D Westerly

Dosimetric comparison of left-sided whole breast irradiation with 3DCRT, forward-planned IMRT, inverse-planned IMRT, helical tomotherapy, and topotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To compare left-sided whole breast conventional and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment planning techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS Treatment plans were created for 10 consecutive patients. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), forward-planned IMRT (for-IMRT), and inverse-planned IMRT (inv-IMRT) used two tangent beams. For-IMRT utilized up to four segments per beam. For helical tomotherapy (HT) plans, beamlet entrance and/or exit to critical structures was blocked. Topotherapy plans, which used static gantry angles with simultaneous couch translation and inverse-planned intensity modulation, used two tangent beams. Plans were normalized to 50Gy to 95% of the retracted PTV. RESULTS Target max doses were reduced with for-IMRT compared to 3DCRT, which were further reduced with HT, topotherapy, and inv-IMRT. HT resulted in lowest heart and ipsilateral lung max doses, but had higher mean doses. Inv-IMRT and topotherapy reduced ipsilateral lung mean and max doses compared to 3DCRT and for-IMRT. CONCLUSIONS All modalities evaluated provide adequate coverage of the intact breast. HT, topotherapy, and inv-IMRT can reduce high doses to the target and normal tissues, although HT results in increased low doses to large volume of normal tissue. For-IMRT improves target homogeneity compared with 3DCRT, but to a lesser degree than the inverse-planned modalities.

A Comprehensive Assessment by Tumor Site of Patient Setup Using Daily MVCT Imaging From More Than 3,800 Helical Tomotherapy Treatments

PURPOSE To assess patient setup corrections based on daily megavoltage CT (MVCT) imaging for four anatomic treatment sites treated on tomotherapy. METHOD AND MATERIALS Translational and rotational setup corrections, based on registration of daily MVCT to planning CT images, were analyzed for 1,179 brain and head and neck (H&N), 1,414 lung, and 1,274 prostate treatment fractions. Frequencies of three-dimensional vector lengths, overall distributions of setup corrections, and patient-specific distributions of random and systematic setup errors were analyzed. RESULTS Brain and H&N had lower magnitude positioning corrections and smaller variations in translational setup errors but were comparable in roll rotations. Three-dimensional vector translational shifts of larger magnitudes occurred more frequently for lung and prostate than for brain and H&N treatments, yet this was not observed for roll rotations. The global systematic error for prostate was 4.7 mm in the vertical direction, most likely due to couch sag caused by large couch extension distances. Variations in systematic errors and magnitudes of random translational errors ranged from 1.6 to 2.6 mm for brain and H&N and 3.2 to 7.2 mm for lung and prostate, whereas roll rotational errors ranged from 0.8 degrees to 1.2 degrees for brain and H&N and 0.5 degrees to 1.0 degrees for lung and prostate. CONCLUSIONS Differences in setup were observed between brain, H&N, lung, and prostate treatments. Patient setup can be improved if daily imaging is performed. This analysis can assess the utilization of daily image guidance and allows for further investigation into improved anatomic site-specific and patient-specific treatments.

Commissioning of the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator: a multi-institutional study.

PURPOSE Latest generation linear accelerators (linacs), i.e., TrueBeam (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) and its stereotactic counterpart, TrueBeam STx, have several unique features, including high-dose-rate flattening-filter-free (FFF) photon modes, reengineered electron modes with new scattering foil geometries, updated imaging hardware/software, and a novel control system. An evaluation of five TrueBeam linacs at three different institutions has been performed and this work reports on the commissioning experience. METHODS Acceptance and commissioning data were analyzed for five TrueBeam linacs equipped with 120 leaf (5 mm width) MLCs at three different institutions. Dosimetric data and mechanical parameters were compared. These included measurements of photon beam profiles (6X, 6XFFF, 10X, 10XFFF, 15X), photon and electron percent depth dose (PDD) curves (6, 9, 12 MeV), relative photon output factors (Scp), electron cone factors, mechanical isocenter accuracy, MLC transmission, and dosimetric leaf gap (DLG). End-to-end testing and IMRT commissioning were also conducted. RESULTS Gantry/collimator isocentricity measurements were similar (0.27-0.28 mm), with overall couch/gantry/collimator values of 0.46-0.68 mm across the three institutions. Dosimetric data showed good agreement between machines. The average MLC DLGs for 6, 10, and 15 MV photons were 1.33 ± 0.23, 1.57 ± 0.24, and 1.61 ± 0.26 mm, respectively. 6XFFF and 10XFFF modes had average DLGs of 1.16 ± 0.22 and 1.44 ± 0.30 mm, respectively. MLC transmission showed minimal variation across the three institutions, with the standard deviation <0.2% for all linacs. Photon and electron PDDs were comparable for all energies. 6, 10, and 15 MV photon beam quality, %dd(10)x varied less than 0.3% for all linacs. Output factors (Scp) and electron cone factors agreed within 0.27%, on average; largest variations were observed for small field sizes (1.2% coefficient of variation, 10 MV, 2 × 2 cm(2)) and small cone sizes (<1% coefficient of variation, 6 × 6 cm(2) cone), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Overall, excellent agreement was observed in TrueBeam commissioning data. This set of multi-institutional data can provide comparison data to others embarking on TrueBeam commissioning, ultimately improving the safety and quality of beam commissioning.

Feasibility and sensitivity study of helical tomotherapy for dose painting plans

Abstract Important limitations for dose painting are due to treatment planning and delivery constraints. The purpose of this study was to develop a methodology for creating voxel-based dose painting plans that are deliverable using the clinical TomoTherapy Hi-Art II treatment planning system (TPS). Material and methods. Uptake data from a head and neck patient who underwent a [61Cu]Cu-ATSM (hypoxia surrogate) PET/CT scan was retrospectively extracted for planning. Non-uniform voxel-based prescriptions were converted to structured-based prescriptions for compatibility with the Hi-Art II TPS. Optimized plans were generated by varying parameters such as dose level, structure importance, prescription point normalization, DVH volume, min/max dose, and dose penalty. Delivery parameters such as pitch, jaw width and modulation factor were also varied. Isodose distributions, quality volume histograms and planning target volume percentage receiving planned dose within 5% of the prescription (Q0.95–1.05) were used to evaluate plan conformity. Results. In general, the conformity of treatment plans to dose prescriptions was found to be adequate for delivery of dose painting plans. The conformity was better as the dose levels increased from three to nine levels (Q0.95–1.05: 69% to 93%), jaw decreased in width from 5.0cm to 1.05cm (Q0.95–1.05: 81% to 93%), and modulation factor increased up to 2.0 (Q0.95–1.05: 36% to 92%). The conformity was invariant to changes in pitch. Plan conformity decreased as the prescription DVH constraint (Q0.95–1.05: 93% vs. 89%) or the normalization point (Q0.95–1.05: 93% vs. 90%) deviated from the means. Conclusion. This investigation demonstrated the ability of the Hi-Art II TPS to create voxel-based dose painting plans. Results indicated that agreement in prescription dose and planned dose distributions for all plans were sensitive to physical delivery parameter changes in jaw width and modulation factors, but insensitive to changes in pitch. Tight constraints on target structures also resulted in decreased plan conformity while under a relaxed set of optimization parameters, plan conformity was increased.

Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Might Increase Pneumonitis Risk Relative to Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy in Patients Receiving Combined Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy: A Modeling Study of Dose Dumping

