D. Joseph

A randomised phase III study of accelerated or standard fraction radiotherapy with or without concurrent carboplatin in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer: final report of an Australian multi-centre trial.

PURPOSE To investigate the effects separately and together of (a) shortening overall treatment time and (b) giving concurrent carboplatin in patients having radical radiotherapy for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between April 1989 and May 1995, 204 patients with medically inoperable or technically unresectable NSCLC localised to the primary site and regional lymph nodes were randomised to receive one of four treatments using a 2 x 2 factorial design: standard radiotherapy, 60 Gy in 30 fractions in 6 weeks (R6); accelerated radiotherapy, 60 Gy in 30 fractions in 3 weeks (R3); standard radiotherapy as in R6 with carboplatin 70 mg/m2/day for 5 days during weeks 1 and 5 of radiotherapy (R6C); accelerated radiotherapy as in R3 with carboplatin 70 mg/m2/day for 5 days during week 1 of radiotherapy (R3C). RESULTS The estimated median survival of all randomised patients was 15.7 months and estimated 2-year survival was 31%. The longest survival was seen in patients randomised to R6C (median 20.3 months, 41% surviving at 2 years) but there were no statistically significant differences between treatment arms or treatment factors (carboplatin versus no carboplatin, accelerated versus conventional radiotherapy). Haematological toxicity was significantly greater in patients treated with carboplatin and oesophageal toxicity was significantly greater and more protracted in patients treated with accelerated radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS This study failed to show a significant survival advantage for any of the treatment arms or factors. Halving overall treatment time resulted in significantly greater oesophageal toxicity with no suggestion of a survival advantage.

Timing of radiotherapy and chemotherapy following breast-conserving surgery for patients with node-positive breast cancer

PURPOSE A controversy exists regarding whether it is safe to delay radiation therapy until the completion of chemotherapy following breast-conserving surgery for patients with node-positive breast cancer. Within the context of two concurrent randomized clinical trials we had the opportunity to evaluate outcomes for patients who received breast irradiation after completing different durations of chemotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS From July 1986 to April 1993 the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial VI randomly assigned 1554 pre/perimenopausal node-positive breast cancer patients to receive cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) for either three consecutive courses on months 1-3, or six consecutive courses on months 1-6, both with or without reintroduction CMF. IBCSG Trial VII randomly assigned 1266 postmenopausal node-positive breast cancer patients to receive tamoxifen for 5 years, or tamoxifen for 5 years with three early cycles of CMF, both with or without three courses of delayed CMF. Both trials allowed a choice of mastectomy, or breast-conserving surgery plus radiation therapy, and both were stratified by type of surgery. Radiotherapy was delayed until the initial block of CMF was completed; 4 or 7 months after surgery for pre/perimenopausal patients, and 2 or 4 months after surgery for postmenopausal patients. Over both trials, 718 eligible patients elected to receive breast-conserving surgery plus radiation therapy: 433 on Trial VI, and 285 on Trial VII. Four-year actuarial total failure rates (failure at any site), risks of developing distant metastases (DM at any time during observation), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. To avoid potential bias due to competing causes of failure, only patients who could be followed for at least 4 years (enrolled prior to July 1, 1990) were used to evaluate the patterns of first relapse site. Crude percents of local failure with or without other sites (LF), distant metastases including regional nodal failure (DM/RNF), or other first events (second primaries/death without recurrence) were estimated for each treatment group. For this report, an intent to treat analysis was performed at a median follow-up of 48 months. RESULTS No differences were found in the 4-year actuarial total failure rates, risk of developing distant metastases, and overall survival among the two radiotherapy groups of each study. The cumulative incidence of types of first failure and the 4-year crude rates showed no treatment differences in the patterns of site of first event. Estimates for the 4-year crude percent of local failures were 8 and 9% for pre/perimenopausal patients who had radiation therapy at 4 or 7 months after surgery, and 3 and 6% for postmenopausal patients who had radiation therapy at 2 months or 4 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS For node positive patients receiving breast-conserving surgery followed by radiation therapy, the incidence of breast recurrence in the conserved ipsilateral breast within 4 years was between 8 and 9% for pre/perimenopausal patients and between 3 and 6% for postmenopausal patients. After 48 months of median follow-up, administering radiation therapy after three or six cycles of CMF for pre/perimenopausal women, or after no cycles or three cycles of CMF for postmenopausal women does not influence overall efficacy or local control in this series.

