D. Van Winkle
Stanford University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by D. Van Winkle.
Presented at | 2004
D. Teytelman; L. Beckman; D. Van Winkle; J. Fox; A. Young
The PEP-II High and Low energy rings require active longitudinal feedback to control coupled-bunch instabilities. The driving impedances originate from higher order modes as well as the accelerating fundamental impedance. The PEP-II RF systems use direct and comb loop feedback to reduce the cavity fundamental impedance, though the remaining low-mode impedance is providing the fastest growing unstable modes in both HER and LER. Since commissioning the longitudinal feedback systems have used a dedicated“woofer” channel to apply the low-frequency correction kick via the RF system. The performance of this original controller is limited by the maximum gain that can be supported due to the processing delay (group delay), as well as the difficulty in configuring a common correction controller that acts via two correction paths. A dedicated low-mode signal processing system has been developed to allow higher damping rates. It is a digital processing channel, operating at a 10 MHz sampling rate, and implementing flexible 5 to 14 tap FIR control filters. The design of the channel and initial control filters is presented, as are initial machine experiments quantifying the damping and noise floor of this low group delay woofer system.
ieee particle accelerator conference | 2007
J. Fox; T. Mastorides; C. Rivetta; D. Van Winkle
Several high-current accelerators use feedback techniques in the accelerating RF systems to control the impedances seen by the circulating beam. [1, 2] These Direct and Comb Loop architectures put the high power klystron and LLRF signal processing components inside feedback loops, and the ultimate behavior of the systems depends on the individual sub-component properties. Imperfections and non-idealities in the signal processing leads to reduced effectiveness in the impedance controlled loops. In the PEP-II LLRF systems non-linear effects have been shown to reduce the achievable beam currents, increase low-mode longitudinal growth rates and reduce the margins and stability of the LLRF control loops. We present measurements of the driver amplifiers used in the PEP-II systems, and present measurement techniques needed to quantify the small-signal gain, linearity, transient response and image frequency generation of these amplifiers.
ieee particle accelerator conference | 2005
J. Fox; T. Mastorides; D. Teytelman; D. Van Winkle; Y. Zhou; A. Gallo
The direct and comb loop feedback around the RF cavities in PEP-II is critical in reducing longitudinal instabilities driven by the cavity impedance. The non-linear 1.2 MW klystron is in the signal path for these feedback loops. As a result, the effective small-signal gain of the klystron at 85% saturation reduces the impedance control by factors of 5 to 20 as compared to a linear power amplifier. A klystron linearizer circuit has been developed which operates in series with the power amplifier and acts to equalize the small and large signal gains through the combination. The technique must implement a 1 MHz linear control bandwidth over roughly 15 dB of RF signal level variation. The dynamics of this system is operating point dependent, and the channel must have dynamic gain compensation to keep the linearity compensation loop stable over changes in operating point. The design of this non-linear signal processing channel (incorporating RF and DSP techniques) and measured results from full-power klystron testing are presented.
ieee particle accelerator conference | 2007
T. Mastorides; C. Rivetta; J. Fox; D. Teytelman; D. Van Winkle
PEP-II plans to achieve the final goal in luminosity will require an increase of the beam currents to 4 A for LER and 2.2 A for HER. These magnitudes are challenging in part because they will push the longitudinal low-order mode (LOM) beam stability and the station stability to the limit. To analyze the behavior of both rings at high currents and to understand the limits in the longitudinal feedback systems, a simulation tool has been developed at SLAC. This tool is based on a reduced model of the longitudinal LOM dynamics of the beam interacting with the effective impedance presented by the RF stations. Simulations and measurements of the longitudinal beam behavior in both rings have been performed to understand the ultimate limits of the systems. These studies have defined the impact of control loop parameters in the longitudinal beam dynamics, identified the limiting behavior of RF devices affecting the optimal performance of the RF stations and quantified the behavior of the longitudinal LOM beam dynamics. Results of sensitivity to parameter variations in the beam dynamics and limits in the maximum current that LER/HER can achieve based on the longitudinal beam stability are reported in this paper.
Proceedings of the 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference | 2005
D. Van Winkle; J. Fox; D. Teytelman
The PEP-II RF systems incorporate numerous feedback loops in the low-level processing for impedance control and operating point regulation. The interaction of the multiple loops with the beam is complicated, and the systems incorporate online diagnostic tools to configure the feedback loops as well as to record fault files in the case of an RF abort. Rapid and consistent analysis of the RF-related beam aborts and other failures is critical to the reliable operation of the B-Factory, especially at the recently achieved high beam currents. Procedures and algorithms used to extract diagnostic information from time domain fault files are presented and illustrated via example interpretations of PEP-II fault file data. Example faults presented will highlight the subtle interpretation required to determine the root cause. Some such examples are: abort kicker firing asynchronously, klystron and cavity arcs, beam loss leading to longitudinal instability, tuner read back jumps and poorly configured low-level RF feedback loop.
Physical Review Letters | 1987
Cherry A. Murray; D. Van Winkle
Contributed to European Particle Accelerator Conference (EPAC 06), Edinburgh, Scotland, 26-30 Jun 2006 | 2006
D. Teytelman; C. Rivetta; D. Van Winkle; R. Akre; J. Fox; A. Krasnykh; A. Drago; Frascati
Prepared for European Particle Accelerator Conference (EPAC 06), Edinburgh, Scotland, 26-30 Jun 2006 | 2007
U. Wienands; R. Akre; S. Curry; S. DeBarger; S. Ecklund; S. Heifets; A. Krasnykh; A. Kulikov; S. Novokhatski; J. Seeman; M. Sullivan; D. Teytelman; D. Van Winkle; G. Yocky
International Particle Accelerator Conference 2010 Proceedings: Kyoto Japan | 2010
J. Fox; A.Bullitt; T. Mastoridis; G. Ndabashimiye; C. Rivetta; O.Turgut; D. Van Winkle; J.M. Byrd; Miguel A. Furman; J.-L. Vay; Wolfgang Höfle; G. Rumolo; R. de Maria
Physical Review Special Topics-accelerators and Beams | 2007
C. Rivetta; T. Mastorides; J. Fox; D. Teytelman; D. Van Winkle