D. C. Souza
University of São Paulo
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by D. C. Souza.
Theriogenology | 2014
N.A.T. Carvalho; J. G. Soares; D. C. Souza; F.S. Vannucci; Renato Rubens Amaral; J.R.G. Maio; J.N.S. Sales; M. F. Sá Filho; P. S. Baruselli
Three experiments were designed to evaluate the effect of different circulating progesterone (P4) concentrations during synchronization of ovulation protocol for timed artificial insemination of seasonal anestrous buffalo cows. In the first trial, ovariectomized cows were randomly allocated into one of three groups: using new P4 devices (G-New; n = 8), using devices previously used for 9 days (G-Used1x; n = 8), and using devices previously used for 18 days (G-Used2x; n = 8). The P4 device was maintained for 9 days, and the circulating P4 concentration was measured daily. The circulating P4 concentrations during the P4 device treatment were the lowest for G-Used2x (1.10 ± 0.04 ng/mL), intermediate for G-Used1x (1.52 ± 0.05 ng/mL), and the highest for G-New (2.47 ± 0.07 ng/mL; P = 0.001). In the second trial, 31 anestrous cows had their ovarian follicular dynamics evaluated after receiving the treatments described previously (G-New [n = 10], G-Used1x [n = 11], and G-Used2x [n = 10]). At insertion of the P4 device, cows were administered 2.0 mg of estradiol benzoate. Nine days later, the P4 device was removed and cows were administered 0.53 mg of cloprostenol sodium plus 400 IU of eCG. Forty-eight hours after P4 device removal, 10 μg of buserelin acetate was administered. There were no differences among the groups (G-New vs. G-Used1x vs. G-Used2x) in diameter of the largest follicle at P4 device removal (9.0 ± 0.8 vs. 10.1 ± 0.9 vs. 8.6 ± 0.8 mm; P = 0.35), in interval from P4 device removal to ovulation (77.1 ± 4.5 vs. 76.5 ± 4.7 vs. 74.0 ± 4.4 hours; P = 0.31), or in ovulation rate (80.0% vs. 81.8% vs. 60.0%; P = 0.51). In experiment 3, 350 anestrous cows were randomly assigned into one of the three treatments described previously (G-New, n = 111; G-Used1x, n = 121; G-Used2x, n = 118) and received a timed artificial insemination for 16 hours after buserelin treatment. The 30-day pregnancy rates did not differ among groups (55.9% vs. 55.4% vs. 48.3%; P = 0.39). Thus, the low circulating P4 concentrations released from a used P4 device efficiently control the ovarian follicular growth and had no detrimental effect on the pregnancy rates of the seasonal anestrous buffalo cows.
Animal Science Journal | 2016
Bruno Moura Monteiro; D. C. Souza; G. S. F. M. Vasconcellos; Thalita Bueno Corrêa; D. Vecchio; Manoel Francisco de Sá Filho; N. A. T. Carvalho; P. S. Baruselli
This study evaluated the effect of new or used P4 devices on the ovarian responses of dairy buffalo that were administered an estradiol (E2) plus progesterone (P4)-based timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocol during the breeding season. On the first day of the TAI protocol, 142 cows were randomly assigned to receive one of the following: a new device (New; 1.0 g of P4; n = 48); a device that had previously been used for 9 days (Used1x, n = 47); or a device that had previously been used for 18 days (Used2x, n = 47). Ultrasound was used to evaluate the following: the presence of a corpus luteum (CL); the diameter of the dominant follicle (ØDF) during protocol; ovulatory response; and pregnancies per AI (P/AI). Despite similar responses among the treatments, there was a significant positive association of the ØDF during TAI protocol with ovulatory responses and number of pregnancies. In conclusion, satisfactory ovarian responses and a satisfactory pregnancy rate were achieved when grazing dairy buffalo were subjected to the TAI protocol in breeding season, independent of whether a new or used P4 device was used. Furthermore, the presence of the larger follicle was associated with a higher ovulation rate and higher P/AI following TAI.
Theriogenology | 2013
N.A.T. Carvalho; J. G. Soares; R.M. Porto Filho; L. U. Gimenes; D. C. Souza; M. Nichi; J.N.S. Sales; P. S. Baruselli
Animal reproduction | 2015
D. C. Souza; N.A.T. Carvalho; J. G. Soares; Bruno Moura Monteiro; E. H. Madureira; P. S. Baruselli
Animal reproduction | 2014
Bruno Moura Monteiro; D. C. Souza; G. S. F. M. Vasconcellos; M. D. D. V. Ortolan; M. F. Mendanha; J. G. Soares; N. A. T. Carvalho; P. S. Baruselli
Theriogenology | 2018
Bruno Moura Monteiro; D. C. Souza; G. S. F. M. Vasconcellos; N. A. T. Carvalho; P. S. Baruselli
Animal reproduction | 2016
D. C. Souza; N. A. T. Carvalho; J. G. Soares; L. M. Vieira; A. M. Gonella-Diaza; A. P. Bonfim Neto; E. H. Madureira; Paula de Carvalho Papa; M. Binelli; P. S. Baruselli
Animal reproduction | 2016
N.A.T. Carvalho; J. G. Soares; D. C. Souza; J. N. S. Sales; P. S. Baruselli
Animal reproduction | 2015
G. K. V. Kawai; J. D. A. Losano; A. Dalmazzo; D. C. Souza; Bruno Moura Monteiro; N. A. T. Carvalho; P. S. Baruselli; M. Nichi
Animal reproduction | 2015
N.A.T. Carvalho; D. C. Souza; M. F. Sá Filho; J. G. Soares; E. H. Madureira; S. S. Ghuman; P. S. Baruselli