Simultaneous adjuvant radiation therapy and chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer--toxicity and dose modification: a Transtasman Radiation Oncology Group Multi-Institution study.

PURPOSE To establish the toxicity profile of simultaneously administered postoperative radiation therapy and CMF chemotherapy as a prelude to a randomized controlled study addressing the sequencing of the two modalities. METHODS AND MATERIALS One hundred and thirty eight breast cancer patients at high risk of locoregional, as well as systemic relapse, who were referred to three centers in Australia and New Zealand were treated with postoperative radiation therapy and chemotherapy simultaneously. Acute toxicity and dose modifications in these patients were compared with 83 patients treated over the same time frame with chemotherapy alone. In a separate study the long-term radiation and surgical effects in 24 patients treated simultaneously with radiation therapy and chemotherapy at Newcastle (Australia) following conservative surgery were compared with 23 matched patients treated at Newcastle with radiation therapy alone. RESULTS Myelotoxicity was increased in patients treated simultaneously with radiation therapy and chemotherapy. The effect was not great, but may have contributed to chemotherapy dose reductions. Lymphopenia was observed to be the largest factor in total white cell depressions caused by the simultaneous administration of radiation therapy. Postsurgical appearances were found to so dominate long-term treatment effects on the treated breast that the effect of radiation therapy dose and additional chemotherapy was difficult to detect. CONCLUSION Studies addressing the sequencing of radiation therapy and chemotherapy will necessarily be large because adverse effects from administering the two modalities simultaneously are not great. The present study has endorsed the importance in future studies of stratification according to the extent and type of surgery and adherence to a single strict policy of chemotherapy dose modification.

A combined modality approach to the management of oesophageal cancer

This study aims to update the experience of multimodality approaches in the management of oesophageal cancer that have been adopted in several Australian and New Zealand hospitals. Between 1984 and 1985, 92 patients received pre-operative radiotherapy (30-36 Gy over 3 weeks) and one of two chemotherapy regimes (one or two courses of i.v. cisplatin 80 mg/m2 plus a 4-5 day continuous i.v. of fluorouracil 5-800 mg/m2/day) concurrently prior to surgery. Eighty-two patients (89%) underwent resection as planned. Operative specimens were microscopically free of residual tumour in 18 patients. Eight patients (9%) had treatment-related deaths: seven from surgery and one due to pre-operative chemoradiation. The Kaplan-Meier 5-year cause-specific survival estimates were 32.9 +/- 7.8% for the 58 patients with squamous cancer and 0% for the 32 with adenocarcinoma. Complete pathological response to the pre-operative regime was more common in females and was associated with a survival advantage. Five-year cause-specific survival expectation in patients who experienced a complete pathological response was 71.5 +/- 12.4%, whereas it was only 15.9 +/- 5.6% in patients who had residual cancer in their surgical specimens. Although less toxic the pre-operative regime utilizing only one cycle of chemotherapy was no less efficacious either in producing a complete pathological response or in terms of survival expectation. This uncontrolled pilot study has produced encouraging long-term results, especially for patients with squamous carcinoma that experienced a complete response to pre-operative synchronous chemoradiotherapy. A randomized controlled study comparing surgery alone with (one cycle) chemoradiation followed by surgery is now underway.

Pelvic radiotherapy with concurrent 5-fluorouracil modulated by leucovorin for rectal cancer: A phase II study

Combined modality treatment for cancer of the rectum has been shown to reduce recurrences and improve overall survival. We wished to find out if we could safely give concurrent radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) modulated by leucovorin (LV) in 3 settings: pre-operatively, adjuvantly and in recurrent disease. A total of 39 patients were treated, 11 preoperatively, 17 adjuvantly and 11 with recurrent disease. There were 26 males and 13 females with a median age of 64 years. The median radiotherapy (RT) dose was 45 Gy/25 fractions/1.8 Gy per fraction (range 25-63 Gy). Chemotherapy consisted of LV 80 mg/m2 i.v. infusion over 1.5 hours followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m2 i.v. bolus, both given once a week. The median number of cycles was 8 (range 3-12). Diarrhoea was the main toxicity, and was encountered in 30 patients (77%): grade 1 in 3 (8%), grade 2 in 12 (30%), grade 3 in 11 (28%), and grade 4 in 4 (10%). This required 18 (46%) patients to have modifications to their RT (20% had breaks and 26% ceased at doses < 45 Gy). Nine patients (23%) had modifications in the chemotherapy (10% had breaks and 13% received < 6 cycles). Encouraging responses were seen in the preoperative setting. Concurrent RT and 5-FU/LV, as given in this schedule, results in an unacceptable incidence of diarrhoea, limiting both the total dose of RT and chemotherapy that can be delivered, particularly in patients who have had previous surgery.

Phase I/II study of concurrent weekly carboplatin and radiation therapy in advanced head and neck cancer

Thirty-two patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer have been treated with concurrent weekly carboplatin and conventional radiation therapy (RT) (2 Gy fractions 4-5 days/week to a total dose of 64-70 Gy over 7-8 weeks) in a Phase I/II study. Carboplatin was administered weekly during RT at doses of 75-150 mg/m2/wk as a 1-hour infusion. The maximum tolerated dose of carboplatin was 130 mg/m2/wk, with myelosuppression, predominantly neutropenia, being dose limiting. Other systemic toxicities were insignificant and no overlapping toxicity was evident. Ultimate locoregional control and survival probabilities were disappointing. It is suggested that either further studies using radiation and carboplatin at the dose 130 mg/m2/wk, or variations on dose and scheduling be performed prior to the instigation of Phase III studies.

The Complex Relationship Between Lung Tumor Volume and Survival in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated by Definitive Radiotherapy: a Prospective, Observational Prognostic Factor Study of the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (Trog 99.05)

068-P12 LUNG ADENOCARCINOMA BIOMARKER SCREENING IN AN AUSTR`ALIAN POPULATION Ainge Allen H, Stone E, Plit Ml, Havryk A, Goldrick A, Field A, Mead S, Qiu M, Chou A, Morey A Department of Respiratory Medicine, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales/AUSTRALIA; Department of Anatomical Pathology, Sydpath, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales/AUSTRALIA Aims: The emergence of new targeted therapies and clinical trials in lung adenocarcinoma suggest that routine molecular biomarker testing is warranted to detected subtypes of adenocarcinoma which will benefit from new therapies. Australian data is still emerging. We aim to detect the incidence of treatment specific molecular subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma in the Australian population. Methods: This is a single centre prospective pilot study of patients with a histopathological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma who have been presented at a Lung Cancer multidisciplinary meeting. Formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue of 22 tumour samples were submitted for targeted PCR-based EGFR and KRAS mutation analysis; and EGFR amplification, MET amplification and EML4-ALK rearrangement testing by in-situ hybridization. one sample had insufficient tissue for analysis. Results: So far 22 patients received a definite tissue diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma, 8/22 with Stage III and 10/22 with Stage IV disease. 4/22 (19%) are positive for an EGFR mutation, with activating EGFR mutations in 3/22 (14%) and an EGFR mutation of uncertain clinical significance in one patient (5%). EGFR amplification was detected in 2/22 patients (9%), KRAS mutations were detected in 5/22 patients (23%) patients, of which none carried EGFR mutations. EML4-ALK translocation was seen in 2/22 patients (9%) and MET amplification in 1/22 (5%) patients. Conclusions: Preliminary results indicate that treatment specific molecular subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma occur more commonly in the Australia population than other Western populations. Though further investigation is required, routine molecular biomarker testing is warranted. Disclosure: This study was funded by an unrestricted grant from Roche.