D. Beard

Rapid sequence intubation in Scottish urban emergency departments

Objective: Airway care is the cornerstone of resuscitation. In UK emergency department practice, this care is provided by anaesthetists and emergency physicians. The aim of this study was to determine current practice for rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in a sample of emergency departments in Scotland. Methods: Two year, multicentre, prospective observational study of endotracheal intubation in the emergency departments of seven Scottish urban teaching hospitals. Results: 1631 patients underwent an intubation attempt in the emergency department and 735 patients satisfied the criteria for RSI. Emergency physicians intubated 377 patients and anaesthetists intubated 355 patients. There was no difference in median age between the groups but there was a significantly greater proportion of men (73.2% versus 65.3%, p=0.024) and trauma patients (48.5% versus 37.4%, p=0.003) in the anaesthetic group. Anaesthetists had a higher initial success rate (91.8% versus 83.8%, p=0.001) and achieved more good (Cormack-Lehane Grade I and II) views at laryngoscopy (94.0% versus 89.3%, p=0.039). There was a non-significant trend to more complications in the group of patients intubated by emergency physicians (8.7% versus 12.7%, p=0.104). Emergency physicians intubated a higher proportion of patients with physiological compromise (91.8% versus 86.1%, p=0.027) and a higher proportion of patients within 15 minutes of arrival (32.6% versus 11.3%, p<0.0001). Conclusion: Anaesthetists achieve more good views at laryngoscopy with higher initial success rates during RSI. Emergency physicians perform RSI on a higher proportion of critically ill patients and a higher proportion of patients within 15 minutes of arrival. Complications may be fewer in the anaesthetists’ group, but this could be related to differences in patient populations. Training issues for RSI and emergency airway care are discussed. Complication rates for both groups are in keeping with previous studies.

The time of death after trauma

The pre-eminence of trauma as a cause of death in young adults in the United Kingdom is well established, but little is known about the temporal distribution of these deaths.1 The only complete data are from a frequently quoted paper, in which Trunkey described trauma deaths in San Francisco over two years.2 These data are nearly two decades old and come from a country where the causes of trauma and the system for dealing with it differ from those in the United Kingdom. All patients aged over 12 who died after trauma in the Lothian and Borders regions of Scotland between 1 February 1992 and 31 January 1994 were studied prospectively by the Scottish Trauma Audit Group and …

Social deprivation and adult head injury: a national study.

Objectives: To establish the association between measures of social deprivation, mechanisms of injury, patterns of care, and outcome following closed head injury. Methods: All Scottish adult A&E attendees with closed head injury (AIS Head ≥3) between July 1996 and December 2000 were studied. Results: Trauma was more common in individuals from more deprived areas. Within the trauma population head injury was relatively more common in patients from deprived areas; these individuals were more likely to sustain an isolated head injury as a result of an assault. Admission GCS was higher and normal physiology (as assessed by the RTS) was more common in individuals from more deprived areas. Recorded co-morbidity was similar between the two groups with the exception of a history of alcohol or substance abuse which was more common among patients from more deprived areas. Similar proportions of patients from more deprived and less deprived areas were transferred to the Regional Neurosurgical Centre. For patients who were transferred directly from A&E, time to neurosurgical theatre was similar for both groups. Length of hospital and ITU stay was less in patients from more deprived areas. After adjusting for known predictors of outcome using logistic regression analysis, there was no significant difference in mortality between patients from more deprived and less deprived areas. Conclusions: Residing in a more deprived area is not associated with increased mortality from head injury among adults in Scotland. It is associated with different patterns of injury and a different process of care following presentation to hospital.

Fatal falls down stairs

Fatal falls down stairs in south-east Scotland were studied using prospectively collected data between 1992 and 1997. 51 individuals, comprising 27 men and 24 women with mean age 68.9 years, died following falls down stairs, 30 (59%) of which were unwitnessed. 43 (84%) individuals died following falls within their own homes. Overall, 27 (53%) fatal falls resulted in death at the scene of the accident. Analysis of injuries according to the Abbreviated Injury Scale yielded injury severity scores (ISS) of between 5 and 75, but only four individuals had injuries recognised to be unsurvivable (ISS = 75). Injury to the brain and/or spinal cord was responsible for the vast majority of most severe injuries. The results demonstrate that stairs represent a significant hazard for the elderly. Most of the deaths in the pre-hospital setting appeared to be more the result of the fact that the victim was alone and unable to summon assistance, rather than as a result of unsurvivable injuries. Consideration needs to be given to both how the safety of stairs can be improved and whether a particular elderly person can safely cope with stairs.

