Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Craig P. Wray is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Craig P. Wray.


Other Information: PBD: 11 Jun 2002 | 2002

Practical Diagnostics for Evaluating Residential Commissioning Metrics

Craig P. Wray; Iain Walker; Jeffrey A. Siegel; Max H. Sherman

LBNL-45959 Practical Diagnostics for Evaluating Residential Commissioning Metrics Craig Wray, Iain Walker, Jeff Siegel, Max Sherman Environmental Energy Technologies Division Indoor Environment Department Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720 July 2002 This report describes work supported by the California Energy Commission through the Public Interest Energy Research program under contract no. 500-98-033, and by the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Building Technology, State and Community Programs, Office of Building Research and Standards, of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract no. DE-AC03-76SF00098.


Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | 2002

Potential Benefits of Commissioning California Homes

Nance E. Matson; Craig P. Wray; Iain S. Walker; Max H. Sherman

LBNL-48258 Potential Benefits of Commissioning California Homes Nance Matson, Craig Wray, Iain Walker, Max Sherman Environmental Energy Technologies Division Energy Performance of Buildings Group Indoor Environment Department Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720 January 2002 This work was supported by the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Building Technology, State and Community Programs, Office of Research and Development, of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC03-76SF00098. This report was prepared as a result of work sponsored by the California Energy Commission. It does not necessarily represent the views of the Commission, its employees, or the State of California. The Commission, the State of California, its employees, contractors and subcontractors make no warranty, express or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this report, nor does any party represent that the use of this information will not infringe upon privately owned rights. This report has not been approved or disapproved by the Commission nor has the Commission passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the information in this report.


Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | 2003

Guidelines for residential commissioning

Craig P. Wray; Iain S. Walker; Max H. Sherman

Currently, houses do not perform optimally or even as many codes and forecasts predict, largely because they are field assembled and there is no consistent process to identify problems or to correct them. Residential commissioning is a solution to this problem. This guide is the culmination of a 30-month project that began in September 1999. The ultimate objective of the project is to increase the number of houses that undergo commissioning, which will improve the quality, comfort, and safety of homes for California citizens. The project goal is to lay the groundwork for a residential commissioning industry in California focused on end-use energy and non-energy issues. As such, we intend this guide to be a beginning and not an end. Our intent is that the guide will lead to the programmatic integration of commissioning with other building industry processes, which in turn will provide more value to a single site visit for people such as home energy auditors and raters, home inspectors, and building performance contractors. Project work to support the development of this guide includes: a literature review and annotated bibliography, which facilitates access to 469 documents related to residential commissioning published over the past 20 years (Wray et al. 2000), an analysis of the potential benefits one can realistically expect from commissioning new and existing California houses (Matson et al. 2002), and an assessment of 107 diagnostic tools for evaluating residential commissioning metrics (Wray et al. 2002). In this guide, we describe the issues that non-experts should consider in developing a commissioning program to achieve the benefits we have identified. We do this by providing specific recommendations about: how to structure the commissioning process, which diagnostics to use, and how to use them to commission new and existing houses. Using examples, we also demonstrate the potential benefits of applying the recommended whole-house commissioning approach to such houses.


Other Information: PBD: 1 May 2003 | 2003

Instrumented home energy rating and commissioning

Craig P. Wray; Iain S. Walker; Max H. Sherman

Currently, houses do not perform optimally or even as many codes and forecasts predict, largely because they are field assembled and there is no consistent process to identify deficiencies or to correct them. Solving this problem requires field performance evaluations using appropriate and agreed upon procedures in the form of a new process called residential commissioning. The purpose of this project is to develop and document these procedures and to demonstrate the value that applying them could provide in both new and existing California houses. This project has four specific objectives: to develop metrics and diagnostics for assessing house performance, to provide information on the potential benefits of commissioning using a whole-house approach, to develop programmatic guidelines for commissioning, and to conduct outreach efforts to transfer project results to industry stakeholders. The primary outcomes from this project are the development of residential commissioning guidelines and the analytical confirmation that there are significant potential benefits associated with commissioning California houses, particularly existing ones. In addition, we have made substantial advances in understanding the accuracy and usability of diagnostics for commissioning houses. In some cases, we have been able to work with equipment manufacturers to improve these aspects of their diagnostic tools. These outcomes provide a solid foundation on which to build a residential commissioning program in California. We expect that a concerted effort will be necessary to integrate such a program with existing building industry efforts and to demonstrate its use in the field.


Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | 2003

Duct thermal performance models for large commercial buildings

Craig P. Wray

LBNL-53410 Duct Thermal Performance Models for Large Commercial Buildings Craig Wray Environmental Energy Technologies Division Indoor Environment Department Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720 October 2003 This report describes work supported by the California Energy Commission through the Public Interest Energy Research program under contract no. 400-99-012-1, and by the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Program, of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract no. DE-AC03-76SF00098.


Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | 2002

Evaluation of flow capture techniques for measuring HVAC grilleairflows

Iain S. Walker; Craig P. Wray

This paper discusses the accuracy of commercially available flow hoods for residential applications. Results of laboratory and field tests indicate these hoods can be inadequate to measure airflows in residential systems, and there can be large measurement discrepancies between different flow hoods. The errors are due to poor calibrations, sensitivity of the hoods to grille airflow non-uniformities, and flow changes from added flow resistance. It is possible to obtain reasonable results using some flow hoods if the field tests are carefully done, the grilles are appropriate, and grille location does not restrict flow hood placement. We also evaluated several simple flow capture techniques for measuring grille airflows that could be adopted by the HVAC industry and homeowners as simple diagnostics. These simple techniques can be as accurate as commercially available devices. Our test results also show that current calibration procedures for flow hoods do not account for field application problems. As a result, agencies such as ASHRAE or ASTM need to develop a new standard for flow hood calibration, along with a new measurement standard to address field use of flow capture techniques.


Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | 2010

Duct Leakage Modeling in EnergyPlus and Analysis of Energy Savings from Implementing SAV with InCITeTM

Craig P. Wray

This project addressed two significant deficiencies in air-handling systems for large commercial building: duct leakage and duct static pressure reset. Both constitute significant energy reduction opportunities for these buildings. The overall project goal is to bridge the gaps in current duct performance modeling capabilities, and to expand our understanding of air-handling system performance in California large commercial buildings. The purpose of this project is to provide technical support for the implementation of a duct leakage modeling capability in EnergyPlus, to demonstrate the capabilities of the new model, and to carry out analyses of field measurements intended to demonstrate the energy saving potential of the SAV with InCITeTM duct static pressure reset (SPR) technology. A new duct leakage model has been successfully implemented in EnergyPlus, which will enable simulation users to assess the impacts of leakage on whole-building energy use and operation in a coupled manner. This feature also provides a foundation to support code change proposals and compliance analyses related to Title 24 where duct leakage is an issue. Our example simulations continue to show that leaky ducts substantially increase fan power: 10percent upstream and 10percent downstream leakage increases supply fan power 30percent on average compared to a tight duct system (2.5percent upstream and 2.5percent downstream leakage). Much of this increase is related to the upstream leakage rather than to the downstream leakage. This does not mean, however, that downstream leakage is unimportant. Our simulations also demonstrate that ceiling heat transfer is a significant effect that needs to be included when assessing the impacts of duct leakage in large commercial buildings. This is not particularly surprising, given that ?ceiling regain? issues have already been included in residential analyses as long as a decade ago (e.g., ASHRAE Standard 152); mainstream simulation programs that are used for large commercial building energy analyses have not had this capability until now. Our analyses of data that we collected during our 2005 tests of the SAV with InCITeTM duct static pressure reset technology show that this technology can substantially reduce fan power (in this case, by about 25 to 30percent). Tempering this assessment, however, is that cooling and heating coil loads were observed to increase or decrease significantly depending on the time window used. Their impact on cooling and heating plant power needs to be addressed in future studies; without translating the coil loads to plant equipment energy use, it is not possible to judge the net impact of this SPR technology on whole-building energy use. If all of the loads had decreased, such a step would not be as necessary.


Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | 2003

Duct leakage impacts on VAV system performance in California large commercial buildings

Craig P. Wray; Nance E. Matson

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the variability of duct leakage impacts on air distribution system performance for typical large commercial buildings in California. Specifically, a hybrid DOE-2/TRNSYS sequential simulation approach was used to model the energy use of a low-pressure terminal-reheat variable-air-volume (VAV) HVAC system with six duct leakage configurations (tight to leaky) in nine prototypical large office buildings (representing three construction eras in three California climates where these types of buildings are common). Combined fan power for the variable-speed-controlled supply and return fans at design conditions was assumed to be 0.8 W/cfm. Based on our analyses of the 54 simulation cases, the increase in annual fan energy is estimated to be 40 to 50% for a system with a total leakage of 19% at design conditions compared to a tight system with 5% leakage. Annual cooling plant energy also increases by about 7 to 10%, but reheat energy decreases (about 3 to 10%). In combination, the increase in total annual HVAC site energy is 2 to 14%. The total HVAC site energy use includes supply and return fan electricity consumption, chiller and cooling tower electricity consumption, boiler electricity consumption, and boiler natural gas consumption. Using year 2000 average commercial sector energy prices for California (


Hvac&r Research | 2014

Low pressure air-handling system leakage in large commercial buildings: Diagnosis, prevalence, and energy impacts

Mark Modera; Craig P. Wray; Darryl Dickerhoff

0.0986/kWh and


Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | 2008

Heating, Ventilating, and Air-Conditioning: Recent Advances in Diagnostics and Controls to Improve Air-Handling System Performance

Craig P. Wray; Max H. Sherman; Iain S. Walker; Darryl Dickerhoff; C. C. Federspiel

7.71/Million Btu), the energy increases result in 9 to 18% (

Collaboration


Dive into the Craig P. Wray's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Max H. Sherman

Technical University of Denmark

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Iain S. Walker

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Darryl Dickerhoff

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Iain Walker

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nance E. Matson

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Max H. Sherman

Technical University of Denmark

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

George A. Ban-Weiss

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rick Diamond

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ronnen Levinson

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge