D. L. Talboys
University of Leicester
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by D. L. Talboys.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2008
E. J. Bunce; C. S. Arridge; John Clarke; A. J. Coates; S. W. H. Cowley; Michele K. Dougherty; Jean-Claude Gérard; Denis Grodent; Kenneth Calvin Hansen; J. D. Nichols; D. J. Southwood; D. L. Talboys
Outer planet auroras have been imaged for more than a decade, yet understanding their physical origin requires simultaneous remote and in situ observations. The first such measurements at Saturn were obtained in January 2007, when the Hubble Space Telescope imaged the ultraviolet aurora, while the Cassini spacecraft crossed field lines connected to the auroral oval in the high-latitude magnetosphere near noon. The Cassini data indicate that the noon aurora lies in the boundary between open- and closed-field lines, where a layer of upward-directed field-aligned current flows whose density requires downward acceleration of magnetospheric electrons sufficient to produce the aurora. These observations indicate that the quasi-continuous main oval is produced by the magnetosphere-solar wind interaction through the shear in rotational flow across the open-closed-field line boundary.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2009
J. D. Nichols; S. V. Badman; E. J. Bunce; John Clarke; S. W. H. Cowley; Frank Judson Crary; M. K. Dougherty; Jean-Claude Gérard; Denis Grodent; Kenneth Calvin Hansen; W. S. Kurth; D. G. Mitchell; Wayne R. Pryor; Tom Stallard; D. L. Talboys; S. Wannawichian
Received 23 October 2009; accepted 24 November 2009; published 23 December 2009. [1] We present the first images of Saturn’s conjugate equinoctial auroras, obtained in early 2009 using the Hubble Space Telescope. We show that the radius of the northern auroral oval is � 1.5 smaller than the southern, indicating that Saturn’s polar ionospheric magnetic field, measured for the first time in the ionosphere, is � 17% larger in the north than the south. Despite this, the total emitted UV power is on average � 17% larger in the north than the south, suggesting that field-aligned currents (FACs) are responsible for the emission. Finally, we show that individual auroral features can exhibit distinct hemispheric asymmetries. These observations will provide important context for Cassini observations as Saturn moves from southern to northern summer. Citation: Nichols, J. D., et al. (2009), Saturn’s equinoctial auroras, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L24102, doi:10.1029/2009GL041491.
Nature | 2008
Tom Stallard; Steve Miller; Makenzie B. Lystrup; Nicholas Achilleos; E. J. Bunce; C. S. Arridge; Michele K. Dougherty; S. W. H. Cowley; S. V. Badman; D. L. Talboys; Robert H. Brown; Kevin H. Baines; Bonnie J. Buratti; Roger N. Clark; Christophe Sotin; Phil D. Nicholson; P. Drossart
The majority of planetary aurorae are produced by electrical currents flowing between the ionosphere and the magnetosphere which accelerate energetic charged particles that hit the upper atmosphere. At Saturn, these processes collisionally excite hydrogen, causing ultraviolet emission, and ionize the hydrogen, leading to H3+ infrared emission. Although the morphology of these aurorae is affected by changes in the solar wind, the source of the currents which produce them is a matter of debate. Recent models predict only weak emission away from the main auroral oval. Here we report images that show emission both poleward and equatorward of the main oval (separated by a region of low emission). The extensive polar emission is highly variable with time, and disappears when the main oval has a spiral morphology; this suggests that although the polar emission may be associated with minor increases in the dynamic pressure from the solar wind, it is not directly linked to strong magnetospheric compressions. This aurora appears to be unique to Saturn and cannot be explained using our current understanding of Saturn’s magnetosphere. The equatorward arc of emission exists only on the nightside of the planet, and arises from internal magnetospheric processes that are currently unknown.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2011
K. Ågren; D. J. Andrews; Stephan C. Buchert; A. J. Coates; S. W. H. Cowley; M. K. Dougherty; Niklas J. T. Edberg; P. Garnier; G. R. Lewis; Ronan Modolo; H. J. Opgenoorth; G. Provan; L. Rosenqvist; D. L. Talboys; Jan-Erik Wahlund; Anne Wellbrock
We present observations from three Cassini flybys of Titan using data from the radio and plasma wave science, magnetometer and plasma spectrometer instruments. We combine magnetic field and cold pl ...
Planetary and Space Science | 2012
Nigel P. Bannister; George W. Fraser; S. T. Lindsay; A. Martindale; D. L. Talboys
Abstract The MESSENGER spacecraft conducted its first flyby of Mercury on 14th January 2008, followed by two subsequent encounters on 6th October 2008 and 29th September 2009, prior to Mercury orbit insertion on 18th March 2011. We have reviewed MESSENGER flight telemetry and X-ray Spectrometer observations from the first two encounters, and correlate several prominent features in the data with the presence of astrophysical X-ray sources in the instrument field of view. We find that two X-ray peaks, attributed in earlier work to the detection of suprathermal electrons from the Mercury magnetosphere, are likely to contain a significant number of events that are of astrophysical origin. The intensities of these two peaks cannot be explained entirely on the basis of astrophysical sources, and we support the previous suprathermal explanation but suggest that the electron fluxes derived in those studies be revised to correct for a significant astrophysical signal.
Earth Moon and Planets | 2005
D. L. Talboys; George W. Fraser; Richard M. Ambrosi; N. Nelms; Nigel P. Bannister; Mark R. Sims; Derek Pullan; J. Holt
Abstract.A human return to the Moon will require that astronauts are well equipped with instrumentation to aid their investigations during geological field work. Two instruments are described in detail. The first is a portable X-ray Spectrometer, which can provide rapid geochemical analyses of rocks and soils, identify lunar resources and aid selection of samples for return to Earth. The second instrument is the Geological and Radiation environment package (GEORAD). This is an instrument package, mounted on a rover, to perform in-situ measurements on the lunar surface. It can be used for bulk geochemical measurements of rocks and soils (particularly identifying KREEP-enriched rocks), prospect for ice in shadowed areas of craters at the poles and characterise the lunar radiation environment.
Planetary and Space Science | 2010
George W. Fraser; James Carpenter; David A. Rothery; James F. Pearson; A. Martindale; J. Huovelin; J. Treis; M. Anand; M. Anttila; M Ashcroft; J Benkoff; P Bland; A Bowyer; A Bradley; John C. Bridges; C Brown; C. Bulloch; E. J. Bunce; Ulrich R. Christensen; M Evans; R. Fairbend; M Feasey; F. Giannini; S Hermann; M Hesse; M. Hilchenbach; T Jorden; K. H. Joy; M. Kaipiainen; I Kitchingman
Annales Geophysicae | 2008
S. W. H. Cowley; C. S. Arridge; E. J. Bunce; John Clarke; A. J. Coates; Michele K. Dougherty; Jean-Claude Gérard; Denis Grodent; J. D. Nichols; D. L. Talboys
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2009
D. L. Talboys; C. S. Arridge; E. J. Bunce; A. J. Coates; S. W. H. Cowley; M. K. Dougherty
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2011
D. L. Talboys; E. J. Bunce; S. W. H. Cowley; C. S. Arridge; A. J. Coates; M. K. Dougherty