Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Cristina De Lorenzo is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Cristina De Lorenzo.


Headache | 2002

Acupuncture in the prophylactic treatment of migraine without aura: a comparison with flunarizine

Gianni Allais; Cristina De Lorenzo; Piero E. Quirico; Gisella Airola; Giampiero Tolardo; Ornella Mana; Chiara Benedetto

Objectives.—In a randomized controlled trial extending over 6 months, we evaluated the effectiveness of acupuncture versus flunarizine in the prophylactic treatment of migraine without aura.


Headache | 1989

Relevance of Prostaglandins in True Menstrual Migraine

G. Nattero; Gianni Allais; Cristina De Lorenzo; Chiara Benedetto; Marina Zonca; E. Melzi; Marco Massobrio

SYNOPSIS


Headache | 1988

Menstrual Migraine: New Biochemical and Psychological Aspects

Giovanni Nattaro; Gianni Aliais; Cristina De Lorenzo; Eugenio Torre; Mario Ancona; Chiara Benedetto; Marco Massobrio

SYNOPSIS


Headache | 1989

Psychological aspects of weekend headache sufferers in comparison with migraine patients.

G. Nattero; Cristina De Lorenzo; Lucia Biale; Gianni Allais; Eugenio Torre; Mario Ancona

SYNOPSIS


Neurological Sciences | 2010

The risks of women with migraine during pregnancy.

Gianni Allais; Ilaria Castagnoli Gabellari; Paola Borgogno; Cristina De Lorenzo; Chiara Benedetto

Most epidemiological studies demonstrate that women suffering from migraine note a significant improvement in their headaches during pregnancy. Both headache specialists and gynecologists commonly hold that migraine does not involve any risks to either the mother, or the fetus. Despite this, recent studies into the medical complications of pregnancy in migrainous women have cast doubts on this assumption. Indeed, most of these studies have revealed a significant association between migraine and hypertension in pregnancy (i.e. preeclampsia and gestational hypertension). Migraine has also been recently postulated as one of the major risk factors for stroke during pregnancy and the puerperium. Therefore, there is an urgent need for prospective studies on large numbers of pregnant women to determine the real existence and extent of the risks posed by migraine during pregnancy. In the meantime, while awaiting verification of this hypothesis, a pregnant woman with migraine must be subject to a particularly attentive screening by both the obstetrician and the headache specialist.


Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics | 2009

Oral contraceptives in migraine

Gianni Allais; Ilaria Castagnoli Gabellari; Cristina De Lorenzo; Ornella Mana; Chiara Benedetto

Combined oral contraceptives are a safe and highly effective method of birth control, but they can also raise problems of clinical tolerability and/or safety in migraine patients. It is now commonly accepted that, in migraine with aura, the use of combined oral contraceptives is always contraindicated, and that their intake must also be suspended by patients suffering from migraine without aura if aura symptoms appear. The newest combined oral contraceptive formulations are generally well tolerated in migraine without aura, and the majority of migraine without aura sufferers do not show any problems with their use; nevertheless, the last International Classification of Headache Disorders identifies at least two entities evidently related to the use of combined oral contraceptives: exogenous hormone-induced headache and estrogen-withdrawal headache. As regards the safety, even if both migraine and combined oral contraceptive intake are associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke, migraine without aura per se is not a contraindication for combined oral contraceptive use. Other risk factors (tobacco use, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity and diabetes) must be carefully considered when prescribing combined oral contraceptives in migraine without aura patients, in particular in women aged over 35 years. Furthermore, the exclusion of a hereditary thrombophilia and of alterations of coagulative parameters should precede any decision of combined oral contraceptive prescription in migraine patients.


Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics | 2007

Menstrual migraine: clinical and therapeutical aspects

Gianni Allais; Ilaria Castagnoli Gabellari; Cristina De Lorenzo; Ornella Mana; Chiara Benedetto

Estrogens fluctuations, particularly their premenstrual fall, are currently regarded as the main triggers of menstrual migraine (MM). MM presents in two clinical forms: pure MM, where attacks are confined to the perimenstrual period (PMP), and menstrually related migraine, where attacks always occur during, but are not confined to, the PMP. MM episodes are usually longer, more intense, more disabling and more refractory than nonmenstrual attacks. Acute management of MM should initially be abortive and primarily sought with triptans. If this fails, short-term perimenstrual prophylaxis with NSAIDs, coxibs, triptans or ergotamine derivatives can be considered. Hormone manipulations, mainly application of percutaneous estradiol gel in PMP or administration of oral contraceptives in extended cycles, constitute an alternative approach for nonresponders.


Neurological Sciences | 2008

Oral contraceptive-induced menstrual migraine. Clinical aspects and response to frovatriptan

Gianni Allais; Gennaro Bussone; Gisella Airola; Paola Borgogno; Ilaria Castagnoli Gabellari; Cristina De Lorenzo; Elena Pavia; Chiara Benedetto

Oral contraceptive-induced menstrual migraine (OCMM) is a poorly defined migraine subtype mainly triggered by the cyclic pill suspension. In this pilot, open-label trial we describe its clinical features and evaluate the efficacy of frovatriptan in the treatment of its acute attack. During the first 3 months of the study 20 women (mean age 32.2±7.0, range 22–46) with a 6-month history of pure OCMM recorded, in monthly diary cards, clinical information about their migraine. During the 4th menstrual cycle they treated an OCMM attack with frovatriptan 2.5 mg. The majority of attacks were moderate/severe and lasted 25–72 h or more, in the presence of usual treatment. Generally an OCMM attack appeared within the first 5 days after the pill suspension, but in 15% of cases it started later. After frovatriptan administration, headache intensity progressively decreased (2.4 at onset, 1.6 after 2 h, 1.1 after 4 h and 0.8 after 24 h; p=0.0001). In 55% of patients pain relief was reported after 2 h. Ten percent of subjects were pain-free subjects after 2 h, 35% after 4 h and 60% after 24 h (p=0.003 for trend); 36% relapsed within 24 h. Rescue medication was needed by 35% of patients; 50% of frovatriptan-treated required a second dose. Concomitant nausea and/or vomiting, photophobia and phonophobia decreased significantly after drug intake. OCMM is a severe form of migraine; actually its clinical features are not always exactly identified by the ICHD-II classification. However, treatment with frovatriptan 2.5 mg might be effective in its management.


Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics | 2014

The efficacy and tolerability of frovatriptan and dexketoprofen for the treatment of acute migraine attacks.

Gianni Allais; Sara Rolando; Cristina De Lorenzo; Chiara Benedetto

Frovatriptan is a triptan characterized by a high affinity for 5-HT1B/1D receptors and a long half-life contributing to a more sustained and prolonged action than other triptans. Dexketoprofen is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug with a relatively short half-life and rapid onset of action, blocking the action of cyclo-oxygenase, which is involved in prostaglandins’ production, thus reducing inflammation and pain. Both drugs have been successfully employed as monotherapies for the treatment of acute migraine attacks. The combination of these two drugs (frovatriptan 2.5 mg plus dexketoprofen 25 or 37.5 mg) has been tested in migraine sufferers, showing a rapid and good initial efficacy, with 2-h pain free rates of 51%, and a high persistence in the 48-h following the onset of pain: recurrence occurred in only 29% of attacks and sustained pain free rates were 43% at 24- and 33% at 48-h.


Cephalalgia | 1985

Flunarizine in the treatment of headache with or without neurological symptoms.

G. Nattero; Lidia Savi; Cristina De Lorenzo

Flunarizine was given in daily doses of 10 mg for periods of two to four months to 176 patients suffering from various types of headache. The symptoms were improved in 82% of the cases treated. No differences emerged among the various types of headache reported by the patients or in relation to the presence or absence of neurological involvement or its type.

Collaboration


Dive into the Cristina De Lorenzo's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gennaro Bussone

Carlo Besta Neurological Institute

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge