Courtney Bennett

Safety and Feasibility of Contrast Echocardiography for ECMO Evaluation.

Transthoracic echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) are valuable for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). These tools are used to perform “turn down” assessments, evaluate for cannula placement/position, and guide management. ECMO is a form of mechanical

Predictive value of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for mortality in a contemporary cardiac intensive care unit population

Background Optimal methods of mortality risk stratification in patients in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) remain uncertain. We evaluated the ability of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score to predict mortality in a large cohort of unselected patients in the CICU. Methods and Results Adult patients admitted to the CICU from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2015, at a single tertiary care hospital were retrospectively reviewed. SOFA scores were calculated daily, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE)‐III and APACHE‐IV scores were calculated on CICU day 1. Discrimination of hospital mortality was assessed using area under the receiver‐operator characteristic curve values. We included 9961 patients, with a mean age of 67.5±15.2 years; all‐cause hospital mortality was 9.0%. Day 1 SOFA score predicted hospital mortality, with an area under the receiver‐operator characteristic curve value of 0.83; area under the receiver‐operator characteristic curve values were similar for the APACHE‐III score, and APACHE‐IV predicted mortality (P>0.05). Mean and maximum SOFA scores over multiple CICU days had greater discrimination for hospital mortality (P<0.01). Patients with an increasing SOFA score from day 1 and day 2 had higher mortality. Patients with day 1 SOFA score <2 were at low risk of mortality. Increasing tertiles of day 1 SOFA score predicted higher long‐term mortality (P<0.001 by log‐rank test). Conclusions The day 1 SOFA score has good discrimination for short‐term mortality in unselected patients in the CICU, which is comparable to APACHE‐III and APACHE‐IV. Advantages of the SOFA score over APACHE include simplicity, improved discrimination using serial scores, and prediction of long‐term mortality.

Sex-stratified analysis of national trends and outcomes in isolated tricuspid valve surgery

Objective Female sex is a known risk factor for cardiac surgery, and tricuspid valve (TV) disease is more common in women. There are few data on sex-stratified surgical outcomes for isolated TV surgery. An administrative database was used to compare acute in-hospital outcomes between men and women undergoing isolated TV surgery. Methods Patients aged >18 who underwent TV repair or replacement from 2004 to 2013 were identified using the National Inpatient Sample. Patients were excluded if they had congenital heart disease, endocarditis, or were undergoing concomitant cardiac surgeries except coronary bypass. Results were weighted to represent national averages. Sex-stratified analysis was performed using propensity score matching to compare in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications and hospital costs. Results Over 10 years, women represented 58% of the 5005 TV surgeries performed. With propensity matching, hospital mortality (7.9% vs 7.7%; P=0.99) and median length of stay (11 vs 11 days; P=0.99) were similar between men and women. However, median hospital charges were higher for men (

When to incorporate point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) into the initial assessment of acutely ill patients: a pilot crossover study to compare 2 POCUS-assisted simulation protocols

166 000 vs

Comparison of Mortality Risk Prediction among Patients ≥70 versus <70 Years of Age in a Cardiac Intensive Care Unit

155 000; P=0.04). Conclusion Isolated TV surgery is rare, but women more commonly undergo the procedure. In-hospital mortality was similar between men and women after propensity matching, but remains markedly high for both men and women in comparison to that reported for left-sided isolated valve surgery.

Reliability and validity of the checklist for early recognition and treatment of acute illness and injury as a charting tool in the medical intensive care unit

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine the ideal timing for providers to perform point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) with the least increase in workload.MethodsWe conducted a pilot crossover study to compare 2 POCUS-assisted evaluation protocols for acutely ill patients: sequential (physical examination followed by POCUS) vs parallel (POCUS at the time of physical examination). Participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups according to which POCUS-assisted protocol (sequential vs parallel) was used during simulated scenarios. Subsequently, the groups were crossed over to complete assessment by using the other POCUS-assisted protocol in the same patient scenarios. Providers’ workloads, measured with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) and time to complete patient evaluation, were compared between the 2 protocols.ResultsSeven providers completed 14 assessments (7 sequential and 7 parallel). The median (IQR) total NASA-TLX score was 30 (30–50) in the sequential and 55 (50–65) in the parallel protocol (P = .03), which suggests a significantly lower workload in the sequential protocol. When individual components of the NASA-TLX score were evaluated, mental demand and frustration level were significantly lower in the sequential than in the parallel protocol (40 [IQR, 30–60] vs 50 [IQR, 40–70]; P = .03 and 25 [IQR, 20–35] vs 60 [IQR, 45–85]; P = .02, respectively). The time needed to complete the assessment was similar between the sequential and parallel protocols (8.7 [IQR, 6–9] minutes vs 10.1 [IQR, 7–11] minutes, respectively; P = .30).ConclusionsA sequential POCUS-assisted protocol posed less workload to POCUS operators than the parallel protocol.

