D.L. Habliston

Staurosporine induces dissolution of microfilament bundles by a protein kinase C-independent pathway☆

The protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor staurosporine was found to dramatically alter the actin microfilament cytoskeleton of a variety of cultured cells, including PTK2 epithelial cells, Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts, and human foreskin fibroblasts. For example, PTK2 cells exposed to 20 nM staurosporine exhibited a progressive thinning and loss of cytoplasmic actin microfilament bundles over a 60-min period. During this time microtubule and intermediate filament systems remained intact (as shown by immunofluorescence and at higher resolution by photoelectron microscopy), and the cells remained spread even though microfilament bundles were absent. Higher doses of staurosporine or longer exposure times at lower doses resulted in morphological alterations, but even severely arborized cells recovered normal morphology and actin patterns after a wash and an incubation for several hours in fresh medium. The actin filament disruption induced by staurosporine was distinguishable from the actin reorganization induced by exposure to the tumor promoter (and activator of PKC) phorbol myristate acetate (PMA). Swiss 3T3 cells made deficient in PKC by prolonged exposure to PMA (PKC down-regulation) exhibited actin alterations in response to staurosporine which were comparable to those in cells which had not been exposed to the phorbol ester. In a parallel control experiment, the actin cytoskeleton of PKC-deficient 3T3 cells was unaffected in response to PMA, consistent with down-regulation of this kinase. While the exact mechanism of staurosporine-induced actin reorganization remains to be determined, the observed effects of staurosporine on PKC-deficient cells make a role for PKC unlikely. These results indicate the need for care when staurosporine is employed as an inhibitor of protein kinase C in studies involving intact cells.

Biological applications of photoelectron imaging: a practical perspective

Photoelectron imaging is finding a promising niche in the study of biological specimens. The features of photoelectron imaging that contribute to its uniqueness for this application are described. Image formation and the major contrast mechanisms of photoelectron microscopy, material contrast and topographical contrast are reviewed and illustrated with examples of photoelectron images of cultured cells and of DNA. General considerations in sample choice and preparation are also presented. Strategies for photoelectron labeling are discussed including the use of immunogold labeling, silver enhancement and cesium-based photocathodes.

Contrast effects in photoelectron microscopy: UV dose-dependent quantum yields of biological surface components

The relative brightness of photoelectron microscopy images as a function of exposure to UV light has been determined from model systems representative of biological cell surface components. Quantitative data for amino acid homopolymers, yields. The photoelectron quantum yields, increase substantially over the initial values. For example, the quantum yields fo poly-L-tyrosine at 200 nm is initially about 5 X 10(-8) electron/incident photon. The quantum yield increases with 254 nm irradiation, leveling off at about 5 X 10(-4) electrons/incident photon after a dose of 3 X 10(21) quanta cm-2. Pre-irradiation of poly-L-tyrosine in the presence of certain chemical agents, for example, the Lewis base diborane (B2H6), results in a substantial reduction of the dose-dependent increase in quantum yield. Exposure to the reducing agent stannane (SnH4) essentially eliminates the effect. These chemical treatments provide methods of controlling the UV dose-dependent effects in the photoelectron images.

Photoelectron imaging of cells: photoconductivity extends the range of applicability

Photoelectron imaging is a sensitive surface technique in which photons are used to excite electron emission. This novel method has been applied successfully in studies of relatively flat cultured cells, viruses, and protein-DNA complexes. However, rounded-up cell types such as tumor cells frequently are more difficult to image. By comparing photoelectron images of uncoated and metal-coated MCF-7 human breast carcinoma cells, it is shown that the problem is specimen charging rather than a fundamental limitation of the electron imaging process. This is confirmed by emission current measurements on uncoated monolayers of MCF-7 carcinoma cells and flatter, normal Wi-38 fibroblasts. We report here that sample charging in photoelectron microscopy can be eliminated in most specimens by simultaneous use of two light sources--the standard UV excitation source (e.g., 254 nm) and a longer wavelength light source (e.g., 325 nm). The reduction in sample charging results largely from enhanced photoconduction in the bulk sample and greatly extends the range of cells that can be examined by photoelectron imaging. The contributions of photoconductivity, the electric field of the imaging system, and the short escape depths of the photoelectrons combine to make photoelectron imaging a uniquely sensitive technique for the study of biological surfaces.

A computer-aided control, design and image-processing system for electron microscopes

A computer-control system for electron microscopes is described. The aim is to reduce a complex series of vacuum-system controls to a menu-driven program that simplifies the operation of the microscope. The system also incorporates image processing, notebook, computer-aided design, and communication functions. It is designed around a commercially available computer workstation. This system has been implemented on an institute-built photoelectron microscope of ultrahigh-vacuum design.

Photoelectron imaging of viruses and DNA: evaluation of substrates by unidirectional low angle shadowing and photoemission current measurements.

Photoelectron imaging (photoelectron emission microscopy, PEM or PEEM) is a promising high resolution surface-sensitive technique for biophysical studies. At present, image quality is often limited by the underlying substrate. For photoelectron imaging, the substrate must be electrically conductive, low in electron emission, and relatively flat. A number of conductive substrate materials with relatively low electron emission were examined for surface roughness. Low angle, unidirectional shadowing of the specimens followed by photoelectron microscopy was found to be an effective way to test the quality of substrate surfaces. Optimal results were obtained by depositing approximately 0.1 nm of platinum-palladium (80:20) at an angle of 3 degrees. Among potential substrates for photoelectron imaging, silicon and evaporated chromium surfaces were found to be much smoother than evaporated magnesium fluoride, which initially appeared promising because of its very low electron emission. The best images were obtained with a chromium substrate coated with a thin layer of dextran derivatized with spermidine, which facilitated the spreading and adhesion of biomolecules to the surfaces. Making use of this substrate, improved photoelectron images are reported for tobacco mosaic virus particles and DNA-recA complexes.

On the possibility of obtaining a physical map of genomes by photoelectron imaging

Photoelectron imaging provides the possibility of a new method of mapping chromosomes. The basic concept is to cause DNA to emit electrons under the action of UV light. The criteria which must be met to map genomes by photoelectron imaging are set forth and discussed. Forming an image of the DNA by accelerating and focusing the electrons is a necessary but not sufficient condition for genome mapping. Equally important is to identify wavelengths of UV light which will cause selective emission from the base pairs, adenine-thymine and guanine-cytosine. The resulting image would then contain a modulation in the image brightness along the DNA duplex. By examining the photoelectron current from uniform films of homopolymers, a wavelength region is identified where marked differences in emission from base pairs is observed. At 160 nm, for example, the relative electron emission from a film of poly(dGdC) is approximately 5 times greater than for an equivalent film of poly(dAdT). Using the experimental data and known sequences, photoelectron gene maps are calculated for the bacteriophage lambda and for a short interspersed repetitive DNA sequence (an Alu repeat) of the human genome. The results suggest that a 5-nm physical map of chromosomes generated by photoelectron imaging would be informative and useful in mapping human and other large genomes.