Clough Shelton

Iatrogenic facial nerve injury during otologic surgery

Perhaps the most devastating complication in otologic surgery is that of inadvertent injury to the facial nerve. A review of 22 patients who had sustained an iatrogenic facial nerve injury was conducted. Although the most common procedure being performed during the injury was mastoidectomy (55%), a surprising number of patients had injury during tympanoplasty (14%) or during removal of exostoses (14%). The most common area of injury to the facial nerve in this series was in the tympanic segment. In 79% of the patients, the facial nerve injury was not detected at the time of surgery. All patients underwent surgical exploration of the facial nerve. Otologic surgeons are cautioned to be familiar with the normal course of the facial nerve and to be aware of the potential for facial nerve injury when performing transcanal surgery.

Acoustic tumors: Effect of surgical removal on tinnitus

Tinnitus is common in patients with acoustic tumors and may be the initial symptom leading to diagnosis. We might anticipate that tumor removal would alleviate preoperative tinnitus. However, few have studied this systematically. Further, the effect of tumor removal in those with no preoperative tinnitus has rarely been examined. In this study, a questionnaire was sent retrospectively to patients who had undergone surgical removal of an acoustic tumor, addressing the characteristics of tinnitus, and asking whether surgery had directly affected tinnitus. A total of 134 questionnaires were returned. Those who indicated preoperative tinnitus tended to show small but statistically significant improvements in the perceived severity of the tinnitus after surgery, although the symptom rarely resolved entirely. Those with no preoperative tinnitus have an approximately 50 percent chance of developing it following surgery.

Management of hydrocephalus resulting from acoustic neuromas.

Patients with large acoustic neuromas may have secondary obstructive hydrocephalus and occasionally significant neurologic deficit develops. At the House Ear Clinic, we have managed patients with hydrocephalus by translabyrinthine tumor removal without preoperative ventriculoperitoneal shunting. Forty-three patients with documented hydrocephalus who underwent acoustic neuroma removal have been reviewed. Six patients had neurologic deficit resulting from raised Intracranial pressure before surgery. In each of these six cases, the deficit resolved after tumor removal without requiring shunting. Two patients had had ventriculoperitoneal shunts inserted because of neurologic deficit before referral for tumor removal. Two other patients underwent postoperative shunting for neurologic deficit — One at 2 weeks and one at 2 years. Cerebral or cerebellar herniation was not noted in any case. Cerebrospinal fluid leak occurred In five patients (11.6%) and culture-positive meningitis in two patients (4.6%). We conclude that decompression by translabyrinthine tumor removal is a safe method of management for patients with hydrocephalus resulting from large acoustic tumors.

The treatment of small acoustic tumors : now or later ?

Prior to the advent of microneurosurgery, the operative mortality for acoustic tumor removal was high and management often consisted of observation until sufficient symptoms warranted removal. The treatment of these tumors has evolved, and recent introduction of gadolinium‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows the diagnosis of very small intracanalicular acoustic tumors before hearing has been significantly affected. For such tumors, some surgeons advocate the premicrosurgical philosophy of observation rather than removal.

Sudden hearing loss: Determining the specific cause and the most appropriate treatment

PreviewSudden hearing loss commonly strikes young adults with no other medical problems, and it most often occurs idiopathically, which presents a diagnostic challenge. Patients who experience such hearing loss often are concerned that the loss may be permanent or signals a serious underlying problem. Similarly, physicians are uneasy when faced with the overwhelming multitude of categories and causes of hearing loss. In this article, Drs Bredenkamp and Shelton review the most common of these and how to differentiate them, the selection of proper diagnostic procedures and treatments, and appropriate referral.

OTOSCLEROSIS : TREATING PROGRESSIVE HEARING LOSS IN YOUNG ADULTS

When a patient presents with bilateral progressive hearing loss and has a family history of hearing loss, otosclerosis should be placed high on the list of possible causes. Primary care physicians should determined whether the hearing loss is conductive or sensorineural with otologic examination and tuning-fork evaluation. Unless there is an obvious reversible cause for the progressive hearing loss, the patient should be referred to an otolaryngologist for more intensive otologic and audiologic examination. The patients principal concern is the ability to hear and comprehend the spoken word in normal circumstances. Fortunately, most patients can be rehabilitated with surgery or a hearing aid. Fluoride treatment may have a significant role in preventing further hearing loss from otosclerosis.