D. L. Bennett
Niels Bohr Institute
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by D. L. Bennett.
International Journal of Modern Physics A | 1994
D. L. Bennett; Holger Bech Nielsen
In developing a model for predicting the non-Abelian gauge coupling constants, we argue for the phenomenological validity of a “principle of multiple point criticality.” This is supplemented with the assumption of an “(grand) antiunified” gauge group SMGNgen ~ U(1)Ngen × SU(2)Ngen × SU(3)Ngen which, at the Planck scale, breaks down to the diagonal subgroup. (Ngen is the number of generations, which is assumed to be three.) According to this principle of multiple point criticality, the Planck scale experimental couplings correspond to multiple point couplings of the bulk phase transition of a lattice gauge theory (with SMGNgen). Predictions from this principle agree with running non-Abelian couplings (after an extrapolation to the Planck scale using the assumption of a “desert”) to an accuracy of 7%. As an explanation for the existence of the multiple point, a speculative model using a glassy lattice gauge theory is presented.
International Journal of Modern Physics A | 1999
D. L. Bennett; Holger Bech Nielsen
We calculate the U(1) continuum gauge coupling using the values of action parameters coinciding with the multiple point. This is a point in the phase diagram of a lattice gauge theory where a maximum number of phases convene. We obtain for the running inverse fine structure constant the values and at the Planck scale and the MZ scale, respectively. The gauge group underlying the phase diagram in which we seek multiple point parameters is what we call the Anti-grand-unified theory (AGUT) gauge group SMG3, which is the Cartesian product of three Standard Model Groups (SMGs). There is one SMG factor for each of the Ngen=3 generations of quarks and leptons. In our model, this gauge group SMG3 is the predecessor of the usual SMG. The latter arises as the diagonal subgroup surviving the Planck scale breakdown of SMG3. This breakdown leads to a weakening of the U(1) coupling by a Ngen-related factor. For Ngen=3, this factor would be Ngen(Ngen+1)/2=6 if phase transitions between all the phases convening at the multiple point were purely second order. The factor Ngen(Ngen+1)/2=6 corresponds to the six gauge-invariant combinations of the Ngen=3 different U(1)s that give action contributions that are second order in Fμν. The factor analogous to this Ngen(Ngen+1)/2=6 in the case of the earlier considered non-Abelian couplings reduced to the factor Ngen=3 because action terms quadratic in Fμν that arise as contributions from two different of the Ngen=3 SMG factors of SMG3 are forbidden by the requirement of gauge symmetry. Actually we seek the multiple point in the phase diagram of the gauge group U(1)3 as a simplifying approximation to the desired gauge group SMG3. The most important correction obtained from using multiple point parameter values (in a multiparameter phase diagram instead of the single critical parameter value obtained, say, in the one-dimensional phase diagram of a Wilson action) comes from the effect of including the influence of also having at this point phases confined solely w.r.t. discrete subgroups. In particular, what matters is that the degree of first-orderness is taken into account in making the transition from these latter phases at the multiple point to the totally Coulomb-like phase. This gives rise to a discontinuity Δγeff in an effective parameter γeff. Using our calculated value of the quantity Δγeff, we calculate the above-mentioned weakening factor to be more like 6.5 instead of the Ngen(Ngen+1)/2=6, as would be the case if all multiple point transitions were purely second order. Using this same Δγeff, we also calculate the continuum U(1) coupling corresponding to the multiple point of a single U(1). The product of this latter and the weakening factor of about 6.5 yields our Planck scale prediction for the continuum U(1) gauge coupling, i.e. the multiple point critical coupling of the diagonal subgroup of U(1)3∈SMG3. Combining this with the results of earlier work on the non-Abelian gauge couplings leads to our prediction of α-1-137 ± 9 as the value for the fine structure constant at low energies.
arXiv: High Energy Physics - Phenomenology | 1994
D. L. Bennett; C. D. Froggatt; Holger Bech Nielsen
arXiv: High Energy Physics - Phenomenology | 2007
D. L. Bennett; G. Bregar; M. Breskvar; V. V. Dvoeglazov; M. Gregorič; M. Yu. Khlopov; A. Kleppe; L. V. Laperashvili; D. Lukman; N. S. Mankoc Borstnik; R. Mirman; H. B. Nielsen; M. Ninomiya
arXiv: High Energy Physics - Phenomenology | 2006
S. Ansoldi; D. L. Bennett; M. Breskvar; E. Guendelman; M. Yu. Khlopov; L. V. Laperashvili; D. Lukman; N. S. Mankoc Borstnik; R. Mirman; H. B. Nielsen; M. Ninomiya; K. Petrov
International Journal of Modern Physics A | 2013
D. L. Bennett; L. V. Laperashvili; Holger Bech Nielsen; Anca Tureanu
Archive | 1995
D. L. Bennett; Colin D. Froggatt; H. B. Nielsen
Archive | 2006
D. L. Bennett; L. V. Laperashvili; H. B. Nielsen
arXiv: High Energy Physics - Phenomenology | 2005
D. L. Bennett; M. Blagojevic; B. Cvetkovic; A. Borstnik Bracic; C. D. Froggatt; Y. Habara; A. Kleppe; D. Lukman; N. S. Mankoc Borstnik; R. Mirman; P. Nicolini; H. B. Nielsen; M. Ninomiya
Archive | 2004
D. L. Bennett; Holger Bech Nielsen