Cristina Aurigemma

Plaque rupture and intact fibrous cap assessed by optical coherence tomography portend different outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

AIMS Patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may have different plaque morphologies at the culprit lesion. In particular, plaque rupture (PR) has been shown as the more frequent culprit plaque morphology in ACS. However, its prognostic value is still unknown. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of PR, compared with intact fibrous cap (IFC), in patients with ACS. METHODS AND RESULTS We enrolled consecutive patients admitted to our Coronary Care Unit for ACS and undergoing coronary angiography followed by interpretable optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging. Culprit lesion was classified as PR and IFC by OCT criteria. Prognosis was assessed according to such culprit lesion classification. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were defined as the composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and target lesion revascularization (follow-up mean time 31.58 ± 4.69 months). The study comprised 139 consecutive ACS patients (mean age 64.3 ± 12.0 years, male 73.4%, 92 patients with non-ST elevation ACS and 47 with ST-elevation ACS). Plaque rupture was detected in 82/139 (59%) patients. There were no differences in clinical, angiographic, or procedural data between patients with PR when compared with those having IFC. Major adverse cardiac events occurred more frequently in patients with PR when compared with those having IFC (39.0 vs. 14.0%, P = 0.001). Plaque rupture was an independent predictor of outcome at multivariable analysis (odds ratio 3.735, confidence interval 1.358-9.735). CONCLUSION Patients with ACS presenting with PR as culprit lesion by OCT have a worse prognosis compared with that of patients with IFC. This finding should be taken into account in risk stratification and management of patients with ACS.

Strategies of Clopidogrel Load and Atorvastatin Reload to Prevent Ischemic Cerebral Events in Patients Undergoing Protected Carotid Stenting: Results of the Randomized ARMYDA-9 CAROTID (Clopidogrel and Atorvastatin Treatment During Carotid Artery Stenting) Study

OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate whether a strategy with a 600-mg clopidogrel load and a short-term, high-dose atorvastatin reload would improve outcomes in clopidogrel-naïve, statin-treated patients undergoing protected carotid stenting. BACKGROUND Optimal clopidogrel loading dose during carotid stenting has not been investigated; in addition, statin neuroprotection in this setting has not been described. METHODS A total of 156 patients were randomized using a 2 × 2 factorial design to receive either a 600-mg (n = 78) or 300-mg (n = 78) clopidogrel load given 6 h before intervention and either a atorvastatin reload (n = 76; 80 mg + 40 mg initiating 12 h before the procedure) or no statin reload (n = 80). The primary endpoint was the 30-day incidence of transient ischemic attack/stroke or new ischemic lesions on cerebral diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging performed at 24 to 48 h. RESULTS Occurrence of the primary outcome measure was significantly lower in the 600-mg clopidogrel arm (18% vs. 35.9% in the 300-mg group; p = 0.019) and in the atorvastatin reload arm (18.4% vs. 35.0% in the no statin reload group; p = 0.031). High-dose clopidogrel also significantly reduced the transient ischemic attack/stroke rate at 30 days (0% vs. 9%, p = 0.02, secondary endpoint), without an increase in bleeding risk. CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing carotid stenting, a strategy using both a 600-mg clopidogrel load and a short-term reload with high-dose atorvastatin protects against early ischemic cerebral events. These results, obtained along with routine mechanical neuroprotection, provide new evidence of the optimization of drug therapy before percutaneous carotid intervention. (Clopidogrel and Atorvastatin Treatment During Carotid Artery Stenting [ARMYDA-9 CAROTID]; NCT01572623).

Efficacy of contrast medium induced Pd/Pa ratio in predicting functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenosis assessed by fractional flow reserve: insights from the RINASCI study.

AIMS The need of adenosine administration for the achievement of maximal hyperaemia limits the widespread application of fractional flow reserve (FFR) in the real world. We hypothesised that Pd/Pa ratio registered during submaximal reactive hyperaemia induced by conventional non-ionic radiographic contrast medium (contrast medium induced Pd/Pa ratio: CMR) can be sufficient for the assessment of physiological severity of stenosis in the vast majority of cases. The aim of the present study was to test the accuracy of CMR in comparison to FFR. METHODS AND RESULTS Eighty patients with 104 intermediate coronary stenoses were prospectively and consecutively enrolled. CMR was obtained after intracoronary injection of 6 ml of radiographic contrast medium, while FFR was measured after administration of adenosine. Despite the fact that CMR values were significantly higher than FFR values (0.88 [IR 0.80-0.92] vs. 0.87 [IR 0.83-0.94], p<0.001), a strong correlation between CMR and FFR values was observed (r=0.94, p<0.001) with a close agreement at Bland-Altman analysis (95% CI of disagreement: -0.029 to 0.072). ROC curve analysis showed an excellent accuracy of CMR cut-off of ≤0.83 in predicting FFR value ≤0.80 (AUC 0.97 [95% CI: 0.91-0.99, specificity 96.1, sensitivity 85.7]). Moreover, no FFR value ≤0.80 corresponded to a CMR ≥0.88. CONCLUSIONS CMR is accurate in predicting the functional significance of coronary stenosis. This could allow limiting the use of adenosine to obtain FFR to doubtful cases. In particular, we suggest considering a CMR value ≤0.83 to be significant, a CMR value ≥0.88 as not significant, and inducing maximal hyperaemia using adenosine for FFR assessment when CMR is between 0.84 and 0.87.

