D. C. Allred

HER-2/neu in node-negative breast cancer: prognostic significance of overexpression influenced by the presence of in situ carcinoma.

PURPOSE Amplification and/or overexpression of the HER-2/neu oncogene have been shown to correlate with poor clinical outcome in patients with axillary node-positive breast cancer. In contrast, the prognostic significance of HER-2/neu in node-negative disease is controversial. This study was undertaken to evaluate further the relationship between HER-2/neu and clinical outcome in node-negative disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS Overexpression of HER-2/neu was evaluated by permanent-section immunohistochemistry in tumors from 613 patients with long-term clinical follow-up enrolled in the Intergroup Study 0011. Patients were stratified into low-risk (n = 307) and high-risk (n = 306) groups on the basis of tumor size and estrogen-receptor (ER) status. Low-risk patients were defined as having small (less than 3 cm), ER-positive tumors and were observed without additional treatment after initial surgery. High-risk patients had either ER-negative or large (greater than or equal to 3 cm), ER-positive tumors and were randomized to be observed (n = 146) or to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 160) after surgery. RESULTS The rate of HER-2/neu overexpression was 14.3% in all tumors combined and was higher in invasive carcinomas with (21.5%) than without (11.2%) a significant noninvasive or in situ histologic component (P less than .0001). There was no relationship between overexpression and clinical outcome in the natural history setting of combined low-risk and high-risk patients not receiving adjuvant therapy (n = 453). Based on the reasoning that the influence of HER-2/neu may have been obscured by high-risk features and/or the presence of noninvasive carcinoma, we also analyzed the subset of patients with low-risk lesions not containing a significant in situ component (n = 179). Patients of this group with HER-2/neu-positive tumors showed only 40% disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years, compared with over 80% in patients with HER-2/neu-negative tumors (P less than .0001). A similar inverse correlation was observed between overexpression and overall survival in the same group of patients (P = .0001). In a separate analysis involving patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, those with HER-2/neu-negative tumors showed significantly improved DFS in response to therapy compared with patients with HER-2/neu-positive tumors. CONCLUSION Overexpression of HER-2/neu is associated with poor clinical outcome in a subset of node-negative patients with small, ER-positive, predominantly invasive tumors and may play a role in resistance to adjuvant chemotherapy.

Biologic Markers as Predictors of Clinical Outcome From Systemic Therapy for Primary Operable Breast Cancer

PURPOSE To determine whether pretreatment clinical features and molecular markers, together with changes in these factors, can predict treatment response and survival in patients with primary operable breast cancer who receive neoadjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Mitoxantrone, methotrexate (with or without mitomycin), and tamoxifen chemoendocrine therapy was administered to 158 patients before surgery. Clinical response was assessed after four cycles of treatment. Fine-needle aspiration cytology for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), c-erbB-2, p53, bcl-2, Ki67, S-phase fraction (SPF), and ploidy were performed pretreatment and repeated on day 10 or day 21 after the first cycle of treatment. RESULTS Good clinical response (GCR, defined as complete response or minimal residual disease) was achieved in 31% of patients (49 of 158). Tumor size, nodal disease, response, ER, PgR, c-erbB-2, p53, bcl-2, Ki67, SPF, and ploidy were analyzed as predictors of survival. By univariate analysis, node-positive disease (P =.05), lack of ER (P <.05) and PgR (P <.05), and failure to attain GCR (P =.008) were associated with a significantly increased risk of relapse. A significantly increased risk of death was associated with node-positive disease (P =.02), lack of ER expression (P =.04), and failure to attain GCR. By multivariate analysis, GCR was an independent predictor for survival (P =.05). ER expression (P =.03), absence of c-erbB-2 (P =.03), and a decrease in Ki67 on day 10 or day 21 of the first cycle (P <.05) significantly predicted for subsequent GCR. CONCLUSION Molecular markers may be used to predict the likelihood of achieving GCR, which seems to be a valid surrogate marker for survival.

bcl-2, p53, and response to tamoxifen in estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE To test the hypothesis that high bcl-2 expression and accumulation of p53 protein, both of which should inhibit apoptosis, are associated with a poorer tamoxifen response and a more aggressive clinical course in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive metastatic breast cancer. METHODS A total of 205 paraffin-embedded tumor blocks were evaluated for nuclear p53 (a marker of p53 inactivation) and cytoplasmic bcl-2 by immunohistochemistry (IHC). All patients received tamoxifen as initial therapy for metastatic disease. The study began in 1982 and follow-up duration of the 24 patients last known alive is 8 years. RESULTS Response to tamoxifen and time to treatment failure (TTF) were not significantly associated with p53 status, although patients with higher p53 had a worse survival (P = .008; median, 36 v 20 months). Higher bcl-2 expression was associated with higher levels of ER (P = .02), better response to tamoxifen (62% v 49%; P = .07), longer TTF (median, 9 v 5 months; P = .002), and better survival (median, 40 months v 25 months; P = .009). In multivariate analyses, including ER, progesterone receptor (PgR), and p53, high bcl-2 remained significantly associated with a longer TTF (P = .007) and survival (P = .07). p53 status was a significant factor for shorter survival (P = .05), but not for TTF (P = .61). CONCLUSION p53 status, as determined by IHC is not significantly associated with response to tamoxifen, although tumors with altered p53 protein are inherently more aggressive. Contrary to expectation, high bcl-2 identifies a relatively indolent phenotype of ER-positive metastatic breast cancer, in which patients experience a better clinical response to tamoxifen and a longer survival.

Prognostic value of p53 for local failure in mastectomy- treated breast cancer patients

PURPOSE The loss of p53 function is a recognized adverse prognostic factor in invasive breast cancer. Several studies have shown a relationship between the nuclear accumulation of p53 protein (a surrogate marker of p53 inactivation) and poor disease-free and overall survival. In general, however, these studies did not report the prognostic value of p53 for local failure, which we have therefore assessed retrospectively here. MATERIALS AND METHODS Accumulation of p53 protein was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 1,530 mastectomy-treated breast cancer patients (259 radiation therapy [RT]- and 1,271 mastectomy only [No RT]-treated patients). Statistical comparisons were made between p53 protein accumulation, estrogen/progesterone receptors, nodal status, tumor size, and local failure rate (LFR). Local failure was defined as tumor recurrence involving the chest wall and/or the ipsilateral supraclavicular/axillary lymph nodes. The median follow-up period was 62 months. RESULTS In the No RT group, the LFR was 9.1% and 16. 5% in p53-negative and p53-positive patients, respectively (P<.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that p53 protein accumulation was significantly associated with an increased risk of local relapse (relative risk [RR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 2.4). Nodal status and tumor size were also significant factors. In the RT group, the LFR was 9.3% and 21.5% in p53-negative and p53-positive patients, respectively (P = .009). Multivariate analysis revealed that p53 protein accumulation was significantly associated with an increased risk of local relapse (RR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 5.7), as was nodal status. CONCLUSION Nuclear accumulation of p53 protein is independently associated with a significantly increased local failure rate in breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy, with or without radiation.

Cathepsin D by western blotting and immunohistochemistry: failure to confirm correlations with prognosis in node-negative breast cancer.

PURPOSE We attempted to replicate and improve on our previous study (N Engl J Med 322:297-302, 1990) that showed that 34-kd cathepsin D levels as determined by Western blotting strongly correlated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of axillary node-negative (N-) breast cancer patients. We also examined the prognostic significance of cathepsin D measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Western blotting was performed on cytosols from frozen tumor specimens of 927 N- breast cancer patients in the San Antonio Breast Tumor Bank. The monoclonal antibody M1G8 was used to detect cathepsin D (in previous study, a polyclonal antiserum had been used). The same monoclonal antibody was also used for frozen-section IHC staining of tumor specimens from 562 N- patients from the same tumor bank. Levels of cathepsin D expression were then correlated with DFS and OS. RESULTS Although the levels of cathepsin D expression as measured by Western blotting and IHC correlated with each other and with levels of cathepsin D measured in previous work using Western blotting with the polyclonal antiserum, in this present study, using the monoclonal antibody M1G8, we were unable to demonstrate that cathepsin D expression (measured by either Western blotting or by IHC) correlates with DFS or OS. CONCLUSION In this study, cathepsin D expression as determined by either Western blotting or IHC using the monoclonal antibody M1G8 failed to improve the prognostic evaluation of N- breast cancer patients. The role of cathepsin D expression as a prognostic factor is still not precisely defined, raising questions about its use in the routine evaluation of N- breast cancer patients.

WAF1/CIP1 protein expression in human breast tumors

WAF1/CIP1 is a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor which isdirectly induced by p53 and negatively controls cellproliferation. To test the hypothesis that increased levelsof WAF1 would be associated with a lowerS-phase fraction and better prognosis, WAF1 protein wasassessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 115 node-negative humanbreast tumors, and results were correlated with establishedprognostic factors and clinical outcome. Nuclear staining wasobserved in malignant cells in 43% of tumors.In most (90%) of the positive tumors, theproportion of cells staining for WAF1 was low(< 10%). WAF1 was not detected in thecytoplasm, or in non-malignant epithelium. Contrary to expectations,the accumulation of p53 protein, a surrogate markerof p53 inactivation, was weakly but positively associatedwith WAF1 expression (p=0.05). Surprisingly, therewas no significant correlation with S-phase fraction, ERor PgR status, tumor size, age, ploidy, nucleargrade, or survival.Conclusion: WAF1 expression is found inthe nuclei of a small fraction of cellsin human breast tumors. WAF1 status is notsignificantly associated with cell proliferation, other established prognosticfactors, or clinical outcome.

The p53 tumor-suppressor gene in human breast cancer

P53 is a 20-kilobase gene located on human chromosome 17pl3 that encodes a 53-kilodalton (kDa) nuclear phosphoprotein (reviewed in [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]). Homologues of p53 are found in all animal species. The human gene has 11 exons, four of which (5 through 8) have been highly conserved during evolution, suggesting that they are critical for p53 function [6]. Rodents and humans, for example, show over 90% sequence homology in the conserved exons. The brief, intense, and still incomplete history of investigation into the function of the p53 gene and its protein product has evolved from initial thinking that it was a tumor antigen [7,8], to later speculation that it was a protooncogene [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13], to the currently favored hypothesis that it is a tumor-suppressor gene involved in regulation (suppression) of the cell cycle.