Corrado De Rosa

Beliefs of Psychiatric Nurses about Schizophrenia: A Comparison with Patients’ Relatives and Psychiatrists

Background: What patients’ relatives and health professionals think about causes, treatments and psychosocial consequences of schizophrenia can influence its detection and outcome. Aims: To compare the beliefs about schizophrenia in 190 nurses, 110 psychiatrists and 709 relatives of patients with this mental disorder, recruited in 30 randomly selected mental health centres. Methods: In each centre, the key-relatives of the first consecutive 25 subjects with schizophrenia, and the nurses and psychiatrists who had been working in the service for at least one year, were asked to complete the Questionnaire on the Opinions about Mental Illness (QO). Results: The factors most frequently mentioned by psychiatrists and nurses among the causes of schizophrenia were heredity, stress and family conflicts, while those most frequently mentioned by relatives were stress, traumas and love breakdown. Nurses had opinions: (a) similar to those expressed by psychiatrists concerning patients’ ability to work equally as other people, and patients’ punishability in case of illegal acts; (b) similar to those expressed by relatives about patients’ unpredictability and political rights; (c) significantly different from the other two samples as concerns recognition of patients’ affective rights. Conclusions: Family psychoeducational interventions and nurses’ training should address not only clinical aspects but also disability and psychosocial consequences of schizophrenia.

Perception of patients' unpredictability and beliefs on the causes and consequences of schizophrenia- a community survey

Abstract.Background:The belief that mental disorders involve a high risk of unpredictable behaviours is a factor which influences negatively the social acceptance of the mentally ill. In this paper, we compare the beliefs about the causes and psychosocial consequences of schizophrenia expressed by 536 respondents who had the firm conviction that patients with schizophrenia are unpredictable and by 457 respondents who firmly believed that they are not.Methods:The survey was conducted in 30 Italian geographic areas, randomly selected taking into account their location and population density. The data were collected by the Questionnaire about Opinions on Mental Illness (QO).Results:Respondents who believed that patients with schizophrenia are unpredictable reported more frequently factors such as use of alcohol and drugs and frequenting bad company as being involved in the development of the disorder. In addition, this group showed more restrictive opinions about patients’ civil and affective rights. Low education was found to be significantly associated with perception of “unpredictability” in schizophrenia.Conclusions:These results suggest the need to: a) inform the general public on the main clinical characteristics of schizophrenia and on the risk of unpredictable behaviours in the acute phases of this mental disorder; b) carry out sensitisation campaigns against discrimination toward people with schizophrenia emphasising successful experiences of social integration.

Prescription of psychotropic drugs to patients with schizophrenia: an Italian national survey

Objectives This study aims to: (a) describe the type and doses of psychotropic drugs received by outpatients with schizophrenia in Italy; (b) explore the relationship between prescription and patients’ clinical conditions, disability and socio-demographic characteristics; and (c) estimate the percentage of patients receiving polypharmacy and antipsychotics within the official recommended ranges.Methods A total of 682 patients with schizophrenia were consecutively recruited in 30 Italian mental health departments, randomly selected taking into account the geographic location and population density of their catchment areas.ResultsOf the sample, 98% were in treatment with neuroleptics, 47% received benzodiazepines, 25% were on anticholinergics, 10% were prescribed antidepressants and 8% were on mood stabilisers. Polypharmacy was found in 29% of the sample. Patients treated with one neuroleptic received this within therapeutic doses in 77% of cases. In patients who received two neuroleptics (24%), the former was prescribed within the official range in 71% of cases and the latter in 46%. Polytherapy was more frequently prescribed in patients treated with typicals (60% versus 34%) and in those who also received benzodiazepines (61% versus 41%) and anticholinergics (44% versus 16%). Patients in treatment with atypicals (45%) were mainly younger and lived in highly populated areas. Depot medications (25%) were more frequently prescribed to patients living in areas of low population density, who were older and who had a lower educational level, a longer duration of illness and milder anxiety/depression symptoms.ConclusionsThe consistent percentage of patients receiving polypharmacy and neuroleptics outside the therapeutic doses highlights the need to promote interventions aimed at increasing a rational use of psychotropic drugs among mental health professionals.

Family burden and social network in schizophrenia vs. physical diseases: preliminary results from an Italian national study

Objective:  To compare burden and social network in families of patients with schizophrenia or physical diseases.

The family in Italy: Cultural changes and implications for treatment

Abstract In Italy family is characterized by strong ties and is based on mutual aid of all its members. In the last 20 years, the structure of families has been significantly influenced by demographic, economic and professional changes, determining a transition from a patriarchal to a nuclear family model, with a higher number of single-parent families, single-person households, childless couples, same-sex couples. However, this transition has been slower than that occurring in other countries, probably as an ongoing impact of prevalent Catholic ideology. Major demographic changes in Italian families include, 1) a decrease in the number of marriages, delays in getting married and an high number of civil ceremonies, 2) a reduced birth rate; Italy is becoming one of the European countries with lowest growth rate, and with an increasing number of births out of wedlock, 3) an increased marital instability, with a constantly growing number of legal separations. Like many countries, relatives in Italy are highly involved in the care of patients with physical and mental disorders. There are a number of psychosocial interventions used in Italy including the ‘Milan Systemic Approach’ and family psycho-educational interventions. However, there are difficulties in implementing these interventions which are highlighted in this paper. We recommend research strategies to identify the best options to involve families in the care of mentally ill patients and to adequately support them.

Efficacy of psychoeducational family intervention for bipolar I disorder: A controlled, multicentric, real-world study

BACKGROUND This study assessed the efficacy of the Falloon model of psychoeducational family intervention (PFI), originally developed for schizophrenia management and adapted to bipolar I disorder. The efficacy of the intervention was evaluated in terms of improvement of patients׳ social functioning and reduction of family burden. METHODS This was a multicentre, real-world, controlled, outpatient trial carried out in 11 randomly recruited Italian mental health centres. Enroled patients and key-relatives were consecutively allocated either to receive PFI and Treatment As Usual (TAU) or to a waiting list receiving TAU alone. The efficacy of the intervention was evaluated in terms of improvement in patients׳ social functioning (primary outcome) and reduction of family burden (secondary outcome). RESULTS Of the 137 recruited families, 70 were allocated to the experimental group and 67 to the control group. At the end of the intervention, significant improvements in patients׳ social functioning and in relatives׳ burden were found in the treated group compared to TAU. This effect of the intervention remained also after controlling for several confounding patient׳s socio-demographic and clinical factors. The experimental intervention had an impact also on other outcome measures, such as patients׳ clinical status and personal burden. LIMITATIONS Lack of an active control group. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study clearly show that the psychoeducational family intervention according to the Falloon model is effective in improving the social outcome of patients with bipolar I disorder.

A ‘family affair’? The impact of family psychoeducational interventions on depression

Major depressive disorder is reported to be the most common mental disorder, and one of the leading causes of disability-adjusted life years. It causes high levels of family burden and of expressed emotions. Research interest in family functioning in mental disorders has recently shifted from schizophrenia to unipolar and bipolar affective disorders. However, studies on family burden and on the effect of family psychoeducational interventions on major depression are still very few in number and lack a rigorous methodology, clear outcome measures and adequate follow-ups. Despite this, the few available studies on the efficacy of psychoeducational family intervention in unipolar major depression have had promising results. A comprehensive management of unipolar major depression should include psychoeducational family intervention.

The role of relatives in pathways to care of patients with a first episode of psychosis

Aims: To explore the role of relatives in pathways to care of patients with a recent onset of psychosis. Methods: A total of 34 consecutive patients and their relatives from the Department of Psychiatry of the University of Naples SUN participated in the study. Pathways to care were retrospectively evaluated by administering the Pathways to Care Form and the Nottingham Onset Schedule (NOS) to patients, relatives and treating physicians. Relatives were addressed with the Family Involvement in Pathways to care Schedule (FIPS). Results: Duration of untreated illness (DUI) and duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) were 145.4 (±141.9) and 33.3 (±54.0) weeks, respectively. Help-seeking delay was 17.6 (±45.0) weeks. The first request for help was made by relatives in 76% of cases. Among health professionals, general practitioners were those most frequently contacted, followed by psychiatrists, neurologists or psychologists. Stigma and wrong attribution of psychotic symptoms were the main reasons for help-seeking delays. Conclusions: Relatives play a crucial role in pathways to care of patients with psychosis. DUI and DUP could be reduced by interventions aimed at increasing knowledge of early symptoms in the general population, and by the provision of psychiatric consultations in non-stigmatizing settings for young people with psychological distress.

Prediction of community mental health service utilization by individual and ecological level socio-economic factors

Individuals with a more deprived socioeconomic status (SES) are more likely to have higher rates of psychiatric morbidity and use of psychiatric services. Such service use is also influenced by socioeconomic factors at the ecological level. The aim of this article is to investigate the influence of these variables on service utilization. All patients in contact with three Italian community psychiatric services (CPS) were included. Community and hospital contacts over 6 months were investigated. Socio-economic characteristics were described using a SES Index and two new Resources Accessibility Indexes. Low SES was found to be associated with more community service contacts. When other individual and ecological variables were controlled for, SES was negatively associated only with the number of home visits, which was about half the rate in deprived areas. An association between service utilization and the resources of the catchment area was also detected. The economic crisis in Europe is increasing inequality of access, so paying attention to SES characteristics at both the individual and the ecological levels is likely to become increasingly important in understanding patterns of psychiatric service utilization and planning care accordingly.

Pathways to mental health care in Italy: Results from a multicenter study

Background and aims: In Italy, the reform of the mental health system in 1978 should have drastically changed the provision of care and pathways of patients seeking to obtain it. The aim of this article is to examine the current pathways to psychiatric care in Italy. Methods: We used a method developed in the World Health Organization international collaborative studies to investigate pathways to care in 15 Italian mental health centers. We recruited 420 patients with a psychiatric illness and explored the care pathways they took to reach to psychiatric services and the delays from the onset of illness to reaching psychiatric care. Results: The majority of patients (33.8%) had direct access to mental health care, whereas the others arrived to a specialist in psychiatry through general hospitals (20.3%), general practitioners (33.0%) or private practitioners (9.8%). The main diagnosis for referral was neurotic disorder (36.6%), followed by affective disorder (35.4%) and psychotic disorder (11.5%). The delay from onset of illness to psychiatric care was greater for patients with psychotic disorders than for those with affective and neurotic disorders. The most frequently prescribed treatments were pharmacotherapy (56%), psychological support (8%), and psychotherapy (7.0%); 15% of the patients received no treatment. Conclusions: Our multicenter study shows that although general practitioners and hospital doctors are still the main referral point for mental health care, a greater proportion of patients are first seen in private settings or directly reach mental health centers, compared to previous surveys conducted in Italy. However, a stronger collaboration of psychiatrists with general practitioners and psychologists is still needed.