Immunosuppressive therapy with oral prednisone to prevent restenosis after PCI. A multicenter randomized trial

BACKGROUND Prednisone at immunosuppressive doses after stenting has shown remarkable efficacy in reducing ischemic recurrences in nondiabetic patients with high post-procedural levels of C-reactive protein; the study aim was to compare the clinical outcome obtained in a control group of patients treated with bare metal stents versus 2 other study groups--bare metal stent plus oral prednisone or drug eluting stents--assuming similar optimal adjunctive medical treatment. METHODS Five tertiary Italian hospitals enrolled 375 nondiabetic patients with coronary artery disease and no contraindications to dual antiplatelet treatment or corticosteroid therapy in a randomized, controlled study performed between 2007 and 2009. Patients were allocated into 3 study groups: bare metal stents (controls), bare metal stents followed by a 40-day prednisone treatment, or drug-eluting stents. The primary endpoint was the event-free survival of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and recurrence of ischemia needing repeated target vessel revascularization at 1 year as adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee. RESULTS One-year follow-up was obtained in all patients. Patients receiving bare metal stents alone as compared to those treated with prednisone or drug-eluting stents had lower event-free survival; the primary endpoint was 80.8% in controls compared to 88.0% in the prednisone and 88.8% in the drug-eluting stent groups, respectively (P=.04 and .006). CONCLUSION Compared with bare metal stents alone, prednisone treatment after bare metal stents or drug-eluting stent implantation result in a better event-free survival at 1 year.

Early and Long-Term Outcomes After Combined Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients With Carotid and Coronary Artery Stenoses

OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate the 30-day and long-term clinical outcomes of patients with carotid obstructive disease (COD) and concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing a combined percutaneous revascularization, in 4 high-volume centers skilled for the treatment of multilevel vascular disease. BACKGROUND The optimal management of patients with COD and concomitant CAD remains controversial. A variety of therapeutic strategies, including coronary artery bypass grafting, alone or in combination with carotid artery revascularization, have been reported. METHODS Between January 2006 and April 2010, 239 consecutive patients with COD (symptomatic carotid stenosis in 20.5%) and concomitant CAD were treated with staged or simultaneous carotid artery stenting and percutaneous coronary intervention, and enrolled in this prospective registry. The primary endpoint was the incidence of major cardiac and cerebrovascular events, including any death, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurring between the first revascularization procedure and 30 days after treatment of the second vascular territory affected. RESULTS The incidence of the primary endpoint at 30 days was 4.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.02 to 7.56). The rate of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke at long-term follow-up (median 520 days) was 4.2%, 2.1%, and 3.8%, respectively. At long-term follow-up, patients with previous cardiovascular disease had significantly higher rates of major cardiac and cerebrovascular events than did patients with a first clinical episode (17% vs. 6%, hazard ratio: 3.34; 95% CI: 1.46 to 7.63; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS In patients with COD and concomitant CAD, a combined percutaneous treatment compares favorably with previous surgical or hybrid experiences. Such strategy may be particularly suited to complex patients at high surgical risk.

Evidence of increased platelet reactivity in the first six months after acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

INTRODUCTION Platelets play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndromes. Accordingly, previous studies showed increased platelet reactivity on admission in these patients. In this study we assessed platelet reactivity at short-medium term follow-up in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty-nine patients (58 ± 11 years, 45 men), treated with primary angioplasty, were studied 1 month after STEMI. Thirty-five patients were retested at 6 months. Twenty matched patients with stable coronary artery disease served as controls. Platelet reactivity was assessed by flow cyometry at rest and at peak exercise, with and without adenosine diphosphate (ADP) stimulation, by measuring monocyte-platelet aggregates (MPAs) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (CD41) expression in the MPA gate, and CD41 and fibrinogen receptor (PAC-1) expression in the platelet gate. RESULTS Compared to controls, basal MPAs and CD41 in the MPA gate were higher in STEMI patients both at 1 month (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively) and at 6 months (p = 0.03 and p = 0.01, respectively). Basal CD41 and PAC-1 expression was also higher in STEMI patients at the two assessments compared to controls (P<0.001 for both). Exercise induced a similar increase in platelet reactivity in patients and controls. ADP induced a higher increase in CD41 platelet expression in STEMI patients compared to controls both at 1 and 6 months (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Platelet reactivity is increased in the first 6 months after STEMI. The persistence of increased platelet reactivity in this time period may play a role in the early recurrence of coronary events after STEMI.

Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Platelet Activation Induced by Coronary Procedures

In this study, we aim to assess whether remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) reduces platelet activation during coronary angiography (CA) and/or percutaneous coronary interventions. We studied 30 patients who underwent CA because of a suspect of stable angina. Patients were randomized to RIPC (3 short episodes of forearm ischemia) or sham RIPC (controls) before the procedure. Blood samples were collected at baseline, at the end of the procedure, and 24 hours later. Monocyte-platelet aggregate (MPA) formation and platelet CD41 in the MPA gate and CD41 and CD62 expression in the platelet gate were assessed by flow cytometry, in the absence and in the presence of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) stimulation. A significant increase in platelet activation occurred during the invasive procedure in controls, which persisted at 24 hours. However, compared with controls, RIPC group showed no or a lower increase in platelet variables, including MPA formation (p <0.0001) and CD41 (p = 0.002) in the MPA gate and CD41 (p <0.0001) and CD62 (p = 0.002) in the platelet gate. ADP increased platelet activation at baseline, but did not further increase platelet reactivity during the invasive procedure in either groups. Percutaneous coronary interventions, performed in 10 patients (6 in the RIPC group and 4 in controls), did not have any further significant effect on platelet activation and reactivity compared with CA alone. In conclusion, RIPC reduces platelet activation occurring during CA. In contrast, no effects were observed on platelet response to ADP stimulation, probably related to the administration of an ADP antagonist in all patients.

Clinical Spectrum and Outcome of Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome and No Obstructive Coronary Atherosclerosis.

BACKGROUND Because approximately 10% of patients with no-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) show no obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD) on angiography, we assessed the spectrum of diagnoses and the predictors of outcome of these patients. METHODSANDRESULTS We studied 178 patients admitted to a coronary care unit with an initial diagnosis of NSTE-ACS, based on clinical, ECG and laboratory data, but found to have NOCAD. The final diagnosis in these patients was heterogeneous; true NSTE-ACS (ie, coronary thrombosis on an unstable plaque) was ascertained in 1 patient (0.6%), whereas diagnosis at discharge was microvascular NSTE-ACS in 56.2% of patients, variant angina in 10.1%, myocarditis in 8.9%, takotsubo disease in 7.9%, tachyarrhythmia-related chest pain in 6.7%, and non-cardiac pain in 9.6%. At 24.5-month follow-up, 21 deaths (11.8%) had occurred, 9 (5.1%) from cardiovascular causes, including 2 (1.12%) coronary deaths. By multivariable Cox analysis, age only predicted global (hazard ratio [HR] 1.07 [1.02-1.12]; P=0.006) and cardiovascular (HR 1.08 [1.01-1.16]; P=0.04) mortality; non-coronary vascular disease was the main predictor of cardiovascular death or readmission for cardiovascular disease (HR 3.28 [1.75-6.14]; P<0.001) and coronary death or readmission for angina (HR 3.20 [1.26-8.14]; P=0.014). CONCLUSIONS Patients with an initial diagnosis of NSTE-ACS constitute a heterogeneous population with different final diagnoses. Patients have a rather high rate of fatal events, most of which, however, are not related to coronary causes. (Circ J 2016; 80: 1600-1606).

Predictors of exercise-induced platelet reactivity in patients with chronic stable angina.

Objective Previous studies have shown that exercise increases platelet reactivity in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the response of platelet reactivity to exercise is considerably variable and its predictors are poorly known. Methods We studied 214 consecutive patients (age 61.9 ± 9 years, 167 men) with stable angina and obstructive coronary artery disease. All patients underwent a symptom-limited treadmill exercise stress test. Venous blood samples were collected before and at peak exercise. Platelet reactivity was assessed by the platelet function analyzer system as the time for flowing whole blood to occlude a collagen–adenosine diphosphate ring (closure time: shorter times = higher reactivity). Both closure time at peak exercise and the exercise-induced change in closure time from rest were assessed as an expression of exercise-related platelet reactivity. Results Closure time decreased significantly with exercise in the whole population (from 95.9 ± 22 to 81.2 ± 18 s, P < 0.001). The only variable significantly associated with closure time at peak exercise was hematocrit (P = 0.003). Basal systolic blood pressure (P = 0.023) and lack of nitrate use (P = 0.03), on the contrary, were the only variables significantly associated with increased exercise-induced closure time change. Peak hematocrit maintained an independent association with peak closure time in multivariable analysis, although the correlation was mild. No variable, on the contrary, was associated with exercise-induced platelet reactivity after correction for basal closure time values at multivariable analyses. Conclusion Among stable coronary artery disease patients, platelet reactivity after exercise cannot be reliably predicted by several common clinical and laboratory variables.

Clinical and procedural impact of aortic arch anatomic variants in carotid stenting procedures

To evaluate the impact of aortic arch variants in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS).