D. Jeffrey Demanes

American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Part II: high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE This report presents an update to the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy guidelines for locally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS Members of the ABS with expertise in cervical cancer formulated updated guidelines for HDR brachytherapy using tandem and ring, ovoids, cylinder, or interstitial applicators for locally advanced cervical cancer. These guidelines were written based on medical evidence in the literature and input of clinical experts in gynecologic brachytherapy. RESULTS The ABS affirms the essential curative role of tandem-based brachytherapy in the management of locally advanced cervical cancer. Proper applicator selection, insertion, and imaging are fundamental aspects of the procedure. Three-dimensional imaging with magnetic resonance or computed tomography or radiographic imaging may be used for treatment planning. Dosimetry must be performed after each insertion before treatment delivery. Applicator placement, dose specification, and dose fractionation must be documented, quality assurance measures must be performed, and followup information must be obtained. A variety of dose/fractionation schedules and methods for integrating brachytherapy with external-beam radiation exist. The recommended tumor dose in 2-Gray (Gy) per fraction radiobiologic equivalence (normalized therapy dose) is 80-90Gy, depending on tumor size at the time of brachytherapy. Dose limits for normal tissues are discussed. CONCLUSION These guidelines update those of 2000 and provide a comprehensive description of HDR cervical cancer brachytherapy in 2011.

American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE A well-established body of literature supports the use of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer. Most of the articles describe HDR as a boost with adjuvant external beam radiation, but there is a growing experience with HDR monotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS The American Brachytherapy Society has convened a group of expert practitioners and physicists to develop guidelines for the use of HDR in the management of prostate cancer. This involved an extensive literature review and input from an expert panel. RESULTS Despite a wide variation in doses and fractionation reported, HDR brachytherapy provides biochemical control rates of 85-100%, 81-100%, and 43-93% for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancers, respectively. Severe toxicity is rare, with most authors reporting less than 5% Grade 3 or higher toxicity. Careful attention to patient evaluation for appropriate patient selection, meticulous technique, treatment planning, and delivery are essential for successful treatment. CONCLUSION The clinical outcomes for HDR are excellent, with high rates of biochemical control, even for high-risk disease, with low morbidity. HDR monotherapy, both for primary treatment and salvage, are promising treatment modalities.

High-Dose-Rate Monotherapy: Safe and Effective Brachytherapy for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy used as the only treatment (monotherapy) for early prostate cancer is consistent with current concepts in prostate radiobiology, and the dose is reliably delivered in a prospectively defined anatomic distribution that meets all the requirements for safe and effective therapy. We report the disease control and toxicity of HDR monotherapy from California Endocurietherapy (CET) and William Beaumont Hospital (WBH) in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS There were 298 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with HDR monotherapy between 1996 and 2005. Two biologically equivalent hypofractionation protocols were used. At CET the dose was 42 Gy in six fractions (two implantations 1 week apart) delivered to a computed tomography-defined planning treatment volume. At WBH the dose was 38 Gy in four fractions (one implantation) based on intraoperative transrectal ultrasound real-time treatment planning. The bladder, urethral, and rectal dose constraints were similar. Toxicity was scored with the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 3. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 5.2 years. The median age of the patients was 63 years, and the median value of the pretreatment prostate-specific antigen was 6.0 ng/mL. The 8-year results were 99% local control, 97% biochemical control (nadir +2), 99% distant metastasis-free survival, 99% cause-specific survival, and 95% overall survival. Toxicity was scored per event, meaning that an individual patient with more than one symptom was represented repeatedly in the morbidity data table. Genitourinary toxicity consisted of 10% transient Grade 2 urinary frequency or urgency and 3% Grade 3 episode of urinary retention. Gastrointestinal toxicity was <1%. CONCLUSIONS High disease control rates and low morbidity demonstrate that HDR monotherapy is safe and effective for patients with localized prostate cancer.

THE AMERICAN BRACHYTHERAPY SOCIETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR HIGH-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY FOR HEAD-AND-NECK CARCINOMA

PURPOSE To develop recommendations for use of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in patients with head-and-neck cancer. METHODS A panel consisting of members of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) performed a literature review, added information based upon their clinical experience, and formulated recommendations for head-and-neck HDR brachytherapy. RESULTS The ABS recommends the use of brachytherapy as a component of the treatment of head-and-neck tumors. However, the ABS recognizes that some radiation oncologists are reluctant to employ brachytherapy in the head-and-neck region because of the complexity of the postoperative management and concerns about radiation safety. In this regard, HDR eliminates unwanted radiation exposure and thereby permits unrestricted delivery of clinical care to these brachytherapy patients. The ABS made specific recommendations for previously untreated and recurrent head-and-neck cancer patients on patient selection criteria, implant techniques, target volume definition, and HDR treatment parameters (such as time, dose, and fractionation schedules). Suggestions were provided for treatment with HDR alone and in combination with external beam radiation therapy. It should be recognized that only limited experiences exist with HDR brachytherapy in patients with head-and-neck cancers. Therefore, some of these suggested doses have not been extensively tested in clinical practice. Hence, these guidelines will be updated as significant new outcome data are available. Any clinician following these guidelines is expected to use clinical judgment to determine an individual patients treatment. CONCLUSIONS Little has been published in the clinical literature on HDR brachytherapy in head-and-neck cancer. Based upon the available information and the clinical experience of the panel members, general and site-specific recommendations were offered. Areas for further investigations were identified.