Eleven Years of Liver Trauma: The Scottish Experience

The aim of this population based study was to assess the incidence, mechanisms, management, and outcome of patients who sustained hepatic trauma in Scotland (population 5 million) over the period 1992–2002. The Scottish Trauma Audit Group database was searched for details of any patient with liver trauma. Data on identified patients were analyzed for demographic information, mechanisms of injury, associated injuries, hemodynamic stability on presentation, management, and outcome. A total of 783 patients were identified as having sustained liver trauma. The male-to-female ratio was 3:1 with a median age of 31 years. Blunt trauma (especially road traffic accidents) accounted for 69% of injuries. Liver trauma was associated with injuries to the chest, head, and abdominal injuries other than liver injury; most commonly spleen and kidneys. In all, 166 patients died in the emergency department, and a further 164 died in hospital. The mortality rate was higher in patients with increasing age (p < 0.001), hemodynamic instability (p < 0.001), blunt trauma (p < 0.001), and increasing severity of liver injury (p < 0.001). The incidence of liver trauma in Scotland is low, but it accounts for significant mortality. Associated injuries were common. Outcome was worse in patients with advanced age, blunt trauma, multiple injuries and those requiring an immediate laparotomy.

The association between seniority of Accident and Emergency doctor and outcome following trauma

The actual survival of patients treated following trauma in four Scottish Teaching hospitals during five years was compared with predicted survival according to TRISS analysis. The data were analysed according to the seniority of the Accident and Emergency (A&E) doctor treating each patient. The group of patients treated by a consultant had a significantly better outcome (p < 0.05) than the group of patients treated by junior doctors. Analysis of outcome according to the grade of junior A&E doctor suggested a step-wise improvement in outcome with seniority, thus supporting the concept that an improved outcome is associated with experience and seniority. These results support calls for A&E consultants to be increasingly involved in the management of patients with major trauma. Such increased involvement would require an increase in the number of A&E consultants.

Quantifying injury and predicting outcome after trauma

The Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), Injury Severity Scale and TRISS methodology comprise a mathematically sound system for the analysis of injuries and injured patients. This system is of value for research and audit and has potential applications in forensic medicine, such as its use as a tool to assist the classification and analysis of injuries sustained by those injured in mass disasters.

An evaluation of paramedic activities in prehospital trauma care

The object of the study was to identify the effect paramedics have on prehospital trauma care and evaluate their influence on outcome compared to that of ambulance technicians. A prospective review of ambulance and hospital records was conducted over 2 years from 1 August 1993 to 31 July 1995. The setting for the study was the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh and its primary response catchment area served by the South-East Region of the Scottish Ambulance Service central control room. The study involved 1090 patients brought to hospital by ambulance who met the entry criteria for the Scottish Trauma Audit Group study. The results show that paramedics spend significantly longer at scene than the ambulance technicians; however, there was no difference in total prehospital times between the groups. Paramedics direct a significantly higher proportion of patients to the resuscitation room and significantly more of these patients go to theatre, intensive care or the mortuary. There is no reduction in mortality or length of stay in intensive care in the paramedic group. The authors conclude that paramedics deliver an improved process of care but their activities do not significantly reduce mortality or length of stay in intensive care.

Prehospital trauma management: a national study of paramedic activities

Objectives: The benefits of prehospital trauma management remain controversial. This study aimed to compare the processes of care and outcomes of trauma patients treated by paramedics, who are trained in advanced prehospital trauma care, with those treated by ambulance technicians. Methods: A six year prospective study was conducted of adult trauma patients attended to by the Scottish Ambulance Service and subsequently admitted to hospital. Prehospital times, interventions, triage, and outcomes were compared between patients treated by paramedics and those treated by technicians. Results: Paramedics attended more severely injured patients (16.5% versus 13.9%, p<0.001); they attended a higher proportion of patients with penetrating trauma (6.6% versus 5.7%, p = 0.014) and had longer prehospital times. Patients managed by paramedics were more likely to be taken to the intensive care unit, operating theatre or mortuary, (11.2% versus 7.8%, p<0.001) and had higher crude mortality rates (5.3% versus 4.5%, p = 0.07). However, no difference in mortality between the two groups was noted when corrected for age, Glasgow coma score and injury severity score. Conclusions: This large scale national study shows that paramedics show good triage skills and clinical judgement when managing trauma patients. However, the value of the individual interventions they perform could not be ascertained. Further controlled trials are necessary to determine the true benefits of advanced prehospital trauma life support.

INJURY ANALYSES OF FATAL MOTORCYCLE COLLISIONS IN SOUTH-EAST SCOTLAND

The timing of death and pathological findings in fatal motorcycle accidents in south-east Scotland between 1987 and 1997 were investigated. Of the 59 motorcyclists who died, 38 were dead when found at the accident scene, six others were alive when found but died at the scene, two died in an ambulance in transit to hospital and 13 died after reaching hospital. Scoring of the injuries according to the Abbreviated Injury Scale revealed Injury Severity Scores (ISS) ranging from 25 to 75. Overall, injuries to the head, neck and chest were responsible for the most severe injuries. Twenty-five motorcyclists had injuries acknowledged to be unsurvivable (ISS = 75), most of which involved the thoracic aorta, brainstem and cervical spinal cord. The greatest potential to reduce the death rate amongst motorcyclists lies with accident prevention/injury reduction measures, rather than through improved treatment of injuries. Efforts to try to alter driving behaviour and to improve the design of vehicles and helmets need to continue.