Cristina de la Calle

Clinical characteristics and outcome of elderly patients with community-onset bacteremia.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate characteristics and prognostic factors of community-onset bloodstream infection (Co-BSI) in elderly patients (≥65 years). METHODS Analysis of a prospective series of Co-BSI at a tertiary hospital (2005-2011). Predictors of 30-day mortality were established by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 2605 episodes of Co-BSI were identified and empirical antibiotic treatment was inappropriate in 404 (15.5%). Thirty-day mortality was 11.4% and was independently associated with age (75-84 years OR 1.9, 1.37-2.67; ≥85 OR 2.85, 1.93-4.21), previous hospitalization (OR 1.45, 1.05-2.00), a fatal underlying disease (OR 2.81, 2.10-3.76), neutropenia (OR 2.62, 1.54-4.43), absence of fever (OR 1.99, 1.26-3.12), shock (OR 7.96, 5.83-10.89), inappropriate empirical treatment (OR 1.49, 1.03-2.16), isolation of Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-resistant OR 2.83, 1.38-5.78; methicillin-susceptible OR 3.24, 1.98-5.32), enterococci (OR 2.02, 1.14-3.59) or Enterobacteriaceae resistant to third-generation cephalosporin (3GCR-E) (OR 1.96, 1.16-3.32) and having endovascular non-catheter (OR 4.64, 2.51-8.59), abdominal (OR 3.65, 2.12-6.27), skin/soft tissue (OR 3.48, 1.90-6.37), respiratory (OR 2.80, 1.75-4.50) or unknown (OR 1.83, 1.17-2.87) source. CONCLUSIONS Age is a prognostic factor and appropriateness of empirical treatment is the only modifiable variable. S. aureus, enterococci and 3GCR-E may be the microorganisms with major prognostic significance; hence efforts should be made to improve their management.

Rapid Diagnosis of Staphylococcal Catheter-Related Bacteraemia in Direct Blood Samples by Real-Time PCR

Catheter-related bacteremia (CRB) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients, being staphylococci the main etiologic agents. The objective of this study was to assess the use of a PCR-based assay for detection of staphylococci directly from blood obtained through the catheter to diagnose CRB caused by these microorganisms and to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis. A total of 92 patients with suspected CRB were included in the study. Samples were obtained through the catheter. Paired blood cultures were processed by standard culture methods and 4 ml blood samples were processed by GeneXpert-MRSA assay for the detection of methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) or methicillin-resistant (MRSA) Staphylococcus aureus, and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MR-CoNS). Sixteen CRB caused by staphylococci were diagnosed among 92 suspected patients. GeneXpert detected 14 out of 16 cases (87.5%), including 4 MSSA and 10 MR-CoNS in approximately 1 hour after specimen receipt. The sensitivity and specificity of GeneXpert were 87.5% (CI 95%: 60.4–97.8) and 92.1% (CI 95%: 83–96.7), respectively, compared with standard culture methods. The sensitivity of GeneXpert for S. aureus was 100%. Regarding a cost-effectiveness analysis, the incremental cost of using GeneXpert was of 31.1€ per patient while the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of GeneXpert compared with blood culture alones was about 180€ per life year gained. In conclusion, GeneXpert can be used directly with blood samples obtained through infected catheters to detect S. aureus and MR-CoNS in approximately 1h after sampling. In addition, it is cost-effective especially in areas with high prevalence of staphylococcal CRB.

Usefulness of time-to-positivity in aerobic and anaerobic vials to predict the presence of Candida glabrata in patients with candidaemia

OBJECTIVES To determine whether time-to-positivity (TTP) in aerobic and anaerobic blood culture vials is useful to predict the presence of Candida glabrata in patients with candidaemia. METHODS TTP was recorded for both aerobic and anaerobic vials for each blood culture set of monomicrobial candidaemia. We considered TTP as the shortest time registered for any positive vial. Two diagnostic criteria were evaluated: the cut-off TTP value as obtained from a receiver operating characteristic curve and the detection of growth only or with a shorter TTP in anaerobic vials. RESULTS A total of 157 episodes were analysed of which 19 (12.1%) were due to C. glabrata. The TTP for C. glabrata was longer than that for other species. C. glabrata grew more frequently than other species in anaerobic vials [9/19 (47%) versus 19/138 (14%); P = 0.001] and also more often exclusively or earlier in anaerobic vials [7/19 (37%) versus 5/138 (4%); P < 0.0001]. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of a TTP >56.5 h for predicting the presence of C. glabrata were 47%, 88%, 36% and 92%, respectively. Growth detection only or earlier in anaerobic flasks had a sensitivity of 37%, a specificity of 96%, a PPV of 58% and an NPV of 92%. CONCLUSIONS Using the BACTEC 9240 system, a TTP ≤ 56.5 h is useful to rule out C. glabrata. In addition, in settings with an ~12% prevalence of C. glabrata candidaemia, yeast detection exclusively or earlier in anaerobic vials increases the probability of the presence of C. glabrata to 58%, which may be useful for early treatment optimization.

Time to Positivity and Detection of Growth in Anaerobic Blood Culture Vials Predict the Presence of Candida glabrata in Candidemia: a Two-Center European Cohort Study

ABSTRACT This study shows the accuracy of exclusive or earlier growth in anaerobic vials to predict Candida glabrata in a large series of candidemic patients from two European hospitals using the Bactec 9240 system. Alternatively, C. glabrata can be predicted by a time to positivity cutoff value, which should be determined for each setting.

A randomized clinical trial comparing ritonavir-boosted lopinavir versus maraviroc each with tenofovir plus emtricitabine for post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection

OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to assess post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) non-completion at day 28, comparing ritonavir-boosted lopinavir versus maraviroc, both with tenofovir disoproxil/emtricitabine as the backbone. METHODS We conducted a prospective, open, randomized clinical trial. Individuals attending the emergency room because of potential sexual exposure to HIV and who met criteria for receiving PEP were randomized to one of two groups: tenofovir disoproxil/emtricitabine (245/200 mg) once daily plus either ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (400/100 mg) or maraviroc (300 mg) twice daily. Five follow-up visits were scheduled for days 1, 10, 28, 90 and 180. The primary endpoint was PEP non-completion at day 28. Secondary endpoints were adherence, adverse events and rate of seroconversions. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01533272. RESULTS One-hundred-and-seventeen individuals were randomized to receive ritonavir-boosted lopinavir and 120 to maraviroc (n = 237). PEP non-completion at day 28 was 38% (n = 89), with significant differences between arms [ritonavir-boosted lopinavir 44% (n = 51) versus maraviroc 32% (n = 38), P = 0.05]. We performed a modified ITT analysis including only those patients who attended on day 1 (n = 182). PEP non-completion in this subgroup was also significantly higher in the ritonavir-boosted lopinavir arm (27% versus 13%, P = 0.004). The proportion of patients with low adherence was similar between arms (52% versus 47%, P = 0.56). Adverse events were reported by 111 patients and were significantly more common in the ritonavir-boosted lopinavir arm (72% versus 51%, P = 0.003). No seroconversions were observed during the study. CONCLUSIONS PEP non-completion and adverse events were both significantly higher in patients allocated to ritonavir-boosted lopinavir. These data suggest that maraviroc is a well-tolerated antiretroviral that can be used in this setting.