American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy after hysterectomy

PURPOSE To develop recommendations for the use of adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy after hysterectomy and update previous American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) guidelines. METHODS AND MATERIALS A panel of members of the ABS performed a literature review, supplemented their clinical experience, and formulated recommendations for adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy. RESULTS The ABS endorses the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for indications for radiation therapy for patients with endometrial cancer and cervical cancer and the guidelines on quality assurance of the American Association on Physicists in Medicine. The ABS made specific recommendations for applicator selection, insertion techniques, target volume definition, dose fractionation, and specifications for postoperative adjuvant vaginal cuff therapy. The ABS recommends that applicator selection should be based on patient anatomy, target volume geometry, and physician judgment. The dose prescription point should be clearly specified. Suggested doses were tabulated for treatment with brachytherapy alone, and in combination with external beam radiation therapy, when applicable. A properly fitted brachytherapy applicator should be selected that conforms to the vaginal apex and achieves mucosal contact with optimal tumor and normal tissue dosimetry. Dose prescription points may be individually selected but doses should be reported at the vaginal surface and at 0.5-cm depth. CONCLUSIONS Recommendations are made for adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy. Practitioners and cooperative groups are encouraged to use these recommendations to formulate their treatment and dose reporting policies. These recommendations will permit meaningful comparisons of reports from different institutions and lead to better and more appropriate use of vaginal brachytherapy.

High dose rate prostate brachytherapy: the California Endocurietherapy (CET) Method

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To describe the rationale, protocol and procedure for the treatment of prostate cancer using high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and a non-fixed template technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between July 1991 and December 1998, 491 patients with carcinoma of the prostate were treated using HDR-BT and a non-fixed template technique. AJC stages T(1C)-T(3B), patients with prior transurethral resections of the prostate (TURP) and gland volumes >60 cm(3), were included. Flexible cystoscopy, fluoroscopy and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) were used and 17 flexiguides were inserted through the perineum. Dosimetry was carried out using localization films. Treatment volume was defined at 4-6 mm outside the peripheral catheters. BT consisted of two implants, separated by 1 week, with two fractions given per implant for a total of four HDR fractions. Dose prescription to the treatment volume was 6 Gy (HDR) per fraction, with an additional dose of 0.5 to 0.75 Gy given where required. RESULTS Patients with glands >60 cm(3), narrow pubic arches and TURP defects were treated satisfactorily. Symptoms of urinary irritation occurred with variable intensity and abated rapidly 2 weeks after the procedures. There was no high-grade chronic rectal morbidity and most patients reported no rectal symptoms or treatment-related chronic urinary incontinence. CONCLUSIONS The non-fixed template technique allowed flexibility in flexiguide placement to encompass large glands (>60 cm(3)), extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle involvement without the need for additional flexiguides. Also, small pubic arches and TURP defects posed little problem in positioning the flexiguides. This versatility resulted in complete treatment volume coverage of the prostate.

American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for interstitial brachytherapy for vaginal cancer

PURPOSE To present recommendations for the use of interstitial brachytherapy in patients with vaginal cancer or recurrent endometrial cancer in the vagina. METHODS A panel of members of the American Brachytherapy Society reviewed the literature, supplemented that with their clinical experience, and formulated recommendations for interstitial brachytherapy for primary or recurrent cancers in the vagina. RESULTS Patients with bulky disease (approximately >0.5cm thick) should be considered for treatment with interstitial brachytherapy. The American Brachytherapy Society reports specific recommendations for techniques, target volume definition, and dose-fractionation schemes. Three-dimensional treatment planning is recommended with CT scan and/or MRI. The treatment plan should be optimized to conform to the clinical target volume and should reduce the dose to critical organs, including the rectum, bladder, urethra, and sigmoid colon. Suggested doses in combination with external beam radiation therapy and summated equivalent doses in 2Gy fractions are tabulated. CONCLUSION Recommendations are made for interstitial brachytherapy for vaginal cancer and recurrent disease in the vagina. Practitioners and cooperative groups are encouraged to use these recommendations to formulate treatment and dose-reporting policies. Such a process will result in meaningful outcome comparisons, promote technical advances, and lead to appropriate utilization of these techniques.

American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and American College of Radiology (ACR) practice guideline for the transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer.

Transperineal permanent prostate brachytherapy is a safe and efficacious treatment option for patients with organ-confined prostate cancer. Careful adherence to established brachytherapy standards has been shown to improve the likelihood of procedural success and reduce the incidence of treatment-related morbidity. A collaborative effort of the American College of Radiology (ACR) and American Society for Therapeutic Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) has produced a practice guideline for permanent prostate brachytherapy. The guideline defines the qualifications and responsibilities of all the involved personnel, including the radiation oncologist, physicist and dosimetrist. Factors with respect to patient selection and appropriate use of supplemental treatment modalities such as external beam radiation and androgen suppression therapy are discussed. Logistics with respect to the brachytherapy implant procedure, the importance of dosimetric parameters, and attention to radiation safety procedures and documentation are presented. Adherence to these practice guidelines can be part of ensuring quality and safety in a successful prostate brachytherapy program.

High dose rate transperineal interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer: high pelvic control and low complication rates

PURPOSE To report the clinical outcome for cervical carcinoma treated with external beam pelvic radiotherapy and interstitial high dose rate (IS-HDR) brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between July 1991 and June 1996, 62 patients with locally advanced stage cervical carcinoma or early stage carcinoma that precluded satisfactory tandem and ovoid insertion were treated. Most patients received 36 Gy (range: 25 Gy-45 Gy) external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to the pelvis prior to brachytherapy implant. EBRT was continued, with central shielding, to a dose of 50 Gy to the pelvic sidewalls. HDR Iridium-192 brachytherapy was given in 6 fractions of 5.5 to 6.0 Gy. The mean follow-up was 40 months. RESULTS Stage distribution was: Stage IB (12), Stage IIA (1), Stage IIB (26), Stage IIIA (6), Stage IIIB (13), and Stage IVA (4). The overall local tumor control was 94%. Local control rates by FIGO stage were Stage I (12/12) 100%, Stage II (25/27) 93%, Stage III (18/19) 95%, and Stage IV (3/4) 75%. The regional pelvic control rates were overall 81%, Stage I (12/12) 100%, Stage II (22/27) 81%, Stage III (15/19) 79%, and Stage IV (1/4) 25%. Distant metastasis developed in 20 patients (32%). The actuarial 5-year disease-free survival was for all patients 48%, Stage I 81%, Stage II 47%, Stage III 39%, and Stage IV O%. Grade 3-4 delayed morbidity resulting from treatment, occurred in 6.5% (4/62) of patients. A fistula without local recurrence occurred in 1.6% (1/62) patients. CONCLUSIONS We report excellent local and regional pelvic control results using a 6 fraction IS-HDR brachytherapy protocol for cervical carcinoma. The incidence of severe complications is low and suggests that a consistent brachytherapy technique and multiple HDR fractions are therapeutically advantageous to patients treated for cervical carcinoma.

Excellent results from high dose rate brachytherapy and external beam for prostate cancer are not improved by androgen deprivation.

Purpose:Prostate cancer patients treated with high dose rate brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy were stratified by risk group for analysis to determine whether androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) affected outcome. Methods:From 1991 through1998, 411 patients were treated with 4 fractions of 5.5 to 6.0 Gy high dose rate brachytherapy and a total of 36.0 to 39.6 Gy external beam radiation therapy (dose escalation over time). The dataset was prospective. Administration of ADT was not randomized, but it was the primary study variable. During this period, ADT was administered across all risk groups for various indications. It did not necessarily reflect advanced disease or large prostate size. There were 200 patients in the “ADT Group” (20% low, 48% intermediate, and 32% high risk) and 211 in the “No ADT Group” (33% low, 44% intermediate, 23% high risk). The median follow-up was 6.4 years. Cases were grouped according to low, intermediate, and high risk groups to reduce the effects of unrecognized selection bias for or against the ADT group. The prostate specific antigen (PSA) nadir plus 2.0 ng/ml (nadir + 2) was used as the biochemical control end point. Local control, PSA progression-free survival, distant metastasis free survival, and cause-specific survival were compared. Results:The 10 year PSA-PFS (nadir + 2) for all 411 patients was 81%. The results stratified by risk group were: low 92%, intermediate 87%, and high 63%. The low and intermediate risk groups were not statistically different from one another but they were both significantly better than the high risk group. ADT versus No ADT 10-year survival showed no significant differences for any outcome variable: PSA-PFS (83% vs. 81% ns), local control (97% vs. 99%), distant metastasis free survival (94% vs. 97%), and cause-specific survival (97% vs. 97%). A subset analysis of PSA-PFS (nadir + 2) stratified by risk group revealed no difference between the ADT and No ADT groups. Conclusions:high dose rate brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy resulted in high rates of local control, PSA progression-free survival, distant metastasis free survival, and cause-specific survival in all risk groups. Improved outcome from the use of androgen deprivation was not observed.