Craig Russell

Complications of Ventilation Tube Insertion in Children With and Without Cleft Palate: A Nested Case-Control Comparison

IMPORTANCE Optimizing hearing in patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) by early recognition and management of otitis media with effusion is essential for speech development. Some evidence has suggested higher complication rates from ventilation tube (VT) insertion in patients with CLP and has led to a trend not to treat these patients surgically. However, studies have failed to match comparison groups for age and sex. OBJECTIVE To compare complication rates from VT insertion in pediatric patients with and without CLP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The study used a nested case-control design to evaluate 60 pediatric patients with CLP who underwent VT insertion at a childrens hospital. The control group of age- and sex-matched patients was selected from a database of 2943 VT insertions. INTERVENTIONS All patients were administered general anesthesia and underwent VT insertion by a pediatric otorhinolaryngology (ENT) team. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomes were numbers of otorrhea complications. Secondarily, rates of attendance at an ENT clinic specifically for complications were evaluated. Finally, numbers of complications other than otorrhea were assessed but not statistically analyzed owing to the varied types and low numbers in each group. RESULTS The control cohort had 151 documented cases of otorrhea compared with 121 in the CLP group (ratio 1.25:1); the difference between groups was not statistically significant (P = .52). There was no significant difference in mean ENT clinic visits per patient for complications between groups (0.80 in the CLP group, 0.78 for controls) (P = .66). Regarding complications other than otorrhea, the control group reported more than the CLP group (43 vs 25; ratio, 1.7:1). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Complication rates of VT placement among patients with CLP were not higher than those among patients without CLP. Therefore, treatment with VT insertion should be administered to patients with CLP under the same guidelines as for those without CLP. Indeed, there could be an argument for a shift in practice toward more aggressive treatment of patients with CLP, who are already vulnerable to speech and social developmental delay.

Socioeconomic influence on orofacial cleft patient care.

Background Cleft lip and palate is the most common craniofacial birth defect in the UK. Orofacial clefts have functional and aesthetic implications requiring intensive multi-disciplinary follow-up to optimise development. Failure to attend follow-up is likely to have a negative impact on patient outcomes. The aim of this retrospective audit is to establish if socioeconomic status influences attendance, DNA and cancellation rates in cleft patients. Methods and results A retrospective audit of 74 orofacial cleft patients born and operated on at the Royal Hospital for Sick Children Glasgow between 2006 and 2007. There was higher rate of DNA in more deprived social groups−21% (SIMD 1) against 10% (SIMD 5). A higher rate of DNA in cleft lip and palate patients was noted. This group of patients showed a marked difference in attendance between SIMD 1 (38%) and SIMD 5 (78%). Conclusion More deprived areas have a higher outpatient DNA rate for cleft patients resulting in suboptimal follow-up. Ultimately, causation of poorer outcomes in this group is likely to be multi-factorial but the financial implication of travelling to multiple clinics should be considered and it may be that resource reallocation is the answer to address the current inequality of health care provision.