D.A. McGowan

Incidence of nerve damage following third molar removal: A West of Scotland Oral Surgery Research Group Study

A survey was carried out to record both initial and longterm effects on the lingual and inferior alveolar nerves following third molar removal. Eight hundred and twenty five patients were included from eight West of Scotland Oral Surgery Units, and had 1339 third molars removed. Changes in sensation were recorded by direct questioning at 6 to 24 h and 7 to 10 days, and by postal questionnaire at 12-18 months. The incidence of lingual nerve damage was found to be 15% of operated sides at 6 to 24 hours, 10.7% at 7 to 10 days, and 0.6% after 1 year. The incidence of inferior alveolar nerve damage was 5.5% of operated sides at 6 to 24 h, 3.9% at 7 to 10 days, and 0.9% after 1 year. These results are proposed as an indication of the likely incidence of nerve damage complicating third molar removal in the general circumstances of current United Kingdom practice and are presented as a basis for discussion of patient information and current prudent practice. Since one in four patients suffered at least temporary sensory deficit, we believe the case for effective warning of all patients undergoing impacted third molar removal is overwhelming.

A microbiological and clinical review of the acute dentoalveolar abscess

Early microbiological studies of acute suppurative dental infection implicated streptococci or staphylococci as the causative microorganisms but recent studies suggest that the microbial flora of acute dentoalveolar abscess is usually polymicrobial, predominantly involving CO2-dependent streptococci, strictly anaerobic Gram-positive cocci and strictly anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli. These differences are probably due to poor sampling techniques and inadequate culture methods used in the early investigations. It is now accepted that specimens should be obtained by aspiration to avoid contamination and processed promptly using strict anaerobic culture. Traditionally the bacterial strains isolated have been regarded as members of the normal oral commensal microflora but it is becoming increasingly apparent from experimental infections that they have pathogenic properties. Although the vast majority of isolates have been found to be sensitive to a variety of antimicrobial agents there would not appear to be a uniformly effective drug. At the present time a penicillin, such as amoxycillin, would probably be the first choice antimicrobial agent with the addition of metronidazole if clinical improvement does not occur.

Extra-oral endosseous craniofacial implants: current status and future developments

The published experience of extra-oral endosseous craniofacial implants (EOECIs) is reviewed. The definition of osseointegration, concept of success, the relative merit of one- or two-stage implant placement, EOECI design and control of peri-abutment skin infection are discussed. A plea is made for more consistent and objective reading of clinical experience of this technique.

The microflora associated with extra-oral endosseous craniofacial implants: a cross-sectional study

Infection of soft tissues surrounding extra-oral craniofacial endosseous implants is a common clinical problem. The aim of this study was to analyse the microflora associated with such implants, in both health and disease. Eighteen patients with a total of 49 implants were studied. Each patient was seen on two occasions for both a clinical examination and for collection of microbiological samples, using swabs and paper points, from the peri-abutment soft tissues. Specimens were cultured on blood agar and on agars selective for staphylococci and yeasts. Isolates were identified and selective antibiotic susceptibility testing undertaken. No single organism emerged as a predominant cause of peri-abutment skin infection but Staphylococcus aureus, Gram-negative bacilli and yeasts were all present as potential pathogens in this context. Culture and sensitivity results should therefore guide the treatment of these infections.