Clyde S. Crumpacker

Infective Endocarditis: An Analysis Based on Strict Case Definitions

Strict case definitions were applied to 123 clinically diagnosed cases of infective endocarditis. Cases were categorized as definite (19), probable (44), or possible (41) endocarditis or were rejected (19). Compared to other published studies, our patients had an advanced mean age (57), high incidence of underlying valvular disease (66%), short mean duration of symptoms (27 days), and 15% mortality, the lowest reported for a large series. Most cases were caused by viridans streptococci, Staphylococcus aureus, or enterococci; Enterobacteriacae were absent, and negative cultures infrequent (5%). Subgroups included nosocomial endocarditis (13%), usually with underlying valvular disease and invasive procedures; prosthesis endocarditis (12%); and cases requiring cardiac surgery (18%). Deaths were caused by heart failure, neurologic events, or superinfection. Strict definitions are useful in managing suspect cases, and are essential in comparing clinical studies. Early recognition and treatment should be the focus of efforts to reduce mortality from endocarditis.

Guidelines for preventing opportunistic infections among HIV-infected persons - 2002

Introduction In 1995, the U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) developed guidelines for preventing opportunistic infections (OIs) among persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (1-3). These guidelines, which are intended for clinicians and health-care providers and their HIV-infected patients, were revised in 1997 (4) and again in 1999 (5), and have been published in MMWR (1, 4, 5), Clinical Infectious Diseases (2, 6, 7), Annals of Internal Medicine (3, 8), American Family Physician (9, 10), and Pediatrics (11); accompanying editorials have appeared in JAMA (12, 13). Response to these guidelines (e.g., a substantial number of requests for reprints, website contacts, and observations from health-care providers) demonstrates that they have served as a valuable reference for HIV health-care providers. Because the 1995, 1997, and 1999 guidelines included ratings indicating the strength of each recommendation and the quality of supporting evidence, readers have been able to assess the relative importance of each recommendation. Since acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) was first recognized 20 years ago, remarkable progress has been made in improving the quality and duration of life for HIV-infected persons in the industrialized world. During the first decade of the epidemic, this improvement occurred because of improved recognition of opportunistic disease processes, improved therapy for acute and chronic complications, and introduction of chemoprophylaxis against key opportunistic pathogens. The second decade of the epidemic has witnessed extraordinary progress in developing highly active antiretroviral therapies (HAART) as well as continuing progress in preventing and treating OIs. HAART has reduced the incidence of OIs and extended life substantially (14-16). HAART is the most effective approach to preventing OIs and should be considered for all HIV-infected persons who qualify for such therapy (14-16). However, certain patients are not ready or able to take HAART, and others have tried HAART regimens but therapy failed. Such patients will benefit from prophylaxis against OIs (15). In addition, prophylaxis against specific OIs continues to provide survival benefits even among persons who are receiving HAART (15). Clearly, since HAART was introduced in the United States in 1995, chemoprophylaxis for OIs need not be lifelong. Antiretroviral therapy can restore immune function. The period of susceptibility to opportunistic processes continues to be accurately indicated by CD4+ T lymphocyte counts for patients who are receiving HAART. Thus, a strategy of stopping primary or secondary prophylaxis for certain patients whose immunity has improved as a consequence of HAART is logical. Stopping prophylactic regimens can simplify treatment, reduce toxicity and drug interactions, lower cost of care, and potentially facilitate adherence to antiretroviral regimens. In 1999, the USPHS/IDSA guidelines reported that stopping primary or secondary prophylaxis for certain pathogens was safe if HAART has led to an increase in CD4+ T lymphocyte counts above specified threshold levels. Recommendations were made for only those pathogens for which adequate clinical data were available. Data generated since 1999 continue to support these recommendations and allow additional recommendations to be made concerning the safety of stopping primary or secondary prophylaxis for other pathogens. For recommendations regarding discontinuing chemoprophylaxis, readers will note that criteria vary by such factors as duration of CD4+ T lymphocyte count increase, and, in the case of secondary prophylaxis, duration of treatment of the initial episode of disease. These differences reflect the criteria used in specific studies. Therefore, certain inconsistencies in the format of these criteria are unavoidable. Although considerable data are now available concerning discontinuing primary and secondary OI prophylaxis, essentially no data are available regarding restarting prophylaxis when the CD4+ T lymphocyte count decreases again to levels at which the patient is likely to again be at risk for OIs. For primary prophylaxis, whether to use the same threshold at which prophylaxis can be stopped (derived from data in studies addressing prophylaxis discontinuation) or to use the threshold below which initial prophylaxis is recommended, is unknown. Therefore, in this revision of the guidelines, in certain cases, ranges are provided for restarting primary or secondary prophylaxis. For prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP), the indicated threshold for restarting both primary and secondary prophylaxis is 200 cells/L. For all these recommendations, the Roman numeral ratings reflect the lack of data available to assist in making these decisions (Box). Table. System Used to Rate the Strength of Recommendations and Quality of Supporting Evidence During the development of these revised guidelines, working group members reviewed published manuscripts as well as abstracts and material presented at professional meetings. Periodic teleconferences were held to develop the revisions. Major Changes in These Recommendations Major changes in the guidelines since 1999 include the following: Higher level ratings have been provided for discontinuing primary prophylaxis for PCP and Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) when CD4+ T lymphocytes have increased to >200 cells/L and >100 cells/L, respectively, for 3 months in response to HAART (AI), and a new recommendation to discontinue primary toxoplasmosis prophylaxis has been provided when the CD4+ T lymphocyte count has increased to >200 cells/L for 3 months (AI). Secondary PCP prophylaxis should be discontinued among patients whose CD4+ T lymphocyte counts have increased to >200 cells/L for 3 months as a consequence of HAART (BII). Secondary prophylaxis for disseminated MAC can be discontinued among patients with a sustained (e.g., 6-month) increase in CD4+ count to >100 cells/L in response to HAART, if they have completed 12 months of MAC therapy and have no symptoms or signs attributable to MAC (CIII). Secondary prophylaxis for toxoplasmosis and cryptococcosis can be discontinued among patients with a sustained increase in CD4+ counts (e.g. 6 months) to >200 cells/L and >100200 cells/L, respectively, in response to HAART, if they have completed their initial therapy and have no symptoms or signs attributable to these pathogens (CIII). The importance of screening all HIV-infected persons for hepatitis C virus (HCV) is emphasized (BIII). Additional information concerning transmission of human herpesvirus 8 infection (HHV-8) is provided. New information regarding drug interactions is provided, chiefly related to rifamycins and antiretroviral drugs. Revised recommendations for vaccinating HIV-infected adults and HIV-exposed or infected children are provided. Using the Information in This Report For each of the 19 diseases covered in this report, specific recommendations are provided that address 1) preventing exposure to opportunistic pathogens, 2) preventing first episodes of disease, and 3) preventing disease recurrences. Recommendations are rated by a revised version of the IDSA rating system (17). In this system, the letters AE signify the strength of the recommendation for or against a preventive measure, and Roman numerals IIII indicate the quality of evidence supporting the recommendation (Box). Because of their length and complexity, tables in this report are grouped together and follow the references. Tables appear in the following order: Table 1 Dosages for prophylaxis to prevent first episode of opportunistic disease among infected adults and adolescents; Table 1. Prophylaxis to Prevent First Episode of Opportunistic Disease among Adults and Adolescents Infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Table 2 Dosages for prophylaxis to prevent recurrence of opportunistic disease among HIV-infected adults and adolescents; Table 2. Prophylaxis to Prevent Recurrence of Opportunistic Disease, after Chemotherapy for Acute Disease, among Adults and Adolescents Infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Table 3 Effects of food on drugs used to treat OIs; Table 3. Effects of Food on Drugs Used to Prevent Opportunistic Infections Table 4 Effects of medications on drugs used to treat OIs; Table 4. Effects of Medications on Drugs Used to Prevent Opportunistic Infections Table 5 Effects of OI medications on drugs commonly administered to HIV-infected persons; Table 5. Effects of Opportunistic Infection Medications on Antiretroviral Drugs Commonly Administered to Persons Infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Table 6 Adverse effects of drugs used to prevent OIs; Table 6. Adverse Effects of Drugs Used in Preventing Opportunistic Infections Table 7 Dosages of drugs for preventing OIs for persons with renal insufficiency; Table 7. Dosing of Drugs for Primary Prevention of or Maintenance Therapy for Opportunistic Infections Related to Renal Insufficiency Table 8 Costs of agents recommended for preventing OIs among adults with HIV infection; Table 8. Wholesale Acquisition Costs of Agents Recommended for Preventing Opportunistic Infections among Adults Infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Table 9 Immunologic categories for HIV-infected children; Table 9. Immunologic Categories for Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Children, Based on Age-Specific CD4+ T Lymphocyte Counts and Percentage of Total Lymphocytes Table 10 Immunization schedule for HIV-infected children; Table 10. Recommended Immunization Schedule for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Infected Children Table 11 Dosages for prophylaxis to prevent first episode of opportunistic disease among HIV-infected infants and children; Table 11. Prophylaxis to Prevent First Episode of Opportunistic Disease among Infants and Children Infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Tabl

Acyclovir-Resistant Herpes Simplex Virus Infections in Patients with the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

RECURRENT herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections are frequent in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Although they are usually self-limiting in the normal host, such infecti...

Rapid and durable antiretroviral effect of the HIV-1 Integrase inhibitor raltegravir as part of combination therapy in treatment-naive patients with HIV-1 infection: results of a 48-week controlled study.

Background:Raltegravir is an HIV-1 integrase strand-transfer inhibitor with potent in vitro activity. This study explored the antiretroviral activity and safety of raltegravir in treatment-naive patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels ≥5000 copies/mL and CD4+ T-cell counts ≥100 cells/mm3. Methods:Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled study of raltegravir at doses of 100, 200, 400, and 600 mg twice daily versus efavirenz at a dose of 600 mg/d, all in combination with tenofovir at a dose of 300 mg/d and lamivudine at a dose of 300 mg/d (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00100048). Results:In the 198 patients treated (160 on raltegravir and 38 on efavirenz), the mean HIV-1 RNA level ranged from 4.6 to 4.8 log10 copies/mL at baseline. At weeks 2, 4, and 8, the proportion of patients achieving an HIV-1 RNA level <50 copies/mL was greater in each of the raltegravir treatment groups than in the efavirenz group. By week 24, all treatment groups appeared similar, with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <400 copies/mL in 85% to 98% of patients and <50 copies/mL in 85% to 95% of patients. These reductions were maintained through week 48 in 85% to 98% of patients and in 83% to 88% of patients, respectively. Five (3%) patients on raltegravir and 1 (3%) on efavirenz experienced virologic failure before week 48. Drug-related clinical adverse events were less common with raltegravir than with efavirenz. After 24 and 48 weeks of treatment, raltegravir did not result in increased serum levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, or triglycerides. Conclusions:Raltegravir at all doses studied was generally well tolerated in combination with tenofovir and lamivudine. Raltegravir exhibited potent and durable antiretroviral activity similar to that of efavirenz at 24 and 48 weeks but achieved HIV-1 RNA levels below detection at a more rapid rate.

A Controlled Trial Comparing Continued Zidovudine with Didanosine in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection

BACKGROUND Although zidovudine is effective in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, its efficacy may decline with prolonged use. Didanosine is another inhibitor of HIV reverse transcriptase. We evaluated the effectiveness of changing anti-HIV treatment from zidovudine to didanosine. METHODS This multicenter, double-blind study involved 913 patients who had tolerated zidovudine for at least 16 weeks. The patients had the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), AIDS-related complex with less than or equal to 300 CD4 cells per cubic milliliter, or asymptomatic HIV infection with less than or equal to 200 CD4 cells per cubic milliliter. They were randomly assigned to receive 600 mg per day of zidovudine, 750 mg per day of didanosine, or 500 mg per day of didanosine. RESULTS There were significantly fewer new AIDS-defining events and deaths among the 298 subjects assigned to 500 mg per day of didanosine than among the subjects who continued to receive zidovudine (relative risk, 1.39; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.06 to 1.82; P = 0.015). With 750 mg of didanosine, there was no clear benefit over zidovudine (relative risk, 1.10; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.42). The efficacy of didanosine was unrelated to the duration of previous zidovudine treatment. In the two didanosine groups, there were improvements in the number of CD4 cells (P less than 0.001 for both groups) and in p24 antigen levels (P = 0.03 in the 500-mg group; P = 0.005 in the 750-mg group), as compared with the zidovudine group. CONCLUSIONS Changing treatment from zidovudine to 500 mg per day of didanosine appears to slow the progression of HIV disease.

