Cornelia Putz
Heidelberg University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Cornelia Putz.
Journal of Neurotrauma | 2012
Christian Schuld; Julia Wiese; Andreas Hug; Cornelia Putz; Hubertus J. A. van Hedel; Martina Spiess; Rüdiger Rupp
The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI), defined by the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA), and particularly the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) are widely used for research and clinical purposes. Although detailed procedures for scaling, scoring, and classification have been defined, misclassifications remain a major problem, especially for cases with missing (i.e., not testable [NT]) data. This work aimed to implement computer-based classification algorithms that included rules for handling NT data. A consistent and structured algorithmic scoring, scaling, and classification scheme, and a computerized application have been developed by redefining logical/mathematical imprecisions. Existing scoring rules are extended for handling NT segments. Design criterion is a pure logical approach so that substitution of non-testability for all valid examination scores leads to concordant results. Nine percent of 5542 datasets from 1594 patients in the database of the European Multicenter Study of Human Spinal Cord Injury (EM-SCI) contained NT segments. After adjusting computational algorithms, the classification accuracy was equivalent between clinical experts and the computational approach and resulted in 84% valid AIS classifications within datasets containing NT. Additionally, the computational method is much more efficient, processing approximately 200,000 classifications/sec. Computational algorithms offer the ability to classify ISNCSCI subscores efficiently and without the risk of human-induced errors. This is of particular clinical relevance, since these scores are used for early predictions of neurological recovery and functional outcome for patients with spinal cord injuries.
Spine | 2008
Cornelia Putz; Bernd Wiedenhöfer; Hans Jürgen Gerner; C.H. Fürstenberg
Study Design. Retrospective clinical study. Objective. The aim of this study was to examine whether the Tokuhashi score correlates with the neurologic outcome in early surgical treatment in metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). A retrospective analysis of 35 consecutive incomplete tetraplegic and paraplegic patients with vertebral metastases (VM) and spinal cord compression (SCC) was performed. Summary of Background Data. MSCC is a challenging problem in VM and constitutes an oncologic emergency. The Tokuhashi score has been modified recently and seems to constitute the best method of prediction for real survival in patients with VM. Until now the influence of the neurologic status as a prognostic factor has been discussed controversially. Methods. Data of 35 patients with VM and incomplete tetraplegia or paraplegia, who underwent surgical treatment, were reviewed retrospectively from 2005 to 2006 at our hospital. All patients were classified among the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) before and after surgery and at the follow-up. Data were analyzed with SPSS 15.0® and correlation coefficients (Spearman rho) were computed. Results. Analysis showed that 19 patients (54.3%) with an average Tokuhashi score of 9 showed an improvement in the AIS, whereas 12 (34.3%) patients with an average score of 8 had no change and 4 (11.4%) patients with a score of 7 had deterioration. AIS changes showed a positive correlation with Tokuhashi score (r = 0.33; P = 0.048). Conclusion. Our clinical observation suggests that patients with spinal metastases and a high Tokuhashi score benefit from surgical treatment with moderate improvement in sensomotoric function even in a heterogenic collective.
Spinal Cord | 2013
C Schuld; J Wiese; S Franz; Cornelia Putz; I Stierle; I Smoor; Norbert Weidner; Rüdiger Rupp
Study Design:Prospective, longitudinal cohort study.Objectives:To quantify the effect of formal training in the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) on the classification accuracy and to identify the most difficult ISNCSCI rules.Settings:European Multicenter Study on Human Spinal Cord Injury (EMSCI).Methods:EMSCI participants rated five challenging cases of full sensory, motor and anorectal examinations before (pre-test) and after (post-test) an ISNCSCI instructional course. Classification variables included sensory and motor levels (ML), completeness, ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) and the zones of partial preservation.Results:106 attendees were trained in 10 ISNCSCI workshops since 2006. The number of correct classifications increased significantly (P<0.00001) from 49.6% (2628 of 5300) in pre-testing to 91.5% (4849 of 5300) in post-testing. Every attendee improved, 12 (11.3%) achieved 100% correctness. Sensory levels (96.8%) and completeness (96.2%) are easiest to rate in post-testing, while ML (81.9%) and AIS (88.1%) are more difficult to determine. Most of the errors in ML determination arise from sensory levels in the high cervical region (C2−C4), where by convention the ML is presumed to be the same as the sensory level. The most difficult step in AIS classification is the determination of motor incompleteness.Conclusion:ISNCSCI training significantly improves the classification skills regardless of the experience in spinal cord injury medicine. These findings need to be considered for the appropriate preparation and interpretation of clinical trials in spinal cord injury.
