Corrado Betterle

Autoimmune Polyendocrine Syndrome Type 1 and NALP5, a Parathyroid Autoantigen

BACKGROUND Autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1 (APS-1) is a multiorgan autoimmune disorder caused by mutations in AIRE, the autoimmune regulator gene. Though recent studies concerning AIRE deficiency have begun to elucidate the molecular pathogenesis of organ-specific autoimmunity in patients with APS-1, the autoantigen responsible for hypoparathyroidism, a hallmark of APS-1 and its most common autoimmune endocrinopathy, has not yet been identified. METHODS We performed immunoscreening of a human parathyroid complementary DNA library, using serum samples from patients with APS-1 and hypoparathyroidism, to identify patients with reactivity to the NACHT leucine-rich-repeat protein 5 (NALP5). Subsequently, serum samples from 87 patients with APS-1 and 293 controls, including patients with other autoimmune disorders, were used to determine the frequency and specificity of autoantibodies against NALP5. In addition, the expression of NALP5 was investigated in various tissues. RESULTS NALP5-specific autoantibodies were detected in 49% of the patients with APS-1 and hypoparathyroidism but were absent in all patients with APS-1 but without hypoparathyroidism, in all patients with other autoimmune endocrine disorders, and in all healthy controls. NALP5 was predominantly expressed in the cytoplasm of parathyroid chief cells. CONCLUSIONS NALP5 appears to be a tissue-specific autoantigen involved in hypoparathyroidism in patients with APS-1. Autoantibodies against NALP5 appear to be highly specific and may be diagnostic for this prominent component of APS-1.

Consensus statement on the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with primary adrenal insufficiency

Primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI), or Addisons disease, is a rare, potentially deadly, but treatable disease. Most cases of PAI are caused by autoimmune destruction of the adrenal cortex. Consequently, patients with PAI are at higher risk of developing other autoimmune diseases. The diagnosis of PAI is often delayed by many months, and most patients present with symptoms of acute adrenal insufficiency. Because PAI is rare, even medical specialists in this therapeutic area rarely manage more than a few patients. Currently, the procedures for diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up of this rare disease vary greatly within Europe. The common autoimmune form of PAI is characterized by the presence of 21‐hydroxylase autoantibodies; other causes should be sought if no autoantibodies are detected. Acute adrenal crisis is a life‐threatening condition that requires immediate treatment. Standard replacement therapy consists of multiple daily doses of hydrocortisone or cortisone acetate combined with fludrocortisone. Annual follow‐up by an endocrinologist is recommended with the focus on optimization of replacement therapy and detection of new autoimmune diseases. Patient education to enable self‐adjustment of dosages of replacement therapy and crisis prevention is particularly important in this disease. The authors of this document have collaborated within an EU project (Euadrenal) to study the pathogenesis, describe the natural course and improve the treatment for Addisons disease. Based on a synthesis of this research, the available literature, and the views and experiences of the consortiums investigators and key experts, we now attempt to provide a European Expert Consensus Statement for diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up.

Autoimmune polyglandular syndrome Type 2: the tip of an iceberg?

Autoimmune polyglandular syndromes (APS) are conditions characterized by the association of two or more organ‐specific disorders. Type 2 APS is defined by the occurrence of Addisons disease with thyroid autoimmune disease and/or Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Clinically overt disorders are considered only the tip of the autoimmune iceberg, since latent forms are much more frequent. Historical, clinical, genetic, and immunological aspects of Type 2 APS are reviewed. Furthermore, data on 146 personal cases of Type 2 APS are also reported.

Clinical and subclinical organ-specific autoimmune manifestations in Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients and their first-degree relatives

SummaryStudying 239 Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients and 144 of their first-degree relatives, we found a significant prevalence of autoimmune manifestations in both groups, compared with sex-and age-matched control subjects (p< 0.001). In particular, in diabetic patients we found a high frequency of autoimmune thyroid disease and idiopathic Addisons disease and also a significant prevalence of thyroid (p< 0.001), parietal cell (p< 0.05) and adrenal antibodies (p< 0.05). In the relatives a high frequency of thyroid disease, thyroid, parietal cell and adrenal antibodies and a significant prevalence of islet cell antibodies (p< 0.05) were detected. In both groups functional glandular tests and gastric biopsies performed on the basis of autoantibody positivity revealed 13 examples of subclinical hypothyroidism, two cases of reduced adrenocortical reserve and five of atrophic gastritis. Autoantibody screening in diabetic patients and their relatives permitted the early diagnosis of the underlying endocrine disorders.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus in patients with chronic hepatitis C before and after interferon therapy.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus is the result of an autoimmune process characterized by pancreatic beta cell destruction. It has been reported that chronic hepatitis C infection is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus, but not with type 1. Although the prevalence of markers of pancreatic autoimmunity in hepatitis C virus‐positive patients is not significantly different to that reported in the general population, it increases during alpha‐interferon therapy from 3 to 7%, probably due to the immunostimulatory effects of this cytokine. To date, 31 case reports of type 1 diabetes mellitus related to interferon treatment have been published. Type 1 diabetes mellitus occurs more frequently in patients treated for chronic hepatitis C than for other conditions and is irreversible in most cases. In 50% of these patients, markers of pancreatic autoimmunity predated treatment, the majority of cases having a genetic predisposition. Thus, in predisposed individuals, alpha‐interferon can either induce or accelerate a diabetogenic process already underway. We suggest that islet cell autoantibodies and glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies should be investigated before and during interferon treatment in order to identify subjects at high risk of developing type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus during alpha-interferon therapy for chronic viral hepatitis

A 29-year-old man was observed to develop insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus following a 5-month treatment with recombinant alpha-2b-interferon for chronic hepatitis C. After the onset of the disease, serum samples that had, respectively, been collected before therapy commencement, at month 3, and at the onset of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus were tested for islet-cell (ICA-IgG), glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD-Abs), IA2 (IA2-Abs) and insulin (IA-Abs) autoantibodies. The following results were obtained: ICA-IgG, 5, >80, and >80 JDF-U, respectively; GAD-Abs: >100 U/ml in all three measurements; IA2-Abs and IA-Abs: negative. During treatment, thyroid microsomal autoantibodies increased markedly (from 1:100 to 25,600 titer); thyroid-stimulating hormone was persistently normal. HLA class II typing revealed a genetic predisposition to insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus as demonstrated by the presence of DRB1* 04/08, DQ A1 52 Arg+/Arg+, and DQB1 57 N-Asp/Asp alleles. One year after the onset of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, the patient is still receiving 30 IU insulin daily; the liver function tests are normal and HCV-RNA is negative. These data support the hypothesis that, in predisposed patients, alpha-interferon therapy can enhance an ongoing autoimmune process against pancreatic beta-cells and induce overt insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. We therefore suggest that, in patients with a documented predisposition to insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, alpha-IFN therapy should be administered with caution.

Natural course of subclinical hypothyroidism in Down’s syndrome: Prospective study results and therapeutic considerations

Pathogenesis, natural course and therapeutic management of subclinical hypothyroidism (SH) in Down’s syndrome (DS) remain object of debate in literature. In the present study thyroid function, antithyroid antibody (ATA) prevalence and serum lipid concentrations were investigated in a group of 344 Down patients (DP) and data were compared with those obtained from a control group of 257 age and sex matched healthy subjects. Thyroid function and ATA prevalence were also studied in 120 parents of DP. SH prevalence was clearly higher in DP (32.5% of cases) than in controls (1.1%) and parents (0%). Similarly, ATA prevalence was higher in DP (18% of cases) than in controls (5.8%) and parents (6.6%). In spite of this, no correlation was found in DP between SH and ATA prevalences, since ATA were detected in 18.7% of SH-DP and in 15.8% of euthyroid DP. Thus, circulating ATA were not detected in the majority of SH-DP. No significant differences regarding T4, FT4, T3 and serum lipid levels among SH and euthyroid DP and controls were found. Moreover, TSH levels were only slightly increased, generally less than 10 μU/ml, in most cases of SH-DP. Follow-up was longer than 24 months (range 2–7 years, mean 3.1) in a group of 201 DP: two different patterns of SH course were observed, mainly depending on the presence or the absence of circulating ATA. In particular, 35.7% of ATA-positive SH-DP developed a clinically evident thyroid disease (overt hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism), while no similar case was recorded among ATA-negative SH-DP. On the contrary, a significant number of these patients (33.9% of cases) showed a spontaneous normalization of TSH levels. The present data suggest that: a) DS per se seems to be a clinical risk condition in developing thyroid autoimmune diseases, b) SH represents a very common conditions in DP and in most cases it appears to be independent of the presence of circulating ATA, c) SH alone, that is in the absence of detectable ATA, does not seem to be predisposing condition to develop a clinically evident thyroid disease, as a spontaneous normalization of TSH levels is often observed. From the therapeutic point of view, it seems unlikely that L-thyroxine substitutive therapy could lead to some improvement in SH-DP in the absence of detectable ATA. A wait and see policy with frequent thyroid function screening could be considered adequate, thus avoiding chronic hormonal therapy at least in DP in whom TSH levels tend to spontaneously normalize. On the contrary, L-thyroxine should not be delayed in ATA-positive SH-DP due to the frequent evolution towards an overt thyroid disease.

Frequency of Hashimoto's thyroiditis in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus

A total of 1419 children with type 1 diabetes mellitus was investigated in order to assess the true frequency of Hashimotos thyroiditis (HT), diagnosed by microsomal and/or thyroglobulin autoantibodies, by ultrasound and in many cases also by fine needle biopsy. According to these criteria, 55 cases (3.9%) of HT were identified, a number significantly higher (P<0.0001) than the distribution reported in the normal paediatric population. No typical antibody pattern was seen prior to the onset of HT, nor was an antibody threshold level found which could have been diagnostic for this disease. Patients with subclinical hypothyroidism were treated withl-thyroxine and were investigated regarding the behaviour of anti-thyroid autoantibodies; however, no significant changes were seen. The data showed a high frequency of HT in diabetic children, and therefore we recommend that children with type 1 diabetes mellitus should be screened for thyroid autoantibodies and those positive should undergo periodic thyroid function testing.

COMPLEMENT-FIXING ADRENAL AUTOANTIBODIES AS A MARKER FOR PREDICTING ONSET OF IDIOPATHIC ADDISON'S DISEASE

In a prospective investigation of the role of adrenal autoantibodies (AA) in predicting the onset of idiopathic Addisons disease, 9 initially non-addisonian AA-positive autoimmune subjects were followed for 42 months. In 4 of these subjects Addisons disease developed within 1-31 months. A fifth had reduced adrenocortical reserve at the start and at the end of the investigation. An AA capable of fixing the membrane attack complex of complement [(C5-C9) F-AA] was detected before onset of the disease in the sera of the 4 patients in whom Addisons disease developed. (C5-C9) F-AA may be involved in the pathogenesis of idiopathic Addisons disease and may be regarded as a marker for individuals in whom idiopathic adrenal insufficiency is likely to develop.

Islet cell and insulin autoantibodies in organ-specific autoimmune patients. Their behaviour and predictive value for the development of Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. A 10-year follow-up study

SummaryTo evaluate the behaviour and predictive value of islet cell and insulin autoantibodies in patients with organspecific autoimmune diseases, we followed 21 non-diabetic subjects for a mean period of 84±27 months. Ten patients were persistently seropositive for complement-fixing islet cell antibodies and high titres of immunoglobulin G islet cell antibodies (≥ 1∶8). The prevalence of persistent insulin autoantibodies in this group was 67%. Seven patients (70%) developed Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus after a latency period of 2–60 months. The predictive value of complement-fixing islet cell antibodies was 65%, and in the presence of both complement-fixing islet cell and insulin autoantibodies the predictive value rose to 76%. Eleven patients were seronegative for complement-fixing islet cell antibodies and had low immunoglobulin G islet cell antibodies titres (< 1∶8) that were either persistent or transient, or that fluctuated during follow-up. The prevalence of persistent insulin autoantibodies in this group was 45%; only one subject developed Type 1 diabetes. The predictive value of persistent islet cell antibodies (complement-fixing positive/negative) was 54%, and it rose to 70% when both islet cell and insulin autoantibodies were present. Individuals with only insulin autoantibodies or immunoglobulin G islet cell antibodies did not develop diabetes mellitus. A high frequency of HLA-DR3 and/or DR4 was found in patients who developed diabetes mellitus. Thus, the presence of both islet cell and insulin autoantibodies in patients with organ-specific autoimmune disease appears to confer the highest risk of progression toward Type 1 diabetes.