D.A. Barcarolo
École centrale de Nantes
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by D.A. Barcarolo.
Journal of Computational Physics | 2014
D.A. Barcarolo; D. Le Touzé; G. Oger; F. de Vuyst
SPH simulations are usually performed with a uniform particle distribution. New techniques have been recently proposed to enable the use of spatially varying particle distributions, which encouraged the development of automatic adaptivity and particle refinement/derefinement algorithms. All these efforts resulted in very interesting and promising procedures leading to more efficient and faster SPH simulations. In this article, a family of particle refinement techniques is reviewed and a new derefinement technique is proposed and validated through several test cases involving both free-surface and viscous flows. Besides, this new procedure allows higher resolutions in the regions requiring increased accuracy. Moreover, several levels of refinement can be used with this new technique, as often encountered in adaptive mesh refinement techniques in mesh-based methods.
Procedia Computer Science | 2011
David Le Touzé; John Biddiscombe; Andrea Colagrossi; E. Jacquin; Francis Leboeuf; Jean-Christophe Marongiu; Nathan J. Quinlan; Andrea Amicarelli; M. Antuono; D.A. Barcarolo; Mihai Basa; Joëlle Caro; Matthieu De Leffe; N. Grenier; P.M. Guilcher; Matthieu Kerhuel; Fang Le; Libor Lobovský; Salvatore Marrone; Adam Marsh; Guillaume Oger; Etienne Parkinson; Jerome Soumagne
We describe the development of a highly interactive approach to simulation of engineering multi-mechanics problems, using the smoothed particle hydrodynamics mesh-free method as the computational engine, for applications including ship survival, medical devices and Pelton turbines.
ASME 2016 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering | 2016
D.A. Barcarolo; Olivia Thilleul; David Le Touzé; E. Jacquin; Igor de Vries; Mamoun Naciri
The prediction of ship motions in extreme seastates is very complex as it involves strong nonlinearities. It deals with high motions of the ship and implies strong mooring system loads. These seastates are usually modeled in tank tests but an alternative in the near future could be CFD computations. In this article, all required steps to setup and verify the hydrodynamic and numerical model are performed. The setup of the hydrodynamic and numerical model enable us to show that CFD computations of motion RAOS and pitch decay tests provide results in agreement with diffraction-radiation results. Wave only simulations enable us to verify that irregular waves are accurately modelled in the CFD domain. Since the wavemaker motion used in tank tests to generate irregular waves is not available, a process of linear back propagation is set up from the wave elevation on a wave probe in tank tests. High Order Spectral (HOS) simulations are performed to reproduce the seastate measured in tank tests. Finally, a test was performed to model the ship motions in irregular extreme waves with ICARE solver coupled to the computed HOS wave field through Spectral Wave Explicit Navier Stokes Equations (SWENSE).
ASME 2013 32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering | 2013
David Le Touzé; D.A. Barcarolo; Matthieu Kerhuel; G. Oger; N. Grenier; Nathan J. Quinlan; Libor Lobovsky; Mihai Basa; Francis Leboeuf; Joëlle Caro; Andrea Colagrossi; Salvatore Marrone; Matthieu De Leffe; P.M. Guilcher; Jean-Christophe Marongiu
In this paper are presented comparisons of SPH variants on academic test cases classically used to validate numerical fluid dynamics software. These comparisons are extracted from NextMuSE FP7 project activities which will be published more extensively in the near future. One of the goals of this project was to better understand the SPH method and to leave the path to its establishment within CFD methods. An important work load was thus dedicated to benchmark SPH variants on selected test cases.A number of results and conclusions of this comparative study are presented in this paper. The studied variants are: standard weekly-compressible SPH, δ-SPH, Riemann-SPH, incompressible SPH, and FVPM. The majority of the test cases also present a reference solution, either experimental or computed using a mesh-based solver. Test cases include: wave propagation, flow past a cylinder, jet impact, floating body, bubble rise, dam break on obstacle, floating body dynamics, etc. Conclusions may help SPH practitioners to choose one variant or another and shall give detailed understanding necessary to derive further improvements of the method.Copyright
9th Int. SPHERIC Workshop | 2014
D.A. Barcarolo; D. Le Touzé; G. Oger; Florian De Vuyst
ASME 2016 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering | 2016
D.A. Barcarolo; Yann Andrillon; E. Jacquin; Alain Ledoux
Offshore Technology Conference | 2015
O. Thilleul; A. Drouet; Y. Andrillon; P-M. Guilcher; E. Jacquin; D.A. Barcarolo; L. Berry; A. Ledoux; P-E. Guillerm; D. Le Touzé; Q. Derbanne; N. Legregeois
10th World Congress on Computational Mechanics | 2014
D.A. Barcarolo; D. Le Touzé; F. de Vuyst
SPHERIC 2013 | 2013
D.A. Barcarolo; D. Le Touzé; G. Oger; Florian De Vuyst
Marine 2013 | 2013
D.A. Barcarolo; D. Le Touzé; G. Oger; Florian De Vuyst