D.A.L. Morgan

Whole-breast irradiation with or without a boost for patients treated with breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer: 20-year follow-up of a randomised phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND Since the introduction of breast-conserving treatment, various radiation doses after lumpectomy have been used. In a phase 3 randomised controlled trial, we investigated the effect of a radiation boost of 16 Gy on overall survival, local control, and fibrosis for patients with stage I and II breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving treatment compared with patients who received no boost. Here, we present the 20-year follow-up results. METHODS Patients with microscopically complete excision for invasive disease followed by whole-breast irradiation of 50 Gy in 5 weeks were centrally randomised (1:1) with a minimisation algorithm to receive 16 Gy boost or no boost, with minimisation for age, menopausal status, presence of extensive ductal carcinoma in situ, clinical tumour size, nodal status, and institution. Neither patients nor investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02295033. FINDINGS Between May 24, 1989, and June 25, 1996, 2657 patients were randomly assigned to receive no radiation boost and 2661 patients randomly assigned to receive a radiation boost. Median follow-up was 17.2 years (IQR 13.0-19.0). 20-year overall survival was 59.7% (99% CI 56.3-63.0) in the boost group versus 61.1% (57.6-64.3) in the no boost group, hazard ratio (HR) 1.05 (99% CI 0.92-1.19, p=0.323). Ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence was the first treatment failure for 354 patients (13%) in the no boost group versus 237 patients (9%) in the boost group, HR 0.65 (99% CI 0.52-0.81, p<0.0001). The 20-year cumulative incidence of ipsilatelal breast tumour recurrence was 16.4% (99% CI 14.1-18.8) in the no boost group versus 12.0% (9.8-14.4) in the boost group. Mastectomies as first salvage treatment for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence occurred in 279 (79%) of 354 patients in the no boost group versus 178 (75%) of 237 in the boost group. The cumulative incidence of severe fibrosis at 20 years was 1.8% (99% CI 1.1-2.5) in the no boost group versus 5.2% (99% CI 3.9-6.4) in the boost group (p<0.0001). INTERPRETATION A radiation boost after whole-breast irradiation has no effect on long-term overall survival, but can improve local control, with the largest absolute benefit in young patients, although it increases the risk of moderate to severe fibrosis. The extra radiation dose can be avoided in most patients older than age 60 years. FUNDING Fonds Cancer, Belgium.

Predictors of the risk of fibrosis at 10 years after breast conserving therapy for early breast cancer - A study based on the EORTC trial 22881-10882 'boost versus no boost'

The EORTC 22881-10882 trial in 5178 conservatively treated early breast cancer patients showed that a 16 Gy boost dose significantly improved local control, but increased the risk of breast fibrosis. To investigate predictors for the long-term risk of fibrosis, Cox regression models of the time to moderate or severe fibrosis were developed on a random set of 1797 patients with and 1827 patients without a boost, and validated in the remaining set. The median follow-up was 10.7 years. The risk of fibrosis significantly increased (P<0.01) with increasing maximum whole breast irradiation (WBI) dose and with concomitant chemotherapy, but was independent of age. In the boost arm, the risk further increased (P<0.01) if patients had post-operative breast oedema or haematoma, but it decreased (P<0.01) if WBI was given with >6 MV photons. The c-index was around 0.62. Nomograms with these factors are proposed to forecast the long-term risk of moderate or severe fibrosis.

Boost radiotherapy in young women with ductal carcinoma in situ: a multicentre, retrospective study of the Rare Cancer Network

BACKGROUND Outcome data in young women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are rare. The benefits of boost radiotherapy in this group are also unknown. We aimed to assess the effect of boost radiotherapy in young patients with DCIS. METHODS We included 373 women from 18 institutions who met the following inclusion criteria: having tumour status Tis and nodal status (N)0, age 45 years or younger at diagnosis, and having had breast-conserving surgery. 57 (15%) patients had no radiotherapy after surgery, 166 (45%) had radiotherapy without boost (median dose 50 Gy [range 40-60]), and 150 (40%) had radiotherapy with boost (60 Gy [53-76]). The primary outcome was local relapse-free survival. FINDINGS Median follow-up was 72 months (range 1-281). 55 (15%) patients had local relapse. Local relapse-free survival at 10 years was 46% (95% CI 24-67) for patients given no radiotherapy, 72% (61-83) for those given radiotherapy without boost, and 86% (78-93) for those given radiotherapy and boost (difference between all three groups, p<0.0001). Age, margin status, and radiotherapy dose were significant predictors of local relapse-free survival. Compared with patients who had no radiotherapy, those who had radiotherapy had a decreased risk of local relapse (without boost, hazard ratio 0.33 [95% CI 0.16-0.71], p=0.004; with boost, 0.15 [0.06-0.36], p<0.0001). INTERPRETATION In the absence of randomised trials, boost radiotherapy should be considered in addition to surgery for breast-conserving treatment for DCIS.

The prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast carcinoma.

Although lymphovascular invasion (LVI) has been associated with a poor outcome in patients with breast cancer, it is not included in most internationally recognized staging systems, including the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor, lymph node, metastasis (TNM) classification. This is mainly because it remains unclear whether the presence of LVI is an independent, high‐risk criterion in clinically relevant staging subgroups.

Shortened irradiation scheme, continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil and fractionation of mitomycin C in locally advanced anal carcinomas. Results of a phase II study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Radiotherapy and Gastrointestinal Cooperative Groups

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 22861 randomised trial established that combined radiochemotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced anal cancer. This EORTC phase II study (#22953) tests the feasibility of reducing the gap between sequences to 2 weeks, to deliver Mitomycin C (MMC) in each radiotherapy sequence and 5-FU continuously during the treatment. The first sequence consisted of 36 Gy over 4 weeks. 5-FU 200 mg/m(2)/days 1-26, MMC 10 mg/m(2)/day 1 gap 16 days. Then a second sequence of 23.4 Gy over 17 days, 5-FU 200 mg/m(2)/days 1-17 and, MMC 10 mg/m(2)/day 1 was given. 43 patients with a World Health Organization (WHO) status of 0 (n=27) or 1 (n=16) and with T2-T4, N0-3 tumours were included. Compliance with the planned treatment, doses and duration was 93%. The complete response rate was 90.7%. Grade 3 toxicities of 28, 12 and 2% were observed for skin, diarrhoea and haematological toxicities, respectively. The 3-year estimated rates for trials 22861 and 22953 are: 68 and 88% for local control; 72 and 81% for colostomy-free interval, 62 and 84% for severe late toxicity-free interval, and 70 and 81% for survival, respectively. The 22953 scheme is feasible and the results are promising. This is now considered as the new standard scheme by the EORTC.

Radiotherapy or tamoxifen after conserving surgery for breast cancers of excellent prognosis: British Association of Surgical Oncology (BASO) II trial

BACKGROUND The incidence of local recurrence (LR) after conservative surgery for early breast cancer without adjuvant therapy is unacceptably high even with favourable tumours. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of adjuvant therapies in tumours with excellent prognostic features. METHODS Patients with primary invasive breast cancer <2 cm diameter, grade 1 or good prognosis special type, and node negative, treated by wide local excision (WLE) with clear margins were randomised into a 2 × 2 clinical trial of factorial design with or without radiotherapy and with or without tamoxifen. Trial entry was allowed to either comparison or both. FINDINGS The actuarial breast cancer specific survival in 1135 randomised patients at 10 years was 96%. Analysis by intention to treat showed that LR after WLE was reduced in patients randomised to radiotherapy (RT) (HR 0.37, CI 0.22-0.61 p<0.001) and to tamoxifen (HR 0.33, CI 0.15 - 0.70 p<0.004). Actuarial analysis of patients entered into the four-way randomisation showed that LR after WLE alone was 1.9% per annum (PA) versus 0.7% with RT alone and 0.8% with tamoxifen alone. No patient randomised to both adjuvant treatments developed LR. Analysis by treatment received showed LR at 2.2%PA for surgery alone versus 0.8% for either adjuvant radiotherapy or tamoxifen and 0.2% for both treatments. CONCLUSIONS Even in these patients with tumours of excellent prognosis, LR after conservative surgery without adjuvant therapy was still very high. This was reduced to a similar extent by either radiotherapy or tamoxifen but to a greater extent by the receipt of both treatments.

Factors predicting the response of patients with advanced breast cancer to endocrine (Megace) therapy

We have treated 238 patients with advanced breast cancer with megestrol acetate (Megace, Bristol-Myers): 221 were assessable for response at 6 months by UICC criteria. Thirty-six (16%) patients responded, 54 (25%) were static and 131 (59%) progressed. Survival from the time of starting Megace calculated by log-rank analysis showed no significant difference in survival between patients showing response and static disease at 6 months. Patients with progression of disease within 6 months survived significantly shorter than patients who showed response or static disease at 6 months. Categorizing response at 6 months appeared to identify patients who had static disease of worthwhile duration. ER status of the primary tumour correlated significantly with survival from the time of commencing Megace. However, when Megace was used as a second-line hormone therapy the assessment of response or static disease on prior hormone therapy was a better predictor of the effect of Megace than ER status of the primary tumour.

Maintenance chemotherapy for anaplastic small cell carcinoma of the bronchus: A randomised, controlled trial

SummarySince March 1980, 309 patients with anaplastic small cell carcinoma of the bronchus (ASCB) have received remission induction therapy prior to randomisation to maintenance (M) or no maintenance (NM) chemotherapy. Induction therapy consisted of six courses of vincristine, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (VAC) given IV every 3 weeks. Those with limited disease also received mediastinal irradiation. Consenting patients with no unequivocal residual disease were randomised to have no further treatment until relapse or a further eight courses of VAC, at a lower dosage, every 4 weeks. Patients failing to achieve randomisation status received palliative treatment only. The median survival for all patients with limited disease (LD) is 363 days and that for patients with extensive disease (ED) is 272 days (P<0.00001).Sixty-one patients with ED were randomised. Those having maintenance chemotherapy lived significantly longer (median 372 days) than those who did not continue therapy (median 259 days) (P=0.006). An imbalance in the proportion of ‘complete remitters’ randomised to maintenance therapy does not account for this difference. There is no significant difference between the M and NM groups in the 32 randomised LD patients. Continuing treatment during remission with agents used to induce the remission can prolong survival in patients with extensive stage ASCB.

Squamous carcinoma of the temporal bone: a revised staging

Carcinoma of the middle ear is a difficult tumour to treat. We present ten cases and discuss staging of these tumours. Our results would suggest that a revised staging system may allow better identification of patients that would benefit from surgery whilst sparing some multilating surgery that offers little to improve their quality or quantity of life.

Expression of thioredoxin system and related peroxiredoxin proteins is associated with clinical outcome in radiotherapy treated early stage breast cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Deregulated redox systems provide cancer cells protection from increased oxidative stress, such as that induced by ionizing radiation. Expression of the thioredoxin system proteins (thioredoxin, thioredoxin reductase and thioredoxin interacting protein) and downstream peroxiredoxins (I-VI), was examined in tumor specimens from early stage breast cancer patients, subsequently treated by breast conserving surgery and locoregional radiotherapy, to determine if redox protein expression is associated with clinical outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS Nuclear and cytoplasmic expression was assessed using conventional immunohistochemistry on a tissue microarray of 224 tumors. RESULTS High expression of cytoplasmic peroxiredoxin-I correlated with a greater risk of local recurrence (p=0.009). When nuclear and cytoplasmic expression patterns were combined, patients with low nuclear but high cytoplasmic expression of peroxiredoxin-I increased significance (p=0.005). Both were independent factors (p=0.006 and 0.003) from multivariate analysis. Associations were obtained between tumor grade and nuclear thioredoxin interacting protein (p=0.01) and with cytoplasmic expression of peroxiredoxin-V (p=0.007) but not with peroxiredoxin-I suggesting that the latter may exert influence via regulation of oxidative stress rather than via altering the tumor phenotype. CONCLUSIONS Results highlight the potential of using redox protein expression, namely peroxiredoxin-I, to predict clinical outcome and support further studies to validate its usefulness as an independent prognostic, and potentially predictive, marker.