Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Dafna Yahav is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Dafna Yahav.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2008

Antimicrobial Lock Solutions for the Prevention of Infections Associated with Intravascular Catheters in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials

Dafna Yahav; Benaya Rozen-Zvi; Anat Gafter-Gvili; Leonard Leibovici; Uzi Gafter; Mical Paul

BACKGROUND Prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients undergoing hemodialysis by use of antimicrobial catheter lock solutions has been examined in several trials, but no consensus is available for clinical practice. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed of randomized controlled trials that compared single or combination antimicrobial catheter lock solutions with heparin or another antimicrobial for the prevention of infections in patients undergoing hemodialysis. The primary outcomes assessed were bloodstream infections, catheter-related bloodstream infections, and the need for catheter removal. Relative risks with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for individual trials were pooled. RESULTS Eleven trials (924 patients) that assessed antibiotic catheter lock solutions and 5 trials (661 patients)that assessed non antibiotic antimicrobial catheter lock solutions met inclusion criteria. None of the trials assessed all bloodstream infections. Antibiotic catheter lock solutions significantly reduced catheter-related bloodstream infections (relative risk, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.38-0.50). Significant heterogeneity for this outcome could be explained by smaller effect estimates in larger trials that reported adequate randomization methods (relative risk, 0.60; 95%CI, 0.54-0.67). Efficacy was higher when additional preventive measures were used and to prevent the first episode of catheter-related bloodstream infection. Catheter removal rates were significantly reduced (relative risk, 0.35;95% CI, 0.23-0.55). Resistance development was documented in a single patient. Data concerning nonantibiotic antimicrobial lock solutions were limited and heterogeneous. High-quality trials that used additional preventive measures showed a significant reduction in catheter-related bloodstream infections (relative risk, 0.25; 95% CI,0.13-0.50). CONCLUSIONS Antibiotic catheter lock solutions reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections, with a number needed to treat of 4 patients (95% CI, 4-5), and catheter removal rates in patients undergoing hemodialysis. The use of antibiotic catheter lock solutions should be considered in routine clinical practice in conjunction with other prevention modalities.


Clinical Microbiology and Infection | 2012

Colistin: new lessons on an old antibiotic

Dafna Yahav; L. Farbman; Leonard Leibovici; Mical Paul

Colistin has been re-introduced into clinical practice for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Studies in the last decade attempted to reconstruct the path that present-day medications undergo prior to clinical use. In this review, we summarize the results of recent clinical studies. Colistin was associated with lower mortality than no effective treatment and higher unadjusted mortality than β-lactams in non-randomized clinical studies. However, it was administered to sicker patients with carabapenem-resistant bacteria. Overall, nephrotoxicity rates were not higher with colistin in these studies, and colistin-induced nephrotoxicity is reversible in most patients. The emergence of colistin resistance has been described in high-use settings. Synergy with carbapenem, rifampin and other antibiotics has been reported in vitro. Randomized controlled trials are ongoing or in planning to assess this and other aspects of colistin use in clinical practice.


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy | 2010

Effectiveness and safety of colistin: prospective comparative cohort study

Mical Paul; Jihad Bishara; Ariela Levcovich; Michal Chowers; Elad Goldberg; Pierre Singer; Shaul Lev; Perla Leon; Maria Raskin; Dafna Yahav; Leonard Leibovici

BACKGROUND Colistin has re-entered clinical use by necessity. We aimed to assess its effectiveness and safety compared with newer antibiotics. METHODS This was a single-centre, prospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria were microbiologically documented pneumonia, urinary tract infection, surgical site infection, meningitis or bacteraemia treated appropriately with colistin versus imipenem, meropenem or ampicillin/sulbactam (comparators). All consecutive patients were included, only once, between May 2006 and July 2009. The primary outcome was 30 day mortality. Multivariable and Cox regression survival analyses were used to adjust comparisons between groups. Odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals are reported. RESULTS Two hundred patients treated with colistin and 295 patients treated with comparators were included. Treatment with colistin was associated with older age, admission from healthcare facilities, mechanical ventilation and lower rate of early appropriate antibiotic treatment. The 30 day mortality was 39% (78/200) for colistin versus 28.8% (85/295) for comparators; unadjusted OR 1.58 (1.08-2.31). In the adjusted analysis the OR was 1.44 (0.91-2.26) overall and 1.99 (1.06-3.77) for bacteraemic patients (n = 220). At the end of follow-up, treatment with colistin was significantly associated with cumulative mortality; adjusted HR 1.27 (1.01-1.60) overall and 1.65 (1.18-2.31) among patients with bacteraemia. Nephrotoxicity at the end of treatment was more frequent with colistin; OR adjusted for other risk factors for nephrotoxicity 3.31 (1.54-7.08). Treatment with colistin was followed by increased incidence of Proteus spp. infections during a 3 month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The need for colistin treatment is associated with poorer survival. Adjusted analyses suggest that colistin is less effective and more toxic than beta-lactam antibiotics.


