D. McLain

THE IMPACT OF ADJUVANT NEPHRECTOMY ON MULTIMODALITY TREATMENT OF METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA

Multimodality treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with biological response modifiers and cytoreductive surgery has produced durable responses. The timing and impact of cytoreductive surgery on the success of immunotherapy require further study. We reviewed the treatment of 62 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and primary tumors in place who qualified for multimodality treatment comprising adjuvant nephrectomy and biological response modifier protocols at our institution between 1987 and 1992. Of the patients 37 were scheduled to undergo initial adjuvant nephrectomy followed by biological response modifier therapy. A total of 25 patients underwent initial biological response modifier therapy with planned delayed adjuvant nephrectomy if a response to treatment was demonstrated. Of the 37 patients undergoing initial adjuvant nephrectomy, 8 (22%) were unable to enter induction of immunotherapy because of perioperative complications (1), medical contraindications (2), tumor progression (4) or death (1). Three patients in the initial adjuvant nephrectomy group (8%) had a partial response and the median survival in this group was 12 months (range 1 to 57). In the initial biological response modifier group 3 patients (12%) with an objective response (2 complete and 1 partial) to biological response modifier therapy underwent nephrectomy. The median survival for the initial biological response modifier group was 14 months (range 1 to 48). These results add to our understanding of the impact of adjuvant nephrectomy on patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma considered for immunotherapy protocols.

Phase II Trial of Liposomal Doxorubicin (Doxil®) in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas

AbstractPurpose: To assess the objective response rate, toxicityexperienced, progression-free survival, and overall survival ofpatients with previously untreated advanced soft tissue sarcomastreated with a liposomal doxorubicin formulation (Doxil). Methods: Patients with metastatic or recurrent soft tissuesarcoma who had received no prior chemotherapy for advanceddisease were treated with liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) accordingto a two stage accrual design. Doxil was administered at 50mg/m2 every 4 weeks. A total of 15 patients were treated andare evaluable for response and toxicity. Results: The male/female ratio was 7/8, the median age was60 years (34–75) and the ECOG performance status was 0-1 in>90% of patients. Leiomyosarcoma (7/15) and malignant fibroushistiocytoma (2/15) were the most common histologic diagnoses.No objective responses were observed in the 15 evaluablepatients. No lethal toxicity occurred. Grade 3–4 leukopenia orneutropenia were reported in 3/15 (20%) patients. Grade 3mucositis or hand-foot syndrome occurred in 2/15 (13%) and 1/15(7%) patients respectively and seemed more severe in olderpatients. The median time to progression was 1.9 months (range0.9–6.2). Twelve patients have now died. The Kaplan-Meierestimate of median overall survival is 12.3 months. As called forin the study design, accrual was terminated because no responseswere obtained in the first 15 patients. Conclusion: Though well-tolerated, Doxil given accordingto this dose and schedule to patients with advanced soft tissuesarcoma had no significant therapeutic activity. A correlationbetween older age and skin/mucosal toxicity of Doxil is suggestedin this study but needs confirmation. Future investigations ofDoxil in soft tissue sarcomas should use a different schedule anddose.

Phase II trial of interleukin-2 and interferon-α in patients with renal cell carcinoma : Clinical results and immunologic correlates of response

A phase II trial was conducted in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, to assess the clinical efficacy and immunoregulatory effects of continuous-infusion recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) (9.0 x 10(6) IU/m2/day on days 1-5, 8-12, 15-19, and 22-26) and subcutaneously administered recombinant human interferon-alpha 2b (rHuIFN alpha 2b) (10.0 x 10(6) U/m2/day TIW). Thirty-six patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, performance status of 0-1, and measurable disease who had not received prior rIL-2, rHuIFN alpha 2b, or chemotherapy were treated. Patients with CNS metastases, active infections, history of another malignancy within 3 years, and those requiring corticosteroids were ineligible. Cycles of rIL-2 and rHuIFN alpha 2b were administered in the outpatient department every 6-8 weeks in stable or responding patients until patient tolerance or a complete response were reached. Doses were modified for grade III or IV toxicity. Ancillary studies included three-color immunocytometric analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes, repetitive tumor biopsies for immunohistologic analysis of infiltrating cells and proliferative responses of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, and preliminary studies of changes in peripheral blood T-lymphocyte signal transduction molecules [T-cell receptor (TCR)-zeta, p56ick, p59fyn]. Thirty-six eligible patients were treated, with 6 of 36 patients (17%, 95% confidence interval 6-33%) responding (3 complete response, 3 partial response). In two of the partial responders, and in an additional three patients with either minimal tumor regression (one patient) or stable disease (two patients), surgical removal of residual disease was undertaken. The median survival of all patients was 14 months. The toxicity of this regimen was severe, but outpatient administration was possible in most instances. Immunoregulatory effects on T-cell subsets included increases in various CD3+ CD25+/- HLADr+/- subsets unrelated to response. Tumor biopsies before and/or during therapy were obtained in 17 patients, and no consistent alterations in the degree of T-lymphocyte or macrophage infiltrates could be detected. In a subset of patients, tumor infiltrating lymphocyte proliferative responses and levels of peripheral blood T-cell signal transduction molecules (TCR-zeta, p56lck, p59fyn) were investigated. Abnormalities were found in selected patients, which improved during rIL-2/rHuIFN alpha 2b therapy. This cytokine combination produces tumor regression in selected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Surrogate immunologic markers associated with response were not identified; however, preliminary studies demonstrate investigation of immune defects and their reversal with cytokine therapy is possible.

Phase I study of WR-2721 and carboplatin

Because WR-2721 reduces the toxicity of cisplatin and carboplatin in preclinical systems, we have treated 35 patients in a phase I study of WR-2721 and carboplatin. As the plasma half-life of WR-2721 is short relative to that of carboplatin, WR-2721 was administered in two divided doses. This schedule produced acceptable toxicity in 24 patients treated with carboplatin 400 mg/m2 and escalating doses of WR-2721. In the subsequent 11 patients, WR-2721 was fixed at 740 mg/m2/dose and the dose of carboplatin was escalated. With WR-2721, grade 3-4 thrombopenia (platelets < 50 x 10(9)/l) was produced in 4/5 patients treated with carboplatin 625 mg/m2 and in 1/6 patients treated with carboplatin 500 mg/m2. Carboplatin pharmacokinetic parameters in 4 patients were similar to those reported for carboplatin alone. These results suggest that WR-2721 might increase the maximum tolerated dose of carboplatin from 400 to 500 mg/m2.

Phase I trial of recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with lung cancer: clinical and immunologic effects.

Recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhuGM-CSF) may enhance the functional activity of monocytes and macrophages in vitro and in vivo and thereby have antitumor activity. A phase I trial using rhuGM-CSF was performed; the trial included 17 patients with unresectable and/or metastatic lung cancer. rhuGM-CSF was administered as a continuous infusion for 14 days at four dose levels: 60 micrograms/m2, 125 micrograms/m2, 250 micrograms/m2, and 500 micrograms/m2. Dose-limiting toxicity was pulmonary and occurred at 500 micrograms/m2, with the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) identified as 250 micrograms/m2. The hematologic effects of rhuGM-CSF included leukocytosis with significant correlations between dose level and the numbers of neutrophils, monocytes, eosinophils, and lymphocytes. Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed for 14 patients, and no effect on alveolar macrophage numbers was detected. Tumor biopsies were obtained in two patients, and no changes in macrophage infiltrates were detected with use of immunohistochemical studies. Serum levels of GM-CSF reached a steady state during week one and decreased or were undetectable during week two. No evidence of tumor regression was seen. rhuGM-CSF when administered as a continuous infusion was well tolerated and appears to modulate monocyte numbers and function in vivo.

Phase I and II trials of subcutaneously administered rIL-2, interferon alfa-2a, and fluorouracil in patients with metastatic renal carcinoma

Purpose: A phase I followed by a phase II trial utilizing rIL-2, IFNα, and 5-FU were conducted in patients with unresectable and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Methods: Treatment consisted of: rIL-2 at 5.0 × 106 IU/m2 SQ on days 1–5 for 4 weeks, rHuIFNα-2a at 5.0 × 106 U/m2 SQ on days 1, 3, and 5 for 4 weeks, and 5-FU by IV bolus on days 1–5 during week 1. In the phase I study, patients were treated at varying doses of 5-FU: I-none, II-250 mg/m2, III-300, and IV 375. A phase II trial was then conducted utilizing the same schedule and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for 5-FU. Results: Twenty patients were entered into the phase I trial. Dose-limiting toxicity included grade III nausea and vomiting, and one sudden cardiac death. The MTD for 5-FU was determined to be 300 mg/m2. In the phase II trial, a median of two cycles of therapy was administered to 25 evaluable patients. Toxicity was moderate and consisted primarily of fevers, chills, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and anorexia. Grade IV thrombocytopenia, consistent with ITP, developed in one patient each on the phase I and phase II trial. Seven partial responses were seen among 25 patients treated in the phase II trial for a 28% (CI 12–49%) response rate. Conclusions: The addition of 5-FU to rIL-2 and rHuIFNα-2a appears to increase the toxicity of this therapy. Randomized trials will be required to determine if efficacy is enhanced.

Amifostine: potential for clinically useful cytoprotection

The ability to target malignant cells for cytotoxicity while sparing normal host tissues has proven to be limited. These limitations have resulted in unacceptable toxicity or insufficiently effective therapy. Continuing investigation of new, potentially useful cytotoxic agents must continue. An alternative approach, also worthy of study, is the selective protection of normal tissues. This approach, used in conjunction with available therapeutic agents, may open the therapeutic window and incrementally enhance the effectiveness of cytotoxic therapy. A variety of methods have been used to protect normal tissues selectively. Regional protection can be used for certain organ systems, such as the oral mucosa. Selective protection on a systemic level is more difficult but agents that seem to protect normal but not malignant tissues selectively are being developed. Among these is amifostine, which was originally selected by the U.S. defense department for study as a radio-protectant. Pre-clinical studies have suggested that amifostine is differentially concentrated in normal tissues but not in malignant tissues. Tissue-specific differences in the activity of alkaline phosphatase, which dephosphorylates amifostine to its active metabolite WR-1065, and in pH are thought to be involved in this relative specificity. Clinical studies indicate that amifostine can reduce the myelosuppression produced by cyclophosphamide, the combination of cyclophosphamide and cisplatin, and, perhaps, carboplatin. The protective effects of amifostine on non-hematopoietic toxicities are being investigated. Future trials will investigate the integration of amifostine with cytokine-based supportive care in order to define the role of this potentially clinically useful cytoprotectant agent.

Phase I Trial of Cisplatin, WR-2721, and the Murine Monoclonal Antibody R24 in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma: Clinical and Biologic Effects

The therapeutic and biologic effects of murine monoclonal antibodies in patients with malignancies have been widely investigated. Attempts to enhance results by combining these agents with cytotoxic drugs are now under study. A Phase I trial was performed to assess the toxicity and biologic effects of escalating doses of R24 (0-40 mg/m2/day 1-5, 8-12), an antibody that binds to the ganglioside GD3 present on melanoma cells, administered in combination with cisplatin (120 mg/m2) and WR-2721 (740 mg/m2) on day 1. Twenty-three patients with metastatic malignant melanoma were treated and are evaluable. The true maximum tolerated dose of R24 given as part of this combination was not reached. The toxicity of the regimen was moderate and included fever and urticaria, which were attributed to R24. Severe but reversible renal failure was noted in six patients in subsequent (two or more) treatment cycles, but when cisplatin was administered in 3% saline, this toxicity was not seen. Responses were seen in 2 of 19 patients receiving all three agents and in 1 of 4 patients receiving only cisplatin and WR-2721. No significant enhancement of natural killer, lymphokine-activated killer, and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity lytic activity or significant changes from baseline in lymphocyte subsets secondary to R24 were seen. In 4 of 10 patients tumor localization of mouse monoclonal antibody was found and appeared greatest at higher R24 doses and during week 1 of therapy. Human anti-mouse antibody responses developed by day 22 in 17 of 19 patients treated with R24, and the coadministration of cisplatin did not appear to abrogate this response. Finally, the half-life and Cmax of cisplatin were not affected by R24. In summary, the combination was well tolerated, responses were few, and significant biologic interactions or immunomodulation were not observed.

Phase 1 trial of subcutaneous IL-6 in patients with refractory cancer: Clinical and biologic effects

The authors evaluated the clinical and biologic effects of human recombinant interleukin-6 (rhIL-6) in patients with refractory cancer. A phase 1 trial using escalating doses of rhIL-6 (1–50 &mgr;g·kg−1·d−1, Monday through Friday for 4 weeks) was performed in 30 patients. Toxicity was moderate and the maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 25 &mgr;g·kg−1·d−1 based on cardiac and neurocortical toxicity in one patient each and thrombocytosis (platelets > 800,000/&mgr;L) in three patients. One patient with non–small-cell lung cancer had a partial response after three cycles of therapy. The biologic effects of rhIL-6 included anemia and dose-related thrombocytosis. Various proinflammatory activities were induced and included dose-related cyclical increases in peripheral blood monocytes and the CD14+/CD45RB+ ± CD16C+ mononuclear cell populations. These increases were accompanied by increased levels of C-reactive protein, serum neopterin, and type I soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor. In contrast, rhIL-6 did not affect lymphocyte numbers or function (cytotoxicity, cytokine levels, immunoglobulin levels), with the possible exception of IL-2R&agr; mRNA induction in peripheral blood lymphocytes. rhIL-6 has pleiotropic proinflammatory actions in vivo and moderate toxicity when administered as long-term therapy.

A phase II pharmacodynamic study of pyrazoloacridine in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Purpose: To perform a phase II trial of pyrazoloacridine (PZA), a novel DNA intercalator, in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma and no previous therapy. Methods: PZA was administered at a dose of 750 mg/m2 intravenously over 3 h every 21 days. Pharmacokinetic studies to determine PZA plasma concentrations were performed. Results: No responses were seen in 14 response-evaluable patients. Patients received a median of two cycles of PZA (range 1–6). Toxicity included neutropenia and neurologic side-effects, which were ≥ grade III in 73% and 14%, respectively. High plasma concentrations of PZA (Cmax) correlated with low neutrophil counts (P=0.04). Conclusions: PZA is inactive at this dose and schedule in colorectal cancer, and produces moderately severe toxicity.