D. Thomson

Is concurrent radiation therapy required in patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus? A randomised phase II trial

INTRODUCTION Preoperative chemotherapy (CT) and preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for resectable oesophageal cancer have been shown to improve overall survival in meta-analyses. There are limited data comparing these preoperative therapies. We report the outcomes of a randomised phase II trial comparing preoperative CT and CRT for resectable adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction. METHODS Patients were randomised to receive preoperative CT with cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)) and infusional 5 fluorouracil (1000 mg/m(2)/d) on days 1 and 21, or preoperative CRT with the same drugs accompanied by concurrent radiation therapy commencing on day 21 of chemotherapy and the 5 fluorouracil reduced to 800 mg/m(2)/d. The radiation dose was 35 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks. The endpoints were toxicity, response rates, resection (R) status, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and quality of life. RESULTS Seventy-five patients were enrolled on the study: 36 received preoperative CT and 39 preoperative CRT. Toxicity was similar for CT and CRT. Eight patients (11%) did not proceed to resection. The histopathological response rate (CRT 31% versus CT 8%, p = 0.01) and R1 resection rate (CRT 0% versus CT 11%, p = 0.04) favoured those receiving CRT. The median PFS was 14 and 26 months for CT and CRT respectively (p = 0.37). The median OS was 29 months for CT compared with 32 months for CRT (p = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS Despite no difference in survival, the improvement from preoperative CRT with respect to margin involvement makes this treatment a reasonable option for bulky, locally advanced resectable adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus.

Prognostic value of quality of life scores in a trial of chemotherapy with or without interferon in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma

In a multi-centre randomised clinical trial comparing dacarbazine (DTIC) plus recombinant interferon-alfa2a (IFN) versus DTIC alone for patients with metastatic malignant melanoma, aspects of quality of life (QL) were measured prospectively by patients using linear analogue self assessment (LASA) scales including the GLQ-8 and by doctors using Spitzers QL Index. QL scores and performance status at the time of randomisation were available for 152 of 170 eligible patients. These scores carried significant prognostic information. In univariate analyses, Spitzer QL Index assessed by the doctor and LASA scores for physical wellbeing (PWB), mood, pain, appetite, nausea and vomiting, GLQ-8 total and overall QL were significant (P < 0.01) predictors of subsequent survival. QL Index and LASA scales for mood, appetite, and overall QL remained independently significant (all P < 0.05) in multivariate models allowing for significant prognostic factors other than QL (liver metastases and performance status). These findings closely parallel those in patients with metastatic breast cancer. They add further validity to the QL Index and LASA scores, provide the first evidence of the prognostic significance of the GLQ-8, and argue strongly for the routine assessment of QL in future therapy trials.

Incidence and nature of CD20-negative relapses following rituximab therapy in aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a retrospective review.

Summary. Re‐treatment with rituximab for B‐cell non‐Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) relapsing after previous rituximab therapy has recently been shown to be clinically efficacious. Although the mechanism of resistance to rituximab re‐treatment in non‐responding patients is unknown, it is possible that loss of CD20 expression in the relapsed NHL could be important in some patients. We examined the incidence and nature of CD20 negative relapses following rituximab therapy in aggressive B‐cell NHL treated at our institution. Of a total of 18 patients who received rituximab, 13 have relapsed, with 10 patients subsequently undergoing repeat tissue biopsy. Six of these 10 patients (60%) were shown to have lost CD20 expression by either immunohistochemistry and/or flow cytometry. Furthermore, three of the six patients who relapsed with CD20‐negative NHL also suffered relapses at unusual anatomical sites. We conclude that loss of CD20 expression in aggressive B‐cell NHL relapsing post‐rituximab therapy is common. As such, repeat tissue biopsy should be undertaken to document CD20 expression by both flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry prior to considering repeated courses of rituximab in relapsed aggressive lymphomas.

Melanoma incidence and mortality in Scotland 1979-2003.

