D. Pelegrin

Hypogammaglobulinemia following cardiac transplantation: a link between rejection and infection

BACKGROUND Hypogammaglobulinemia (HGG) has been reported after solid organ transplantation and is noted to confer an increased risk of opportunistic infections. OBJECTIVES In this study, we sought to assess the relationship between severe HGG to infection and acute cellular rejection following heart transplantation. METHODS Between February 1997 and January 1999, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcome of 111 consecutive heart transplant recipients who had immunoglobulin G (IgG) level monitoring at 3 and 6 months post-transplant and when clinically indicated. RESULTS Eighty-one percent of patients were males, mean age 54 +/- 13 years, and the mean follow-up period was 13.8 +/- 5.7 months. Patients had normal IgG levels prior to transplant (mean 1137 +/- 353 mg/dl). Ten percent (11 of 111) of patients developed severe HGG (IgG < 350 mg/dl) post-transplant. The average time to the lowest IgG level was 196 +/- 125 days. Patients with severe HGG were at increased risk of opportunistic infections compared to patients with IgG > 350 mg/dl (55% [6 of 11] vs. 5% [5 of 100], odds ratio = 22.8, p < 0.001). Compared to patients with no rejection, patients who experienced three or more episodes of rejection had lower mean IgG (580 +/- 309 vs. 751 +/- 325, p = 0.05), and increased incidence of severe HGG (33% [7 of 21] vs. 2.8% [1 of 35], p = 0.001). The incidence of rejection episodes per patient at 1 year was higher in patients with severe HGG compared to patients with IgG >350 (2.82 +/- 1.66 vs. 1.36 +/- 1.45 episodes/patient, p = 0.02). The use of parenteral steroid pulse therapy was associated with an increased risk of severe HGG (odds ratio = 15.28, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Severe HGG after cardiac transplantation may develop as a consequence of intensification of immunosuppressive therapy for rejection and hence, confers an increased risk of opportunistic infections. IgG level may be a useful marker for identifying patients at high risk.

Efficacy of tacrolimus in patients with steroid-resistant cardiac allograft cellular rejection.

BACKGROUND Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive agent that is gaining widespread use in solid organ transplantation. This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of tacrolimus in treating steroid-resistant cellular myocardial rejection. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of rejection and clinical outcome of 21 heart transplant recipients who were electively converted from cyclosporine to tacrolimus for recurrent episodes of steroid-resistant cellular rejection. These were compared to a historic group of 6 hemodynamically stable patients who were treated electively with Orthoclone OKT3 (Muromonab/CD3) for recurrent rejection. RESULTS Eighty five percent (56/66) of the episodes of rejection occurred within the first 3 months after heart transplantation. Tacrolimus was started 2. 4 +/- 2.0 months post-transplant, and the mean follow-up duration on tacrolimus was 11.0 +/- 7.0 months. After conversion, a significant decline was noted in both the number of episodes of acute rejection per patient (3.14 +/- 0.85-0.57 +/- 0.87, p < 0.0001), and the incidence of acute rejection per 100 patient-days (6.39 +/- 3.96-0. 25 +/- 0.47, p < 0.0001). In comparison, OKT3 was started 5.25 +/- 9. 20 months post-transplant. Similarly, there was a significant decrease in the incidence of acute rejection per 100 patient-days (8. 69 +/- 5.65-0.20 +/- 0.23, p < 0.0001). The average hospital charges per patient for the OKT3-treated group was

Oral steroid pulse without taper for the treatment of asymptomatic moderate cardiac allograft rejection

33,339 +/-

Significant post-transplant hypogammaglobulinemia in six heart transplant recipients: an emerging clinical phenomenon?

10,511. There was no significant difference in the actuarial 1-year survival between the tacrolimus and OKT3-treated groups (93% vs 80%, p = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS Outpatient conversion to tacrolimus is safe, well tolerated, and an effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of steroid-resistant cellular rejection in heart transplant recipients. It is more cost-effective than OKT3 in the hemodynamically stable patient and outcomes are similar.

The impact of CytoGam on cardiac transplant recipients with moderate hypogammaglobulinemia: a randomized single-center study.

BACKGROUND The most frequently administered treatment for asymptomatic ISHLT Grade 3A cardiac allograft rejection is intravenous steroids or oral steroid pulse with a taper. This study analyzes the efficacy of 3-day 100-mg course of prednisone without a tapered regimen for the treatment of asymptomatic moderate cardiac allograft rejection. METHODS All new episodes of asymptomatic ISHLT Grade 3A rejections were treated with oral steroid pulse without taper, consisting of 100 mg of prednisone for 3 consecutive days followed by resuming the pre-rejection steroid dose on the fourth day. We retrospectively reviewed the histologic response of all treated episodes among all cardiac transplant recipients transplanted between January 1995 through December 1997 who were treated with triple therapy consisting of cyclosporine, azathioprine and steroids. Patients receiving additional or alternative immunosuppressives were excluded from the study. The treated episodes were analyzed as responders if the follow-up biopsy were Grade 0, 1A, 1B, or 2; treatment was counted as non-responders if the follow-up biopsy showed Grade 3A or higher. RESULTS Of 230 cardiac transplant recipients, 100 patients received a 3-day 100 mg course of prednisone without taper for 174 new episodes of asymptomatic ISHLT Grade 3A rejection. The overall response rate was 75% (130/174 rejection episodes). A significant difference in the response rate was observed depending on the number of days post transplant. A comparison of the success rates among rejections which occurred > 90 days post transplant versus < 30 days revealed responses to be 88% versus 70% (p = 0.02); for rejections treated > 60 days post transplant versus < 30 days showed success rates of 84% versus 70% (p = 0.04). The mean age of the recipient revealed a trend to be lower among the non-responder group (49+/-12 years versus 53+/-9 years, p = 0.07). Having left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant did not significantly affect the treatment outcome. The response rates were 69% for the patients who required the assist device versus 77% for those not bridged (p = ns). There was no significant difference in the gender or the baseline immunosuppressive doses between the responders and non-responders. The cost of a 3-day outpatient, visiting nurse supervised intravenous steroid therapy versus 3 days of oral prednisone was

Troglitazone, a new antidiabetic agent, decreases cyclosporine level.

861 vs

366: Patterns and predictors of physical functional disability at 5-10 years after heart transplantation

6.88. CONCLUSION Oral steroid pulse without taper is an effective and economical way to treat asymptomatic moderate grade cardiac allograft rejection. A 3-day course of 100 mg of prednisone without taper should be considered as first line of therapy for clinically stable form of moderate cardiac allograft rejection occurring > 60 days post transplant.