Cynthia B. Peterson

Slow amyloid nucleation via α-helix-rich oligomeric intermediates in short polyglutamine-containing huntingtin fragments.

The 17-amino-acid N-terminal segment (htt(NT)) that leads into the polyglutamine (polyQ) segment in the Huntingtons disease protein huntingtin (htt) dramatically increases aggregation rates and changes the aggregation mechanism, compared to a simple polyQ peptide of similar length. With polyQ segments near or above the pathological repeat length threshold of about 37, aggregation of htt N-terminal fragments is so rapid that it is difficult to tease out mechanistic details. We describe here the use of very short polyQ repeat lengths in htt N-terminal fragments to slow this disease-associated aggregation. Although all of these peptides, in addition to htt(NT) itself, form α-helix-rich oligomeric intermediates, only peptides with Q(N) of eight or longer mature into amyloid-like aggregates, doing so by a slow increase in β-structure. Concentration-dependent circular dichroism and analytical ultracentrifugation suggest that the htt(NT) sequence, with or without added glutamine residues, exists in solution as an equilibrium between disordered monomer and α-helical tetramer. Higher order, α-helix rich oligomers appear to be built up via these tetramers. However, only htt(NT)Q(N) peptides with N=8 or more undergo conversion into polyQ β-sheet aggregates. These final amyloid-like aggregates not only feature the expected high β-sheet content but also retain an element of solvent-exposed α-helix. The α-helix-rich oligomeric intermediates appear to be both on- and off-pathway, with some oligomers serving as the pool from within which nuclei emerge, while those that fail to undergo amyloid nucleation serve as a reservoir for release of monomers to support fibril elongation. Based on a regular pattern of multimers observed in analytical ultracentrifugation, and a concentration dependence of α-helix formation in CD spectroscopy, it is likely that these oligomers assemble via a four-helix assembly unit. PolyQ expansion in these peptides appears to enhance the rates of both oligomer formation and nucleation from within the oligomer population, by structural mechanisms that remain unclear.

Plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 promotes the self-association of vitronectin into complexes exhibiting altered incorporation into the extracellular matrix

Serine proteinase inhibitors, including plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) and antithrombin, are key regulators of hemostatic processes such as thrombosis and wound healing. Much evidence suggests that PAI-1 can influence such processes, as well as pathological events like tumor metastasis, through its ability to directly regulate binding of blood platelets and cells to extracellular substrata. One way that PAI-1 influences these processes may be mediated through its binding to the plasma protein vitronectin. Binding to PAI-1 results in the incorporation of vitronectin into a higher order complex with a potential for multivalent interactions (Podor, T. J., Shaughnessy, S. G., Blackburn, M. N., and Peterson, C. B. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 25402–25410). In this study, evidence is provided to support this concept from studies on the effects of PAI-1-induced multimerization on the interactions of vitronectin with matrix components and cell surface receptors. By monitoring complex formation and stability over time using size-exclusion high performance liquid chromatography, a correlation is made between PAI-1-induced multimerization and enhanced cell/matrix binding properties of vitronectin. This evidence indicates that PAI-1 alters the adhesive functions of vitronectin by converting the protein via the higher order complex to a self-associated, multivalent species that is functionally distinct from the abundant monomeric form found in the circulation.

The Use of Fluorescent Probes to Characterize Conformational Changes in the Interaction between Vitronectin and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), the primary inhibitor of tissue-type plasminogen activator and urokinase, is known to convert readily to a latent form by insertion of the reactive center loop into a central β-sheet. Interaction with vitronectin stabilizes PAI-1 and decreases the rate of conversion to the latent form, but conformational effects of vitronectin on the reactive center loop of PAI-1 have not been documented. Mutant forms of PAI-1 were designed with a cysteine substitution at either position P1′ or P9 of the reactive center loop. Labeling of the unique cysteine with a sulfhydryl-reactive fluorophore provides a probe that is sensitive to vitronectin binding. Results indicate that the scissile P1-P1′ bond of PAI-1 is more solvent exposed upon interaction with vitronectin, whereas the N-terminal portion of the reactive loop does not experience a significant change in its environment. These results were complemented by labeling vitronectin with an arginine-specific coumarin probe which compromises heparin binding but does not interfere with PAI-1 binding to the protein. Dissociation constants of approximately 100 nM are calculated for the vitronectin/PAI-1 interaction from titrations using both fluorescent probes. Furthermore, experiments in which PAI-1 failed to compete with heparin for binding to vitronectin argue for separate binding sites for the two ligands on vitronectin.

Model for the three‐dimensional structure of vitronectin: Predictions for the multi‐domain protein from threading and docking

The structure of vitronectin, an adhesive protein that circulates in high concentrations in human plasma, was predicted through a combination of computational methods and experimental approaches. Fold recognition and sequence–structure alignment were performed using the threading program PROSPECT for each of three structural domains, i.e., the N‐terminal somatomedin B domain (residues 1–53), the central region that folds into a four‐bladed β‐propeller domain (residues 131–342), and the C‐terminal heparin‐binding domain (residues 347–459). The atomic structure of each domain was generated using MODELLER, based on the alignment obtained from threading. Docking experiments between the central and C‐terminal domains were conducted using the program GRAMM, with limits on the degrees of freedom from a known inter‐domain disulfide bridge. The docked structure has a large inter‐domain contact surface and defines a putative heparin‐binding groove at the inter‐domain interface. We also docked heparin together with the combined structure of the central and C‐terminal domains, using GRAMM. The predictions from the threading and docking experiments are consistent with experimental data on purified plasma vitronectin pertaining to protease sensitivity, ligand‐binding sites, and buried cysteines. Proteins 2001;44:312–320.

New Insights into the Size and Stoichiometry of the Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor Type-1·Vitronectin Complex

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-type 1 (PAI-1) is the primary inhibitor of endogenous plasminogen activators that generate plasmin in the vicinity of a thrombus to initiate thrombolysis, or in the pericellular region of cells to facilitate migration and/or tissue remodeling. It has been shown that the physiologically relevant form of PAI-1 is in a complex with the abundant plasma glycoprotein, vitronectin. The interaction between vitronectin and PAI-1 is important for stabilizing the inhibitor in a reactive conformation. Although the complex is clearly significant, information is vague regarding the composition of the complex and consequences of its formation on the distribution and activity of vitronectin in vivo. Most studies have assumed a 1:1 interaction between the two proteins, but this has not been demonstrated experimentally and is a matter of some controversy since more than one PAI-1-binding site has been proposed within the sequence of vitronectin. To address this issue, competition studies using monoclonal antibodies specific for separate epitopes confirmed that the two distinct PAI-1-binding sites present on vitronectin can be occupied simultaneously. Analytical ultracentrifugation was used also for a rigorous analysis of the composition and sizes of complexes formed from purified vitronectin and PAI-1. The predominant associating species observed was high in molecular weight (M r ∼ 320,000), demonstrating that self-association of vitronectin occurs upon interaction with PAI-1. Moreover, the size of this higher order complex indicates that two molecules of PAI-1 bind per vitronectin molecule. Binding of PAI-1 to vitronectin and association into higher order complexes is proposed to facilitate interaction with macromolecules on surfaces.

A Deletion Mutant of Vitronectin Lacking the Somatomedin B Domain Exhibits Residual Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1-binding Activity

Vitronectin and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) are important physiological binding partners that work in concert to regulate cellular adhesion, migration, and fibrinolysis. The high affinity binding site for PAI-1 is located within the N-terminal somatomedin B domain of vitronectin; however, several studies have suggested a second PAI-1-binding site within vitronectin. To investigate this secondary site, a vitronectin mutant lacking the somatomedin B domain (rΔsBVN) was engineered. The short deletion had no effect on heparin-binding, integrin-binding, or cellular adhesion. Binding to the urokinase receptor was completely abolished while PAI-1 binding was still observed, albeit with a lower affinity. Analytical ultracentrifugation on the PAI-1-vitronectin complex demonstrated that increasing NaCl concentration favors 1:1 versus 2:1 PAI-1-vitronectin complexes and hampers formation of higher order complexes, pointing to the contribution of charge-charge interactions for PAI-1 binding to the second site. Furthermore, fluorescence resonance energy transfer between differentially labeled PAI-1 molecules confirmed that two independent molecules of PAI-1 are capable of binding to vitronectin. These results support a model for the assembly of higher order PAI-1-vitronectin complexes via two distinct binding sites in both proteins.

Orientation of Heparin-binding Sites in Native Vitronectin ANALYSES OF LIGAND BINDING TO THE PRIMARY GLYCOSAMINOGLYCAN-BINDING SITE INDICATE THAT PUTATIVE SECONDARY SITES ARE NOT FUNCTIONAL

A primary heparin-binding site in vitronectin has been localized to a cluster of cationic residues near the C terminus of the protein. More recently, secondary binding sites have been proposed. In order to investigate whether the binding site originally identified on vitronectin functions as an exclusive and independent heparin-binding domain, solution binding methods have been used in combination with NMR and recombinant approaches to evaluate ligand binding to the primary site. Evaluation of the ionic strength dependence of heparin binding to vitronectin according to classical linkage theory indicates that a single ionic bond is prominent. It had been previously shown that chemical modification of vitronectin using an arginine-reactive probe results in a significant reduction in heparin binding (Gibson, A., Baburaj, K., Day, D. E., Verhamme, I., Shore, J. D., and Peterson, C. B. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 5112–5121). The label has now been localized to arginine residues within the cyanogen bromide fragment-(341–380) that contains the primary heparin-binding site on vitronectin. One- and two-dimensional NMR on model peptides based on this primary heparin-binding site indicate that an arginine residue participates in the ionic interaction and that other nonionic interactions may be involved in forming a complex with heparin. A recombinant polypeptide corresponding to the C-terminal 129 amino acids of vitronectin exhibits heparin-binding affinity that is comparable to that of full-length vitronectin and is equally effective at neutralizing heparin anticoagulant activity. Results from this broad experimental approach argue that the behavior of the primary site is sufficient to account for the heparin binding activity of vitronectin and support an exposed orientation for the site in the structure of the native protein.

Tissue‐type plasminogen activator‐plasmin‐BDNF modulate glutamate‐induced phase‐shifts of the mouse suprachiasmatic circadian clock in vitro

The mammalian circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) maintains environmental synchrony through light signals transmitted by glutamate released from retinal ganglion terminals. Brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is required for light/glutamate to reset the clock. In the hippocampus, BDNF is activated by the extracellular protease, plasmin, which is produced from plasminogen by tissue‐type plasminogen activator (tPA). We provide data showing expression of proteins from the plasminogen activation cascade in the SCN and their involvement in circadian clock phase‐resetting. Early night glutamate application to SCN‐containing brain slices resets the circadian clock. Plasminogen activator inhibitor‐1 (PAI‐1) blocked these shifts in slices from wild‐type mice but not mice lacking its stabilizing protein, vitronectin (VN). Plasmin, but not plasminogen, prevented inhibition by PAI‐1. Both plasmin and active BDNF reversed α2‐antiplasmin inhibition of glutamate‐induced shifts. α2‐Antiplasmin decreased the conversion of inactive to active BDNF in the SCN. Finally, both tPA and BDNF allowed daytime glutamate‐induced phase‐resetting. Together, these data are the first to demonstrate expression of these proteases in the SCN, their involvement in modulating photic phase‐shifts, and their activation of BDNF in the SCN, a potential ‘gating’ mechanism for photic phase‐resetting. These data also demonstrate a functional interaction between PAI‐1 and VN in adult brain. Given the usual association of these proteins with the extracellular matrix, these data suggest new lines of investigation into the locations and processes modulating mammalian circadian clock phase‐resetting.

Native and Multimeric Vitronectin Exhibit Similar Affinity for Heparin DIFFERENCES IN HEPARIN BINDING PROPERTIES INDUCED UPON DENATURATION ARE DUE TO SELF-ASSOCIATION INTO A MULTIVALENT FORM

For many years, the concept that the heparin-binding sequence is sequestered within vitronectin and exposed upon denaturation of the protein has guided experimental design and interpretation of related structure-function studies on the protein. To evaluate binding of heparin to both native and denatured/renatured vitronectin, methods for monitoring binding in solution have been developed. A fluorescence method based on changes in an extrinsic probe attached to heparin has been used to evaluate heparin binding to native and denatured/renatured vitronectin. This approach indicates that there are not major differences in intrinsic heparin-binding affinities between native and renatured protein and invalidate the currently accepted model for a cryptic heparin-binding sequence in the protein. Denaturation and renaturation of vitronectin under near physiological solution conditions is accompanied invariably by self-association of the protein into a multimeric form (Zhuang, P., Blackburn, M. N., and Peterson, C. B. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 14323-14332), resulting in exposure of multiple heparin-binding sites on the surface of the oligomer. On the basis of the binding data from solution studies and interaction of the native monomer and the denatured multimeric form of vitronectin with a heparin column, along with evaluation of the ionic strength dependence of heparin binding to these vitronectin forms in solution, an alternative model is favored to account for the altered heparin binding properties of vitronectin associated with denaturation of the protein. This model proposes that multivalent interactions between heparin and multimeric vitronectin are responsible for differences in heparin affinity chromatography and ionic strength dependence compared with the native protein.

Characterization of a Site on PAI-1 That Binds to Vitronectin Outside of the Somatomedin B Domain

Vitronectin and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) are proteins that interact in the circulatory system and pericellular region to regulate fibrinolysis, cell adhesion, and migration. The interactions between the two proteins have been attributed primarily to binding of the somatomedin B (SMB) domain, which comprises the N-terminal 44 residues of vitronectin, to the flexible joint region of PAI-1, including residues Arg-103, Met-112, and Gln-125 of PAI-1. A strategy for deletion mutagenesis that removes the SMB domain demonstrates that this mutant form of vitronectin retains PAI-1 binding (Schar, C. R., Blouse, G. E., Minor, K. M., and Peterson, C. B. (2008) J. Biol. Chem. 283, 10297–10309). In the current study, the complementary binding site on PAI-1 was mapped by testing for the ability of a battery of PAI-1 mutants to bind to the engineered vitronectin lacking the SMB domain. This approach identified a second, separate site for interaction between vitronectin and PAI-1. The binding of PAI-1 to this site was defined by a set of mutations in PAI-1 distinct from the mutations that disrupt binding to the SMB domain. Using the mutations in PAI-1 to map the second site suggested interactions between α-helices D and E in PAI-1 and a site in vitronectin outside of the SMB domain. The affinity of this second interaction exhibited a KD value ∼100-fold higher than that of the PAI-1-somatomedin B interaction. In contrast to the PAI-1-somatomedin B binding, the second interaction had almost the same affinity for active and latent PAI-1. We hypothesize that, together, the two sites form an extended binding area that may promote assembly of higher order vitronectin-PAI-1 complexes.