We studied 12 450 cases of invasive melanoma diagnosed in Scotland in 1979–2003, by thickness, pathological type, and body site at ages under 40, 40–59, and 60 years and over. Melanoma incidence trebled in males from 3.57 to 10.93/105 per year, and increased 2.3-fold in females from 5.60 to 12.96/105 per year. The rate of increase fell in each successive 5-year period. The greatest increase was in males aged 60 years and over at diagnosis. Significant incidence increases were seen in melanomas <1 mm in all three age groups, but those >4 mm only increased significantly at ages 60 years and over. All histological types increased significantly at ages 60 years and over, and in this age group the greatest increase was seen on the head and neck. Five-year disease-free survival improved steadily. Survival figures for 1994–1998 ranged from 93.6% for males and 95.8% for females with tumours <1 mm, to 52.4 and 48.3%, respectively, for those with tumours >4 mm. Over the 25 years, melanoma mortality doubled in males from 1.1 to 2.4/105 per year, but was unchanged in females at 1.5/105 per year. Public education on melanoma is required both for primary prevention and earlier diagnosis, particularly for older males.

Enhanced toxicity with concurrent cetuximab and radiotherapy in head and neck cancer

PURPOSE To report toxicity data from the first 13 consecutive patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC), ineligible for cisplatin, treated with concurrent cetuximab and radiotherapy (RT) at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were collected prospectively between August 2007 and May 2008. Planned treatment consisted of a cetuximab loading dose (400mg/m(2)) via intravenous infusion 1 week prior and then weekly (250mg/m(2)) with 70Gy in 35 daily fractions over 7 weeks. RESULTS Median age was 68 years (range 52-82 years). The predominant primary sites were hypopharyngeal (5) and oropharyngeal (5). Ineligibility for cisplatin consisted of renal impairment (5), hearing impairment (4) and of other major co-morbidities (4). Of the 13 patients, 10 (77%) had grade 3/4 skin reactions and 10 (77%) grade 3/4 mucositis. Six (46%) patients required admission for management of severe skin reactions and/or mucositis with 4 (31%) requiring a treatment break, median 10 days (9-15days). Only 4 (31%) patients managed to complete the planned 8 cycles of cetuximab. Of the 9 patients with 12-week post-therapy data, 7 (78%) achieved a complete response. CONCLUSIONS Our early experience with cetuximab/RT has demonstrated a higher rate of toxicity compared with the recently reported randomised trial, resulting in low treatment compliance and delays in completing RT.

Comparison of two standard chemotherapy regimens for good-prognosis germ-cell tumours: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND Most patients with metastatic germ-cell tumours are cured with chemotherapy. However, the optimum chemotherapy regimen is uncertain, and there is variation in international practice. We did a multicentre randomised trial to compare two standard chemotherapy regimens for men with good-prognosis germ-cell tumours. METHODS Good prognosis was defined by modified Memorial Sloan-Kettering criteria. The first regimen (regimen A) was based on treatment recommendations from Indiana University and comprised three cycles of 20 mg/m2 cisplatin on days 1-5, 100 mg/m2 etoposide on days 1-5, and 30 kU bleomycin on days 1, 8, and 15, repeated every 21 days. The second regimen (regimen B) was based on the control regimen of a published randomised clinical trial and comprised four cycles of 100 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1, 120 mg/m2 etoposide on days 1-3, and 30 kU bleomycin on day 1, repeated every 21 days. The primary outcome measure was overall survival. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS 166 patients were randomised, 83 to each regimen. The trial was stopped when the second planned interim analysis met predefined stopping rules. The median follow-up was 33 months. Overall survival was substantially better with regimen A (three vs 13 deaths, hazard ratio 0.22 [95% CI 0.06-0.77], p=0.008). This difference was due to deaths from cancer (one vs nine), and not deaths from treatment (two vs two) and remained significant after adjustment for other prognostic factors (0.25 [0.07-0.88], p=0.03). INTERPRETATION In men with good-prognosis germ-cell tumours, the regimen developed at Indiana University is superior to the alternative regimen studied in this trial. The lower total dose and dose-intensity of bleomycin and the lower dose-intensity of etoposide in regimen B could be responsible for the worse outcome.

Cisplatin-based therapy: A neurological and neuropsychological review

The present paper reviews research in the area of the broad‐spectrum chemotherapeutic agent cisplatin (cis‐diamminedichloro‐platinum II) and examines the implications for clinical neuropsychology arising from the neurological disruption associated with cisplatin‐based therapy. The paper begins with a brief review of cisplatin treatment in terms other than survival alone, and examines the side‐effects and the potential central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction in terms of neurological symptoms and concomitant implications for neuropsychology. Two main implications for clinical neuropsychology arising from cisplatin therapy are identified. First, cisplatin therapy impacts upon the psychological well‐being of the patient, particularly during and in the months following treatment. It is suggested that during this time, a primary role for neuropsychology is to focus upon the monitoring and the active enhancement of the patients social, psychological and spiritual resources. Second, with regard to neurocognitive changes, the review suggests that (1) neurocognitive assessment may not yield stable results within 8 months following treatment and (2) while perceptual, memory, attentional and executive dysfunction may be predicted following cisplatin treatment, little systematic research has been carried out to investigate such a possibility. Future research might profitably address this issue and also specifically examine the effects of low dosage cisplatin‐based therapy and the effects of recently developed neuroprotective agents. Finally, there is some evidence to suggest that women may be more susceptible to neurotoxicity during cisplatin therapy, but no gender‐related cognitive effects are reported in the cisplatin literature. Future research could usefully investigate gender differences in association with cisplatin chemotherapy. Copyright

Psychological responses to malignant melanoma: An investigation of traumatic stress rections to life-threatening illness

A cross-sectional study of 95 individuals with malignant melanoma was conducted to investigate posttraumatic stress responses to a diagnosis of melanoma and to validate the use of the Impact of Event Scale (IES) as a measure of the response to the trauma of life-threatening disease. The diagnosis and progression of malignant disease are likely to present a range of acute and chronic trauma to the individual and the individuals family. The findings suggest that the IES is a reliable and valid measure of this distress, with scores varying according to disease progression and prognostic status of nonmetastatic disease patients. This indicates the importance of clinical attention to the specific symptoms that may best reflect the traumatic impact of life-threatening illness and its progression, and the applicability of posttraumatic stress syndromes in understanding the psychological distress of this clinical population.

Positron emission tomography and pathological evidence of response to neoadjuvant therapy in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus

Our aim was to determine if fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) could be correlated with a pathological response in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or chemoradiation therapy. Patients with resectable, histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were entered in the study. Preoperative chemotherapy comprised two cycles of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Radiation therapy commenced with the second cycle on day 22. FDG-PET images were obtained pre-treatment and on completion of intended neo-adjuvant treatment. Quantification was achieved by the calculation of both standardized uptake values (SUV) and tumor/liver ratios (TLR). Evidence of histopathological response was identified according to the Mandard tumor regression scoring system. There were 45 patients, 22 receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 23 chemoradiation therapy. Forty patients underwent surgical resection. Seven patients (16%) had a histopathological response. The mean percentage change in SUV in the histological responders group was -56.8% (SD 29) and in the non-responders -27.8% (SD 32.1) (P = 0.035). The mean percentage change in TLR was -49.1% (SD 44.8) in the responders and in the non-responders -27.3% (SD 31.3) (P = 0.128). There was no difference between the two methods of assessment, however there was less variation with SUV. There was no correlation between the FDG-PET response and the histopathological response. Presently an FDG-PET scan performed 3-6 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus should not be used as a marker of the potential result of the treatment. The optimal timing of a second FDG-PET remains unclear.

Analysis of a prospectively randomized comparison of doxorubicin versus 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and BCNU in advanced gastric cancer: implications for future studies.

A multi-institutional cooperative study of patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who had not previously received chemotherapy was conducted, prospectively randomizing patients to receive either doxorubicin or the three-drug combination, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin (Adriamycin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio), and BCNU (FAB). The 187 evaluable patients were initially stratified according to the presence of measurable or evaluable disease and performance status. There was a significantly higher response rate observed for FAB (40%) compared with doxorubicin (13%) among the 145 measurable-disease patients. Duration of response and survival were significantly longer for FAB in the measurable-disease group, but for the total patient population an early advantage for FAB in time to disease progression and survival was lost with continued follow-up. Median survival was 33 weeks for patients receiving FAB and 19 weeks for those receiving doxorubicin. Significant pretreatment factors adversely affecting survival included poor performance status, weight loss of greater than 10%, and more than two sites of metastases. Toxicity was not severe in either treatment arm, and only thrombocytopenia occurred significantly more often with FAB. It is contended that in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, chemotherapy only exerts a relatively short-term and modest beneficial effect, most apparent in patients with intermediate tumor bulk. 5-FU remains the most active single agent, and combination chemotherapy has not yet proven its overall worth. Further studies are indicated comparing the most active combinations with 5-FU using optimal doses and schedules, and consideration must be given to the incorporation of no-treatment controls.