Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where D. Monga is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by D. Monga.


Experimental Agriculture | 2015

PROSPECTING CYANOBACTERIA-FORTIFIED COMPOSTS AS PLANT GROWTH PROMOTING AND BIOCONTROL AGENTS IN COTTON

Radha Prasanna; Santosh Babu; Ngangom Bidyarani; Arun Kumar; S. Triveni; D. Monga; Arup Kumar Mukherjee; S. Kranthi; Nandini Gokte-Narkhedkar; Anurup Adak; Kuldeep Yadav; Lata Nain; Anil Kumar Saxena

The potential of cyanobacteria-based compost formulations was evaluated in cotton crop at two agro-ecological locations (Nagpur and Sirsa) as plant growth promoting (PGP) and biocontrol agents. Compost-based formulations fortified with Calothrix sp. or Anabaena sp. enhanced germination and fresh weight of plants, and microbiological activity by 10–15%, besides increased available nitrogen (by 20–50%) in soil at Nagpur. In the fungi-infected fields at Sirsa, Anabaena – T. viride biofilmed formulation performed the best, recording 11.1% lower plant mortality than commercial Trichoderma formulation. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed the colonisation of inoculated cyanobacteria/biofilms on roots. Significant correlation between mortality, increased activity of hydrolytic enzymes and fresh weight of plant roots were recorded. Calothrix sp. and Anabaena sp. proved promising as both PGP and biocontrol agents, while biofilmed formulations substantially reduced mortality of cotton plants in sick plots. This study illustrates the promise of cyanobacteria as viable inoculation option for integrated nutrient and pest management strategies of cotton.


Phytoparasitica | 2012

Influence of pesticides and application methods on pest and predatory arthropods associated with cotton

Rishi Kumar; S. Kranthi; Mukesh Nitharwal; S. L. Jat; D. Monga

Incidence of sucking pests was studied in a transgenic (Bt) and non-transgenic cotton (non-Bt) agro ecosystem in 2008 and 2009. Simultaneously, the influence of different pesticides applied in two different methods on sucking pests and generalist predators was investigated on transgenic cotton. In stem application, the insecticides solutions prepared were painted directly on the middle portion of the plant stem but in foliar application the recommended dosages of the insecticides were sprayed on the cotton plant. The transgenic and non-transgenic cotton did not differ significantly in the population of sucking pests. The different pesticides when applied by foliar sprays reduced significantly more sucking pests than stem application. Among the different insecticides used, imidacloprid caused the maximum reduction of the leaf hopper population, acetamiprid caused the maximum whitefly reduction, and clothianidin caused the maximum thrips reduction under foliar application. Via stem application, acetamiprid and thiomethoxam were found better in suppression of the sucking pests’ population, but the population of predators was significantly less disrupted by the stem application method. The foliar application was in general more effective; stem application may be more applicable early in the season when its efficacy was higher and when foliar sprays were particularly destructive to beneficial pests. In foliar application, all the systemic neonicotinoids like imidacloprid, clothianidin, admire, thiamethoxam and acetamiprid were found highly toxic to natural enemies in comparison with spirotetramat, buprofezin and fipronil.


International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences | 2018

Evaluation of Advance Generation Populations of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) for High Ginning Out Turn Percent and Yield

S.L. Ahuja; D. Monga; Rishi Kumar; S.K. Sain

Historically, cotton breeders have focused on seed cotton yield, quality, maturity and host plant resistant traits. Advances in breeding for increased lint yield have slowed down perhaps because of its relatively low heritability and high environmental interaction. Approaches to enhance lint yield by increasing ginning out turn percent (GOT%) (presently around 35% in India) should help breeder to break the productivity barriers in response to global competition.


Journal of Heredity | 2006

Genetics of Resistance to Cotton Leaf Curl Disease in Gossypium hirsutum L. under Field Conditions

Shankar Lal Ahuja; D. Monga; Laxman Singh Dhayal


European Journal of Plant Pathology | 2015

Evaluating microbe-plant interactions and varietal differences for enhancing biocontrol efficacy in root rot disease challenged cotton crop

Santosh Babu; Ngangom Bidyarani; Preeti Chopra; D. Monga; Rishi Kumar; Radha Prasanna; S. Kranthi; Anil Kumar Saxena


Journal of Biological Control | 2010

Natural Parasitization of Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on Cotton by Aenasius bambawalei Hayat (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae)

Rishi Kumar; K. R. Kranthi; D. Monga; S. L. Jat


Euphytica | 2009

Performance of upland coloured cotton germplasm lines in line × tester crosses

Shankar Lal Ahuja; Laxman Singh Dhayal; D. Monga


Journal of Phytopathology | 2016

Microbial Inoculants with Multifaceted Traits Suppress Rhizoctonia Populations and Promote Plant Growth in Cotton

Radha Prasanna; Balasubramanian Ramakrishnan; Kunal Ranjan; Siddarthan Venkatachalam; Amrita Kanchan; Priyanka Solanki; D. Monga; Yashbir Singh Shivay; S. Kranthi


World Cotton Research Conference-5, Mumbai, India, 7-11 November 2011 | 2011

Emerging and key insect pests on Bt cotton - their identification, taxonomy, genetic diversity and management.

S. Kranthi; K. R. Kranthi; Rishi Kumar; Dharajothi; S. S. Udikeri; G. M. V. P. Rao; P. R. Zanwar; V. N. Nagrare; C. B. Naik; V. Singh; V. V. Ramamurthy; D. Monga


Current Science | 2017

Non-Bt Seeds Provided by Seed Companies in India - Are they Suitable as Refuge for Bt-Cotton?

S. Kranthi; U. Satija; P. Pusadkar; Rishi Kumar; C. S. Shastri; S. Ansari; H. B. Santosh; D. Monga; K. R. Kranthi

Collaboration


Dive into the D. Monga's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rishi Kumar

Central Institute for Cotton Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Kranthi

Central Institute for Cotton Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

K. R. Kranthi

Central Institute for Cotton Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. L. Jat

Central Institute for Cotton Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mukesh Nitharwal

Central Institute for Cotton Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Radha Prasanna

Indian Agricultural Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shankar Lal Ahuja

Central Institute for Cotton Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anil Kumar Saxena

Indian Agricultural Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

K. C. Kumhar

Central Institute for Cotton Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Laxman Singh Dhayal

Central Institute for Cotton Research

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge