Craig MacLeod
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Craig MacLeod.
Cancer | 2005
Andrew Wirth; Kally Yuen; Michael Barton; Daniel Roos; Kumar Gogna; Gary Pratt; Craig MacLeod; Sean Bydder; Graeme Morgan; David Christie
The curative potential of radiotherapy (RT) alone as initial treatment for patients with Stage I–II lymphocyte‐predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (LPHL) has not been defined well.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1998
Craig MacLeod; Allan Fowler; Peter Duval; Ieta D’Costa; Chris Dalrymple; Ian Firth; Peter Elliott; Ken Atkinson; Jonathan Carter
PURPOSE To evaluate the outcome of post-hysterectomy adjuvant vaginal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS A retrospective analysis was performed on a series of 143 patients with endometrial cancer treated with HDR brachytherapy alone post-hysterectomy from 1985 to June 1993. Of these patients, 141 received 34 Gy in four fractions prescribed to the vaginal mucosa in a 2-week period. The median follow-up was 6.9 years. Patients were analyzed for treatment parameters, survival, local recurrence, distant relapse, and toxicity. RESULTS Five-year relapse free survival and overall survival was 100% and 88% for Stage 1A, 98% and 94% for Stage IB, 100% and 86% for Stage IC, and 92% and 92% for Stage IIA. The overall vaginal recurrence rate was 1.4%. The overall late-toxicity rate was low, and no RTOG grade 3, 4, or 5 complications were recorded. CONCLUSION These results are similar to reported international series that have used either low-dose-rate or HDR brachytherapy. The biological effective dose was low for both acute and late responding tissues compared with some of the HDR brachytherapy series, and supports using this lower dose and possibly decreasing late side-effects with no apparent increased risk of vaginal recurrence.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1998
Craig MacLeod; David Bernshaw; Sam Leung; Kalaish Narayan; Ian Firth
PURPOSE A phase II trial was designed to evaluate the toxicity and outcome of patients with locally advanced cervix cancer treated with accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy (AHFX). METHODS AND MATERIALS In this prospective trial, AHFX doses of 1.25 Gy were administered twice daily at least 6 hours apart to a total pelvic dose of 57.5 Gy. A booster dose was then administered via either low-dose rate brachytherapy or external beam therapy to a smaller volume. All patients were accrued and treated at Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute (PMCI) between 1986 until April 1991. RESULTS Sixty-one eligible patients were enrolled in this protocol; 2 (3.2%) had Stage IIB; 42 (68.9%) had Stage III; 8 (13.1%) had Stage IV and 9 (14.8%) had recurrent cervical cancer. Fifty-two patients (85%) completed the planned external beam without a treatment break. Thirty patients had acute toxicity that required regular medication. One patient died of acute treatment related toxicity. Fifty-five patients received booster therapy: 45 with intrauterine brachytherapy, 6 with interstitial brachtherapy, and 4 with external beam. The median follow-up of surviving patients was 6 years. Overall 5-year survival is 27% and 5-year relapse free survival is 36%. Nineteen patients died with pelvic disease and the actuarial local control rate was 66%. There were 8 severe late complications observed in 7 patients. Seven required surgical intervention (an actuarial rate of 27%). Five patients also required total hip replacement. CONCLUSIONS The local control rate was favorable compared with other series that have used standard fractionation, although overall survival remained similar. The severe late complication rate was high for this protocol and higher than similar protocols reported in the literature.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2000
George Hruby; Craig MacLeod; Ian Firth
PURPOSE To evaluate the treatment and outcome of recurrent vulvar cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS In a retrospective review of 26 women referred to the department of radiation oncology between 1982 and 1995, patient records were analyzed with respect to the findings at original surgery, the time to locoregional recurrence, the location of the recurrence, and the subsequent management and outcome. RESULTS Sixteen recurrences were managed with a combination of surgery and radiotherapy, and the remainder with radiation treatment, combined with chemotherapy in some cases. The overall survival for the entire cohort at 5 years was 22%. The 5-year survival for those with recurrence confined to the vulva (n = 13) was 46%, compared with 0% for those women with a recurrence located or extending beyond the vulva (p = 0.002). The local control rate was 34.6%. CONCLUSION Our results confirm the poor overall prognosis for this condition. In particular, they highlight the importance of the location of the recurrence as a prognostic indicator. Based on this review, we conclude that radiotherapy fields should encompass the region at risk if the intent is curative. Finally, low-dose palliation for groin node recurrence is ineffectual.