A Controlled Trial Comparing Foscarnet with Vidarabine for Acyclovir-Resistant Mucocutaneous Herpes Simplex in the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

BACKGROUND AND METHODS Most strains of herpes simplex virus that are resistant to acyclovir are susceptible in vitro to both foscarnet and vidarabine. We conducted a randomized trial to compare foscarnet with vidarabine in 14 patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and mucocutaneous herpetic lesions that had been unresponsive to intravenous therapy with acyclovir for a minimum of 10 days. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either foscarnet (40 mg per kilogram of body weight intravenously every 8 hours) or vidarabine (15 mg per kilogram per day intravenously) for 10 to 42 days. In the isolates of herpes simplex virus we documented in vitro resistance to acyclovir and susceptibility to foscarnet and vidarabine. RESULTS The lesions in all eight patients assigned to foscarnet healed completely after 10 to 24 days of therapy. In contrast, vidarabine was discontinued because of failure in all six patients assigned to receive it. The time to complete healing (P = 0.01), time to 50 percent reductions in the size of the lesions (P = 0.01) and the pain score (P = 0.004), and time to the end of viral shedding (P = 0.006) were all significantly shorter in the patients assigned to foscarnet. Three patients had new neurologic abnormalities while receiving vidarabine. No patient discontinued foscarnet because of toxicity. Although initial recurrences of herpes simplex infection after the index lesion had healed tended to be susceptible to acyclovir, acyclovir-resistant infection eventually recurred in every healed patient, a median of 42.5 days (range, 14 to 191) after foscarnet was discontinued. CONCLUSIONS For the treatment of acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex infection in patients with AIDS, foscarnet has superior efficacy and less frequent serious toxicity than vidarabine. Once the treatment is stopped, however; there is a high frequency of relapse.

Resistance to Antiviral Drugs of Herpes Simplex Virus Isolated from a Patient Treated with Acyclovir

SEVERAL drugs that inhibit the replication of herpesvirus in vitro are now being evaluated for the prevention or treatment of infections with herpes simplex virus and varicella zoster virus.1 2 3 T...

Ribavirin antagonizes the effect of azidothymidine on HIV replication

Azidothymidine and ribavirin both inhibit replication of human immunodeficiency virus in vitro and show promise of clinical utility in patients infected with this virus. In this study, the possible interactions of these drugs were examined in vitro, and a reproducible antagonism between azidothymidine and ribavirin was found to occur under a variety of experimental conditions. The mechanism responsible for this antagonism appeared to be inhibition of azidothymidine phosphorylation by ribavirin. Because similar effects may occur in vivo, clinical trials of these two drugs in combination must be performed only under carefully controlled conditions.

Growth Inhibition by Acycloguanosine of Herpesviruses Isolated from Human Infections

Inhibition by acycloguanosine (ACG) of plaque formation by harpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2), varicella-zoster virus, and cytomegalovirus was studied. Seventeen clinical isolates of HSV-1 were inhibited by ACG at a mean 50% inhibitory dose (ID50) of 0.15 ± 0.09 μM. The mean ID50 for 10 isolates of HSV-2 was 1.62 ± 0.76 μM, and for four isolates of varicella-zoster virus it was 3.75 ± 1.30 μM. The ID50s for two cytomegalovirus isolates were 100 and 160 μM, and for four additional isolates of cytomegalovirus no end point (ID50) was reached at 200 μM. ACG at a concentration of 200 μM had no effect on deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis in human fibroblast cells and only inhibited thymidine incorporation by Vero cells by one-third. These studies demonstrated the antiviral activity of ACG against clinical isolates of HSV-1, HSV-2, and varicella-zoster virus and the lack of toxicity to monkey or human cells in culture at concentrations which markedly inhibited these viruses. ACG had little effect on cytomegalovirus at concentrations in excess of 100 μM.

Nonresponsiveness to hepatitis B vaccine in health care workers. Results of revaccination and genetic typings.

Twenty-eight health care workers who had a poor antibody response when initially vaccinated with hepatitis B vaccine were revaccinated with three additional 20-microgram doses. Eight of the twenty nonresponders, who had levels of antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) of less than 8 estimated radioimmunoassay (RIA) units, and all 8 of the hyporesponders, who had anti-HBs levels of 8 or 16 RIA units, attained anti-HBs levels of 36 RIA units or more after revaccination. Tests for HLA-A, B, C, and DR; for complement proteins C2, C4A, C4B, and BF; and for the erythrocyte enzyme glyoxalase I were done in 17 nonresponders and 3 hyporesponders. Nine (45%) had HLA-DR7 and 8 (40%) had HLA-DR3, compared with an expected rate of 23% in the general population. At least one of two extended haplotypes (B44, DR7, FC31 or B8, DR3, SCO1) were detected in 6 of the 9 who did not respond to revaccination, compared with 2 of 11 who responded to a second course of vaccine. Poor responders to vaccine may benefit from revaccination, and genetic factors may modulate the immune response to vaccination.