Daijiro Kobayashi

Visualization of complex DNA double-strand breaks in a tumor treated with carbon ion radiotherapy.

Carbon ion radiotherapy shows great potential as a cure for X-ray-resistant tumors. Basic research suggests that the strong cell-killing effect induced by carbon ions is based on their ability to cause complex DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). However, evidence supporting the formation of complex DSBs in actual patients is lacking. Here, we used advanced high-resolution microscopy with deconvolution to show that complex DSBs are formed in a human tumor clinically treated with carbon ion radiotherapy, but not in a tumor treated with X-ray radiotherapy. Furthermore, analysis using a physics model suggested that the complexity of radiotherapy-induced DSBs is related to linear energy transfer, which is much higher for carbon ion beams than for X-rays. Visualization of complex DSBs in clinical specimens will help us to understand the anti-tumor effects of carbon ion radiotherapy.

Clinical outcomes of carbon ion radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced uterine cervical adenocarcinoma in a phase 1/2 clinical trial (Protocol 1001)

We conducted a phase 1/2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy (C‐ion RT) with concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced uterine cervical adenocarcinoma. Thirty‐three patients were enrolled between April 2010 and March 2014. Treatment consisted of C‐ion RT with concurrent weekly cisplatin at a dose of 40 mg/m2. In the phase 1 component, the total dose was escalated from 68.0 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) to 74.4 Gy (RBE) to determine the maximum tolerated dose of C‐ion RT. In the phase 2 component, the efficacy and safety of C‐ion RT with concurrent chemotherapy were evaluated using the dose determined in the phase 1 component. The median follow‐up duration was 30 months. Two patients did not receive chemotherapy because of anemia or leukocytopenia immediately prior to commencing treatment; 31 patients were analyzed. None of the patients developed dose‐limiting toxicities. The recommended dose (RD) was determined to be 74.4 Gy (RBE). In the phase 2 component, two patients developed Grade 3–4 toxicities in the gastrointestinal tract, due to repeated laser coagulation or peritonitis caused by appendicitis. In the patients treated with the RD, the 2‐year local control, progression‐free survival, and overall survival rates were 71%, 56%, and 88%, respectively. C‐ion RT with concurrent weekly cisplatin was well tolerated in patients with locally advanced uterine cervical adenocarcinoma. Our findings support further investigations into the efficacy of this strategy.

Mitotic catastrophe is a putative mechanism underlying the weak correlation between sensitivity to carbon ions and cisplatin.

In cancer therapy today, carbon ion radiotherapy is used mainly as monotherapy, whereas cisplatin is used concomitantly with X-ray radiotherapy. The effectiveness of concomitant carbon ions and cisplatin is unclear. To obtain the information on the mechanisms potentially shared between carbon ions or X-rays and cisplatin, we assessed the correlation of sensitivity to the single treatments. In 20 human cancer cell lines, sensitivity to X-rays strongly correlated with sensitivity to cisplatin, indicating the presence of potentially shared target mechanisms. Interestingly, the correlation of sensitivity to carbon ions and cisplatin was much weaker than that of sensitivity to X-rays and cisplatin, indicating the presence of potentially different target mechanisms between carbon ions and cisplatin. Assessment of clonogenic cell death by 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride staining showed that mitotic catastrophe was more efficiently induced by carbon ions than by the same physical dose of X-rays, while apoptosis and senescence were not. These data indicate that the correlation of sensitivity to carbon ions and cisplatin is weaker than that of sensitivity to X-rays and cisplatin, which are helpful as biological basis to understand the potentially shared mechanism among these treatments. Further investigation is mandatory to elucidate the clinical efficacy of carbon ions and cisplatin combination.

Prospective observational study of carbon‐ion radiotherapy for non‐squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of carbon‐ion radiotherapy for non‐squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, 35 patients were enrolled in this prospective study. The primary end‐point was the 3‐year local control rate, and the secondary end‐points included the 3‐year overall survival rate and adverse events. Acute and late adverse events were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. The median follow‐up time for all patients was 39 months. Thirty‐two and three patients received 64.0 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) and 57.6 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 16 fractions, respectively. Adenoid cystic carcinoma was dominant (60%). Four patients had local recurrence and five patients died. The 3‐year local control and overall survival rates were 93% and 88%, respectively. Acute grade 2–3 radiation mucositis (65%) and dermatitis (31%) was common, which improved immediately with conservative therapy. Late mucositis of grade 2, grade 3, and grade 4 were observed in 11, one, and no patients, respectively. There were no adverse events of grade 5. Carbon‐ion radiotherapy achieved excellent local control and overall survival rates for non‐squamous cell carcinoma. However, the late mucosal adverse events were not rare, and meticulous treatment planning is required. Trial registration no. UMIN000007886.

Carbon-ion radiotherapy for inoperable endometrial carcinoma

Abstract This is a pooled analysis to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) for inoperable endometrial carcinoma. Eligible patients had previously untreated Stage I–III endometrial carcinoma without para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Total dose to the tumor was 62.4–74.4 Gy [relative biological effectiveness (RBE)] in 20 fractions, and the dose to the gastrointestinal tract was limited to <60 Gy (RBE). Intracavitary brachytherapy was not combined in the present study. Fourteen patients with endometrial carcinoma were analyzed. Ten of the 14 patients were judged medically inoperable, and the others refused surgery. The numbers of patients with Stage I, II and III disease were 1, 9 and 4, respectively. Tumor size was 3.8–13.8 cm in maximum diameter. Median follow-up periods for all patients and surviving patients were 50 months (range, 12–218 months) and 78 months (range, 23–218 months), respectively. Two of three patients receiving 62.4–64.8 Gy (RBE) had local recurrence whereas none of 11 patients receiving 68.0 Gy (RBE) or more had local recurrence. Three patients developed distant metastases and one of them also had local recurrence. The 5-year local control, progression-free survival, overall survival, and cause-specific survival rates were 86%, 64%, 68% and 73%, respectively. No patient developed Grade 3 or higher acute or late toxicity. The present study showed that C-ion RT alone could be a safe and curative treatment modality for inoperable endometrial carcinoma.

Dose–volume histogram analysis of brainstem necrosis in head and neck tumors treated using carbon-ion radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the relationship between brainstem necrosis and dose-volume histograms in patients with head and neck tumors after carbon-ion radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS We evaluated 85 patients with head and neck tumors who underwent carbon-ion radiotherapy and were followed-up for ≥12months. Brainstem necrosis was evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). RESULTS The median follow-up was 24months, and four patients developed grade 1 brainstem necrosis, with 2-year and 3-year cumulative rates of 2.8% and 6.5%, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed the following significant cut-off values: a maximum brainstem dose of 48Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]), D1cm3 of 27Gy (RBE), V40Gy (RBE) of 0.1cm3, V30Gy (RBE) of 0.7cm3, and V20Gy (RBE) of 1.4cm3. Multivariate analysis revealed that V30Gy (RBE) was most significantly associated with brainstem necrosis. The 2-year cumulative rates were 33% and 0% for V30Gy (RBE) of ≥0.7cm3 and <0.7cm3, respectively (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The present study indicated that the dose constraints might help minimize brainstem necrosis after carbon-ion radiotherapy.