D. J. Patterson

Interaction of Endophyte-Infected Fescue and Heat Stress on Ovarian Function in the Beef Heifer

Abstract The objective of the experiment was to examine the interaction of endophyte-infected tall fescue and environmental temperature on follicular and luteal development and function in beef heifers. Heifers were fed endophyte-free or endophyte-infected tall fescue seed at thermoneutral or heat stress temperatures (n = 6/treatment) 4 wk before and 3 wk after synchronized ovulation. All heifers were subjected to thermoneutral conditions (19°C, 50% relative humidity) from Days −7 to −2; temperature increased incrementally from Days −1 to 0 and cycled between 25°C and 31°C between Days 1 and 20 for heat-stressed heifers. Serum was collected and ovaries monitored every other day after induced luteolysis between Days 1 and 23 or until ovulation. Size and location of follicles >4 mm and corpora lutea were recorded. Serum concentrations of prolactin were reduced in heat-stressed heifers fed infected seed and both heat stress and infected seed decreased total cholesterol. Rectal temperature and respiration rate were greatest in heifers fed the infected seed when exposed to maximal temperatures. Heat stress led to reduced diameter of the corpus luteum and serum progesterone compared with thermoneutral conditions. Progesterone was reduced more so in heifers fed infected seed. The combination of infected seed and heat stress was associated with reduced diameter of the preovulatory dominant follicle, and consumption of infected seed led to fewer large follicles during the estrous cycle. Both stressors led to reduced serum estradiol. Impaired follicle function may explain reduced pregnancy rates commonly observed in heifers grazing infected tall fescue pasture.

Comparison of long-term CIDR-based protocols to synchronize estrus in beef heifers.

Two experiments evaluated long-term controlled internal drug release (CIDR) insert-based protocols to synchronize estrus and compare differences in their potential ability to facilitate fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) in beef heifers. In Experiment 1 estrous cycling heifers (n=85) were assigned to one of two treatments by age and body weight (BW). Heifers with T1 received a CIDR from days 0 to 14, gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) on day 23, and prostaglandin F(2 alpha) (PG) on day 30. Heifers with T2 received a CIDR from days 2 to 16, GnRH on day 23, and PG on day 30. Ovaries were evaluated by ultrasonography on days 23 and 25 to determine ovulatory response to GnRH. In Experiment 2 heifers (n=353) were assigned within reproductive tract scores by age and BW to one of four treatments. Heifers in T1 and T2 received the same treatments described in Experiment 1. Heifers in T3 and T4 received the same treatments as T1 and T2, respectively, minus the addition of GnRH. In Experiments 1 and 2, heifers were fitted with HeatWatch transmitters for estrous detection and AI was performed 12h after estrus. In Experiment 1 heifers assigned to T1 had larger dominant follicles at GnRH compared to T2 (P<0.01) but response to GnRH, estrous response after PG, mean interval to estrus, and variance for interval to estrus after PG did not differ (P>0.10). AI conception and final pregnancy rate were similar (P>0.50). In Experiment 2 estrous response after PG did not differ (P>0.70). Differences in mean interval to estrus and variance for interval to estrus (P<0.05) differed based on the three-way interaction of treatment length, GnRH, and estrous cyclicity status. AI conception and final pregnancy rates were similar (P>0.10). In summary, the greater estrous response following PG and resulting AI conception and final pregnancy rates reported for heifers assigned to the two treatments in Experiment 1 and among the four treatments in Experiment 2 suggest that each of these long-term CIDR-based protocols was effective in synchronizing estrus in prepubertal and estrous cycling beef heifers. However, the three-way interaction involving treatment length, GnRH, and estrous cyclicity status in Experiment 2 clearly suggests that further evaluation of long-term CIDR-based protocols is required with and without the addition of GnRH and on the basis of estrous cyclicity status to determine the efficacy of these protocols for use in facilitating FTAI.

Comparison of short-term progestin-based protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation in postpartum beef cows

Two experiments evaluated short-term controlled internal drug release (CIDR) insert-based protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation and compare differences in their potential to facilitate fixed-time AI (FTAI) in postpartum beef cows. Experiment 1 was designed to compare the 7- and 5-d Select Synch + CIDR protocols on the basis of timing and synchrony of estrus after treatment. Cows assigned to the 7-d protocol (n = 59) received GnRH [100 microg intramuscularly (i.m.)] and CIDR inserts (1.38 g of progesterone) on d 0 and PGF(2alpha) (25 mg i.m.) and CIDR removal on d 7. Cows assigned to the 5-d protocol (n = 58) received GnRH and CIDR inserts on d 2, PGF(2alpha) and CIDR removal on d 7, and a second injection of PGF(2alpha) 12 h after CIDR removal. Estrus detection and AI were performed for cows assigned to each protocol during the 144-h synchronized period. There was no difference in estrous response (P = 0.85), interval to estrus (P = 0.09), or variance for interval to estrus (P = 0.75) between treatments, nor were there differences in synchronized conception or pregnancy rates resulting from AI (P = 0.85, P = 0.91, respectively). Experiment 2 was designed to compare pregnancy rates resulting from FTAI after administration of the 7- and 5-d CO-Synch + CIDR protocols. Both treatments were administered the same as in Exp. 1; however, cows assigned to the 7-d protocol were inseminated 66 h after PGF(2alpha) and CIDR removal, and cows assigned to the 5-d protocol were inseminated 72 h after the first PGF(2alpha) injection. Cows assigned to both protocols were administered GnRH (100 microg i.m.) at AI. There was no effect of treatment (P = 0.85), technician (P = 0.20), or sire (P = 0.25) on pregnancy rates resulting from FTAI. Given these observations, the 5-d protocol provides an effective alternative to the 7-d protocol for use in facilitating FTAI; however, beef producers must carefully consider the increased labor and treatment costs associated with the 5-d protocol.

Estrus synchronization with an oral progestogen prior to superovulation of postpartum beef cows

Ovarian follicular dynamics and steroid secretion patterns were monitored in postpartum beef cows that were synchronized for estrus with melengestrol acetate (MGA) or prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF) prior to superovulation. Twenty-four muhiparous Angus cows were stratified by number of days postpartum to an MGA or PGF treatment prior to superovulation. Cows in the MGA group were fed 0.5 mg MGA/d for 14 d in a grain carrier. Superstitnulatory treatments began 14 d after withdrawal of MGA from feed or 11 d after administering a single injection of 500 microg cloprostenol (PGF). Supersthnulatory treatments (FSH) were administered twice daily in decreasing doses (7.5, 5, 5, 2.5 mg) over 4 d. Sixty and 72 h after initiating the superstimulatory treatments, all cows were treated with 750 microg and 500 microg PGF, respectively Cows were inseminated at 0, 12, and 24 h from the onset of standing estrus with semen from 2 proven sires. Cows within treatment were inseminated with 1, 2 and 1 (single) or 2, 4 and 2 units (double) of semen at the designated insemination times. Blood sampling and transrectal ultrasonography of ovaries were performed daily beginning 2 d prior to the initiation of FSH treatment and were continued through embryo recovery. Ovaries were examined daily to determine the number and size of follicles. Plasma samples were analyzed for progesterone and estradiol. Follicles were counted and categorized based on a 5 to 9 mm range or >/= 10 mm. At the end of superovulatory treatment there were more (P </= 0.01) follicles >/= 10 mm among cows that were estrus synchronized with MGA (75 +/- 1.2) than with PGF (3.9 +/- 1.2) These differences were reflected in higher (P </= 0.05) subsequent concentrations of plasma progesterone, suggestive of differences in ovulation rate between treatments (MGA = 8.5 ng/ml; PGF = 5.6 ng/ml). There were no significant differences between treatments in concentrations of estradiol, total number of ova (MGA = 11; PGF = 9), fertilized embryos (MGA = 9; PGF = 7), or transferable embryos recovered (MGA = 8; PGF = 6) Furthermore, double insemination offered no significant improvement in the number of recovered fertilized ova. These data identify differences in follicular and endocrine response when cows were estrus synchronized with MGA versus PGF prior to superovulation.

Comparison of controlled internal drug release insert-based protocols to synchronize estrus in prepubertal and estrous-cycling beef heifers

The objective of the experiment was to examine the necessity of adding a GnRH injection to a 14-d controlled internal drug release (CIDR)-based protocol for synchronization of estrus in beef heifers that were prepubertal or estrous-cycling at the initiation of treatment. The hypothesis tested was that the addition of GnRH in a CIDR-based estrus synchronization protocol would increase the synchrony of estrus after PGF(2alpha) (PG). Beef heifers (n = 285) were assigned to 1 of 2 treatments within reproductive tract scores (2 or 3 = prepubertal; 4 or 5 = estrous-cycling) by age and BW. Heifers assigned to CIDR Select received a CIDR insert (1.38 g of progesterone) from d 0 to 14 followed by GnRH (100 microg, intramuscularly) on d 23 and PG (25 mg intramuscularly) on d 30. Heifers assigned to CIDR-PG received a CIDR insert from d 0 to 14 and PG on d 30. Heifers were fitted with a HeatWatch estrus detection system transmitter at the time of PG administration for continuous estrus detection during the synchronized period (0 to 144 h after PG); AI was performed 12 h after estrus onset. Estrous response did not differ (P = 0.43) between treatments (94% CIDR Select, 98% CIDR-PG). Mean interval to estrus after PG was 7 h shorter (P = 0.01) and variance for interval to estrus was reduced (P < 0.01) among CIDR-PG-treated compared with CIDR Select-treated heifers. Conception rate to AI tended (P = 0.09) to be greater for CIDR-PG heifers (67%) compared with CIDR Select heifers (58%), and AI pregnancy rate was greater (P = 0.05) for CIDR-PG heifers (66%) compared with CIDR Select heifers (55%). Final pregnancy rate at the end of the breeding season was similar for the 2 treatments (81% for both; P = 0.94). We conclude that the administration of GnRH 9 d after CIDR removal in the CIDR Select protocol is not required to facilitate an improvement in the synchrony of estrus in beef heifers.

Comparison of long-term progestin-based protocols to synchronize estrus before fixed-time artificial insemination in beef heifers1

Two experiments were conducted to compare pregnancy rates resulting from fixed-time AI (FTAI) after administration of 1 of 2 long-term controlled internal drug release (CIDR)-based protocols. Heifers were assigned to treatment by age, BW, and pubertal status. The CIDR Select-treated heifers (Exp. 1, n = 37; Exp. 2, n = 192) received a CIDR (1.38 g of progesterone) from d 0 to 14, followed by 100 µg of GnRH, intramuscularly (i.m.) 9 d after CIDR removal (d 23) and PGF(2α) (25 mg, i.m.) 7 d after GnRH treatment (d 30). Heifers assigned to the Show-Me-Synch protocol (Exp. 1, n = 40; Exp. 2, n = 200) received a CIDR from d 0 to 14, followed by PGF(2α) 16 d later (d 30). Artificial insemination was performed at 72 or 66 h after PGF(2α) treatment for the CIDR Select- and Show-Me-Synch-treated heifers, respectively, and each heifer was given GnRH (100 µg, i.m.) at the time of AI. In Exp. 1, ovaries of each heifer were examined by transrectal ultrasonography on d 23 and 30 to characterize follicular dynamics. Follicles ≥5 mm and the presence of corpora lutea were recorded. On d 25, ovaries of each heifer were examined to characterize the status of dominant follicles recorded on d 23. Heifers were fitted with HeatWatch (DDx Inc., Denver, CO) estrus-detection transmitters at PGF(2α) to characterize estrus distribution up to FTAI. The diameter of dominant follicles on d 23 at PGF(2α) and on d 30, and the estrous response after PGF(2α) treatment up to the point of FTAI did not differ between CIDR Select- and Show-Me-Synch-treated heifers. Concentrations of progesterone in serum at PGF(2α) were greater (P = 0.07) in Show-Me-Synch- than CIDR Select-treated heifers (6.0 vs. 4.8 ng/mL, respectively). Pregnancy rates of heifers resulting from FTAI did not differ (P = 0.33) between CIDR Select- and Show-Me-Synch-treated heifers (CIDR Select, 59%; Show-Me-Synch, 70%). In Exp. 2, FTAI pregnancy rates tended (P = 0.07) to be greater in Show-Me-Synch-treated (62%) than in CIDR Select-treated (51%) heifers. Pregnancy rates at the end of the breeding season did not differ (P = 0.72; CIDR Select, 85%; Show-Me-Synch, 83%) between treatments. In summary, pregnancy rates resulting from FTAI were comparable for heifers assigned to each of the 2 long-term progestin-based protocols. The reduced treatment cost and animal handling associated with administration of the Show-Me-Synch protocol offer distinct advantages over the CIDR Select protocol despite similarities in pregnancy rates resulting from FTAI.

Delayed insemination of nonestrous cows improves pregnancy rates when using sex-sorted semen in timed artificial insemination of suckled beef cows.

This experiment was designed to test the hypothesis that delayed insemination of nonestrous cows would increase pregnancy rates when using sex-sorted semen in conjunction with fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI). Estrus was synchronized for 656 suckled beef cows with the 7-d CO-Synch + controlled internal drug release (CIDR) protocol (100 μg GnRH + CIDR [1.38 g progesterone] on d 0, 25 mg PGF2α at CIDR removal on d 7, and 100 μg GnRH on d 10, 66 h after CIDR removal). Estrus detection aids (Estrotect) were applied at PGF2α and CIDR removal on d 7, and estrous expression was recorded at GnRH on d 10. Cows were assigned to 1 of 3 treatments: 1) FTAI (concurrent with GnRH, 66 h after CIDR removal) with conventional semen regardless of estrous expression, 2) FTAI with sex-sorted semen regardless of estrous expression, or 3) FTAI with sex-sorted semen for cows having expressed estrus and delayed AI 20 h after final GnRH for cows failing to express estrus. A treatment × estrous expression interaction was found (P < 0.0001). Higher pregnancy rates (P < 0.0001) were achieved with conventional semen (Treatment 1; 77%) than with sex-sorted semen (Treatments 2 and 3; 51 and 42%, respectively) among cows that expressed estrus. However, among cows that failed to express estrus, delayed insemination with sex-sorted semen yielded higher (P < 0.0001) pregnancy rates than with sex-sorted semen at the standard time (Treatments 2 and 3; 3 versus 36%, respectively). Furthermore, among cows that failed to express estrus, FTAI pregnancy rates when using sex-sorted semen at the delayed time (36%) were comparable (P = 0.9) to those achieved using conventional semen at the standard time (Treatment 1; 37%). These results indicate that delaying AI of nonestrous cows by 20 h from the standard FTAI improves pregnancy rates when sex-sorted semen is used with FTAI.

Comparison of long-term progestin-based estrus synchronization protocols in beef heifers

Two experiments evaluated long-term progestin-based estrus-synchronization programs on the basis of potential for use in facilitating fixed-time AI in estrous cycling and prepubertal beef heifers. In Exp. 1, heifers were assigned to 1 of 2 treatments by age, BW, and estrous cyclicity status. Heifers assigned to the melengestrol acetate-PGF(2α) protocol (MGA-PG; n = 50) received MGA (0.5 mg·animal(-1)·d(-1)) in a 1.0-kg carrier from d 0 to 13 and were administered PGF(2α) (25 mg, intramuscularly) 19 d after MGA withdrawal (d 32). Heifers assigned to the Show-Me-Synch protocol (n = 49) received a controlled internal drug release (CIDR) insert (1.38 g of progesterone) from d 2 to 16 followed by PGF(2α) administration 16 d after CIDR removal (d 32). All heifers were fitted with HeatWatch estrus-detection transmitters at the time of progestin removal for continuous estrus detection through the synchronized period after PGF(2α). In Exp. 2, heifers (n = 396) were assigned to the same 2 treatments described in Exp. 1 by age, BW, and reproductive tract score. Heifers in Exp. 2, however, were fitted with HeatWatch estrus-detection transmitters at PGF(2α) to characterize estrus-distribution patterns during the synchronized period after PGF(2α). Heifers in both experiments were inseminated approximately 12 h after the onset of estrus. In Exp. 1, estrous response after PGF(2α) and mean interval to estrus after PGF(2α) did not differ between MGA-PG and Show-Me-Synch treatments (P = 0.97). The variance for interval to estrus after PGF(2α) tended (P = 0.06) to be reduced among MGA-PG-treated heifers compared with Show-Me-Synch-treated heifers. Conception to AI, AI pregnancy, and final pregnancy rates did not differ (P > 0.1) between treatments. In Exp. 2, estrous response after PGF(2α) was greater (P = 0.01) among Show-Me-Synch-treated heifers (92%) compared with MGA-PG-treated heifers (85%); however, mean interval to estrus after PGF(2α) did not differ (P = 0.74) between MGA-PG (57.4 ± 2.5 h) and Show-Me-Synch (56.2 ± 2.5 h) treatments. The variance for interval to estrus after PGF(2α) was reduced (P < 0.01) among Show-Me-Synch-treated vs. MGA-PG-treated heifers. Conception to AI, AI pregnancy, and final pregnancy rates did not differ (P > 0.1) between treatments. In summary, the Show-Me-Synch protocol compared favorably with the MGA-PG protocol on the basis of estrous response, synchrony of estrus, and resulting fertility after treatment administration.

Multi-state Beef Reproduction Task Force provides science-based recommendations for the application of reproductive technologies.

Since its formation, the Beef Reproduction Task Force (BRTF) has worked to enhance productivity and profitability of US beef herds by integrating research and extension efforts with the intent of more effectively transferring the use of reproductive technologies to the field. A key early step was to coordinate efforts in identifying effective breeding management protocols for beef cattle and to clarify their associated acronyms. A short list of recommended protocols and their acronyms for synchronization of estrus and ovulation in beef cattle was developed based on results from peer-reviewed, published research and a comprehensive review of data collected from the field. The list of recommended protocols was developed by the BRTF in cooperation with veterinarians and cattle AI industries. These protocols and their acronyms are presented uniformly in all of the major AI sire directories and are available online at http://www.beefrepro.info. Protocol updates are made annually to incorporate the most recent research findings related to estrous cycle control in beef cattle. The Estrus Synchronization Planner, a software program developed in cooperation with the Iowa Beef Center, now reflects these same recommendations. Beginning in 2002, the BRTF hosted and presented 11 educational workshops to more than 1,900 attendees in key cow-calf states. These Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle workshops targeted beef producers, AI industry personnel, veterinarians, allied industry representatives, and academicians. A national media sponsor provided online coverage of the last 3 workshops at http://www.appliedreprostrategies.com. A postmeeting evaluation, developed to assess application of information from 2 recent workshops, was returned by 55% of those contacted (n = 150). Attendees averaged 16 (± 13.4 SD) yr of AI experience, and 80% of respondents represented more than 100 cows. Respondents were asked to estimate the value of AI-sired calves compared with natural-service-sired calves to their operation on a per-animal-marketed basis, and 17 and 31% responded

Development of estrous synchronization protocols using melengestrol acetate in Bos indicus cattle

50 to