D. Dasig
Stanford University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by D. Dasig.
Fertility and Sterility | 2000
Amin A. Milki; Mary D Hinckley; Jeffrey D Fisch; D. Dasig; B. Behr
OBJECTIVE To compare implantation and pregnancy rates (PRs) achieved with blastocyst transfer (BT) and day 3 ET in similar patient populations. DESIGN Retrospective analysis. SETTING Academic infertility center. PATIENT(S) One hundred consecutive patients <40 years undergoing IVF, each with more than three eight-cell embryos on day 3. INTERVENTION(S) Patients used their own eggs for IVF or IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Embryos were cultured in P1 medium (Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, CA) until day 3, when they were either transferred or, in the case of embryos for BT, incubated in Blastocyst Medium (Irvine Scientific), followed by transferring on day 5. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Implantation and PRs. RESULT(S) There were no statistically significant differences in patient age, FSH level, or number of oocytes or zygotes. The BT group had fewer embryos transferred (mean, 2.4) compared with the day 3-ET group (mean, 4.6). The viable PR (cardiac activity at 6-7 weeks was considered indicative of a viable pregnancy) was higher with BT (68%, 34/50) than with day 3 ET (46%, 23/50). The implantation rate was increased with BT (47%, 56 sacs/120 embryos) compared with day 3 ET (20%, 46 sacs/231 embryos). CONCLUSION(S) The BT group in our study had higher implantation and PRs compared with the day 3-ET group. Better embryo selection, improved embryo-uterine synchrony, and decreased cervical mucus on day 5 may have accounted for the enhanced outcome. Our data support the use of BT to limit the number of embryos transferred while improving PRs.
Fertility and Sterility | 2001
Amin A. Milki; Mary D Hinckley; J. Gebhardt; D. Dasig; Lynn M. Westphal; B. Behr
OBJECTIVE To assess the accuracy of day 3 morphologic criteria in identifying the best embryos. DESIGN Prospective observational study. SETTING University IVF program. PATIENT(S) One hundred cycles in women desiring blastocyst transfer who had > or =3 eight-cell embryos on day 3. INTERVENTION(S) On day 3, the embryologist chose the two embryos that would have been transferred that day. On day 5, embryos were examined to determine the best and second-best blastocysts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Accuracy of day 3 picks as measured in culture on day 5, outcome of nontransferred picks, and cryopreservation rate. RESULT(S) All cycles reached the blastocyst stage and 73% had cryopreservation. The mean number of blastocysts was 4.8 (3.2 on day 5 and 1.6 on day 6). Neither pick was chosen in 39% of cycles; one pick was transferred in 38%; and both picks were transferred in 23%. Of 116 nontransferred picks, 51 were frozen and 65 arrested, with both picks arresting in 9 cycles. The single best blastocyst was chosen from the picks in 39% of cycles. CONCLUSION(S) Morphologic criteria for cleavage-stage embryo selection may fall short when the transfer is limited to two embryos. Culture to blastocyst is warranted in this population to avoid high-order multiples and still be able to choose the two embryos with the highest implantation potential.
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | 2004
D. Dasig; J. Lyon; B. Behr; Amin A. Milki
Purpose: To present a case involving the transfer of a single pronucleated oocyte resulting in a monozygotic twin pregnancy.Method: A descriptive case report of a single patient.Results: The patient conceived and was found to have a monochorionic diamnionic pregnancy which resulted in the birth of normal identical twin boys at 32 weeks of gestation.Conclusions: The case report addresses an issue that has not received proper attention in the literature. It illustrates that observing a single PN in an oocyte at fertilization check should not be an absolute deterrent to transferring the resulting embryo even in an older patient with a high FSH level. This report also suggests that single observations, especially at the assessment of fertilization, in the IVF laboratory are limited when evaluating embryo potential and normalcy.
Human Reproduction | 1999
B. Behr; Thomas B. Pool; Amin A. Milki; D. Moore; J. Gebhardt; D. Dasig
Fertility and Sterility | 2002
Hongbo Wang; D. Dasig; J. Gebhardt; Mary Lake Polan; B. Behr
Fertility and Sterility | 1999
Amin A. Milki; Mary D Hinckley; Jeffrey D Fisch; D. Dasig; B. Behr
Fertility and Sterility | 2005
B. Behr; J. Lyon; E. Litman; D. Dasig
Fertility and Sterility | 2004
B. Behr; J. Gebhardt; J. Watt; J. Lyon; D. Dasig; Y. Shu
Fertility and Sterility | 2002
B. Behr; D. Dasig; J. Gebhardt; Hongbo Wang; W. Yen; Mary Lake Polan
Fertility and Sterility | 2001
B. Behr; D. Dasig; J. Gebhardt