Cynthia Milluzzi
Case Western Reserve University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Cynthia Milluzzi.
Reproductive Sciences | 2010
Brian M. Mercer; Adli Abdelrahim; Robert M. Moore; Jillian Novak; Deepak Kumar; Joseph M. Mansour; Marina Perez-Fournier; Cynthia Milluzzi; John J. Moore
Generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) has been suggested as a mechanism of fetal membrane (FM) weakening leading to rupture, particularly with preterm premature rupture of the fetal membranes (PROM). In vitro, FM incubation with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) mimics physiological FM weakening, concomitant with generation of ROS and collagen remodeling. Proinflammatory cytokines are also postulated to have a role in the development of the FM physiological weak zone where rupture normally initiates in-term gestations. We hypothesized that antioxidant treatment may block ROS development and resultant FM weakening. Two studies examining antioxidant effects upon FM strength were conducted, one in vivo and the other in vitro. Fetal membrane of patients enrolled in a multicenter placebo-controlled trial to determine the effect of vitamin C (1 g/day) and vitamin E (400 IU/day) upon complications of pre-eclampsia were examined for FM biomechanical properties and biochemical remodeling at birth. Separately, biomechanics and biochemical markers of remodeling were determined in FM fragments incubated with TNF with or without vitamin C preincubation. Supplemental dietary vitamin C in combination with vitamin E did not modify rupture strength, work to rupture, or matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP9; protein or activity) either within or outside the term FM physiological weak zone. In vitro, TNF decreased FM rupture strength by 50% while increasing MMP9 protein. Vitamin C did not inhibit these TNF-induced effects. Vitamin C alone had a weakening effect on FM in vitro. We speculate that vitamin C supplementation during pregnancy will not be useful in the prevention of preterm PROM.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2015
Sabine Zoghbi Bousleiman; Madeline Murguia Rice; Joan Moss; Allison Todd; Monica Rincon; Gail Mallett; Cynthia Milluzzi; D. Allard; Karen Dorman; F. Ortiz; Francee Johnson; Peggy Reed; Susan Tolivaisa; Ron Wapner; Cande Ananth; L. Plante; Matthew K. Hoffman; S. Lort; A. Ranzini; George R. Saade; Maged Costantine; J. Brandon; Gary D.V. Hankins; Ashley Salazar; Alan Tita; W. Andrews; Jorge E. Tolosa; A. Lawrence; C. Clock; M. Blaser
OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate the frequency of, and factors associated with, the use of 3 evidence-based interventions: antenatal corticosteroids for fetal lung maturity, progesterone for prevention of recurrent preterm birth, and magnesium sulfate for fetal neuroprotection. STUDY DESIGN A self-administered survey was conducted from January through May 2011 among obstetricians from 21 hospitals that included 30 questions regarding their knowledge, attitudes, and practice of the 3 evidence-based interventions and the 14-item short version of the Team Climate for Innovation survey. Frequency of use of each intervention was ascertained from an obstetrical cohort of women between January 2010 and February 2011. RESULTS A total of 329 obstetricians (74% response rate) who managed 16,946 deliveries within the obstetrical cohort participated in the survey. More than 90% of obstetricians reported that they incorporated each intervention into routine practice. Actual frequency of administration in women eligible for the treatments was 93% for corticosteroids, 39% for progesterone, and 71% for magnesium sulfate. Provider satisfaction with quality of treatment evidence was 97% for corticosteroids, 82% for progesterone, and 57% for magnesium sulfate. Obstetricians perceived that barriers to treatment were most frequent for progesterone (76%), 30% for magnesium sulfate, and 17% for corticosteroids. Progesterone use was more frequent among patients whose provider reported the quality of the evidence was above average to excellent compared with poor to average (42% vs 25%, respectively; P < .001), and they were satisfied with their knowledge of the intervention (41% vs 28%; P = .02), and was less common among patients whose provider reported barriers to hospital or pharmacy drug delivery (31% vs 42%; P = .01). Corticosteroid administration was more common among patients who delivered at hospitals with 24 hours a day-7 days a week maternal-fetal medicine specialist coverage (93% vs 84%; P = .046), CONCLUSION: Obstetricians in Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network hospitals frequently use these evidence-based interventions; however, progesterone use was found to be related to their assessment of evidence quality. Neither progesterone nor the other interventions were associated with overall climate of innovation within a hospital as measured by the Team Climate for Innovation. National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference Statements may also have an impact on use; there is such a statement for antenatal corticosteroids but not for progesterone for preterm prevention or magnesium sulfate for fetal neuroprotection.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2005
Brian M. Mercer; Cynthia Milluzzi; Marc Collin
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2008
Brian M. Mercer; Amy Merlino; Cynthia Milluzzi; John J. Moore
/data/revues/00029378/v208i1sS/S000293781201722X/ | 2012
Asha Talati; Cynthia Milluzzi; Brian M. Mercer
/data/revues/00029378/v187i5/S0002937802003903/ | 2011
Hugh M. Ehrenberg; LeRoy J. Dierker; Cynthia Milluzzi; Brian M. Mercer
/data/revues/00029378/v185i6sS/S000293780180315X/ | 2011
Hugh M. Ehrenberg; Brian M. Mercer; LeRoy J. Dierker; Cynthia Milluzzi
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2004
Brian M. Mercer; Cynthia Milluzzi; Marc Collin