BMJ | 2008

Treatment of human brucellosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Keren Skalsky; Dafna Yahav; Jihad Bishara; Silvio Pitlik; Leonard Leibovici; Mical Paul

Objectives To determine and quantify differences in efficacy between treatment regimens for brucellosis. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials assessing different antibiotic regimens and durations of treatment for human brucellosis. Data sources PubMed, CENTRAL, Lilacs, conference proceedings, and bibliographies with no restrictions on language, study year, or publication status. Review methods Search, application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, data extraction, and assessment of methodological quality independently performed in duplicate. Primary outcomes were relapse and overall failure resulting from primary failure or relapse. Relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were calculated and pooled with a fixed effect model. Results 30 trials and 77 treatment arms were included. Overall failure was significantly higher with doxycycline-rifampicin compared to doxycycline-streptomycin, mainly due to a higher rate of relapse (relative risk 2.80, 95% confidence interval 1.81 to 4.36; 13 trials, without heterogeneity). Results were consistent among patients with bacteraemia and complicated brucellosis. Doxycycline-streptomycin resulted in a significantly higher rate of failure than doxycycline-rifampicin-aminoglycoside (triple drug regimen) (2.50, 1.26 to 5.00; two trials). Gentamicin was not inferior to streptomycin (1.45, 0.52 to 4.00 for failure; two trials). Quinolones combined with rifampicin were significantly less effective than doxycycline combined with rifampicin or streptomycin (1.83, 1.11 to 3.02, for failure; five trials). Monotherapy was associated with a higher risk of failure than combined treatment when administered for a similar duration (2.56, 1.55 to 4.23; five trials). Treatment for six weeks or more offered an advantage over shorter treatment durations. Conclusions There are significant differences in effectiveness between currently recommended treatment regimens for brucellosis. The preferred treatment should be with dual or triple regimens including an aminoglycoside.


Clinical Microbiology and Infection | 2013

Gut bacterial microbiota and obesity

Matthieu Million; Jean-Christophe Lagier; Dafna Yahav; Mical Paul

Although probiotics and antibiotics have been used for decades as growth promoters in animals, attention has only recently been drawn to the association between the gut microbiota composition, its manipulation, and obesity. Studies in mice have associated the phylum Firmicutes with obesity and the phylum Bacteroidetes with weight loss. Proposed mechanisms linking the microbiota to fat content and weight include differential effects of bacteria on the efficiency of energy extraction from the diet, and changes in host metabolism of absorbed calories. The independent effect of the microbiota on fat accumulation has been demonstrated in mice, where transplantation of microbiota from obese mice or mice fed western diets to lean or germ-free mice produced fat accumulation among recipients. The microbiota can be manipulated by prebiotics, probiotics, and antibiotics. Probiotics affect the microbiota directly by modulating its bacterial content, and indirectly through bacteriocins produced by the probiotic bacteria. Interestingly, certain probiotics are associated with weight gain both in animals and in humans. The effects are dependent on the probiotic strain, the host, and specific host characteristics, such as age and baseline nutritional status. Attention has recently been drawn to the association between antibiotic use and weight gain in children and adults. We herein review the studies describing the associations between the microbiota composition, its manipulation, and obesity.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology | 2012

Diagnostic Accuracy of PCR Alone Compared to Galactomannan in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid for Diagnosis of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis: a Systematic Review

Tomer Avni; Itzhak Levy; Hannah Sprecher; Dafna Yahav; Leonard Leibovici; Mical Paul

ABSTRACT PCR in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid has not been accepted as a diagnostic criterion for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). We conducted a systematic review assessing the diagnostic accuracy of PCR in BAL fluid with a direct comparison versus galactomannan (GM) in BAL fluid. We included prospective and retrospective cohort and case-control studies. Studies were included if they used the EORTC/MSG consensus definition criteria of IPA and assessed ≥80% of patients at risk for IPA. Two reviewers abstracted data independently. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. Summary sensitivity and specificity values were estimated using a bivariate model and reported with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Nineteen studies published between 1993 and 2012 were included. The summary sensitivity and specificity values (CIs) for diagnosis of proven or probable IPA were 90.2% (77.2 to 96.1%) and 96.4% (93.3 to 98.1%), respectively. In nine cohort studies strictly adherent to the 2002 or 2008 EORTC/MSG criteria for reference standard definitions, the summary sensitivity and specificity values (CIs) were 77.2% (62 to 87.6%) and 93.5% (90.6 to 95.6%), respectively. Antifungal treatment before bronchoscopy significantly reduced sensitivity. The diagnostic performance of PCR was similar to that of GM in BAL fluid using an optical density index cutoff of 0.5. If either PCR or GM in BAL fluid defined a positive result, the pooled sensitivity was higher than that of GM alone, with similar specificity. We conclude that the diagnostic performance of PCR in BAL fluid is good and comparable to that of GM in BAL fluid. Performing both tests results in optimal sensitivity with no loss of specificity. Results are dependent on the reference standard definitions.


American Journal of Kidney Diseases | 2010

Vasopressin Receptor Antagonists for the Treatment of Hyponatremia: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Benaya Rozen-Zvi; Dafna Yahav; Mihai Gheorghiade; Asher Korzets; Leonard Leibovici; Uzi Gafter

BACKGROUND In patients with euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia, the effect of vasopressin antagonists is yet undefined. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). SETTING & POPULATION In- and outpatients with euvolemic or hypervolemic hyponatremia. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES We included all RCTs regardless of publication status or language. INTERVENTION Vasopressin antagonists with or without fluid restriction versus placebo or no treatment with or without fluid restriction. OUTCOMES Response rate defined as normalization of serum sodium level or significant increase in serum sodium level at 3-7 days (primary) and later, change from baseline serum sodium level at 3-7 days and later, adverse events, rate of rapid sodium level correction, and rate of hypernatremia. RESULTS 15 RCTs were identified. Vasopressin antagonist treatment significantly increased response rate both early (RR, 3.15; 95% CI, 2.27-4.37; 11 trials) and late (RR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.79-2.89; 4 trials). Response rates were high in trials assessing mostly euvolemic patients and those assessing mostly hypervolemic patients, with greater effect estimate in the former. Change from baseline serum sodium level was significantly increased both early (weighted mean difference, 5.27 mEq/L; 95% CI, 4.27-6.26, 13 trials) and late (weighted mean difference, 3.49 mEq/L; 95% CI, 2.56-4.41, 8 trials). Although there was an increased rate of rapid sodium correction (RR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.26-5.08, 8 trials) with vasopressin antagonists, hypernatremia rates were not significantly higher (RR, 2.21; 95% CI, 0.61-7.96; 5 trials), adverse events were not increased, and there were no reports of osmotic demyelination syndrome. LIMITATIONS Significant heterogeneity in the primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS Vasopressin antagonists are effective for the treatment of hypervolemic and euvolemic hyponatremia.


BMJ | 2015

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus vancomycin for severe infections caused by meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus: randomised controlled trial

Mical Paul; Jihad Bishara; Dafna Yahav; Elad Goldberg; Ami Neuberger; Nesrin Ghanem-Zoubi; Yaakov Dickstein; William Nseir; Michael Dan; Leonard Leibovici

Objective To show non-inferiority of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole compared with vancomycin for the treatment of severe infections due to meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Design Parallel, open label, randomised controlled trial. Setting Four acute care hospitals in Israel. Participants Adults with severe infections caused by MRSA susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and vancomycin. Patients with left sided endocarditis, meningitis, chronic haemodialysis, and prolonged neutropenia were excluded. Interventions Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 320 mg/1600 mg twice daily versus vancomycin 1 g twice daily for a minimum of seven days and then by indication. Main outcome measures The primary efficacy outcome was treatment failure assessed at day 7, consisting of death, persistence of haemodynamic instability or fever, stable or worsening Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, and persistence of bacteraemia. The primary safety outcome was all cause mortality at day 30. Non-inferiority was defined by a difference of less than 15% for treatment failure. Results 252 patients were included in the trial, of whom 91 (36%) had bacteraemia. No significant difference in treatment failure was seen for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (51/135, 38%) versus vancomycin (32/117, 27%)—risk ratio 1.38 (95% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.99). However, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole did not meet the non-inferiority criterion—absolute difference 10.4% (95% confidence interval −1.2% to 21.5%). For patients with bacteraemia, the risk ratio was 1.40 (0.91 to 2.16). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was significantly associated with treatment failure (adjusted odds ratio 2.00, 1.09 to 3.65). The 30 day mortality rate was 32/252 (13%), with no significant difference between arms. Among patients with bacteraemia, 14/41 (34%) treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and 9/50 (18%) with vancomycin died (risk ratio 1.90, 0.92 to 3.93). Conclusions High dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole did not achieve non-inferiority to vancomycin in the treatment of severe MRSA infections. The difference was particularly marked for patients with bacteraemia. Trial registration Clinical trials NCT00427076.


European Journal of Cancer | 2009

Antiviral prophylaxis in haematological patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Dafna Yahav; Anat Gafter-Gvili; Eli Muchtar; Keren Skalsky; Galia Kariv; Moshe Yeshurun; Leonard Leibovici; Mical Paul

PURPOSE Antiviral prophylaxis is commonly prescribed to haematological cancer patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify its overall benefit in specific clinical scenarios. METHODS Randomised controlled trials assessing antiviral prophylaxis versus placebo, no treatment, pre-emptive treatment or another antiviral drug were included. Patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or intensive chemotherapy for acute leukaemia or high-grade lymphoma were included. No restrictions on language, year or publication status were applied. Overall mortality, herpes simplex virus (HSV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) diseases were assessed as primary outcomes. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and numbers needed to treat (NNT) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported. RESULTS HSCT was the condition assessed in 22 trials and intensive chemotherapy in 5 trials. In the pre-engraftment setting of autologous or allogeneic HSCT, antiviral prophylaxis (mainly acyclovir for HSV seropositive recipients) significantly reduced HSV (NNT 2, 2-2, control event rate (CER) 61.9%) and CMV disease, with no effect on overall mortality. In the allogeneic post-engraftment setting (mainly CMV-seropositive recipients/donors), antiviral prophylaxis resulted in a significant reduction in overall mortality, RR 0.79 (0.65-0.95), NNT 12 (7-50, CER 39.4%) and all viral-related outcomes. In this setting, acyclovir significantly reduced overall mortality (RR 0.71, 0.53-0.96, 4 trials) and ganciclovir/maribavir significantly reduced CMV disease (RR 0.26, 0.14-0.48, 5 trials). During chemotherapy, acyclovir significantly decreased HSV disease (NNT 3, 2-4, CER 37.4%) and infection rates, with no effect on mortality. CONCLUSIONS Antiviral prophylaxis reduced mortality with a small NNT in the post-engraftment setting of allogeneic HSCT. In the pre-engraftment phase and during chemotherapy only viral-related morbidity was reduced.


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy | 2013

Duration of antibiotic treatment for acute pyelonephritis and septic urinary tract infection— 7 days or less versus longer treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Noa Eliakim-Raz; Dafna Yahav; Mical Paul; Leonard Leibovici

BACKGROUND Acute pyelonephritis is a frequent cause of morbidity, with a wide variation in duration of therapy. We performed a systematic review of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ≤7 days treatment with a longer course. METHODS Electronic databases were searched to identify RCTs that assessed adults treated for pyelonephritis, comparing a 7 day or shorter versus longer therapy. Primary outcome was clinical failure at the end of the long treatment arm (EOT). Secondary outcomes included clinical failure at the end of follow-up (EOF), microbiological failure, all-cause mortality, the development of resistance and adverse events. RESULTS Clinical failure at EOT did not significantly differ between the two treatment arms [relative risk (RR) 0.63, 95% CI 0.33-1.18, I(2) = 41%]. Results did not differ when including studies comparing only fluoroquinolones, reducing the heterogeneity (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.49-1.17, I(2) = 0%). We found no difference between the short and long treatment arms regarding clinical failure at EOF, even in a small subgroup of bacteraemic patients. No difference was found between the arms regarding microbiological failure at EOF, except in a subgroup of studies with a high percentage of patients with urogenital abnormalities, where microbiological failure at EOF was significantly higher in the short treatment arm (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.02-3.10, I(2) = 21%). Adverse events were similar between the arms. CONCLUSIONS Seven days of treatment for acute pyelonephritis is equivalent to longer treatment in terms of clinical failure and microbiological failure, including in bacteraemic patients. In patients with urogenital abnormalities, the evidence, although weak, suggests that longer treatment is required.

Collaboration


Dive into the Dafna Yahav's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mical Paul

Rambam Health Care Campus

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge