Cyprian O. Onyeji

Pharmacokinetic interactions between ritonavir and quinine in healthy volunteers following concurrent administration.

AIMS To evaluate the pharmacokinetic interactions between ritonavir and quinine in healthy volunteers. METHODS Ten healthy volunteers were each given 600-mg single oral doses of quinine alone, ritonavir alone (200 mg every 12 h for 9 days), and quinine in combination with ritonavir, in a three-period pharmacokinetic nonrandomized sequential design study. Quinine was co-administered with the 15th dose of ritonavir. Blood samples collected at predetermined time intervals were analysed for ritonavir, quinine and its major metabolite, 3-hydroxyquinine, using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method. RESULTS Concurrent ritonavir administration resulted in about fourfold increases in both the C(max) and AUC(T)[C(max) 2.79 +/- 0.22 vs. 10.72 +/- 0.32 mg l(-1), 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.81, 8.04; AUC 50.06 +/- 2.52 vs. 220.47 +/- 6.68 mg h(-1) l(-1), 95% CI 166.3, 175.3], a significant increase (P < 0.01) in the elimination half-life (11.15 +/- 0.80 vs. 13.37 +/- 0.33 h, 95% CI 1.64, 2.77) and about a 4.5-fold decrease in CL/F (12.01 +/- 0.61 vs. 2.71 +/- 0.09 l h(-1)) of quinine. Also, with ritonavir, there was a pronounced reduction of AUC(metabolite)/AUC(unchanged drug) ratio of quinine (1.35 +/- 0.10 vs. 0.13 +/- 0.02) along with a marked decrease in C(max) (1.80 +/- 0.12 vs. 0.96 +/- 0.09 mg l(-1)) and AUC(0-48h) (62.80 +/- 6.30 vs. 25.61 +/- 2.44 mg h(-1) l(-1)) of the metabolite. Similarly, quinine caused modest but significant increases (P < 0.01) in the C(max), AUC and elimination T((1/2)) of ritonavir. CONCLUSIONS Downward dosage adjustment of quinine appears necessary when concurrently administered with ritonavir.

Efficacies of liposome-encapsulated clarithromycin and ofloxacin against Mycobacterium avium-M. intracellulare complex in human macrophages

The therapeutic efficacies of liposome-encapsulated ofloxacin and clarithromycin against Mycobacterium avium-M. intracellulare (MAI) were evaluated in a model of intramacrophage infection. Liposome encapsulation was found to markedly enhance the uptake of each of the drugs by human macrophages. The human blood-derived macrophages were infected at day 7 of culture with MAI. Treatment was initiated 24 h after the infection, and the number of intracellular bacteria was determined at days 2, 3, and 4. Liposome entrapment of either ofloxacin or clarithromycin significantly (P < 0.005) enhanced the activities of the drugs when compared with the antimycobacterial effects of equivalent concentrations of the free (unentrapped) drugs. The drugs were used at concentrations close to their clinically achievable peak levels. The efficacy of clarithromycin, either in the free or liposome-entrapped form, was markedly higher than that of ofloxacin. Liposome-encapsulated ofloxacin or clarithromycin plus ethambutol was, in each case, more effective in organism eradication (P < 0.005) than each agent used singly. These results suggest that liposome-encapsulated clarithromycin may be more effective than the free form of the drug against MAI infections in vivo, and the use of a combination therapy with ethambutol could further enhance the efficacy.

Pharmacodynamics of Intermittent- and Continuous-Infusion Cefepime Alone and in Combination with Once-Daily Tobramycin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro Infection Model

Cefepime, a fourth-generation cephalosporin, is currently one of the primary agents used in combination with an aminoglycoside when treating Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. The bactericidal activity of cefepime administered as intermittent doses (IT) or continuous infusion (CI) both alone and in combination with once-daily tobramycin (ODT) against two clinical strains of P. aeruginosa was compared using an in vitro infection model. Cefepime concentrations simulated human pharmacokinetics after a 1-gram Q12 regimen, or a 1-gram loading dose followed by a 2-gram Q24 CI regimen; the ODT regimen mimicked peak concentrations of ≥10 × MIC. All regimen simulations were run in duplicate over 48 h and a growth control (no antimicrobials added) was run concurrently. Strains tested, PSA5 and PSA10, had MICs of 2 and 8 μg/ml to cefepime, respectively; both MICs to tobramycin were 1.0 μg/ml. CI regimens resulted in concentrations approximately 6× and 2× the MIC for PSA5 and PSA10, respectively. The change in log10 colony-forming units (CFU) per milliliter over time for both P. aeruginosa isolates was compared to initial inocula for all treatment regimens. Initial bolus doses of both IT and CI regimens resulted in a similar decrease in the log10 CFU/ml of both organisms over the first 12 h of the study. After subsequent doses, however, both IT regimens showed greatly diminished bactericidal activity, while both CI regimens were persistently bactericidal without the observation of significant regrowth. As a result, a statistical difference in log10 CFU/ml between both IT and CI regimens with and without ODT was realized at 24, 36 and 48 h for each isolate. Unlike IT dosing, CI cefepime alone or in combination with ODT optimizes bactericidal activity by maximizing the percent of the dosing interval that concentrations remained above the MIC resulting in undiminished bacterial inhibition when compared to IT regimens. These data further suggest that CI is the most efficient method of administration of β-lactam antibiotics.

Pharmacodynamic Assessment of Cefprozil against Streptococcus pneumoniae: Implications for Breakpoint Determinations

ABSTRACT Cefprozil, an oral semisynthetic cephalosporin, is commonly utilized in the treatment of respiratory-tract infections in children. While this agent has provided acceptable clinical success over a number of years, this study was undertaken to better define its pharmacodynamic profile against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Nineteen clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae were utilized in the neutropenic murine thigh infection model. To simulate the pharmacokinetic profile of cefprozil in children, the renal function of mice was impaired with uranyl nitrate, and a commercially available cefprozil suspension (6 mg/kg of body weight) was administered orally every 12 h. Mice were infected with 106 to 107 CFU per thigh, and therapy was initiated 2 h later. At 0 and 24 h postinfection, thighs were harvested to determine bacterial density. Survival was assessed during 96 h of therapy. The magnitude of bacterial kill ranged from 0.5 to 4.4 log10 CFU per thigh over 24 h, and the extent of microbial eradication was dependent on the MIC. Killing of more than 2.6 log10 CFU per thigh was observed with MICs of ≤3 μg/ml, while either minimal killing or growth was detected with MICs of ≥4 μg/ml. Mortality in untreated control animals was 100%. Animals infected with strains for which the MICs were ≤2 μg/ml survived the infection, whereas MICs exceeding 2 μg/ml resulted in substantial mortality. These studies demonstrate the effectiveness of cefprozil against isolates of the pneumococcus for which the MICs are ≤2 μg/ml using a drug exposure typically observed in children. These data support a susceptibility breakpoint of ≤2 μg/ml for cefprozil.

Optimal times above MICs of ceftibuten and cefaclor in experimental intra-abdominal infections.

The duration of time that serum drug levels remain above the MIC (time above the MIC) for the pathogen has been shown to be the most significant parameter determining the efficacies of beta-lactam antibiotics. In the described study, we investigated the optimal time above the MIC of ceftibuten and cefaclor using a nonneutropenic mouse model of intra-abdominal infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae. The abilities of the drugs to protect mice against the organisms were determined in mouse protection tests, and the doses were fractionated to produce various dosing regimens with different times above the MIC. All drug-organism combinations showed a significant correlation (r > 0.9) between drug efficacy and the time above the MIC. Also, with ceftibuten treatment, the different dosing regimens that produced equal times above the MIC resulted in the same efficacy, whereas with cefaclor, an apparent dose-dependent effect was observed. These results showed that for a 100% recovery from K. pneumoniae and E. coli infections, the optimal times above the MIC with ceftibuten treatment were 2.2 and 1.6 h, respectively. Relatively high doses of both antibiotics were required to ensure recovery from S. pneumoniae infections. In vitro time-kill studies demonstrated that cefaclor exhibits a marked inoculum effect against the pathogens, and there was a concentration-dependent killing at a large inoculum size. On the other hand, ceftibuten showed no inoculum effect. It is suggested that optimization of both dose and time above the MIC appears to be necessary for the treatment of S. aureus infections with cefaclor, and this may apply to other beta-lactams tht exhibit marked inoculum effects.

High-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of drotaverine in human plasma and urine

A simple and sensitive HPLC method for the determination of drotaverine in human plasma and urine has been developed. Alkalinized plasma or urine was extracted with organic solvent and the basic components in the organic phase were back-extracted into 0.1 M HCl. An aliquot of the aqueous layer was injected onto the column and the eluent was monitored at 254 nm. Separation was performed on a C18-column with 0.02 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate-methanol (30:70, v/v) containing perchlorate ion at pH 3.2 as mobile phase. Drotaverine was well resolved from the plasma constituents and internal standard. An excellent linearity was observed between peak-height ratios and plasma concentrations and the intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were always < 10%. The lowest limit of detection (signal-to-noise ratio 3:1) was 6 ng/ml. The method is suitable for therapeutic monitoring and pharmacokinetic studies of drotaverine in humans as well as in animal models.

Effects of concurrent administration of nevirapine on the disposition of quinine in healthy volunteers

Objectives Nevirapine and quinine are likely to be administered concurrently in the treatment of patients with HIV and malaria. Both drugs are metabolised to a significant extent by cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 and nevirapine is also an inducer of this enzyme. This study therefore evaluated the effect of nevirapine on the pharmacokinetics of quinine.

Alteration of pharmacokinetics of proguanil in healthy volunteers following concurrent administration of efavirenz.

Efavirenz and proguanil are likely to be administered concurrently for the treatment of patients with HIV and malaria. The metabolism of proguanil is mediated principally by CYP2C19 while efavirenz is known to inhibit this enzyme. This study therefore investigated the effect of efavirenz on proguanil disposition. Fifteen healthy volunteers were each given 300 mg single oral doses of proguanil alone or with the 9th dose of efavirenz (400mg daily for 11 days) in a crossover fashion. Blood samples were collected at pre-determined time intervals and analyzed for proguanil and its major metabolite, cycloguanil, using a validated HPLC method. Co-administration of proguanil and efavirenz resulted in significant increases (p < 0.05) in C(max), T(max), AUC(T) and elimination half-life (T(1/2beta)) of proguanil compared with values for proguanil alone [C(max): 2.55+/-0.24 mg/l vs 3.75+/-0.48 mg/l; T(max): 2.80+/-0.99 h vs 4.80+/-0.99 h; AUC(T): 45.58+/-12.75 mgh/l vs 97.00+/-23.33 mgh/l; T(1/2beta): 16.50+/-4.55 h vs 23.24+/-4.08 h]. Also, efavirenz caused a pronounced decrease in the AUC(metabolite)/AUC(unchanged drug) ratio of proguanil along with a significant decrease (p < 0.05) in C(max) and AUC of the metabolite. These results indicate that efavirenz significantly alters the pharmacokinetics of proguanil. These suggest that the protection against malaria by proguanil may be decreased when the drug is co-administered with efavirenz and the antimalarial efficacy is dependent on cycloguanil plasma levels.

Pharmacokinetic aspects of chloroquine-induced pruritus: influence of dose and evidence for varied extent of metabolism of the drug

The significance of a pharmacokinetics basis in chloroquine (CQ)-induced pruritus was investigated by determining the disposition of the drug in two groups of volunteers; pruritus positive and pruritus negative. Single oral dose of 600 mg CQ was administered to each of 36 volunteers, 18 for each of the two groups. After a washout period of 9 months, 150 mg single oral dose of the drug was given to 12 of the same volunteers, six each from the two groups. Blood and urine samples were collected at predetermined times following administration of each dose. Concentrations of CQ and its major metabolite, desethylchloroquine (CQM), were measured in plasma and urine using an established HPLC method. Results showed that the ratio, AUC (CQ)/AUC (CQM), as well as AUC(0-48 h) and 24-h urinary CQ excretion were all significantly higher (P<0.05) in pruritus-positive compared to pruritus-negative volunteers, following administration of the 600-mg CQ dose. Also, urinary drug-metabolite ratios monitored over 0-48 h postdose were markedly higher in the pruritus positive group. However, after administration of the 150-mg dose, 24-h urinary CQ collection and urinary drug-metabolite ratios were highly comparable between the two groups (P>0.1). This study indicates that there might be a decreased metabolism of CQ in subjects susceptible to CQ-induced pruritus following ingestion of a therapeutic dose. It also suggests that the extent of metabolism of CQ in this group may be influenced by the dose of the drug. Comparatively higher CQ levels in pruritus susceptible subjects may possibly be responsible for the pruritus experienced by such individuals when given therapeutic regimen.

Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of drotaverine in humans

SummaryThe pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of drotaverine was studied in 10 healthy volunteers after administration of single 80 mg oral and intravenous doses of the HCl salt of the drug, in a crossover fashion. Plasma and urine samples were analyzed for the unchanged drug by HPLC. The pharmacokinetic parameters, such as elimination half-life, plasma clearance, renal clearance and apparent volume of distribution, were not influenced by the route of drug administration. The drug was mainly eliminated by non-renal routes since renal clearance accounted for only 0.31±0.13% of the total plasma clearance. The absolute bioavailability was variable and ranged from 24.5–91% with a mean of 58.2±18.2% (mean ±SD). It is suggested that the high variation in the bioavailability of drotaverine HCl after oral administration may result in significant interindividual differences in therapeutic response.