy‐six patients with advanced breast cancer were entered into the current study. They were randomized to receive either idarubicin (IDA) 45 mg/m2 orally or doxorubicin (DX) 75 mg/m2 intravenously (IV), both drugs being administered every 3 weeks. Among 37 evaluable patients who received DX treatment the overall response rate was 46%, whereas it was 21% in 34 evaluable patients treated with IDA. This difference was statistically significant. In previously untreated patients the response rate with DX was 60% compared to 29% with IDA. Patients with prior chemotherapy had 29% response rate to DX in contrast to 12% with IDA. The median time to response, the median response duration, and the median time to progression were similar in both groups. The median survival of all patients was 20 months in DX arm and 14 months in IDA arm (95% confidence limits 16.69–23.31 and 10.77–17.23, respectively; P = 0.09). Both treatments produced equivalent incidence and severity of myelotoxicity. Gastrointestinal toxicity and alopecia were significantly lower in patients receiving IDA. As for cardiotoxicity, four cases of congestive heart failure were recorded among patients treated with DX whereas no cases occurred in the IDA group. The results of this study indicate that, although DX remains the best single agent available in the treatment of breast cancer, IDA may have a role in selected patients with this disease. Cancer 64:2431–2436, 1989.

CMF vs alternating CMF/EV in the adjuvant treatment of operable breast cancer. A single centre randomised clinical trial (Naples GUN-3 study).

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis of Goldie and Coldman that the use of non-cross-resistant regimens of chemotherapy could lead to maximal anti-tumour effect. We compared standard CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil) with alternating CMF/EV (epirubicin, vincristine) in the adjuvant therapy of early breast cancer. Stage II premenopausal node-positive or post-menopausal node-positive oestrogen receptor-negative and stage III breast cancer patients were eligible for the study. From January 1985 to December 1990, 220 patients were randomised (115 to CMF and 105 to CMF/EV). Toxicity was mild; neurotoxicity, vomiting and hair loss were more frequent in the CMF/EV group, while permanent amenorrhoea, diarrhoea, stomach ache and minor infections occurred more often in the CMF arm. At a follow-up of 48 months, 113 patients (51.4%) had had recurrence (62 on CMF and 51 on CMF/EV) and 54 (24.5%) had died (30 on CMF and 24 on CMF/EV). There was no significant difference in disease-free and overall survival between the two arms. After adjusting for menopausal status and stage, the relative risk (RR) of recurrence for CMF/EV patients was 0.93 (95% CL 0.64-1.35), while the RR of death was 0.85 (95% CL 0.49-1.47). In conclusion, the Goldie-Coldman model of alternating therapy is not confirmed in this trial of adjuvant therapy of early breast cancer, although in view of its design a difference of less than 20% in 3 year disease-free survival could not be excluded.

Prolactin receptor does not correlate with oestrogen and progesterone receptors in primary breast cancer and lacks prognostic significance. Ten year results of the Naples adjuvant (GUN) study

The correlation between prolactin (PRLR) and oestrogen (ER) or progesterone receptors (PgR) in breast cancer and a possible prognostic significance of PRLR at 10 year follow-up have been investigated in the Naples (GUN) adjuvant trial. A total of 308 pre- and post-menopausal patients with early breast cancer, who entered the trial from 1 February 1978 to 31 December 1983, received randomly Tamoxifen (TM), 30 mg per die for 2 years, or no therapy. PRLR status was known in 229 (74.3%) patients. Values of specific binding less than 1% were considered negative. PRLR was positive in 75/229 (32.8%). ER was assayed in 210/229 (91.7%) patients and PgR in 188/229 (82.1%). No significant correlation, by the Spearman test, was found between PRLR and ER or PgR, while ER status was highly interrelated with PgR status. By the Cox model no evidence of an independent prognostic role of PRLR on disease-free survival (DFS) was observed, nor an interaction between PRLR and adjuvant treatment with TM was found.

A randomised factorial trial of sequential doxorubicin and CMF vs CMF and chemotherapy alone vs chemotherapy followed by goserelin plus tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer.

The sequential doxorubicin → CMF (CMF=cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil) regimen has never been compared to CMF in a randomised trial. The role of adding goserelin and tamoxifen after chemotherapy is unclear. In all, 466 premenopausal node-positive patients were randomised to: (a) CMF × 6 cycles (CMF); (b) doxorubicin × 4 cycles followed by CMF × 6 cycles (A → CMF); (c) CMF × 6 cycles followed by goserelin plus tamoxifen × 2 years (CMF → GT); and (d) doxorubicin × 4 cycles followed by CMF × 6 cycles followed by goserelin plus tamoxifen × 2 years (A → CMF → GT). The study used a 2 × 2 factorial experimental design to assess: (1) the effect of the chemotherapy regimens (CMF vs A → CMF or arms a+c vs b+d) and (2) the effect of adding GT after chemotherapy (arms a+b vs c+d). At a median follow-up of 72 months, A → CMF as compared to CMF significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) with a multivariate hazard ratio (HR)=0.740 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.556–0.986; P=0.040) and produced a nonsignificant improvement of overall survival (OS) (HR=0.764; 95% CI: 0.489–1.193). The addition of GT after chemotherapy significantly improved DFS (HR=0.74; 95% CI: 0.555–0.987; P=0.040), with a nonsignificant improvement of OS (HR=0.84; 95% CI: 0.54–1.32). A → CMF is superior to CMF. Adding GT after chemotherapy is beneficial for premenopausal node-positive patients.

Steroid hormone receptor levels and adjuvant tamoxifen in early breast cancer - Ten year results of the Naples (GUN) study

SummaryTen year disease-free survival (DFS) results of the Naples randomized trial of adjuvant tamoxifen (TM), 30 mg per day for 2 years versus no therapy according to receptor levels, are reported. From Feb. 1, 1978, through Dec. 31, 1983, 308 pre- and postmenopausal patients with early breast cancer entered the trial. Estrogen receptor (ER) data were available on 239 (77.6%) patients, progesterone receptor (PgR) data on 194 (63.0%), and both receptor data on 181 (58.8%).ER and PgR were assayed by dextran-coated charcoal technique in a single laboratory. The effect of adjuvant TM was significantly related to ER and PgR concentration of the primary tumor. The greatest TM benefit on DFS was evident in patients with the highest levels of receptors. The interaction between the treatment effect and receptor concentration was found whether ER and PgR were considered separately or together.

CA 15-3 in human breast cancer. Comparison with tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA).

CEA, TPA, CA 15-3 were assayed in 238 patients in follow-up for breast cancer after surgery. CA 15-3 showed the best sensitivity and specificity; the predictive value of a positive CA 15-3 test was three times higher than CEA and TPA. No association was found between marker positivity and the number of organs involved by metastases. CA 15-3 positivity was significantly associated with visceral rather than soft tissue recurrences; no significant similar association was observed for CEA and TPA. CA 15-3 serum levels were early predictors of relapse in four out of nine patients within a 6-12 month follow-up period.

Mitomycin C and mitoxantrone in anthracycline-pretreated advanced breast cancer patients : a phase II study

Twenty-one patients with anthracycline-pretreated advanced breast cancer were treated with mitomycin C plus mitoxantrone (MM), 10 mg/m2, on day 1 of a 28-day cycle. All patients were evaluated for toxicity and response. Overall, 83 cycles were administered, with a median number of 4 cycles per patient. Hematologic toxicity, not requiring hospitalization, was the major side effect. Vomiting occurred in 19.2% of cycles. Objective response rate was 33.3% (95% confidence interval: 12.2–53.1%); best responses were 1 complete and 6 partial; also 7 stable and 7 progressive disease were recorded. The best responding site was the viscera, the worst was bone. Responses were seen preferentially in second-rather than in third-line therapy and in patients who had responded to previous chemotherapy, although differences were not statistically significant. Kaplan-Meier estimated median time to progression and overall survival were 26 weeks (range: 2–67 weeks) and 35 weeks (range: 6–79 weeks), respectively. In conclusion the MM regimen showed acceptable toxicity and appreciable activity in anthracycline-pretreated advanced breast cancer.

CHEMOTHERAPY WITH MITOMYCIN C AND VINBLASTINE IN PRETREATED METASTATIC BREAST CANCER

Aims In February 1986 we began a study to test the activity of mitomycin C (12 mg/m2) plus vinblastine (6 mg/m2) on day 1 of a 28-day cycle (MV) as second or third-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer patients. Methods As of February 1988 the study was stopped after 26 patients had been enrolled. The median age of the patients was 54 years (range 35-78); all patients were progressive from chemotherapy; 15 (57.7 %) patients were treated as second and 11 (42.3 %) as third line; 19 (73.1 %) patients had received anthracyclines as first (13 patients) or second-line (6 patients) chemotherapy; 18 (69.2 %) patients had visceral Involvement; 7 (26.9 %) had one metastatic site, 11 (42.3 %) two sites, 6 (23.1 %) three sites and 2 (7.7 %) four sites. Results Overall, 86 cycles were administered, with a median number of 3 cycles per patient. Toxicity was mild; hematologic side effects required discontinuation of treatment in 3 cases. Vomiting occurred in 3 (11.5 %) patients, nausea in 5 (19.2 %). Moderate neurologic toxicity was recorded in 6 (23 %) patients. No complete and 3 partial responses were observed. The objective response rate was 11.5 % (exact 95 % confidence interval, 2.4-30.1). Responses occurred independently of disease-free interval, dominant metastatic site, response to previous chemotherapy, previous anthracycline and line of treatment; all responses were recorded in patients under 50 years of age. Kaplan-Meier estimated median time to progression and overall survival were 13 and 40 weeks, respectively. Conclusion The MV regimen was well tolerated but showed little activity in pretreated metastatic breast cancer.