Craig E. Whitfill

Efficacy of a Novel Infectious Bursal Disease Virus Immune Complex Vaccine in Broiler Chickens

Two experiments were conducted to test the efficacy of a novel infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) vaccine in broiler chickens with maternal IBDV immunity. The IBDV vaccine was formulated by mixing IBDV strain 2512 with bursal disease antibodies (BDA) to produce the IBDV-BDA complex vaccine. In Expt. I, 1-day-old Cobb x Cobb broiler chickens were vaccinated subcutaneously with either IBDV-BDA or commercial live intermediate IBDV vaccine (vaccine A) or were left unvaccinated. In Expt. 2, the vaccine A group was not included; instead, IBDV strain 2512 was included. Chickens were maintained in isolation houses. On day 28 (Expt. 1) and day 32 (Expt. 2) of age, chickens from each group were challenged with a standard USDA IBDV (STC strain) challenge. Challenged and unchallenged chickens were evaluated for their bursa/body weight ratios and antibody titers 3 days post-challenge. Bursae collected from Expt. 2 were examined histologically to evaluate bursal lesions and confirm gross examination. None of the unvaccinated chickens was protected against the challenge virus as evidenced by the presence of acute bursal lesions (edema/hemorrhage). All chickens receiving the IBDV-BDA complex or the IBDV strain 2512 (Expt. 2) were protected from the challenge virus as evidenced by no acute bursal lesions. Additionally, chickens receiving the IBDV-BDA complex vaccine or the IBDV strain 2512 had antibody titers to IBDV, indication the presence of an active immune response. In Expt. 1, chickens vaccinated with vaccine A and challenged had bursal lesions similar to those observed in the unvaccinated, challenged chickens. These chickens also showed no indication of active immunity against the virus. These results suggest that the 1-day-of-age-administered IBDV-BDA complex vaccine can induce active immunity and protection against a standard IBDV challenge in the face of variable levels of maternal IBDV immunity.

Determination of Optimum Formulation of a Novel Infectious Bursal Disease Virus (IBDV) Vaccine Constructed by Mixing Bursal Disease Antibody with IBDV

A novel vaccine against infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) has been developed. The new vaccine was constructed by mixing bursal disease antibody (BDA) contained in whole antiserum with live IBDV before lyophilization. To establish various formulations of BDA and IBDV, several BDA doses between 5 units and 80 units of BDA/50 microliters were mixed with 100 EID50/50 microliters of IBDV suspension in Expt. 1; in Expt. 2, several IBDV doses between 10 EID50/50 microliters and 977 EID50/50 microliters of IBDV suspension were mixed with 24 units of BDA/50 microliters. Vaccine preparations were administered subcutaneously to the nape of 1-day-old specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chicks. Safety, potency, and immunogenicity of the different vaccine formulations were evaluated using bursal weight, bursal gross examination, and IBDV antibody titer. Some bursae were examined histologically to confirm gross examinations. Several vaccine formulations were safe and efficacious and met the safety, potency, and immunogenicity criteria. A vaccine construct of 100 EID50 mixed with 24 units of BDA was selected as the release dose. When administered at 1 day of age, the novel vaccine allows for delayed infection of the bursa until after days 6-8 of age in SPF chicks, while initiating potency and immunogenicity to an IBDV challenge. The addition of BDA to the IBDV results in a complex vaccine that allows for safer immunization in SPF birds than under administration of the vaccine virus without BDA.

Effect of In Ovo Vaccine Delivery Route on Herpesvirus of Turkeys/SB-1 Efficacy and Viremia

SUMMARY. A study was designed to ascertain the influence of in ovo site of inoculation and embryonic fluid type on the development of Mareks disease (MD) vaccine viremia and efficacy against MD challenge. The experiments were divided into in vitro and in vivo phases. In the in vitro phase, herpesvirus of turkeys/SB-1 vaccine was combined with basal medium eagle (BME) medium (control), amniotic fluid, or allantoic fluid and subsequently titrated on secondary chick embryo fibroblast cultures. There were no significant differences in titer between the virus inoculum carried in BME and the virus inoculum combined with either the allantoic fluid or the amniotic fluid. In the in vivo phase, five routes of inoculation, amniotic, intraembryonic, allantoic, air cell, and subcutaneous at hatch, were compared for generation of protection against virulent MD challenge. Comparisons were made in both specific-pathogen-free and commercial broiler embryos/chicks and, for the amniotic and allantoic routes, injection at either day 17 or day 18 of embryonation. Reisolation of the vaccine virus at day 3 of age was also done for all routes with the exception of the air cell route. Vaccine virus was recovered from all birds tested that were injected in ovo via the amniotic and intraembryonic routes and the subcutaneously at hatch route but was isolated only sporadically from birds inoculated via the allantoic route. Vaccination protective efficacy against virulent MD for all birds vaccinated in ovo via the amniotic or intraembryonic routes and birds vaccinated subcutaneously at hatch was over 90% regardless of day of in ovo injection or bird type. Protective efficacy for vaccines delivered in ovo by either the allantoic or the air cell routes was less than 50% regardless of day of injection or bird type. Therefore, in ovo MD vaccines must be injected either via the amniotic route or the intraembryonic route for optimal performance.

Protective immunity to infectious bronchitis in broilers vaccinated against Marek's disease either in ovo or at hatch and against infectious bronchitis at hatch.

Two experiments were conducted using commercial broiler chickens to determine if Mareks disease (MD) vaccines HVT/SB-1 and HVT plus CVI-988 given either in ovo or at hatch adversely affected the efficacy of infectious bronchitis (IB) vaccines (Ark and Mass serotypes) given by eyedrop on the day of hatch. Nonvaccinated negative controls and controls that received only IB vaccines were included in each study. Birds were challenged with either infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) Mass-41 or IBV Ark-99 on either day 26 or 27 of age. Protection was assessed 5 days post-IBV challenged by virus isolation from the trachea. The day of hatch mean antibody titer to IBV was 12,668 +/- 4704 and 2503 +/- 3243 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in experiments 1 and 2, respectively. In each study, nonvaccinated controls had a significantly higher (P < or = 0.05) incidence (88%-100%) of IBV challenge virus isolation than did controls vaccinated for IB but not for MD. Analysis of data from both studies showed that protection to IB in groups that received only IB vaccines at hatch ranged from 55.0% to 77.3%, whereas protection to IB in groups receiving both MD and IB vaccines ranged from 50.0% to 95.5%. In both experiments and within IBV challenge serotype, broilers given MD vaccines (in ovo or at hatch) and IB vaccines at hatch had protection rates to IBV challenges that were not significantly less (P < or = 0.05) than IB protection rates of groups that received only IB vaccines at hatch. Analysis of these data shows that administration of high-titered MD vaccines either in ovo or at hatch did not affect the efficacy of an IB vaccination (serotypes Ark and Mass) given by eyedrop at hatch.

Optimized Adenovirus-Antibody Complexes Stimulate Strong Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses against an Encoded Antigen in Naïve Mice and Those with Preexisting Immunity

ABSTRACT The immune response to recombinant adenoviruses is the most significant impediment to their clinical use for immunization. We test the hypothesis that specific virus-antibody combinations dictate the type of immune response generated against the adenovirus and its transgene cassette under certain physiological conditions while minimizing vector-induced toxicity. In vitro and in vivo assays were used to characterize the transduction efficiency, the T and B cell responses to the encoded transgene, and the toxicity of 1 × 1011 adenovirus particles mixed with different concentrations of neutralizing antibodies. Complexes formed at concentrations of 500 to 0.05 times the 50% neutralizing dose (ND50) elicited strong virus- and transgene-specific T cell responses. The 0.05-ND50 formulation elicited measurable anti-transgene antibodies that were similar to those of virus alone (P = 0.07). This preparation also elicited very strong transgene-specific memory T cell responses (28.6 ± 5.2% proliferation versus 7.7 ± 1.4% for virus alone). Preexisting immunity significantly reduced all responses elicited by these formulations. Although lower concentrations (0.005 and 0.0005 ND50) of antibody did not improve cellular and humoral responses in naïve animals, they did promote strong cellular (0.005 ND50) and humoral (0.0005 ND50) responses in mice with preexisting immunity. Some virus-antibody complexes may improve the potency of adenovirus-based vaccines in naïve individuals, while others can sway the immune response in those with preexisting immunity. Additional studies with these and other virus-antibody ratios may be useful to predict and model the type of immune responses generated against a transgene in those with different levels of exposure to adenovirus.

Stimulation of Progressor and Regressor Chicken Leukocytes with Con A, PHA-P, and Rous Sarcoma Tumor Antigens

Progressor (Pr) and regressor (R) chickens from the University of Arkansas lines were used as leukocyte donors. Peripheral blood leukocytes were stimulated with two mitogens, concanavalin A (Con A) and phytohemagglutinin-P (PHA-P). Both Pr and R leukocytes displayed the same Con A-stimulated dose dependency on blastogenesis. The regressor leukocytes were stimulated more than the progressor leukocytes at high concentrations of PHA-P. There did not appear to be any correlation between the response of individual chickens to mitogens and their ability to regress a Rous sarcoma. We concluded that the R-Rs-1 gene, which controls the animals response to Rous sarcoma, and the Con A and PHA-P response genes are probably located at different loci in the chicken genome. Mitogen-induced blastogenesis does not appear to be a useful index to predict regression response in the chicken. Under our experimental conditions, regressor leukocytes showed a sensitization to sarcoma antigens, but the progressor leukocytes did not. The data suggest that the R-Rs-1 gene does not confer a generally enhanced immune status to the chicken but acts as an Ir response gene to augment the immune response to specific antigens.

Time course of production of low molecular weight viral-neutralizing substance(s) in chickens

Regressor (R) line chickens respond to Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) by producing low molecular weight (LMW) virus-neutralizing factors. LMW factors were detected in R-line sera as early as 4 days after initial challenge with RSV and disappear as the Rous sarcoma regresses. This LMW material does not appear to be produced in significant amounts by progressor chickens at the selected assay times. These LMW factor(s) may be stimulated by the R-Rs-1 gene.