D. D. Zalesky

Effects of suckling and low doses of estradiol on luteinizing hormone secretion during the postpartum period in beef cows

Abstract An experiment was conducted to test if suckling acutely suppressed circulating levels of LH during the postpartum period in beef cows. In addition, the influence of exogenous administration of low concentrations of estradiol on LH secretion during the postpartum period was evaluated. Twelve mature cows were randomly assigned before parturition to one of three treatments. Four intact cows were used as controls (INT). Eight cows were ovariectomized within the first 7 days following parturition. Four of these cows received a silastic 17β-estradiol implant subcutaneously at the time of ovariectomy (OVX-E); the remaining four cows received no further treatment (OVX). All cows were allowed to nurse one calf for 30 min daily between 1200 and 1230 hours for the duration of the experiment. Blood samples were collected at 12 min intervals for 6 hr before and 6 hr after suckling on days 9, 30, 44 and 58 postpartum. Mean interval (mean ± SE) to the first increase in peripheral progesterone concentrations indicative of the onset of ovarian luteal activity was detected in INT cows 37 ± 4.9 days postpartum. An acute effect of suckling on LH secretion did not occur in INT and OVX cows but mean LH concentrations were reduced in OVX-E cows following suckling on days 44 and 58. Mean LH concentrations remained low in INT cows; whereas, in OVX and OVX-E cows LH concentrations increased linearly (P

Circulating concentrations of 17-estradiol influence pattern of LH in circulation of cows☆

The objective of the research was to determine the relationship between circulating 17 beta-estradiol (E2) and secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) in cows. A second objective was to determine if response to E2 was influenced by interval between ovariectomy and the start of E2 treatment. Thirty-one nulliparous cows 3 yr of age were randomly assigned to a 2 x 4 factorial arrangement of treatments. Sixteen cows were ovariectomized at 18 mo of age (long term), and the other 15 cows were ovariectomized at 36 mo of age (short term). At the time of ovariectomy of cows in the short term group, 11 cows in the short term group and 12 cows in the long term group were implanted subcutaneously with 1, 2 or 4 polydimethylsiloxane capsules containing E2. The other eight cows served as non-implanted controls (n = 4-short term, n = 4-long term). All cows were fitted with jugular vein catheters on day 29 of treatment, and on day 30 blood samples were collected at 12-min intervals for 6 hr. At the end of 6 hr, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) was administered and blood sampling continued at 12-min intervals for an additional hour. Serum was analyzed for LH and E2. Variables of LH secretion analyzed were mean concentration, frequency of pulses, amplitude of pulses and maximum concentration after LHRH. There were no significant interactions for any of the variables of LH among cows ovariectomized for the long and short term. There was a significant linear increase in mean concentration of LH with increased circulating concentration of E2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Luteinizing hormone in the bovine pars tuberalis: Secretion in response to luteinizing hormone releasing hormone and intracellular isoforms

The objective of this study was to examine the physiological characteristics of gonadotropes in the bovine (b) pars tuberalis as assessed by their ability to release Luteinizing Hormone (LH) in response to LH-Releasing Hormone (LHRH) and the intracellular distribution of LH isoforms. At slaughter, the stalk median eminence and associated pars tuberalis as well as the anterior pituitary gland were collected from each of 7 castrate males. Each stalk median eminence and pituitary gland was mid-sagitally sectioned and weighed. One half of each tissue was immediately frozen and subsequently homogenized to determine the intracellular distribution of bLH isoforms. Tissue extracts were desalted by flow dialysis against water and chromatofocused on pH 10.5-7.0 gradients. The remaining half of the pituitary was sliced with a Staddie-Riggs slicer. The pituitary slices and the remaining half of the stalk median eminence were perifused (0.1 ml/min) for a total of 360 min with effluent samples (1.0 ml) collected every 10 min. At 130 min tissues were stimulated with 5 x 10(-8) M LHRH. Concentrations of LH in the effluent samples and the fractions collected from chromatofocusing were determined by radioimmunoassay. The release of LH in response to LHRH was 43.9% and 47.0% above basal secretion for the pars tuberalis and pituitary, respectively, suggesting similar degrees of responsiveness. Pars tuberalis and pituitary extracts resolved into nine LH isoforms during chromatofocusing and were coded with letters beginning with the most basic form. No differences (P greater than .05) were observed in distribution of LH isoforms between the pars tuberalis and the pituitary gland.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of copulation on timing of the LH surge following synchronization of estrus in the bovine.

Forty-four crossbred postpubertal bovine females were used to study how mating with a bull affected estradiol-17beta (E(2)) secretion and timing of the preovulatory LH surge. Estrous cycles were synchronized with two injections of prostaglandin-F(2alpha) (PGF(2alpha)) 11 d apart. Females were either isolated from males (NE) or exposed to epididectomized bulls (BE) after the second PGF(2alpha) injection. Females exposed to bulls were allowed to mate once and then were separated from the bull. Blood samples were collected at 2-h intervals from the second PGF(2alpha) injection until 12-h post injection to monitor progesterone (P(4)) and luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations and at hourly intervals from 12 h to 60 h post-injection to monitor LH secretion and timing of the preovulatory LH surge. Samples were also collected at 4-h intervals until 60 h post-injection to monitor estrogen (E(2)) secretion. LH surges were detected in 16 and 14 of 22 females from the BE and NE groups, respectively, during the 60-h period after PGF(2alpha) injection Mean P(4) concentrations and time of P(4) decline to <1 ng/ml were not different between the two treatment groups (P>0.30). Mean E(2) concentration during the 60-h sampling period was different (P<0.003) between BE and NE groups, and a significant treatment effect (P<0.002) occurred 48 h, 52 h and 60 h after the second PGF(2alpha) injection. However, mean LH concentration before the LH surge, duration of the LH surge and peak LH concentration during the surge were not different between the BE and NE groups (P>0.40). Mean time for the second PGF(2alpha) injection to the beginning of the LH surge was 51.6 +/- 1.5 h (X +/- S E) for the females not exposed to bulls and 48.5 +/- 1.4 h for females exposed to bulls (P>0.14). In this study, the presence of and/or mating by a bull did not affect LH secretion or timing of the preovulatory LH surge after PGF(2alpha) administration.