Respirology | 1999
Shalini K Vinod; Craig MacLeod; David J. Barnes; Julie Fletcher
Primary tracheal sarcomas are rare. Only 23 cases have previously been reported in the English literature. The present case describes a 72‐year‐old woman with a malignant fibrous histiocytoma of the trachea. She underwent an endoscopic resection followed by radiotherapy and is well at 12 months follow up. Other cases are reviewed. Tracheal resection is the standard care. However, local resection with postoperative radiotherapy remains an option. Adjuvant chemotherapy may improve local control. Long‐term survival has been documented.
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology | 1997
Craig MacLeod; Alan Fowler; Chris Dalrymple; Ieta D'costa; Ian Firth; Ken Atkinson; Peter Elliot; Jonathan Carter
Summary: High‐dose‐rate brachytherapy was introduced at this hospital for the treatment of gynaecological malignancy in 1985. A retrospective analysis was performed of 103 patients with cervix cancer treated with this technique from 1985 to June, 1993. The patients were analyzed for treatment parameters, response, survival, relapse and toxicity. Five‐year survival was 78% for Stage 1B, 72% for Stage 2A, 42% for Stage 2B and 29% for Stage 3B. The severe late toxicity rate was 4.9%. These results are similar to reported international series that have used either low‐dose‐rate or high‐dose‐rate brachytherapy.
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology | 2001
Craig MacLeod; Anne O'donnell; Martin H. N. Tattersall; Chris Dalrymple; Ian Firth
Primary or neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to definitive local therapy has potential advantages for locally advanced cervix cancer. It can downstage a cancer and allow definitive local therapy to be technically possible (surgery), or potentially more effective (radiotherapy). It can also eradicate subclinical systemic metastases. This report reviews a single institutions experience of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to definitive local therapy for cervix cancer over a 13-year period. One hundred and six patients were treated with this intent. The patients were analysed for their response to chemotherapy, treatment received, survival, relapse and toxicity. The chemotherapy was feasible and the majority of patients had a complete or partial response (58.5%). Eight patients did not proceed to local treatment. Forty-six patients had definitive surgery and 52 had definitive radiotherapy. The 5-year overall survival was 27% and the majority of patients died with disease. The first site of relapse was usually in the pelvis (46.2%). Late complications that required ongoing medical therapy (n=6) or surgical intervention (n=2) were recorded in eight patients (7.5%). On univariate analysis stage (P=0.04), tumour size (P=0.01), lymph node status (P=0.003), response to chemotherapy (P=0.045) and treatment (P=0.003) were all significant predictors of survival. On multivariate analysis, tumour size (P < 0.0001) and nodal status (P=0.02) were significant predictors of survival. Despite the impressive responses to chemotherapy of advanced cervix cancer, there is evidence from randomized trials that it does not improve or compromise survival prior to radiotherapy. As its role prior to surgery remains unclear, it should not be used in this setting outside a prospective randomized trial.
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology | 2000
Shalini K Vinod; Craig MacLeod; Christopher Dalrymple; Peter Elliott; Ken Atkinson; Jonathan Carter; I Firth
The use of post‐operative radiotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer is controversial. The aim of this study was to document the results and toxicity of adjuvant irradiation in patients with Stage 1B and 2A cervical cancer.
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology | 1999
Jonathan Carter; Craig MacLeod; Allan Fowler; Felix Chan; Christopher Dalrymple; Felix Wong
Cancer of the uterine corpus, commonly referred to as cancer of the endometrium or cancer of the uterus, continues to be the most common pelvic genital malignancy affecting western women (1). In 1998 in the United States 36,100 women were diagnosed with this cancer, and there were 6,300 deaths from this condition in that year. Of concern is that despite a relatively stable incidence over the last decade, the annual number of deaths since 1987 from endometrial cancer has more than doubled (2). Many controversies exist in the management of apparent early endometrial cancer. These include: 1. The role of surgical staging which includes pelvic lymphadenectomy. 2. The role of the subspecialist gynaecological oncologist in primary surgical treatment. 3. Indications for vaginal and external beam radiotherapy. 4. Who is at risk for recurrence? 5. The role of laparoscopic approach to the management of this disease. Despite their importance, these and other issues have not been appropriately addressed by prospective randomized studies. Treatment strategies and algorithms have thus been based upon a combination of clinicopathological studies and uncontrolled reviews. The views expressed in this clinical opinion are those of the Sydney Gynaecologic Oncology Group and reflect our philosophy on the current management of this tumour, supported by recent and appropriate peer reviewed scientific literature.
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer | 2000
Peter Elliott; Malcolm Coppleson; Peter Russell; P. Liouros; Jonathan Carter; Craig MacLeod; M. Jones