Influence of empirical double-active combination antimicrobial therapy compared with active monotherapy on mortality in patients with septic shock: a propensity score-adjusted and matched analysis—authors’ response

Objectives To evaluate the influence on mortality of empirical double-active combination antimicrobial therapy (DACT) compared with active monotherapy (AM) in septic shock patients. Methods A retrospective study was performed of monomicrobial septic shock patients admitted to a university centre during 2010-15. A propensity score (PS) was calculated using a logistic regression model taking the assigned therapy as the dependent variable, and used as a covariate in multivariate analysis predicting 7, 15 and 30 day mortality and for matching patients who received DACT or AM. Multivariate models comprising the assigned therapy group and the PS were built for specific patient subgroups. Results Five-hundred and seventy-six patients with monomicrobial septic shock who received active empirical antimicrobial therapy were included. Of these, 340 received AM and 236 DACT. No difference in 7, 15 and 30 day all-cause mortality was found between groups either in the PS-adjusted multivariate logistic regression analysis or in the PS-matched cohorts. However, in patients with neutropenia, DACT was independently associated with a better outcome at 15 (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09-0.92) and 30 (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08-0.79) days, while in patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection DACT was associated with lower 7 (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.7) and 30 day (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08-0.92) mortality. Conclusions All-cause mortality at 7, 15 and 30 days was similar in patients with monomicrobial septic shock receiving empirical double-active combination therapy and active monotherapy. However, a beneficial influence of empirical double-active combination on mortality in patients with neutropenia and those with P. aeruginosa infection is worthy of further study.

Evaluation of ceftazidime/avibactam for serious infections due to multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

OBJECTIVES The steady progress in resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) has led to difficulties in treating infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) has in vitro activity against many of these strains, however clinical experience with CAZ/AVI is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of eight patients with infections due to MDR- or XDR-PA treated with CAZ/AVI, including four strains resistant to ceftolozane/tazobactam. METHODS This was a retrospective descriptive study of patients admitted to a teaching hospital between January 2016 and May 2017 who received CAZ/AVI as initial or continuation therapy for infection due to MDR- and XDR-PA. RESULTS The sources of infection were hospital-acquired lower respiratory tract infection in five patients (62.5%) and osteomyelitis, meningitis and catheter-related bacteraemia in one patient each. Clinical cure was achieved in 4 patients (50.0%). The 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were 12.5% and 37.5%, respectively. One patient (12.5%) developed encephalopathy that improved with discontinuation of the drug. CONCLUSIONS CAZ/AVI may be a valuable option for serious infections due to resistant PA.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine plus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir or cobicistat-boosted elvitegravir as a single-tablet regimen for HIV post-exposure prophylaxis

Objectives To assess HIV-1 post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) non-completion at day 28, comparing ritonavir-boosted lopinavir versus cobicistat-boosted elvitegravir as a single-tablet regimen (STR), using tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine with both of these therapies. Methods A prospective, open, randomized clinical trial was performed. Individuals attending the emergency room due to potential sexual exposure to HIV and who met criteria for PEP were randomized 1:3 into two groups receiving either 400/100 mg of lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 38) or 150/150 mg of elvitegravir/cobicistat (n = 119), with both groups also receiving 245/200 mg of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine. Five follow-up visits were scheduled at days 1, 10, 28, 90 and 180. The primary endpoint was PEP non-completion at day 28. Secondary endpoints were adherence, adverse effects and rate of seroconversions. Clinical trials.gov number: NCT08431173. Results Median age was 32 years and 95% were males. PEP non-completion at day 28 was 36% (n = 57), with a trend to be higher in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm [lopinavir/ritonavir 47% (n = 18) versus elvitegravir/cobicistat 33% (n = 39), P = 0.10]. We performed a modified ITT analysis including only those patients who attended on day 1. PEP non-completion in this subgroup was higher in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm than in the elvitegravir/cobicistat arm (33% versus 15%, respectively, P = 0.04). Poor adherence was significantly higher in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm versus the elvitegravir/cobicistat arm (47% versus 9%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Adverse events were reported by 73 patients (59%), and were significantly more common in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm (90% versus 49%, P = 0.0001). A seroconversion was observed in the elvitegravir/cobicistat arm in a patient with multiple exposures before and after PEP. Conclusions A higher PEP non-completion, poor adherence and adverse events were observed in patients allocated to the lopinavir/ritonavir arm, suggesting that STR elvitegravir/cobicistat is a well-tolerated antiretroviral for PEP.