D. Vidal
Autonomous University of Barcelona
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by D. Vidal.
Journal of Dermatological Treatment | 2004
D. Vidal; Lluís Puig; Montserrat Gilaberte; A. Alomar
BACKGROUND: Classical pyoderma gangrenosum (CPG) is an uncommon, idiopathic, neutrophilic skin disease, generally associated with other skin conditions and systemic diseases, and with several treatment options. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to know the clinical and therapeutic features of our cases of CPG. METHODS: Twenty‐six cases of CPG were included; 65 episodes of PG and 120 treatment courses were analysed; and the mean follow‐up was 4.6 years. RESULTS: 21 cases (80%) had lesions on the lower extremities, 16 (61%) had recurrences, 22 (84%) had some disease associated, and 13 (50%) had autoimmune inflammatory conditions. Ciclosporin A (CSA) was used in 22 (84%) patients and 51 (78%) episodes, and prednisone (PDN) was used in 15 (57%) patients and 26 (40%) episodes. CONCLUSIONS: CSA efficacy was excellent, with an early response and acceptable toxicity, although it did not seem to have any impact on the incidence of PG recurrences.
British Journal of Dermatology | 2005
A.T. Vila; Lluís Puig; María-Teresa Fernández-Figueras; A. Laiz; D. Vidal; A. Alomar
Background Anakinra, a recombinant human form of interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist, is used to treat patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas (English Edition) | 2013
Lluís Puig; J.M. Carrascosa; G. Carretero; P. de la Cueva; R.F. Lafuente-Urrez; Isabel Belinchón; M. Sánchez-Regaña; M. García-Bustinduy; Miquel Ribera; Mercè Alsina; Carlos Ferrándiz; Eduardo Fonseca; V. García-Patos; E. Herrera; J.L. López-Estebaranz; S.E. Marrón; J.C. Moreno; J. Notario; Raquel Rivera; C. Rodriguez-Cerdeira; A. Romero; R. Ruiz-Villaverde; Rosa Taberner; D. Vidal
Biologic therapy is a well-established strategy for managing moderate and severe psoriasis. Nevertheless, the high cost of such therapy, the relatively short span of clinical experience with biologics, and the abundance of literature now available on these agents have made evidence-based and consensus-based clinical guidelines necessary. The ideal goal of psoriasis treatment is to achieve complete or nearly complete clearing of lesions and to maintain it over time. Failing that ideal, the goal would be to reduce involvement to localized lesions that can be controlled with topical therapy. Although current evidence allows us to directly or indirectly compare the efficacy or risk of primary or secondary failure of available biologics based on objective outcomes, clinical trial findings cannot be directly translated to routine practice. As a result, the prescribing physician must tailor the treatment regimen to the individual patient. This update of the clinical practice guidelines issued by the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) on biologic therapy for psoriasis incorporates information from the most recent publications on this topic.
Journal of The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology | 2003
Montserrat Gilaberte; Lluís Puig; D. Vidal; A. Alomar
Dariers disease (DD) is an autosomal‐dominant skin disorder characterized by loss of adhesion between epidermal cells and abnormal keratinization. Several patients with unilateral, linear, ‘zosteriform’ or localized lesions have been reported. We report three cases of DD in a localized pattern corresponding to mosaicism type 1 according to Happles classification and review the literature about the genetic cause of DD and DD in a ‘zosteriform’ pattern.
Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas | 2016
J.M. Carrascosa; P. de la Cueva; M. Ara; L. Puig; X. Bordas; G. Carretero; L. Ferrándiz; J.L. Sánchez-Carazo; E. Daudén; J.L. López-Estebaranz; D. Vidal; P. Herranz; E. Jorquera; P. Coto-Segura; Miquel Ribera
Methotrexate (MTX) is the most frequently used conventional systemic drug in the treatment of psoriasis. Despite over 50years of experience in this setting, certain aspects of the use of this drug in clinical practice are still little standardized and poorly understood. For this reason, a group of 15 experts took part in a consensus development conference to achieve consensus on a series of recommendations on the use of MTX in psoriasis. The guidelines, which were developed on the basis of a systematic review of the literature, were validated by 2 rounds of voting and categorized by level of evidence and grade of recommendation. Before MTX can be used to treat moderate to severe psoriasis, the patient must be evaluated to assess the suitability of the treatment, including consideration of vaccination status and screening for tuberculosis and pregnancy. The recommended starting dose for a patient with no risk factors is 10 to 20mg/wk, the therapeutic dose for most patients is 15mg/wk, and the maximum dose is 20mg/wk. Most patients who respond to treatment will show improvement within 8weeks. Parenteral administration of MTX is desirable when there is a risk of erroroneous dosing, nonadherence, gastrointestinal intolerance, or inadequate response to the therapeutic dose taken orally. Noninvasive methods are preferred for monitoring hepatotoxicity. MTX is a good treatment option for patients with a history of cancer, but is not recommended in patients with chronic hepatitisB infection or individuals who are seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus.
Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas | 2011
J.M. Carrascosa; J.L. López-Estebaranz; G. Carretero; E. Daudén; Carlos Ferrándiz; D. Vidal; Isabel Belinchón; M. Sánchez-Regaña; Lluís Puig
Novel treatment strategies and new information concerning the management of moderate to severe psoriasis justify a reassessment of the role of the classic therapies in this setting. This consensus statement evaluates narrowband UV-B therapy, which is currently considered the phototherapy option of choice in psoriasis because of its risk-to- benefit ratio. The role of excimer laser and photodynamic therapies are also discussed. These targeted therapies are still only available in a small number of centers in Spain and are used principally in the treatment of localized and recalcitrant forms of psoriasis. We discuss the efficacy and safety of phototherapy as well as treatment regimens, combination therapy, and clinical considerations relating to the characteristics of the patient or the disease.
Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas (English Edition) | 2013
Lluís Puig; P. de la Cueva; M. Linares; J. Suarez; M. Velasco; D. Vidal; A. Zulaica; Carmen García-Calvo
BACKGROUND Although national guidelines on biologic agents for treating moderate to severe psoriasis in adults have been published in several countries, increased knowledge on the practical aspects of their implementation is required. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to survey Spanish dermatologists to determine their expert opinions on practical aspects of psoriasis treatment with biologics. MATERIALS AND METHODS An online survey was sent to 309 dermatologists who belong to the Spanish Psoriasis Group and/or the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV). The questionnaire was designed specifically for the study and included items on various aspects of the treatment of psoriasis in clinical practice. Six coordinators in different geographic areas worked together to write the final expert report. RESULTS The response rate was 97% (300 returned questionnaires). The biologics preferred, or considered to be the best option (median score 4 out of 4 points) by respondents, were infliximab for its short-term efficacy (74% of the respondents) and rapid onset of action (78%); ustekinumab for convenience of administration (73%); and etanercept because of its suitability for cyclic treatment (71%), safety in long-term use (72%), and the possibility of temporary interruption of treatment under certain circumstances (76%). Etanercept was assigned the highest evaluations for safety and expected survival time (scored 5 on each item by 49% and 33% of the respondents, respectively). Thirty percent of the respondents considered that clinical guidelines contain important information for therapeutic management of psoriasis. CONCLUSIONS This study provides a unique perspective on the opinions of a large sample of dermatologists as regards current treatment of psoriasis with biologics in Spain.
Journal of The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology | 2015
D. Vidal; M. Salleras; J. Romaní; Miquel Ribera; Fernando Gallardo; M. Viñas; A. Xifra; X. García-Navarro; X. Bordas; Marta Ferran; J.M. Carrascosa
receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS) associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004; 43: 1292–1299. 4 Mori S, Yonemura K, Migita K. Familial Mediterranean fever occurring in an elderly Japanese woman with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis. Intern Med 2013; 52: 385–388. 5 Tsuchiya-Suzuki A, Yazaki M, Nakamura A et al. Clinical and genetic features of familial Mediterranean fever in Japan. J Rheumatol 2009; 36: 1671–1676. 6 Migita K, Agematsu K, Yazaki M et al. Familial Mediterranean fever: genotype-phenotype correlations in Japanese patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2014; 93: 158–164. 7 Radakovic S, Holzer G, Tanew A. Erysipelas-like erythema as a cutaneous sign of familial Mediterranean fever: a case report and review of the histopathologic findings. J Am Acad Dermatol 2013; 68: e61–e63. 8 Ben-Chetrit E, Touitou I. Familial mediterranean Fever in the world. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 61: 1447–1453. 9 Baykal Y, Saglam K, Yilmaz MI et al. Serum sIL-2r, IL-6, IL-10 and TNFalpha level in familial Mediterranean fever patients. Clin Rheumatol 2003; 22: 99–101. 10 Ozgocmen S, Akgul O. Anti-TNF agents in familial Mediterranean fever: report of three cases and review of the literature.Mod Rheumatol 2011; 21: 684–690.
Journal of The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology | 2018
Gustavo Deza; Jaime Notario; A. López-Ferrer; Eva Vilarrasa; Marta Ferran; Elena del Alcázar; J.M. Carrascosa; Marina Corral; M. Salleras; Miquel Ribera; Lluís Puig; Ramon M. Pujol; D. Vidal; Fernando Gallardo
Ixekizumab (anti‐IL17A) is effective as treatment for moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis, but real‐life data on effectiveness and safety are currently very limited.
Journal of Dermatological Treatment | 2018
Jaime Notario; Gustavo Deza; Eva Vilarrasa; Francesc Valentí; Carlos Muñoz; Jordi Mollet; Vicenç Rocamora; J.M. Carrascosa; Elena del Alcázar; Mercè Alsina; D. Vidal; Lluís Puig; Ana López-Ferrer; José Riera; Fernando Gallardo; Marta Ferran
Abstract Background: The efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients with plaque psoriasis (PsO) have been demonstrated in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). However, data regarding its efficacy and safety in real-life settings are scarce. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab in clinical practice in patients with PsO attending 10 dermatology centers in Spain. Methods: Data from 136 patients consecutively treated with secukinumab for at least 52 weeks were collected in a retrospective observational study. Results: After 52 weeks of treatment, 69% and 46% of patients achieved a PASI-75, PASI-90, respectively. PASI-score ≤5 was achieved in 83% of patients, PASI-score ≤3 in 73% and PASI-score ≤1 in 47%. Response rates were found significantly lower in patients with obesity and non-naïve to biologics (p < .05). The most common adverse event (AE) was candidiasis (5/136). Thirty-six patients (26.5%) discontinued treatment by week 52 due to lack or loss of response (n = 29), AEs (n = 2) or other causes (n = 5). Conclusion: These findings complement the efficacy and safety profiles of secukinumab in PsO outlined in RCTs. The effectiveness in clinical practice may be lower in patients with a BMI ≥30 and those previously treated with other biologic agents.