Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where D. Ian Hodson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by D. Ian Hodson.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1983

Chordoma: The results of megavoltage radiation therapy

Bernard Cummings; D. Ian Hodson; Raymond S. Bush

Twenty-four patients with chordoma who received one or more courses of megavoltage radiation therapy following biopsy or incomplete resection were reviewed. The uncorrected survival rate at five years was 62%, and at 10 years was 28%, but most patients had clinically detectable residual chordoma present at the time of death or last follow-up. The duration of symptomatic improvement following irradiation ranged from a few months to 18 years, median 3.5 years. Detailed dose-time and symptomatic response data for 56 patients from this series and from the literature who were treated by conventional daily fractionated megavoltage irradiation show no convincing evidence that symptomatic relief is more likely after high doses than after total doses of only 4000 to 5500 cGy. Patients are rarely cured of chordoma by partial tumor resection and conventional radiation. Four patients received multiple fractions of 100 cGy each day either as retreatment for recurrence, or as initial treatment. Symptomatic responses, and decreases in the size of tumor masses, were seen following total doses ranging from 2000 cGy/20 fractions/5 days/4 X 3 hourly fractions each day to 4000 cGy/40 fractions/12 days/4 X 3 hourly fractions each day. The short duration of follow-up in these patients prevents comparison with conventional fractionation. However, this technique presents one possible new approach for the treatment of chordoma.


Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | 2001

Glottic cancer in Ontario, Canada and the SEER areas of the United States: Do different management philosophies produce different outcome profiles?

Patti A. Groome; Brian O'Sullivan; Jonathan C. Irish; Deanna Rothwell; Karleen Schulze M. Math; Randy J. Bissett; Peter R. Dixon; Libni J. Eapen; Sunil P.P. Gulavita; J. Alex Hammond; D. Ian Hodson; Robert G. Mackenzie; Ken Schneider; Padraig Warde; William J. Mackillop

We compared the management and outcome of glottic cancer in Ontario, Canada to that in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program areas in the United States to determine whether the greater use of primary radiotherapy with surgery reserved for salvage in Ontario was associated with similar survival and better larynx retention rates than the U.S. approach where primary surgery is used more often. Electronic, clinical and hospital data were linked to cancer registry data and supplemented by chart review where necessary. Initial treatment and survival in patients diagnosed in the SEER areas from 1988 through 1994 were compared to patients from Ontario diagnosed from 1982 through 1995. Actuarial laryngectomy rates were compared for patients over 65 at diagnosis in the two regions. Analyses were conducted over all cases and stratified by disease stage. In localized disease (T1 or T2), conservative treatment was the most common initial treatment in both regions, although total laryngectomy was used more often in SEER than Ontario (6.2% vs. 0.2%, respectively, P <.001). In advanced disease (T3 or T4), total laryngectomy was more commonly used as initial treatment in SEER (62.9% vs. 21.0% in Ontario, P < or =.001). Over all cases, the relative survival rate was 80% in Ontario at 5 years compared to 78% in SEER (P =.33). In localized disease, the relative survival rates were 4 to 5% higher in Ontario from the second year on, while in advanced disease 2 to 3% higher rates in SEER did not approach statistical significance. Actuarial laryngectomy rates at 3 years differed between the two regions, with a 4% higher rate in SEER (P =.01). In localized disease, 12.6% of Ontario patients had a laryngectomy by 3 years postdiagnosis compared to 17.9% in SEER (P =.05). In advanced disease, the rates were 63.3% and 79.2%, respectively (P =.07). There are large differences in the management of glottic cancer between the SEER areas of the U.S. and Ontario and no evidence that a policy emphasizing radiotherapy with surgery reserved for salvage is associated with worse survival. Ultimate laryngectomy rates are lower in Ontario for localized disease and may be lower for advanced disease. Conservation treatment should be used for localized disease while the treatment decision in advanced disease may be especially sensitive to patient values for voice retention versus initial cure.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2003

Management and outcome differences in supraglottic cancer between Ontario, Canada, and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results areas of the United States.

Patti A. Groome; Brian O’Sullivan; Jonathan C. Irish; Deanna Rothwell; Karleen Schulze; Padraig Warde; Ken Schneider; Robert MacKenzie; D. Ian Hodson; J. Alex Hammond; Sunil P.P. Gulavita; Libni Eapen; Peter Dixon; Randy J. Bissett; William J. Mackillop

PURPOSE We compared the management and outcome of supraglottic cancer in Ontario, Canada, with that in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program areas in the United States. METHODS Electronic, clinical, and hospital data were linked to cancer registry data and supplemented by chart review where necessary. Stage-stratified analyses compared initial treatment and survival in the SEER areas (n = 1,643) with a random sample from Ontario (n = 265). We also compared laryngectomy rates at 3 years in those patients 65 years and older at diagnosis. RESULTS Radical surgery was more commonly used in SEER, with absolute differences increasing with increasing stage: I/II, 17%; III, 36%; and IV, 45%. The 5-year survival rates were 74% in Ontario and 56% in SEER for stage I/II disease (P =.01), 55.7% in Ontario and 46.8% in SEER for stage III disease (P =.40), and 28.5% in Ontario and 29.1% in SEER for stage IV disease (P =.28). Cancer-specific survival results mirrored the overall survival results with the exception of stage IV disease, for which 34.6% of Ontario patients survived their cancer compared with 38.1% in SEER (P =.10). This stage IV difference was more pronounced when we further controlled for possible cause of death errors by restricting the comparison to patients with a single primary cancer (P =.01). Three-year actuarial laryngectomy rates differed. In stage I/II, these rates were 3% in Ontario compared with 35% in SEER (P < 10(-3)). In stage III disease, the rates were 30% and 54%, respectively (P =.03), and in stage IV disease they were 33% and 64% (P =.002). CONCLUSION There are large differences in the management of supraglottic cancer between the SEER areas of the United States and Ontario. Long-term larynx retention was higher in Ontario, where radiotherapy is widely regarded as the treatment of choice and surgery is reserved for salvage. In stages I to III, survival was similar in the two regions despite the differences in treatment policy. In stage IV, there may be a small survival advantage in the U.S. SEER areas related to the higher use of primary surgery.


Cancer | 2001

The role of computed tomography in the T classification of laryngeal carcinoma

Lisa Barbera; Patti A. Groome; William J. Mackillop; Karleen Schulze; Brian O'Sullivan; Jonathan C. Irish; Padraig Warde; Ken Schneider; Robert G. Mackenzie; D. Ian Hodson; J. Alex Hammond; Sunil P.P. Gulavita; Libni Eapen; Peter Dixon; Randy J. Bissett

The objectives of this study were 1) to describe patterns of use of computed tomography (CT) in laryngeal carcinoma, and 2) to characterize the contribution of CT to the T classification of laryngeal carcinoma.


Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | 2002

A comparison of published head and neck stage groupings in laryngeal cancer using data from two countries.

Patti A. Groome; Karleen Schulze; Morten Boysen; Stephen F. Hall; William J. Mackillop; Brian O'Sullivan; J. Irish; Padraig Warde; Ken Schneider; Robert G. Mackenzie; D. Ian Hodson; J. Alex Hammond; Sunil P.P. Gulavita; Libni J. Eapen; P.F. Dixon; Randy J. Bissett

The combination of T, N, and M classifications into stage groupings is meant to facilitate a number of activities including: the estimation of prognosis and the comparison of therapeutic interventions among similar groups of cases. We tested the UICC/AJCC fifth edition stage grouping and six other TNM-based groupings proposed for head and neck cancer for their ability to meet these expectations in laryngeal cancer using data from Ontario, Canada, and the area of Southern Norway surrounding Oslo. We defined four criteria to assess each grouping scheme: (1) the subgroups defined by T, N, and M comprising a given group within a grouping scheme have similar survival rates (hazard consistency); (2) the survival rates differ among the groups (hazard discrimination); (3) the prediction of cure is high (outcome prediction); and (4) the distribution of patients among the groups is balanced. We previously identified or derived a measure for each criterion, and the findings were summarized using a scoring system. The range of scores was from 0 (best) to 7 (worst). The data sets were population-based, with 861 cases from Ontario and 642 cases from Southern Norway. Clinical stage assignment was used and the outcome of interest was cause-specific survival. Summary scores across the seven schemes had similar ranges: 0.9 to 5.1 in Ontario and 1.8 to 5.7 in Southern Norway, but the ranking varied. Summing the scores across the two datasets, the TANIS-7 scheme (Head & Neck 1993;15:497-503) ranked first, and was ranked high in both datasets (first and second, respectively). The UICC/AJCC scheme ranked sixth out of seven schemes, and its ranking was fifth and seventh, respectively. UICC/AJCC stage groupings were defined without empirical investigation. When tested, this scheme did not perform best. Our results suggest that the usefulness of the TNM system could be enhanced by optimizing the design of stage groupings through empirical investigation.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1983

Hypofractionated radiotherapy for the palliation of advanced pelvic malignancy.

D. Ian Hodson; K. Malaker; W. McLellan; A.L. Meikle; J.M. Gillies

Forty-two patients, with a variety of advanced pelvic malignancies, have been treated with a hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen. The most common schedule was 30 Gy in three fractions at monthly intervals. This has provided effective palliation with acceptable morbidity in the select patient group treated. The results in advanced rectal and ovarian tumors were particularly encouraging. The most effective dose/fraction and interfraction interval is, at present, under active investigation within our institution.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2006

Compromised local control due to treatment interruptions and late treatment breaks in early glottic cancer: Population-based outcomes study supporting need for intensified treatment schedules

Patti A. Groome; Brian O’Sullivan; William J. Mackillop; Lynda D. Jackson; Karleen Schulze; Jonathan C. Irish; Padraig Warde; Ken Schneider; Robert G. Mackenzie; D. Ian Hodson; J. Alex Hammond; Sunil P.P. Gulavita; Libni J. Eapen; P.F. Dixon; Randy J. Bissett


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1994

Patterns of failure following loco-regional radiotherapy in the treatment of limited stage small cell lung cancer☆

Peter Coy; D. Ian Hodson; Nevin Murray; Joseph L. Peter; David Payne; Andrew Arnold; Edmund Kostashuk; Peter Dixon; William K. Evans; Benny Zee; Anna Sadura; Joseph Ayoub; Martin Levitt; Rafal Wierzbicki; Ronald Feld; Jean A. Maroun; Kenneth S. Wilson


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1981

Hypothyroidism complicating combined modality therapy for head and neck malignancy

D. Ian Hodson; R. Talbot-Jones; K. Malaker


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1994

0–7–21: Hypofractionated radiation management for loco-regionally advanced squamous head and neck malignancy

D. Ian Hodson; Glenn Jones; F. Rojas; J. Sathya; V. Basrur; S. Archibald; J.E.M. Young

Collaboration


Dive into the D. Ian Hodson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge