Craig P. Fischer

Predicting poor outcome following hepatectomy: analysis of 2313 hepatectomies in the NSQIP database

BACKGROUND For the past two decades multiple series have documented that liver resection has become safer. The purpose of this study was to determine the current status of hepatic resection in the USA by analysing the multi-institutional experience within the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) dataset. METHODS Of the 363,897 cases in the 2005-2007 NSQIP Participant Use File, 2313 elective open hepatectomy cases were identified (1344 partial, 230 left, 510 right and 229 extended hepatectomies). A total of 57 perioperative risk factors and 28 postoperative complications were compared. To determine the applicability of NSQIP general risk models to hepatic surgery, the prognostic value of standard multivariate analysis was compared with the NSQIP general surgery aggregate risk indices (expected probability of morbidity [morbprob], expected probability of mortality [mortprob]). RESULTS The median age of patients listed in the database was 60 years; sex distributions were equivalent; 78% were White; 65% of patients had an ASA score of 3 or 4, and the most prevalent co-morbidity was hypertension (46%). A total of 41% of patients had disseminated cancer, 19% of whom had received chemotherapy within 30 days of surgery. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 2.5% (57/2313) and the 30-day major morbidity rate was 19.6% (453/2313). Multivariate analysis identified nine risk factors associated with major morbidity and two risk factors associated with mortality. In contrast, the morbprob and mortprob statistics did not predict outcomes accurately. For those patients who developed major morbidity, the median length of stay was longer (10 vs. 6 days; P = 0.001) and the mortality rate was higher (11.3% vs. 0.3%; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Analysis of the NSQIP experience with hepatectomy indicates that the current mortality and major morbidity rate benchmarks are 2.5% and 19.6%, respectively. Poor outcomes were associated with nutritional status, liver function and the extent of hepatectomy. The NSQIP general surgery morbprob and mortprob values were relatively poor predictors of post-hepatectomy observed morbidity, indicating the need for specialty-specific NSQIP modelling.

Method of Pyloric Reconstruction and Impact Upon Delayed Gastric Emptying and Hospital Stay After Pylorus-Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Preservation of the pylorus at the time of pancreaticoduodenectomy has been associated with equal oncological outcomes when compared to the classical Whipple operation. Multiple studies have demonstrated that pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) has equal or superior outcomes regarding quality of life when compared with the traditional Whipple operation, but many studies have suggested a higher incidence of delayed gastric emptying (DGE). DGE prolongs hospital stay, and its association with PPPD has hampered its adoption by many pancreatic surgery centers. We describe a novel surgical technique for the prevention of delayed gastric emptying following pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. The technique of pyloric dilatation appears to decrease the incidence of delayed gastric emptying and facilitates earlier hospital discharge, when compared with standard pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Phase 3, randomized, double-blind study of plasma-derived human thrombin versus bovine thrombin in achieving hemostasis in patients undergoing surgery

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the effectiveness of plasma-derived human thrombin and bovine thrombin for achieving hemostasis during surgery. Methods: Adults (N = 305) with ≥ 1 mild or moderate bleeding site not manageable by conventional modalities during elective cardiovascular, neurologic, or general surgical procedures at multiple study centers were randomized to human (n = 153) or bovine (n = 152) thrombin, applied topically with an absorbable gelatin sponge. Bleeding was assessed 3, 6, and 10 min post-application. Other evaluations included laboratory assessments, vital signs, blood loss, blood transfusions, time in specialty-care units, procedure duration, and length of hospital stay. Blood samples for antibody assessment were collected at baseline and postoperative week 5. Results: The proportion of patients achieving hemostasis within 10 min (primary outcome) was equivalent for human and bovine thrombin (97.4 vs. 97.4%, respectively; ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.96–1.05). The proportions of patients achieving hemostasis at 6 min (94.8 vs. 92.8%) and 3 min (73.2 vs. 72.4%) were also equivalent. No clinically meaningful differences were noted for other variables. The products had similar adverse event profiles. More patients (12.7%) who received bovine thrombin demonstrated seroconversion for ≥ 1 of the 4 antibodies assayed than patients who received human thrombin (3.3%). No patients in the human thrombin group developed seroconversion for anti-human thrombin or anti-human factor V/Va antibodies. Limitations of this study include the lack of a placebo-control group, the potential for inter-surgeon variability, and the fact that antibody assessment was not evaluable in all patients. Conclusions: Plasma-derived human thrombin and bovine thrombin were equivalent in achieving hemostasis within 10, 6, and 3 min and had comparable safety profiles. None of the patients receiving human thrombin developed seroconversion for antibodies to any of the human antigens.

Timing of referral impacts surgical outcomes in patients undergoing repair of bile duct injuries

Bile duct injury (BDI) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) remains a significant surgical challenge. Despite claims to the contrary, the incidence of bile duct injury has remained elevated since the introduction of LC. Several issues regarding the surgical management of BDI are controversial, including: (i) identification of the surgeon and centre most capable of managing the injury, (ii) timing of surgical repair, (iii) incidence and significance of associated vascular injury and (iv) identification of patient factors which significantly impact outcome after repair. Variability in timing of referral of BDI to tertiary centres has been noted in the literature. The impact of timing of referral upon post-operative outcomes after definitive surgery has yet to be clearly investigated. We report our experience with 44 patients who required reconstructive surgery after BDI. In contrast to the many studies available in the literature, patients in the current study were classified according to a modern injury classification system. Additionally, we examined the impact of delayed referral to our centre on short- and long-term outcomes after surgical repair of BDI.

A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of fibrin pad as an adjunct to control soft tissue bleeding during abdominal, retroperitoneal, pelvic, and thoracic surgery.

BACKGROUND This study evaluated the hemostatic effectiveness and safety of Fibrin Pad (Omrix Biopharmaceuticals Ltd.) vs absorbable hemostat in patients undergoing nonemergent surgery. Fibrin Pad is a topical absorbable hemostat designed to be effective in a variety of soft tissues and across multiple bleeding intensities. STUDY DESIGN Patients 18 years and older, requiring abdominal, retroperitoneal, pelvic, or thoracic (noncardiac) surgery and with an appropriate soft-tissue target bleeding site (TBS), were randomized to receive Fibrin Pad or absorbable hemostat (NCT00658723). Patients were stratified by bleeding severity at the TBS. Assessments included percentage of patients achieving hemostasis at 4 minutes after randomization with no rebleeding requiring treatment during the subsequent 6 minutes (primary endpoint), proportion of patients achieving hemostasis at 10 minutes, and incidence of treatment failure. RESULTS On the primary endpoint, 98.3% of patients with Fibrin Pad and 53.3% with absorbable hemostat achieved hemostasis at 4 minutes (p < 0.0001). The treatment differential was magnified (efficacy was maintained with Fibrin Pad but decreased with absorbable hemostat) with increasing bleeding intensity: in patients with mild bleeding, 100.0% vs 80.0% achieved hemostasis with Fibrin Pad and absorbable hemostat (p = 0.03), respectively; rates were 96.6% vs 26.7%, respectively (p < 0.0001) with moderate bleeding. Percentages of patients who achieved hemostasis at 10 minutes were: Fibrin Pad, 98.3% and absorbable hemostat, 73.3% (p < 0.0001). Incidences of adverse events were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS Fibrin Pad is superior to absorbable hemostat (SURGICEL Original Absorbable Hemostat [Ethicon]) in soft-tissue bleeding control and is safe and effective as an adjunct for rapidly and reliably achieving hemostasis for soft-tissue bleeding during surgery.

A phase III, randomized, controlled, superiority trial evaluating the fibrin pad versus standard of care in controlling parenchymal bleeding during elective hepatic surgery

INTRODUCTION Haemostasis after liver resection may be difficult to achieve as a result of the presence of challenging bleeding, the anatomic landscape of the liver and the quality of tissue making up the hepatic parenchyma. The fibrin pad (FP) is a topical absorbable haemostat designed to be effective in a variety of tissues and across multiple bleeding intensities. This is the first clinical trial to evaluate the hemostats safety and effectiveness in controlling bleeding during elective hepatic resection. METHODS This prospective, randomized, controlled superiority trial enrolled 104 subjects undergoing elective hepatectomy in 5 countries. After parenchymal transection, subjects with an appropriately defined target bleeding site (TBS) were stratified according to the type of hepatic parenchyma and immediately randomized 1:1: FP versus Standard of Care (SoC). SoC comprised manual compression with the use of an approved topical absorbable haemostat. The primary endpoint was haemostasis at 4 min from identification of the TBS, with no re-bleeding requiring re-treatment prior to abdominal closure. Results were stratified for both normal and abnormal (steatosis or cirrhosis) hepatic parenchyma. All subjects were followed for 60 days post-operatively. RESULTS The intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis showed an overall treatment difference of 53.0% (P < 0.001), 82.5% (33/40 FP) versus 29.5% (13/44 SoC) in achieving haemostasis at 4 min with no re-bleeding requiring treatment up to wound closure. The per protocol analysis showed an overall treatment difference of 65.7% (P < 0.001), with 33/35 successes (94.3%) in the FP group and 12/42 in the SoC group (28.6%). The stratification results showed treatment differences between the normal parenchyma group, 63.6% (95.8% FP versus 32.3% SoC P < 0.001) and a larger difference of 72.7% in the abnormal parenchyma group (90.9% FP versus 18.2% SoC P = 0.0003). Post-operative intra-abdominal fluid collections were less frequent in the FP group (3.4% FP versus 13.3% SoC P = 0.059). There was no difference in the safety profile between the FP or SoC groups. CONCLUSIONS The FP is safe and effective when used as an adjunct to achieve haemostasis during hepatic surgery. The success rate of achieving haemostasis with a FP remained high compared with the SOC group, especially in steatotic or cirrhotic liver tissue where the control success rates diminish. In addition, FP treatment of hepatic parenchymal surfaces may reduce the risk of post-operative biliary and fluid collections.

Synchronous resection of colorectal primary and hepatic metastasis.

Up to 50% of the over 140,000 new colorectal cancer patients will present with synchronous colorectal cancer and liver metastasis. Surgical management of patients with resectable synchronous colorectal hepatic metastasis is complex and must consider multiple factors, including the presence of symptoms, location of primary tumor and liver metastases, extent of tumor (both primary and metastatic), patient performance status, and underlying comorbidities. Possible approaches to this select group of patients have included a synchronous resection of the colorectal primary and the hepatic metastases or a staged resection approach. The available literature regarding the safety of synchronous versus staged approaches confirms that a simultaneous resection may be performed in selected patients with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Perioperative mortality when minor hepatectomies are combined with colorectal resection is consistently ≤5%. Perioperative morbidity varies considerably following both synchronous and staged resections. However, the bulk of the existing literature confirms that simultaneous resections are both feasible and safe when hepatic resections are limited to <3 segments. Data regarding the oncologic outcomes following synchronous versus staged resections for Stage IV colorectal cancer are more limited than those available regarding postoperative morbidity and mortality. The available data suggest equivalent overall and disease-free survival regardless of timing of resection. Experience with minimally invasive combined colorectal and hepatic resections is extremely limited to date and consists exclusively of small single center series. The potential benefits of a minimally invasive approach will await the results of larger studies.

Early perioperative outcomes and pancreaticoduodenectomy in a general surgery residency training program

Current trends in national health care are triggering a reassessment of training in general surgery. Currently, 75% of general surgery residents seek postgraduate fellowship training, and significant debate has occurred regarding the best manner for surgeons to acquire competency in performing complex operations. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex procedure performed infrequently by most surgical graduates. From 1990 through 1997, the average number of PD operations performed per general surgery graduate ranged from 1.5 to 2.5. We examine the surgical outcomes following PD performed by surgical resident staff in a university-based general surgery training program. Between January 2001 and October 2004, 164 patients underwent PD for periampullary disease. Data were prospectively entered into a computerized database, including resident participation. We analyzed 30-day mortality and morbidity rates. Perioperative outcomes were 30-day mortality (2.2%), pancreatic fistula (6.1%), reoperation (2.2%), average length of hospital stay (13.5 days), mean operating time (489 minutes), and median estimated blood loss (1274 ml per case). PD can be performed with an acceptable morbidity and mortality within the teaching structure of a general surgery training program. These outcomes are likely related to the performance of PD at a high-volume, tertiary center by a single surgeon and compare favorably to best-practice benchmark outcomes.

A Randomized Trial of Aprotinin-Free Fibrin Sealant Versus Absorbable Hemostat

Background: This study evaluated the safety and hemostatic effectiveness of a tranexamic acid- and aprotinin-free fibrin sealant versus an absorbable hemostat in soft tissue during elective retroperitoneal or intra-abdominal surgery. Materials and Methods: This randomized, active-controlled, multicenter study enrolled patients who were undergoing elective retroperitoneal or intra-abdominal surgery and required adjunctive hemostatic measures at the target bleeding site (TBS). Patients were randomized (time = 0 minutes) to receive fibrin sealant or absorbable hemostat. The primary endpoint was the absence of bleeding at the TBS at 10 minutes. Secondary endpoints included the absence of bleeding at 4 and 7 minutes and the incidence of treatment failure (bleeding at 10 minutes or brisk bleeding requiring additional hemostatic measures), and the incidence of complications potentially related to bleeding. Adverse events were assessed. Results: Patients (N = 124) were randomized to receive fibrin sealant (n = 62) or absorbable hemostat (n = 62). A higher percentage of patients who received fibrin sealant versus absorbable hemostat achieved hemostasis within 10 minutes (95.2% vs 82.3%; 95% CI, 1.02-1.35) and also at 4 (74.2% vs 54.8%; 95% CI, 1.04-1.80) and 7 (90.3% vs 77.4%; 95% CI, 1.00-1.39) minutes. A lower incidence of treatment failure was observed for patients receiving fibrin sealant. Similar incidences of adverse events and complications potentially related to bleeding were observed. Conclusions: This tranexamic acid- and aprotinin-free fibrin sealant is safe and effective for achieving hemostasis in soft tissue during elective retroperitoneal or intra-abdominal surgery.

Erratum to: Safety and Hemostatic Effectiveness of the Fibrin Pad for Severe Soft-Tissue Bleeding During Abdominal, Retroperitoneal, Pelvic, and Thoracic (Non-cardiac) Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled, Superiority Trial

Background In surgery, rapid hemostasis can be required in various settings and bleeding intensities to minimize complications related to blood loss. While effective hemostats are available for mild-to-moderate surgical bleeding, few are effective against challenging severe hemorrhage. We report the effectiveness and safety of the fibrin pad (FP), a novel combination hemostat (device/human biologic), in controlling severe soft-tissue bleeding as compared to the standard of care (SoC).