Jcr-journal of Clinical Rheumatology | 2012
Babak Moradi; Sébastien Hagmann; Anita Zahlten-Hinguranage; Fernanda Caldeira; Cornelia Putz; Nils Rosshirt; Eva Schönit; Alireza Mesrian; Marcus Schiltenwolf; Eva Neubauer
BackgroundThe effectiveness of multidisciplinary treatment programs varies throughout the literature, and it remains controversial how therapy outcome is affected by patients’ individual parameters and which treatment settings work best. ObjectivesWe set out to examine the impact of patient variables on the effectiveness of a 3-week multidisciplinary treatment program in patients with chronic low back pain. By presenting effect sizes, we aimed to enable the comparison of our findings with other studies across disciplines. MethodsData on 395 patients were prospectively collected at study entry, at the end of the program (T1) and after 6 months’ follow-up (T2). Relevant therapy outcomes were analyzed by presenting effect sizes with Cohen’s d. Group comparisons were performed for sociodemographic and clinical features to determine the impact on therapy outcome. ResultsMedium effect sizes (d = −0.6 to −0.7) were shown for visual analog scale (VAS) after treatment and at T2, indicating clinically relevant pain relief. Significant changes in pain-related disability were observed immediately at T1 with a strong treatment effect (d = 0.8). Functional capacity was improved with low to medium effect sizes (0.4–0.5). Quality-of-life subscales (36-item Short Form Health Survey) improved significantly at T1 for physical function, vitality, and mental health (d = 0.5–0.8). Center for Epidemiological Studies – Depression Scale scores improved significantly with strong effect sizes of d = 0.7. Sociodemographic parameters displayed a significant impact on effect sizes for visual analog scale at T2, with females (d = −0.9), age group 30 to 39 years (d = −1), and patients with low physical job exposure (d = −0.9) benefiting most. An increase in number of pain locations (−0.7) and severity of accompanying pain (−0.7) in other body areas significantly impaired therapy outcome and effect sizes of VAS. ConclusionsThus, multidisciplinary treatment ameliorates pain, functional restoration, and quality of life with medium to high effect sizes even for patients with a long history of chronic back pain. Effect sizes are higher than for monodisciplinary treatments and treatment effects remained stable at 6-month follow-up in a longitudinal uncontrolled study design. Thus, we believe that multidisciplinary treatment is vital for the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain. The impact of sociodemographic and pain-related parameters needs to be taken into account when including patients in an appropriate treatment program. We emphasize the presentation of effect sizes as a vital treatment evaluation to enable cross-sectional comparison of therapy outcomes.
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine | 2010
Cornelia Putz; Joost J. van Middendorp; M.H. Pouw; Babak Moradi; Rüdiger Rupp; Norbert Weidner; C.H. Fürstenberg
Objectives: Advanced tumor disease and metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) are two entities with a high impact on patients’ quality of life. However, prognostic factors on the outcome after primary decompressive surgery are less well-defined and not yet standardized. The aim of this review was to identify prognostic variables that predict functional or ambulatory outcomes in surgically treated patients with symptomatic MSCC. Materials and Methods: We conducted MEDLINE database searches using relevant keywords in order to identify abstracts referring to prognostic factors on ambulatory outcomes in surgically treated MSCC patients. Details of all selected articles were assembled and the rates of ambulation were stratified. Results: Evidence from five retrospective comparative trials and one observational prospective study summarizes different prognostic factors with a positive or negative influence on postoperative ambulatory status. Ambulatory patients maintaining ambulation status after decompression of the spinal cord constituted 62.1%. The overall rate of MSCC patients losing the ability to ambulate was 7.5% compared to 23.5 % who regained ambulation. Preoperative ambulation status, time to surgery, compression fracture and individual health status seem to be the most relevant prognostic factors for ambulatory outcome. Conclusions: There is a lack of standardized prognostic tools which allow predicting outcome in surgically treated patients. A quantitative score consisting of reliable prognostic tools is essential to predict loss and/or regain of ambulation and requires validation in future prospective clinical trials.
Spinal Cord | 2011
Cornelia Putz; C Schuld; S Gantz; T Grieser; M. Akbar; B Moradi; B Wiedenhöfer; C H Fürstenberg; Hans Jürgen Gerner; Rüdiger Rupp
Study design:Clinical cohort study.Objective:To evaluate if the impact of the severity of the trauma as a possible confounding factor influences the neurological and functional recovery in paraplegia during the course of a 6-month follow-up period after injury.Setting:Spinal Cord Injury Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany.Methods:A retrospective monocentric analysis, from 2002 to 2008, of the Heidelberg European Multicenter Study about spinal cord injury database was performed. We included 31 paraplegic patients (neurological level T1–T12) who were assigned either to a monotrauma (polytraumaschluessel (PTS) 1) or to a polytrauma (PTS⩾2) group. The American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale, lower extremity motor score, pin prick, light touch and the spinal cord independence measure (SCIM) were obtained at five distinct time points after trauma. Data were analyzed using Mann–Whitney U-test (α<0.05).Results:The changes in lower extremity motor score, pin prick and light touch showed no significant differences in both groups over the whole evaluation period. Polytraumatic paraplegics showed a significantly delayed increase of SCIM between 2 and 6 weeks compared with monotraumatic patients, followed by a quantitative increase in the subitems bladder management, bowel management, use of toilet and prevention of pressure sores between 3 and 6 months (P=0.031). The mean length of primary rehabilitation in the polytrauma group was 5.5 vs 3.6 months in monotrauma.Conclusions:The prognosis of polytraumatic paraplegics in terms of neurological recovery is not inferior to those with monotrauma. Multiple-injured patients need a prolonged hospital stay to reach the functional outcome of monotraumatic patients.
Spinal Cord | 2009
Cornelia Putz; I Stierle; T Grieser; G Mohr; Hans Jürgen Gerner; C H Fürstenberg; B Wiedenhöfer
Study design:Case report.Objective:To describe a rare case of paraplegia in a patient with Scheuermanns disease and dysplastic thoracic spinous processes.Setting:Spinal Cord Injury Center, Orthopaedic University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.Clinical presentation:The authors report on a 15-year-old boy with progressive incomplete spastic paraplegia presenting segmental dysplastic thoracic spinous processes and Scheuermanns disease. The magnetic resonance imaging showed a kyphotic angulation at T 5/6 and signs of myelopathy. Hypoplastic thoracic processes and hypoplastic paraspinal muscles in the upper thoracic spine were observed intraoperatively. In this case, dorsoventral stabilization from T 4–7 was performed and the neurological outcome improved at follow-up (6 months).Conclusion:Paraplegia can be accelerated in patients with Scheuermanns disease, severe kyphotic angulation and dysplastic posterior elements. After operative treatment, neurological recovery and a normal walking pattern were shown.
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2016
Cornelia Putz; L. Döderlein; E. M. Mertens; Sebastian I. Wolf; Simone Gantz; Frank Braatz; Thomas Dreher
AIMS Single-event multilevel surgery (SEMLS) has been used as an effective intervention in children with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy (BSCP) for 30 years. To date there is no evidence for SEMLS in adults with BSCP and the intervention remains focus of debate. METHODS This study analysed the short-term outcome (mean 1.7 years, standard deviation 0.9) of 97 ambulatory adults with BSCP who performed three-dimensional gait analysis before and after SEMLS at one institution. RESULTS Two objective gait variables were calculated pre- and post-operatively; the Gillette Gait Index (GGI) and the Gait Profile Score (GPS). The results were analysed in three groups according to their childhood surgical history (group 1 = no surgery, group 2 = surgery other than SEMLS, group 3 = SEMLS). Improvements in gait were shown by a significant decrease of GPS (p = 0.001). Similar results were obtained for both legs (GGI right side and left side p = 0.01). Furthermore, significant improvements were found in all subgroups although this was less marked in group 3, where patients had undergone previous SEMLS. DISCUSSION SEMLS is an effective and safe procedure to improve gait in adults with cerebral palsy. However, a longer rehabilitation period is to be expected than found in children. SEMLS is still effective in adult patients who have undergone previous SEMLS in childhood. TAKE HOME MESSAGE Single-event multilevel surgery is a safe and effective procedure to improve gait disorders in adults with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy.
Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2011
Cornelia Putz; Christian Schuld; M. Akbar; Thomas Grieser; B. Wiedenhöfer; C.H. Fürstenberg; Hans Jürgen Gerner; Rüdiger Rupp
BACKGROUND Injuries of thoracic vertebrae in multiple trauma patients are often accompanied by severe thoracic injuries and sensorimotor deficits. However, until now, it is not clear whether and how the severity of trauma influences the neurologic and functional outcome in paraplegic patients during the first year after the trauma. The aim of the study was to compare two cohorts of multiple injured paraplegic patients with and without conversion in the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) with regard to the severity of spinal trauma, the severity of thorax trauma, the type of fracture, and the functional outcome 1 year after the date of injury. METHODS Twenty-one traumatic paraplegic patients (neurologic level T1-T12) were included in the study based on a retrospective analysis of the Heidelberg European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury database (www.emsci.org) from 2002 to 2007. In all patients, the Polytraumaschluessel (PTS), the AO classification, the AIS, and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure were collected. Patients with no change in the AIS (group 1, n=14) were compared with patients with AIS changes (group 2, n=7), and t test and χ test were performed (p<0.05). RESULTS Differences in both groups concerning fracture classification were confirmed (p=0.046). A relation between neurologic improvement in the AIS and the severity of trauma (p=0.058) after 1 year was not found. The subitem PTST in the thoracic area showed statistical significance comparing the two groups (p=0.005). Both groups significantly improved functionally (Spinal Cord Independence Measure, p=0.035) during the first year but with no significant difference between the groups after 1 year. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that functional improvement is achieved independently from neurologic recovery. The combined assessment of the PTS, the AO classification, and the AIS in multiple-injured paraplegic patients can contribute to provide a better prognostication of the neurologic changes during rehabilitation and the outcome after 1 year than the AIS alone.
Gait & Posture | 2016
Cornelia Putz; Sebastian I. Wolf; A. Geisbüsch; M. Niklasch; Leonhard Döderlein; Thomas Dreher
BACKGROUND Internal rotation gait constitutes a complex gait disorder in bilateral spastic cerebral palsy (BSCP) including static torsional and dynamic components resulting in lever arm dysfunction. Although femoral derotation osteotomy (FDO) is a standard procedure to correct increased femoral anteversion in children, unpredictable outcome has been reported. The effect of FDO when it is done as part of single-event multilevel surgery (SEMLS) in adulthood has not been investigated. METHODS In this study mid-term data of 63 adults with BSCP and internal rotation gait, undergoing SEMLS including FDO were analyzed pre- and 1.7 years postoperatively by clinical examination and 3D-instrumented gait analysis. All legs were categorized as the more or less involved side to consider asymmetry. The mean hip rotation in stance preoperatively and the intraoperative derotation was correlated with the difference pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS The group as a whole experienced the following results postoperatively: improved mean hip rotation in stance (p=0.0001), mean foot progression angle (p=0.0001) and a significant improvement of the clinical parameter: passive internal and external hip rotation, midpoint and anteversion (p=0.0001) for both legs separately. With regard to the less and more involved side, clinical and kinematic parameters showed comparable significant changes (p=0.0001). The anteversion improved significantly in proximal compared to distal FDO (p=0.03). CONCLUSION This study emphasizes an overall good correction of internal rotation gait in adults with bilateral involvement after FDO. However, the results are more predictable in adults compared to studies reporting outcome after FDO in children.