Cynthia Gyamfi
Columbia University Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Cynthia Gyamfi.
Clinics in Perinatology | 2008
Karin Fuchs; Cynthia Gyamfi
In this article, the authors review the standard management of several maternal and fetal complications of pregnancy and examine the effect these practices may have on the late preterm birth rate. Given the increasing rate of late preterm birth and the increased recognition of the morbidity and mortality associated with delivery between 34 and 37 weeks, standard obstetric practices and practice patterns leading to late preterm birth should be critically evaluated. The possibility of expectant management of some pregnancy complications in the late preterm period should be investigated. Furthermore, prospective research is warranted to investigate the role of antenatal corticosteroids beyond 34 weeks.
Seminars in Perinatology | 2012
Sara Brubaker; Cynthia Gyamfi
The incidence of twin gestation has increased significantly over the past 30 years. One of the most significant public health implications of this trend is the increased incidence of preterm birth (PTB). Efforts to improve neonatal outcomes must address the rate of PTB, particularly among multiple gestations, which contribute a disproportionate share to the burden of PTB and neonatal morbidity. There is evidence that sonographic cervical length assessment and fetal fibronectin testing can identify twin pregnancies at risk for PTB, but, to date, there are no proven interventions for prevention of PTB in this population. Perhaps the most promising is vaginal progesterone, which has been shown to reduce the risk of PTB in a cohort of women that included twin gestations. However, the study lacked statistical power to definitively answer this question. Identification of an appropriate treatment for twin gestations recognized to be at increased risk for prematurity will help to decrease overall rate of PTB, a significant public health problem in the United States.
Journal of Psychosomatic Research | 2013
Julie Spicer; Elizabeth Werner; Yihong Zhao; Chien Wen Choi; Sara López-Pintado; Tianshu Feng; Margaret Altemus; Cynthia Gyamfi; Catherine Monk
OBJECTIVEnPregnant adolescents have high rates of poor birth outcomes, but the causes are unclear. We present a prospective, longitudinal study of pregnant adolescents assessing associations between maternal psychobiological stress indices and offspring gestational age at birth and birthweight.nnnMETHODnHealthy nulliparous pregnant adolescents were recruited (n=205) and followed during pregnancy. Ambulatory assessments over 24h of perceived psychological stress (collected every 30 min) and salivary cortisol (6 samples) and a summary questionnaire, the Perceived Stress Scale, were collected at three time points (13-16, 24-27, and 34-37 gestational weeks). Corticotropin-releasing hormone, C-reactive protein, and interleukin 6 were assayed from blood taken at the latter 2 sessions. A final sample of 119 participants was selected for analyses.nnnRESULTSnThe ambulatory assessment of perceived psychological stress was positively correlated with the Perceived Stress Scale (r=.20, p=.03) but neither was associated with any of the biological assays (all ps>.20). Based on backward selection regression models that included all stress variables and relevant covariates, the ambulatory assessments of perceived psychological stress and cortisol - though not the Perceived Stress Scale - were negatively associated with gestational age at birth (F(4, 107)=3.38, p=.01) while cortisol was negatively related to birthweight (F(5, 107)=14.83, p<.0001).nnnCONCLUSIONSnTargeted interventions to reduce psychological and biological indicators of heightened stress during pregnancy may have positive public health benefits for the offspring given the associations of shortened gestation and lower birthweight with risk for poor mental and physical health outcomes.
American Journal of Perinatology Reports | 2017
Julio Mateus; Roger B. Newman; Baha M. Sibai; Qing Li; John R. Barton; C. Andrew Combs; Edwin R. Guzman; Kim Boggess; Cynthia Gyamfi; Peter von Dadelszen; Doug Woelkers
Objectiveu2003The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of preeclamptic pregnancies according to the proteinuria level. Study Designu2003Secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study of women with preeclampsia (PE) symptomatology. Nonproteinuria, mild-proteinuria, and massive-proteinuria PEs were defined as:u2009<u2009165u2009mg in 12 hours oru2009<u2009300u2009mg in 24 hours, 165u2009mg to 2.69u2009g in 12 hours or 300u2009mg to 4.99u2009g in 24 hours, andu2009≥u20092.7u2009g in 12 hours oru2009≥u20095.0u2009g in 24 hours, respectively. Individual and composite maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes were compared among the PE groups. Resultsu2003Of the 406 analyzed pregnancies, 36 (8.8%) had massive-proteinuria PE, 268 (66.0%) mild-proteinuria PE, and 102 (25.1%) nonproteinuria PE. Compared with the other groups, massive-proteinuria PE women had significantly higher blood pressures (pu2009<u20090.001), epigastric pain (pu2009=u20090.007), and uric acid serum levels (pu2009<u20090.001) prior to delivery. Composite maternal morbidity was similar across the groups. Deliveryu2009<u2009340/7 weeks occurred in 80.6, 49.3, and 22.5% of massive-proteinuria, mild-proteinuria, and nonproteinuria PE groups, respectively (pu2009<u20090.0001). Composite adverse neonatal outcomes were significantly higher in the massive-proteinuria PE compared with the other groups (pu2009=u20090.001). Conclusionu2003While potentially not important diagnostically, massive proteinuria is associated with more severe clinical manifestations of PE prompting earlier delivery.
Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America | 2007
Cynthia Gyamfi; Richard L. Berkowitz
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2007
Karin Fuchs; Omar Maurice Young; Phyllis Gyamfi; Cynthia Gyamfi
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2011
William A. Grobman; Sean C. Blackwell; Cynthia Gyamfi; Leah Antoniewicz; Maria Hutchinson
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2013
Cara Pessel; Saila Moni; Noelia Zork; Sara Brubaker; Samantha Do; Joy Vink; Karin Fuchs; Chia-Ling Nhan-Chang; Cande Ananth; Cynthia Gyamfi
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2012
Kobina Ghartey; Jaclyn Coletta; Liza Lizarraga; Elizabeth Murphy; Cande Ananth; Cynthia Gyamfi
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2012
Jaclyn Coletta; Russell Miller; Zachary Rubeo; Sean C. Blackwell; William A. Grobman; Cynthia Gyamfi; Mary E. D'Alton