The incorporation of focused history in checklist for early recognition and treatment of acute illness and injury

Older adults account for an increasing number of cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) admissions. This study sought to determine the predictive value of illness severity scores for mortality in CICU patients ≥70 years of age. Adult patients admitted to the CICU from 2007 to 2015 at one tertiary care hospital were reviewed. Severity of illness scores were calculated on the first CICU day. Area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUROC) values were used to assess discrimination for hospital mortality in patients ≥70 versus <70 years of age. We included 10,004 patients with a mean age of 67.4 ± 15.2 years (37.4% female); 4,771 patients (47.7%) were ≥70 years of age. Patients ≥70 years of age had greater illness severity and more extensive co-morbidities compared with patients <70 years of age. Patients ≥70 years of age had higher hospital mortality (11.6% vs 6.8%, odds ratio 1.80, 95% confidence interval 1.57 to 2.07, p <0.001), with a progressive increase in mortality as a function of decade. Severity of illness scores had lower AUROC values for hospital mortality in patients ≥70 years of age compared with patients <70 years of age (all p <0.05 by DeLong test). The Braden skin score on CICU admission predicted hospital mortality with an AUROC value only slightly lower than these scores. Increasing age decade was associated with decreased postdischarge survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis (p <0.001 by log-rank). In conclusion, contemporary CICU patients ≥70 years of age have greater illness severity, more co-morbidities and higher mortality than patients <70 years of age, yet severity of illness scores are less accurate for predicting mortality in CICU patients ≥70 years of age, emphasizing the need for more effective risk-stratification methods in this population.

National Trends and Outcomes in Isolated Tricuspid Valve Surgery

Background: Resuscitation of critically ill patients is complex and potentially prone to diagnostic errors and therapeutic harm. The Checklist for early recognition and treatment of acute illness and injury (CERTAIN) is an electronic tool that aims to provide decision-support, charting, and prompting for standardization. This study sought to evaluate the validity and reliability of CERTAIN in a real-time Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Materials and Methods: This was a prospective pilot study in the medical ICU of a tertiary care medical center. A total of thirty patient encounters over 2 months period were charted independently by two CERTAIN investigators. The inter-observer recordings and comparison to the electronic medical records (EMR) were used to evaluate reliability and validity, respectively. The primary outcome was reliability and validity measured using Cohens Kappa statistic. Secondary outcomes included time to completion, user satisfaction, and learning curve. Results: A total of 30 patients with a median age of 59 (42–78) years and median acute physiology and chronic health evaluation III score of 38 (23–50) were included in this study. Inter-observer agreement was very good (κ = 0.79) in this study and agreement between CERTAIN and the EMR was good (κ = 0.5). CERTAIN charting was completed in real-time that was 121 (92–150) min before completion of EMR charting. The subjective learning curve was 3.5 patients without differences in providers with different levels of training. Conclusions: CERTAIN provides a reliable and valid method to evaluate resuscitation events in real time. CERTAIN provided the ability to complete data in real-time.

USE OF CONTINUOUS RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY IN THE CARDIAC INTENSIVE CARE UNIT

BackgroundDiagnostic error and delay are critical impediments to the safety of critically ill patients. Checklist for early recognition and treatment of acute illness and injury (CERTAIN) has been developed as a tool that facilitates timely and error-free evaluation of critically ill patients. While the focused history is an essential part of the CERTAIN framework, it is not clear how best to choreograph this step in the process of evaluation and treatment of the acutely decompensating patient.MethodsAn un-blinded crossover clinical simulation study was designed in which volunteer critical care clinicians (fellows and attendings) were randomly assigned to start with either obtaining a focused history choreographed in series (after) or in parallel to the primary survey. A focused history was obtained using the standardized SAMPLE model that is incorporated into American College of Trauma Life Support (ATLS) and Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS). Clinicians were asked to assess six acutely decompensating patients using pre – determined clinical scenarios (three in series choreography, three in parallel). Once the initial choreography was completed the clinician would crossover to the alternative choreography. The primary outcome was the cognitive burden assessed through the NASA task load index. Secondary outcome was time to completion of a focused history.ResultsA total of 84 simulated cases (42 in parallel, 42 in series) were tested on 14 clinicians. Both the overall cognitive load and time to completion improved with each successive practice scenario, however no difference was observed between the series versus parallel choreographies. The median (IQR) overall NASA TLX task load index for series was 39 (17 – 58) and for parallel 43 (27 – 52), p = 0.57. The median (IQR) time to completion of the tasks in series was 125 (112 – 158) seconds and in parallel 122 (108 – 158) seconds, p = 0.92.ConclusionIn this clinical simulation study assessing the incorporation of a focused history into the primary survey of a non-trauma critically ill patient, there was no difference in cognitive burden or time to task completion when using series choreography (after the exam) compared to parallel choreography (concurrent with the primary survey physical exam). However, with repetition of the task both overall task load and time to completion improved in each of the choreographies.