Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where D. Robesti is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by D. Robesti.


European Urology | 2018

The Impact of Implementation of the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel Recommendations on Reporting and Grading Complications on Perioperative Outcomes after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Giorgio Gandaglia; Carlo Andrea Bravi; Paolo Dell’Oglio; Elio Mazzone; Nicola Fossati; S. Scuderi; D. Robesti; F. Barletta; L. Grillo; Steven MacLennan; James N’Dow; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti

The rate of postoperative complications might vary according to the method used to collect perioperative data. We aimed at assessing the impact of the prospective implementation of the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on reporting and grading of complications in prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). From September 2016, an integrated method for reporting surgical morbidity based on the EAU guidelines was implemented at a single, tertiary center. Perioperative data were prospectively and systematically collected during a patient interview at 30 d after surgery as recommended by the EAU Guidelines Panel Recommendations on Reporting and Grading Complications. The rate and grading of complications of 167 patients who underwent RARP±pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) after the implementation of the prospective collection system (Group 1) were compared with 316 patients treated between January 2015 and August 2016 (Group 2) when a system based on patient chart review was used. No differences were observed in disease characteristics and PLND between the two groups (all p≥0.1). Postoperative complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Overall, the complication rate was higher when the prospective collection system based on the EAU guidelines was used (29%) than when retrospective chart review (10%; p<0.001) was used. In particular, a substantially higher rate of grade 1 (8.4% vs 4.7%) and 2 (14% vs 2.8%) complications was detected in Group 1 versus Group 2 (p<0.001). Although the rate of complications occurred during hospitalization did not differ (13% vs 10%; p=0.3), 31 (19%) complications after discharge were detected in Group 1. This resulted into a readmission rate of 16%. Conversely, no complications after discharge and readmissions were recorded for Group 2. The implementation of the EAU guidelines on reporting perioperative outcomes roughly doubled the complication rate after RARP and allowed for the detection of complications after discharge in more than 15% of patients that would have been otherwise missed, where patients assessed with the EAU implemented protocol had a threefold higher likelihood of reporting complications.nnnPATIENT SUMMARYnThe implementation of the European Association of Urology guidelines on reporting and grading of complications after urologic procedures in prostate cancer patients roughly doubled the complication rate after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared to retrospective patient chart review. Moreover, it allowed for the detection of complications after discharge in more than 15% of patients that would have been otherwise missed.


European Urology Supplements | 2018

Impact of implementation of the EAU guidelines panel recommendations on reporting and grading of complications on perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Giorgio Gandaglia; Nicola Fossati; Nazareno Suardi; Carlo Andrea Bravi; S. Scuderi; L. Grillo; P. Dell’Oglio; Elio Mazzone; D. Robesti; F. Barletta; Marco Moschini; Umberto Capitanio; Vincenzo Mirone; F. Montorsi; A. Briganti

word count: 298; Word count: 1,239; References: 11; Tables: 2; Supplementary files: 1; Pages: 9 Corresponding author: Alberto Briganti Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI San Raffaele Hospital Milan, Italy Tel. +390226437286 Email: [email protected] 1


European Urology | 2018

A Novel Nomogram to Identify Candidates for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Among Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted and Systematic Biopsies

Giorgio Gandaglia; Guillaume Ploussard; Massimo Valerio; Agostino Mattei; C. Fiori; Nicola Fossati; Armando Stabile; Jean-Baptiste Beauval; Bernard Malavaud; Mathieu Roumiguié; D. Robesti; Paolo Dell’Oglio; Marco Moschini; Stefania Zamboni; Arnas Rakauskas; Francesco De Cobelli; Francesco Porpiglia; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti

BACKGROUNDnAvailable models for predicting lymph node invasion (LNI) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) might not be applicable to men diagnosed via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsies.nnnOBJECTIVEnTo assess the accuracy of available tools to predict LNI and to develop a novel model for men diagnosed via MRI-targeted biopsies.nnnDESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSnA total of 497 patients diagnosed via MRI-targeted biopsies and treated with RP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) at five institutions were retrospectively identified.nnnOUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSESnThree available models predicting LNI were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analyses. A nomogram predicting LNI was developed and internally validated.nnnRESULTS AND LIMITATIONSnOverall, 62 patients (12.5%) had LNI. The median number of nodes removed was 15. The AUC for the Briganti 2012, Briganti 2017, and MSKCC nomograms was 82%, 82%, and 81%, respectively, and their calibration characteristics were suboptimal. A model including PSA, clinical stage and maximum diameter of the index lesion on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), grade group on targeted biopsy, and the presence of clinically significant PCa on concomitant systematic biopsy had an AUC of 86% and represented the basis for a coefficient-based nomogram. This tool exhibited a higher AUC and higher net benefit compared to available models developed using standard biopsies. Using a cutoff of 7%, 244 ePLNDs (57%) would be spared and a lower number of LNIs would be missed compared to available nomograms (1.6% vs 4.6% vs 4.5% vs 4.2% for the new nomogram vs Briganti 2012 vs Briganti 2017 vs MSKCC).nnnCONCLUSIONSnAvailable models predicting LNI are characterized by suboptimal accuracy and clinical net benefit for patients diagnosed via MRI-targeted biopsies. A novel nomogram including mpMRI and MRI-targeted biopsy data should be used to identify candidates for ePLND in this setting.nnnPATIENT SUMMARYnWe developed the first nomogram to predict lymph node invasion (LNI) in prostate cancer patients diagnosed via magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy undergoing radical prostatectomy. Adoption of this model to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection could avoid up to 60% of these procedures at the cost of missing only 1.6% patients with LNI.


The Journal of Urology | 2018

MP34-14 WHICH PATIENTS WITH CLINICALLY NODE POSITIVE PROSTATE CANCER BENEFIT FROM RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY? THE IMPACT OF THE SIZE AND SITE OF NODAL INVOLVEMENT

Giorgio Gandaglia; M. Soligo; Antonino Battaglia; T. Muilwijk; D. Robesti; Umberto Capitanio; Manuela Tutolo; Andrea Gallina; Nicola Fossati; Emanuele Zaffuto; Marco Moschini; Vincenzo Scattoni; Steven Joniau; Jeffrey Karnes; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti


The Journal of Urology | 2018

PD38-04 PATIENTS ADHERING TO STANDARDIZED PROTOCOLS FOR FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME ASSESSMENT AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SHOW HIGHER RATES OF RETURN TO PRE-OPERATIVE STATUS: IMPLICATIONS FOR POSSIBLE SELECTION BIASES

Manuela Tutolo; Marco Bianchi; Nicola Fossati; Giorgio Gandaglia; Andrea Salonia; D. Robesti; F. Barletta; S. Scuderi; Davide Oreggia; Francesco Cianflone; Alessandro Nini; Emanuele Zaffuto; Nazareno Suardi; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti


The Journal of Urology | 2018

MP35-18 NEUTROPHIL TO LYMPHOCYTE RATIO IS ASSOCIATED WITH LYMPH NODE INVASION AND HIGHER NODAL BURDEN IN CONTEMPORARY HIGH RISK PATIENTS TREATED WITH RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AND EXTENDED PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION

Carlo Andrea Bravi; Marco Bianchi; Nicola Fossati; Giorgio Gandaglia; Emanuele Zaffuto; S. Scuderi; D. Robesti; F. Barletta; Luigi Nocera; Umberto Capitanio; Andrea Gallina; Nazareno Suardi; Shahrokh F. Shariat; Pierre I. Karakiewicz; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti


European Urology Supplements | 2018

Proposal of a novel procedure-specific classification system for postoperative complications in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

L. Grillo; Carlo Andrea Bravi; Giorgio Gandaglia; Nicola Fossati; P. Dell’Oglio; Armando Stabile; Marco Bandini; E. Zaffuto; Elio Mazzone; D. Robesti; S. Scuderi; Andrea Gallina; Roberto Bertini; Umberto Capitanio; L. Nocera; F. Barletta; Pierre I. Karakiewicz; F. Montorsi; A. Briganti


European Urology Supplements | 2018

Which patients with clinically node prostate cancer benefit from radical prostatectomy? The impact of the size and site of nodal involvement on long-term outcomes

S. Scuderi; Giorgio Gandaglia; M. Soligo; A. Battaglia; T. Muilwijk; D. Robesti; Umberto Capitanio; M. Tutolo; Andrea Gallina; Nicola Fossati; E. Zaffuto; Vincenzo Scattoni; Steven Joniau; J. Karnes; F. Montorsi; A. Briganti


European Urology Supplements | 2018

Patients adhering to standardized protocols for functional outcome assessment after radical prostatectomy show higher rates of return to preoperative status: Implications for possible selection biases

M. Tutolo; Marco Bianchi; Nicola Fossati; Giorgio Gandaglia; Andrea Salonia; D. Robesti; F. Barletta; S. Scuderi; D. Oreggia; Francesco Cianflone; Alessandro Nini; E. Zaffuto; Nazareno Suardi; F. Montorsi; A. Briganti


European Urology Supplements | 2018

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is associated with lymph node invasion and higher nodal burden in contemporary high risk patients treated with radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection

Carlo Andrea Bravi; Marco Bianchi; Nicola Fossati; Giorgio Gandaglia; E. Zaffuto; S. Scuderi; D. Robesti; F. Barletta; Luigi Nocera; Umberto Capitanio; Andrea Gallina; Nazareno Suardi; S.F. Shariat; Pierre I. Karakiewicz; F. Montorsi; A. Briganti

Collaboration


Dive into the D. Robesti's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Giorgio Gandaglia

Vita-Salute San Raffaele University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nicola Fossati

Vita-Salute San Raffaele University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Scuderi

Vita-Salute San Raffaele University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

F. Barletta

Vita-Salute San Raffaele University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Umberto Capitanio

Vita-Salute San Raffaele University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

F. Montorsi

Vita-Salute San Raffaele University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Briganti

Université de Montréal

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alberto Briganti

Vita-Salute San Raffaele University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrea Gallina

Vita-Salute San Raffaele University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carlo Andrea Bravi

Vita-Salute San Raffaele University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge