Courtenay C. Stone
Ball State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Courtenay C. Stone.
Journal of Statistics Education | 2009
Jeffrey J. Green; Courtenay C. Stone; Abera Zegeye; Thomas A. Charles
Because statistical analysis requires the ability to use mathematics, students typically are required to take one or more prerequisite math courses prior to enrolling in the business statistics course. Despite these math prerequisites, however, many students find it difficult to learn business statistics. In this study, we use an ordered probit model to analyze the impact of alternative prerequisite math course sequences on the grade performance of 1,684 business and economics statistics students at a large Midwestern university. In addition, we show how imposing a minimum grade requirement of C- for the math prerequisite course would influence student success in the business statistics course. Although several studies have examined the impact of different math skills, our study is the first to provide a detailed analysis of the impact of different prerequisite math course sequences on student performance in business statistics. We demonstrate that, other things the same, taking more math credit hours, taking math courses that emphasize calculus, and imposing a minimum grade of C- on the prerequisite math course have significant positive impacts on student grade performance in the business and economics statistics course.
The Journal of Education for Business | 2014
Jeffrey J. Green; Courtenay C. Stone; Abera Zegeye
Colleges and universities are being asked by numerous sources to provide assurance of learning assessments of their students and programs. Colleges of business have responded by using a plethora of assessment tools, including the Major Field Test in Business. In this article, the authors show that the use of the Major Field Test in Business for assurance of learning purposes is ill advised. First, it provides no direct evidence of student learning. Second, it offers no useful comparative analyses to other business students or institutions. Consequently, it provides no guidance for curriculum or program changes to achieve better learning outcomes. Thus, use of the Major Field Test in Business offers only a pretend solution to the problem of assurance of learning assessment.
Archive | 2007
Jeffrey J. Green; Courtenay C. Stone; Abera Zegeye; Thomas A. Charles
The Journal of Economic History | 1995
Tung Liu; Gray J. Santoni; Courtenay C. Stone
Archive | 2012
Jeffrey J. Green; Courtenay C. Stone; Abera Zegeye; Thomas A. Charles
Archive | 2011
Lee C. Spector; Courtenay C. Stone
Journal of Economic Education | 1999
Tung Liu; Courtenay C. Stone
Archive | 2013
Jeffrey J. Green; Courtenay C. Stone; DeVon Yoho; Abera Zegeye
Archive | 2010
Lee C. Spector; Courtenay C. Stone
Archive | 2005
Tung Liu; Courtenay C. Stone; G. J. Santoni