D. Scott McMeekin

A novel multiple marker bioassay utilizing HE4 and CA125 for the prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass

INTRODUCTION Patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have improved outcomes when cared for at centers experienced in the management of EOC. The objective of this trial was to validate a predictive model to assess the risk for EOC in women with a pelvic mass. METHODS Women diagnosed with a pelvic mass and scheduled to have surgery were enrolled on a multicenter prospective study. Preoperative serum levels of HE4 and CA125 were measured. Separate logistic regression algorithms for premenopausal and postmenopausal women were utilized to categorize patients into low and high risk groups for EOC. RESULTS Twelve sites enrolled 531 evaluable patients with 352 benign tumors, 129 EOC, 22 LMP tumors, 6 non EOC and 22 non ovarian cancers. The postmenopausal group contained 150 benign cases of which 112 were classified as low risk giving a specificity of 75.0% (95% CI 66.9-81.4), and 111 EOC and 6 LMP tumors of which 108 were classified as high risk giving a sensitivity of 92.3% (95% CI=85.9-96.4). The premenopausal group had 202 benign cases of which 151 were classified as low risk providing a specificity of 74.8% (95% CI=68.2-80.6), and 18 EOC and 16 LMP tumors of which 26 were classified as high risk, providing a sensitivity of 76.5% (95% CI=58.8-89.3). CONCLUSION An algorithm utilizing HE4 and CA125 successfully classified patients into high and low risk groups with 93.8% of EOC correctly classified as high risk. This model can be used to effectively triage patients to centers of excellence.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Cisplatin With or Without Topotecan in Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

PURPOSE On the basis of reported activity of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) or topotecan plus cisplatin in advanced cervix cancer, we undertook a randomized trial comparing these combinations versus cisplatin alone, to determine whether survival is improved with either combination compared with cisplatin alone, and to compare toxicities and quality of life (QOL) among the regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks (CPT); cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) day 1 plus topotecan 0.75 mg/m(2) days 1 to 3 every 3 weeks (CT); or methotrexate 30 mg/m(2) days 1, 15, and 22, vinblastine 3 mg/m(2) days 2, 15, and 22, doxorubicin 30 mg/m(2) day 2, and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) day 2 every 4 weeks (MVAC). Survival was the primary end point; response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) were secondary end points. QOL data are reported separately. RESULTS The MVAC arm was closed by the Data Safety Monitoring Board after four treatment-related deaths occurred among 63 patients, and is not included in this analysis. Two hundred ninety-four patients enrolled onto the remaining regimens: 146 to CPT and 147 to CT. Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity was more common with CT. Patients receiving CT had statistically superior outcomes to those receiving CPT, with median overall survival of 9.4 and 6.5 months (P = .017), median PFS of 4.6 and 2.9 months (P = .014), and response rates of 27% and 13%, respectively. CONCLUSION This is the first randomized phase III trial to demonstrate a survival advantage for combination chemotherapy over cisplatin alone in advanced cervix cancer.

Phase III Trial of Four Cisplatin-Containing Doublet Combinations in Stage IVB, Recurrent, or Persistent Cervical Carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

PURPOSE Assess toxicity and efficacy of cisplatin (Cis) doublet combinations in advanced and recurrent cervical carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) over 24 hours plus Cis 50 mg/m(2) day 2 every 3 weeks (PC, reference arm); vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8 plus Cis 50 mg/m(2) day 1 every 3 weeks (VC); gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) day 1 and 8 plus Cis 50 mg/m(2) day 1 every 3 weeks (GC); or topotecan 0.75 mg/m(2) days 1, 2, and 3 plus Cis 50 mg/m(2) day 1 every 3 weeks (TC). Survival was the primary end point with a 33% improvement relative to PC considered important (85% power, alpha = 5%). Quality-of-life data were prospectively collected. RESULTS A total of 513 patients were enrolled when a planned interim analysis recommended early closure for futility. The experimental-to-PC hazard ratios of death were 1.15 (95% CI, 0.79 to 1.67) for VC, 1.32 (95% CI, 0.91 to 1.92) for GC, and 1.26 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.82) for TC. The hazard ratios for progression-free survival (PFS) were 1.36 (95% CI, 0.97 to 1.90) for VC, 1.39 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.96) for GC, and 1.27 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.78) for TC. Response rates (RRs) for PC, VC, GC, and TC were 29.1%, 25.9%, 22.3%, and 23.4%, respectively. The arms were comparable with respect to toxicity except for leucopenia, neutropenia, infection, and alopecia. CONCLUSION VC, GC, and TC are not superior to PC in terms of overall survival (OS). However, the trend in RR, PFS, and OS favors PC. Differences in chemotherapy scheduling, pre-existing morbidity, and toxicity are important in individualizing therapy.

Phase II trial of trastuzumab in women with advanced or recurrent, HER2-positive endometrial carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study

PURPOSE This study evaluated efficacy of single-agent trastuzumab against advanced or recurrent HER2-positive endometrial carcinoma (EC), and explored predictors for HER2 amplification. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients had measurable stage III, IV, or recurrent EC. There was no limit on prior therapy although total prior doxorubicin dose was limited to 320 mg/m(2). Tumors were required to have HER2 overexpression (2+ or 3+ immunohistochemical staining) or HER2 amplification (FISH HER2/CEP 17 ratio >2.0). Trastuzumab was administered intravenously at a dose of 4 mg/kg in week 1, then 2 mg/kg weekly until disease progression. The primary endpoint was tumor response. RESULTS Of the 286 tumors centrally screened by LabCorp, 33 (11.5%) were HER2-amplified. Three of 8 clear (38%) cell carcinomas and 7 of 25 serous carcinomas (28%) screened exhibited HER2 amplification compared with 7% (2/29) of endometrioid adenocarcinomas. HER2 overexpression was correlated with HER2 amplification (r=0.459; p<0.0001). Thirty-four women were enrolled; 1 was excluded (refused treatment); and 18 had tumors with known HER2 amplification. No major tumor responses were observed. Twelve women experienced stable disease, 18 had increasing disease, and 3 were indeterminate for tumor response. Neither HER2 overexpression nor HER2 amplification appeared to be associated with progression-free survival or overall survival. CONCLUSION Trastuzumab as a single agent did not demonstrate activity against endometrial carcinomas with HER2 overexpression or HER2 amplification, although full planned accrual of women with HER2 amplified tumors was not achieved due to slow recruitment. Serous and clear cell endometrial carcinomas appear to be more likely to demonstrate HER2 amplification.

Phase II Trial of Bevacizumab in Recurrent or Persistent Endometrial Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

PURPOSE Bevacizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), has clinical activity in multiple tumor types. We conducted a phase II trial to assess the activity and tolerability of single-agent bevacizumab in recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer (EMC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients had persistent or recurrent EMC after receiving one to two prior cytotoxic regimens, measurable disease, and Gynecologic Oncology Group performance status of ≤ 2. Treatment consisted of bevacizumab 15 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity. VEGF-A was assessed by immunohistochemistry in archival tumor and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in pretreatment plasma. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months and overall response rate. RESULTS Fifty-six patients were enrolled. Fifty-two patients were eligible and evaluable. Median age was 62 years, and prior treatment consisted of one or two regimens in 33 (63.5%) and 19 (36.5%) patients, respectively. Twenty-nine patients (55.8%) received prior radiation. Adverse events were consistent with those expected with bevacizumab treatment. No GI perforations or fistulae were seen. Seven patients (13.5%) experienced clinical responses (one complete response and six partial responses; median response duration, 6.0 months), and 21 patients (40.4%) survived progression free for at least 6 months. Median PFS and overall survival times were 4.2 and 10.5 months, respectively. Suggested associations were observed between high VEGF-A and adjusted hazard of death or tumor response when evaluated in tumor/plasma or plasma, respectively. CONCLUSION Bevacizumab is well tolerated and active based on PFS at 6 months in recurrent or persistent EMC and warrants further investigation.

Etiologic heterogeneity in endometrial cancer: Evidence from a Gynecologic Oncology Group trial☆

OBJECTIVE Although the epidemiology of typical endometrial carcinomas (grades 1-2 endometrioid or Type I) is well established, less is known regarding higher grade endometrioid or non-endometrioid carcinomas (Type II). Within a large Gynecologic Oncology Group trial (GOG-210), which included central pathology review, we investigated the etiologic heterogeneity of endometrial cancers by comparing risk factors for different histologic categories. METHODS Based on epidemiologic questionnaire data, risk factor associations, expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were estimated comparing grade 3 endometrioid and Type II cancers (including histologic subtypes) to grades 1-2 endometrioid cancers. RESULTS Compared with 2244 grades 1-2 endometrioid cancers, women with Type II cancers (321 serous, 141 carcinosarcomas, 77 clear cell, 42 mixed epithelial with serous or clear cell components) were older; more often non-white, multiparous, current smokers; and less often obese. Risk factors for grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas (n=354) were generally similar to those identified for Type II cancers, although patients with grade 3 endometrioid tumors more often had histories of breast cancer without tamoxifen exposure while those with Type II tumors were more frequently treated with tamoxifen. Patients with serous cancers and carcinosarcomas more frequently had breast cancer histories with tamoxifen treatment compared to patients with other tumors. CONCLUSIONS Risk factors for aggressive endometrial cancers, including grade 3 endometrioid and non-endometrioid tumors, appear to differ from lower grade endometrioid carcinomas. Our findings support etiologic differences between Type I and II endometrial cancers as well as additional heterogeneity within Type II cancers.

Phase II Trial of Ixabepilone As Second-Line Treatment in Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Trial 129-P

PURPOSE A phase II study was conducted to determine the response rate of ixabepilone (BMS-247550, National Cancer Institute (NCI)-supplied agent investigational new drug No. 59,699) in patients with persistent or recurrent endometrial cancer who have progressed despite standard therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients had recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer and measurable disease. One prior chemotherapeutic regimen, which could have included either paclitaxel or docetaxel, was allowed. Patients received ixabepilone 40 mg/m(2) as a 3-hour infusion on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Treatment was continued until disease progression or until unacceptable toxicity occurred. Results Fifty-two patients were entered on the study, and 50 of these were eligible. The median age was 64 years (range, 40 to 83 years). Prior treatment included radiation in 21 patients (42%) and hormonal therapy in eight patients (16%). All patients had prior chemotherapy, and 47 (94%) received prior paclitaxel therapy. The overall response rate was 12%; one patient achieved a complete remission (2%), and five achieved partial remission (10%). Stable disease for at least 8 weeks was noted in 30 patients (60%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.9 months, and the 6-month PFS was 20%. Major grade 3 toxicities were neutropenia (52%), leukopenia (48%), gastrointestinal (24%), neurologic (18%), constitutional (20%), infection (16%), and anemia (14%). CONCLUSION In a cohort of women with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer who were previously treated with paclitaxel, ixabepilone showed modest activity of limited duration as a second-line agent.

A phase II trial of arzoxifene, a selective estrogen response modulator, in patients with recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to determine response rate and evaluate toxicity of LY353381 (arzoxifene) in patients with recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS A phase II, open-labeled study with arzoxifene was performed at 13 centers. Patients with measurable recurrent/advanced EC not amenable to curative therapies were eligible if either the primary tumor or recurrent tumor was ER+ and/or PR+. If receptor status could not be determined, patients with well or moderately well-differentiated EC were also permitted. Prior use of salvage chemotherapy was not allowed; however, prior use of progestagens was permitted and patients were stratified by prior exposure to progestagen. Patients received 20 mg/day PO, and were treated for at least 8 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Efficacy was based on the frequency of complete (CR) and partial (PR) responses, and a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze time to progression and duration of response. RESULTS From February 1999 through April 2001, 37 patients were entered of whom 34 received treatment. Efficacy was evaluated for the 29 patients who received at least 4 weeks of therapy and at least one tumor response assessment. Safety was assessed in all 34 patients who received any drug. Thirty patients were defined as progestagen sensitive, and 4 patients were defined as progestagen failures. Twenty-six patients were ER+, and 22 were PR+. Nine (1 CR + 8 PR) of 29 patients responded (31%, CI 25-51%), with a median duration of response of 13.9 months. All 9 responses occurred in progestagen-sensitive patients. Two additional patients (one from each progestagen cohort) had stable disease for >or=6 months. The median progression-free interval was 3.7 months (CI 1.9-6.6 months) for all 29 patients. Toxicity was minimal with no grade 3-4 toxic effects, and 9 patients had only grade 1-2 toxic effects (7 grade 1, 2 grade 2). Hot flashes were the most common toxic effect and, in all 3 reported cases, were grade 1. CONCLUSIONS Arzoxifene has demonstrated a high response rate with the longest median duration of response reported in a phase II trial of this patient population. The ease of administration and extremely favorable toxicity profile make this an agent warranting further evaluation.

Phase II trial of cetuximab in the treatment of persistent or recurrent squamous or non-squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study

PURPOSE The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) conducted a phase II trial to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab, in persistent or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients had cervical cancer, measurable disease, and GOG performance status ≤2. Treatment consisted of cetuximab 400 mg/m(2) initial dose followed by 250 mg/m(2) weekly until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months and response. The study used a 2-stage group sequential design. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients were entered with 3 exclusions, leaving 35 evaluable for analysis. Thirty-one patients (88.6%) received prior radiation as well as either 1 (n=25, 71.4%) or 2 (n=10) prior cytotoxic regimens. Twenty-four patients (68.6%) had a squamous cell carcinoma. Grade 3 adverse events possibly related to cetuximab included dermatologic (n=5), GI (n=4), anemia (n=2), constitutional (n=3), infection (n=2), vascular (n=2), pain (n=2), and pulmonary, neurological, vomiting and metabolic (n=1 each). No clinical responses were detected. Five patients (14.3%; two-sided 90% CI, 5.8% to 30%) survived without progression for at least 6 months. The median PFS and overall survival (OS) times were 1.97 and 6.7 months, respectively. In this study, all patients with PFS at 6 months harbored tumors with squamous cell histology. CONCLUSION Cetuximab is well tolerated but has limited activity in this population. Cetuximab activity may be limited to patients with squamous cell histology.

Bowel resection at the time of primary cytoreduction for epithelial ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to determine the morbidity and survival associated with bowel resection at the time of primary cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer. STUDY DESIGN We reviewed all patients undergoing bowel resection by gynecologic oncology faculty at the time of primary cytoreduction for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed between 1983 and 1995. RESULTS There were 105 patients meeting the above criteria. The median age was 65 years (range 34 to 85 years). There were 76 stage III and 25 stage IV cancers. The primary indication for bowel resection was tumor debulking in 92% of the patients. Seventy patients had segmental resection of the colon only, and 22 patients underwent resections that included the large and small bowels. Mean operating time was 260 minutes and mean estimated blood loss was 1,447 mL. Thirty-three (31%) patients were optimally cytoreduced to less than 1 cm residual disease. Ten patients experienced major complications directly related to bowel resection, including bowel fistula (4 patients), early postoperative bowel obstruction (5 patients), and stomal hernia (1 patient). Other morbidity included ileus for more than 10 days (18 patients), cardiac complications (17 patients), pneumonia (8 patients), sepsis (5 patients), and thromboembolism (4 patients). Six patients died and five patients required reexploration within 30 days of operation. Patients with preoperative bowel obstruction and suboptimal residual disease were more likely to have postoperative morbidity. Median survival in the optimally debulked patients was 35 months compared with 18 months in patients suboptimally cytoreduced (p = 0.006). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that optimal debulking (p = 0.009) and platinum chemotherapy (p = 0.00006) were independently associated with improved survival. Age, International Federation of Gynecologia Oncologists stage, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and paclitaxel chemotherapy did not influence survival. CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing bowel resection at the time of primary cytoreduction for ovarian cancer, optimal cytoreduction to less than 1 cm residual disease results in improved survival. Morbidity is common but is comparable to other published series of ovarian cancer patients undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery without bowel resection. Additionally, patients with preoperative bowel obstruction and suboptimal residual disease are more likely to have serious morbidity.