PURPOSE To model the possible interaction between cytotoxic chemotherapy and the radiation dose distribution with respect to the risk of radiation pneumonitis. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 18 non-small-cell lung cancer patients previously treated with helical tomotherapy at the University of Wisconsin were selected for the present modeling study. Three treatment plans were considered: the delivered tomotherapy plans; a three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) plan; and a fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan. The IMRT and 3D-CRT plans were generated specifically for the present study. The plans were optimized without adjusting for the chemotherapy effect. The effect of chemotherapy was modeled as an independent cell killing process by considering a uniform chemotherapy equivalent radiation dose added to all voxels of the organ at risk. The risk of radiation pneumonitis was estimated for all plans using the Lyman and the critical volume models. RESULTS For radiotherapy alone, the critical volume model predicts that the two IMRT plans are associated with a lower risk of radiation pneumonitis than the 3D-CRT plan. However, when the chemotherapy equivalent radiation dose exceeds a certain threshold, the radiation pneumonitis risk after IMRT is greater than after 3D-CRT. This threshold dose is in the range estimated from clinical chemoradiotherapy data sets. CONCLUSIONS Cytotoxic chemotherapy might affect the relative merit of competing radiotherapy plans. More work is needed to improve our understanding of the interaction between chemotherapy and the radiation dose distribution in clinical settings.

Treatment planning to improve delivery accuracy and patient throughput in helical tomotherapy.

PURPOSE To investigate delivery quality assurance (DQA) discrepancies observed for a subset of helical tomotherapy patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS Six tomotherapy patient plans were selected for analysis. Three had passing DQA ion chamber (IC) measurements, whereas 3 had measurements deviating from the expected dose by more than 3.0%. All plans used similar parameters, including: 2.5 cm field-width, 15-s gantry period, and pitch values ranging from 0.143 to 0.215. Preliminary analysis suggested discrepancies were associated with plans having predominantly small leaf open times (LOTs). To test this, patients with failing DQA measurements were replanned using an increased pitch of 0.287. New DQA plans were generated and IC measurements performed. Exit fluence data were also collected during DQA delivery for dose reconstruction purposes. RESULTS Sinogram analysis showed increases in mean LOTs ranging from 29.8% to 83.1% for the increased pitch replans. IC measurements for these plans showed a reduction in dose discrepancies, bringing all measurements within +/-3.0%. The replans were also more efficient to deliver, resulting in reduced treatment times. Dose reconstruction results were in excellent agreement with IC measurements, illustrating the impact of leaf-timing inaccuracies on plans having predominantly small LOTs. CONCLUSIONS The impact of leaf-timing inaccuracies on plans with small mean LOTs can be considerable. These inaccuracies result from deviations in multileaf collimator latency from the linear approximation used by the treatment planning system and can be important for plans having a 15-s gantry period. The ability to reduce this effect while improving delivery efficiency by increasing the pitch is demonstrated.

On the impact of longitudinal breathing motion randomness for tomotherapy delivery.

The purpose of this study is to explain the unplanned longitudinal dose modulations that appear in helical tomotherapy (HT) dose distributions in the presence of irregular patient breathing. This explanation is developed by the use of longitudinal (1D) simulations of mock and surrogate data and tested with a fully 4D HT delivered plan. The 1D simulations use a typical mock breathing function which allows more flexibility to adjust various parameters. These simplified simulations are then made more realistic by using 100 surrogate waveforms all similarly scaled to produce longitudinal breathing displacements. The results include the observation that, with many waveforms used simultaneously, a voxel-by-voxel probability of a dose error from breathing is found to be proportional to the realistically random breathing amplitude relative to the beam width if the PTV is larger than the beam width and the breathing displacement amplitude. The 4D experimental test confirms that regular breathing will not result in these modulations because of the insensitivity to leaf motion for low-frequency dynamics such as breathing. These modulations mostly result from a varying average of the breathing displacements along the beam edge gradients. Regular breathing has no displacement variation over many breathing cycles. Some low-frequency interference is also possible in real situations. In the absence of more sophisticated motion management, methods that reduce the breathing amplitude or make the breathing very regular are indicated. However, for typical breathing patterns and magnitudes, motion management techniques may not be required with HT because typical breathing occurs mostly between fundamental HT treatment temporal and spatial scales. A movement beyond only discussing margins is encouraged for intensity modulated radiotherapy such that patient and machine motion interference will be minimized and beneficial averaging maximized. These results are found for homogeneous and longitudinal on-axis delivery for unplanned longitudinal dose modulations.

Hypofractionation does not increase radiation pneumonitis risk with modern conformal radiation delivery techniques.

Abstract Purpose. To study the interaction between radiation dose distribution and hypofractionated radiotherapy with respect to the risk of radiation pneumonitis (RP) estimated from normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. Material and methods. Eighteen non-small cell lung cancer patients previously treated with helical tomotherapy were selected. For each patient a 3D-conformal plan (3D-CRT) plan was produced in addition to the delivered plan. The standard fractionation schedule was set to 60 Gy in 30 fractions. Iso-efficacy comparisons with hypofractionation were performed by changing the fractionation and the physical prescription dose while keeping the equivalent tumor dose in 2 Gy fractions constant. The risk of developing RP after radiotherapy was estimated using the Mean Equivalent Lung Dose in 2-Gy fractions (MELD2) NTCP model with α/β=4 Gy for the residual lung. Overall treatment time was kept constant. Results. The mean risk of clinical RP after standard fractionation was 7.6% for Tomotherapy (range: 2.8–15.9%) and 9.2% for 3D-CRT (range 3.2–20.2%). Changing to 20 fractions, the Tomotherapy plans became slightly less toxic if the tumor α/β ratio, (α/β)T, was 7 Gy (mean RP risk 7.5%, range 2.8–16%) while the 3D-CRT plans became marginally more toxic (mean RP risk 9.8%, range 3.2–21%). If (α/β)T was 13 Gy, the mean estimated risk of RP is 7.9% for Tomotherapy (range: 2.8–17%) and 10% for 3D-CRT (range 3.2–22%). Conclusion. Modern highly conformal dose distributions are radiobiologically more forgiving with respect to hypofractionation, even for a normal tissue endpoint where α/β is lower than for the tumor in question.

MRI patterns of T1 enhancing radiation necrosis versus tumour recurrence in high‐grade gliomas

Despite the emergence of new imaging technologies, the differentiation of treatment‐related changes from recurrent tumour in patients with high‐grade gliomas remains a difficult challenge. We evaluated whether specific MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) T1 post‐contrast enhancement patterns can help to distinguish between radiation necrosis and tumour recurrence.

Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Response and Normal Tissue Regeneration After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy to Liver Metastases

PURPOSE To characterize changes in standardized uptake value (SUV) in positron emission tomography (PET) scans and determine the pace of normal tissue regeneration after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for solid tumor liver metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS We reviewed records of patients with liver metastases treated with SBRT to ≥40 Gy in 3-5 fractions. Evaluable patients had pretreatment PET and ≥1 post-treatment PET. Each PET/CT scan was fused to the planning computed tomography (CT) scan. The maximum SUV (SUV(max)) for each lesion and the total liver volume were measured on each PET/CT scan. Maximum SUV levels before and after SBRT were recorded. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients with 35 treated liver lesions were studied. The median follow-up was 15.7 months (range, 1.5-38.4 mo), with 5 PET scans per patient (range, 2-14). Exponential decay curve fitting (r=0.97) showed that SUV(max) declined to a plateau of 3.1 for controlled lesions at 5 months after SBRT. The estimated SUV(max) decay half-time was 2.0 months. The SUV(max) in controlled lesions fluctuated up to 4.2 during follow-up and later declined; this level is close to 2 standard deviations above the mean normal liver SUV(max) (4.01). A failure cutoff of SUV(max) ≥6 is twice the calculated plateau SUV(max) of controlled lesions. Parenchymal liver volume decreased by 20% at 3-6 months and regenerated to a new baseline level approximately 10% below the pretreatment level at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS Maximum SUV decreases over the first months after SBRT to plateau at 3.1, similar to the median SUV(max) of normal livers. Transient moderate increases in SUV(max) may be observed after SBRT. We propose a cutoff SUV(max) ≥6, twice the baseline normal liver SUV(max), to score local failure by PET criteria. Post-SBRT values between 4 and 6 would be suspicious for local tumor persistence or recurrence. The volume of normal liver reached nadir 3-6 months after SBRT and regenerated within the next 6 months.