Daiqin Li

Hatching responses of subsocial spitting spiders to predation risk.

The carrying of eggs often renders parents vulnerable to predators due to increased conspicuousness or decreased mobility. Nonetheless, egg–carrying parents can escape from the predators to which they are vulnerable. Previous studies have demonstrated heavy predation by spider–eating jumping spiders (Portia labiata) on egg–carrying spitting spider (Scytodes pallida) females, but little predation on eggless females. If the timing of hatching is phenotypically plastic, then both S. pallida females and their eggs could reduce the risk of predation by hatching early. Hence, this study examines the hatching responses of S. pallida to chemical cues from P. labiata, both in the laboratory and in the field, and addresses the following questions. (i) Do cues from predatory P. labiata influence the hatching traits of S. pallida? (ii) Are the olfactory cues from predators sufficient for predator detection by S. pallida ? (iii) Are hatching responses to predatory P. labiata controlled by egg–carrying S. pallida females, or directly by their embryos? The study provides evidence of hatching as a life–history switch point, which shows an adaptive plasticity in response to predation risk in egg–carrying S. pallida. Egg–carrying S. pallida females, but not unattended eggs, adjust egg–hatching time (the interval between oviposition and hatching) in response to the threat of predation on both the female and her eggs by P. labiata. In the presence of P. labiata, eggs that are carried by females hatch sooner; the hatchlings of these eggs are therefore smaller than hatchlings born in the absence of P. labiata. Chemical cues that are released from the draglines of P. labiata are sufficient to elicit changes in the egg–hatching traits of S. pallida. Hatching early in response to this predator may benefit both females and their offspring. To my knowledge, this is the first direct experimental study to demonstrate predator–induced hatching plasticity in spiders and, in particular, in animals with parental care.

Predator-induced plasticity in web-building behaviour

Many orb-web weaving spiders add conspicuous silken structures, called stabilimenta, to the hub of their webs, which are hypothesized to attract more prey. However, they may also attract predators. Orb spiders should therefore alter their web-building behaviour to minimize predation risk. We tested this hypothesis by experimentally examining web-building responses of the St Andrew cross spider, Argiope versicolor, to predation risk from one of its natural predators, the jumping spider Portia labiata. We randomly assigned A. versicolor juveniles to one of three treatments: (1) blank control (clean blotting paper: no odour from the predator or nonpredator); (2) predator odour cues from P. labiata; and (3) nonpredator control (odour cues from Leucauge decorata). Each individual of A. versicolor was monitored until it had built five consecutive webs (two webs before and three webs after the introduction of predator cues). When exposed to predator cues, the juveniles not only decreased the frequency of stabilimentum building but also refrained from increasing stabilimentum area, capture area and capture silk thread with subsequent webs compared with the blank control and the nonpredator control. Web-building traits, however, were not significantly different between the blank control and the nonpredator control. One plausible explanation is that A. versicolor juveniles can detect and discriminate between predators and nonpredators through olfactory cues and alter stabilimentum building and other web traits in response to the risk of predation. This is the first demonstration of an adaptive, plastic web-building behavioural response induced by chemical cues from a predator.

Stabilimenta attract unwelcome predators to orb–webs

Conspicuous behaviour exposes animals to predation; prey–attraction thus often conflicts with antipredator behaviour. The fact that a conspicuous ultraviolet–light reflecting silken structure in the orb–webs of certain spider species, known as a stabilimentum, makes the webs obvious to both prey and predators has been used to argue that spiders benefit from building stabilimenta by attracting prey and/or defending against visually hunting predators. Here, we provide experimental evidence that stabilimenta can act as visual signals that attract web–invading spider–eating predators with acute vision to the webs. We also show that the predators can learn to remember a particular type of stabilimentum. Thus, stabilimentum–building spiders risk a high level of predation by attracting visually hunting predators.

Prey‐capture techniques and prey preferences of nine species of ant‐eating jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) from the Philippines

Abstract Siler sp., Euophrys sp. 1 and 2, and six species of Chalcotropis feed on ants in nature. Capture techniques and preferences of each species were studied in the laboratory using a wide variety of ants and other insects. Siler sp. usually attacked ants, but not other insects, from directly behind. Euophrys sp. 1 and 2 consistently attacked ants, but not other insects, head on. Chalcotropis attacked large ants head on, but there was no particular orientation of attacks on small ants or on other prey regardless of size. All species tended to stab ants, but not other prey, several times before holding on. In three types of prey‐preference tests, each of the nine salticid species took dolichoderine, formicine, myrmicine, ponerine, and pseudomyrmecine ants in preference to a variety of other insects (aphids, bugs, caterpillars, cockroaches, crickets, flies, gnats, lacewings, mantises, may flies, midges, mosquitoes, moths, plant and leafhoppers, plant lice, and termites). Testing with laboratory‐reared s...

Interpopulation variation in the risk-related decisions of Portia labiata, an araneophagic jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae), during predatory sequences with spitting spiders

Abstract. The extent to which decision-making processes are constrained in animals with small brains is poorly understood. Arthropods have brains much smaller and simpler than those of birds and mammals. This raises questions concerning limitations on how intricate the decision-making processes might be in arthropods. At Los Baños in the Philippines, Scytodes pallidus is a spitting spider that specialises in preying on jumping spiders, and Portia labiata is a jumping spider that preys on S. pallidus. Scytodid spit comes from the mouth, and egg-carrying females are less dangerous than eggless scytodids because the female uses her chelicerae to hold her eggs. Held eggs block her mouth, and she has to release them before she can spit. The Los Baños P. labiata sometimes adjusts its tactics depending on whether the scytodid encountered is carrying eggs or not. When pursuing eggless scytodids, the Los Baños P. labiata usually takes detour routes that enable it to close in from behind (away from the scytodids line of fire). However, when pursuing egg-carrying scytodids, the Los Baños P. labiata sometimes takes faster direct routes to reach these safer prey. The Los Baños P. labiata apparently makes risk-related adjustments specific to whether scytodids are carrying eggs, but P. labiata from Sagada in the Philippines (allopatric to Scytodes) fails to make comparable risk-related adjustments.

One-encounter search-image formation by araneophagic spiders

An experimental study of search-image use by araneophagic jumping spiders (i.e., salticid spiders that prey routinely on other spiders) supports five conclusions. First, araneophagic salticids have an innate predisposition to form search images for specific prey from their preferred prey category (spiders) rather than for prey from a non-preferred category (insects). Second, single encounters are sufficient for forming search images. Third, search images are based on selective attention specifically to optical cues. Fourth, there are trade-offs in attention during search-image use (i.e., forming a search image for one type of spider diminishes the araneophagic salticid’s attention to other spiders). Fifth, the araneophagic salticid’s adoption of search images is costly to the prey (i.e., when the araneophagic salticid adopts a search, the prey’s prospects for surviving encounters with the araneophagic salticid are diminished). Cognitive and ecological implications of search-image use are discussed.

Stabilimentum variations in Argiope versicolor (Araneae: Araneidae) from Singapore

Many orb-web building spiders add conspicuous, white silk decorations termed stabilimenta onto the central portion of the webs. Stabilimenta are known to vary greatly in form and quantity from species to species, and also within a species. In the present study, stabilimentum variations in form and quantity are described, and the factors influencing stabilimentum variations in Argiope versicolor from Singapore, in both the field and the laboratory, are examined. Our results from field survey and laboratory experiments show that: (1) the form and occurrence of stabilimenta varied with developmental stage of spiders: A. versicolor juveniles (body length: < 0.6 cm) built disc-like (discoid) stabilimenta while adults spun cross-like (cruciform) stabilimenta; (2) the quantity of stabilimenta (percentage of stabilimentum area covering the web to the web area) decreased with increasing web size and spider size; (3) light intensity affected the density and percentage cover of stabilimentum on the web: A. versicolor tend to build more and denser stabilimenta in dim conditions than in bright surroundings; (4) well-fed A. versicolor adults added more stabilimenta than starved spiders. These findings suggest that A. versicolor may adjust the frequency and quantity of stabilimenta to suit multiple functions, specifying the circumstances under which to use each function (conditional stabilimentum-building strategies).

UVB-based mate-choice cues used by females of the jumping spider Phintella vittata.

Although there are numerous examples of animals having photoreceptors sensitive to UVA (315-400 nm) [1] and relying on UVA-based mate-choice cues [2-5], here we provide the first evidence of an animal using UVB (280-315 nm) for intraspecific communication. An earlier study showed that Phintella vittata, a jumping spider (Salticidae) from China, reflects UVB [6]. By performing six series of binary mate-choice experiments in which we varied lighting conditions with filters (UVB+ [no filter] versus UVB-, UVB+ versus ND1, UVB+ versus ND2, UVB- versus ND1, UVB- versus ND2, and UVB- versus UVA-), we show that significantly more UVB + males than UVB- males are chosen by females as preferred mates. Female preference for UVB-reflective males is not affected by differences in brightness or by UVA.

Effects of age and feeding history on structure-based UV ornaments of a jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae)

Recent studies have shown for birds that females sometimes choose mates on the basis of condition-dependent variation in ultraviolet (UV, less than 400 nm) ornamentation, but there have been few comparable studies on invertebrates. Yet many invertebrates have UV structural coloration. Here, we investigate Cosmophasis umbratica, a jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae) that has sexually dimorphic UV-iridescent ornamentation, and we provide evidence that male UV coloration is condition dependent in this species. Spectral-reflection patterns change with male age and prior feeding history. The position of the UV band (i.e. UV hue) of the carapaces of younger (field-collected as subadults and matured as adults in laboratory) males shifted, relative to older (field-collected as adults) males, significantly towards longer wavelengths. Food deprivation significantly decreased the spectral intensity of the abdomen, but not the carapace. Questions concerning the mechanisms by which UV ornaments change are highlighted, as are hypotheses concerning the role of condition-dependent UV variation in male–male competition and as a criterion used by females when making mate-choice decisions.

Convergent evolution of eye ultrastructure and divergent evolution of vision‐mediated predatory behaviour in jumping spiders

All jumping spiders have unique, complex eyes with exceptional spatial acuity and some of the most elaborate vision‐guided predatory strategies ever documented for any animal of their size. However, it is only recently that phylogenetic techniques have been used to reconstruct the relationships and key evolutionary events within the Salticidae. Here, we used data for 35 species and six genes (4.8 kb) for reconstructing the phylogenetic relationships between Spartaeinae, Lyssomaninae and Salticoida. We document a remarkable case of morphological convergence of eye ultrastructure in two clades with divergent predatory behaviour. We, furthermore, find evidence for a stepwise, gradual evolution of a complex predatory strategy. Divergent predatory behaviour ranges from cursorial hunting to building prey‐catching webs and araneophagy with web invasion and aggressive mimicry. Web invasion and aggressive mimicry evolved once from an ancestral spartaeine that was already araneophagic and had no difficulty entering webs due to glue immunity. Web invasion and aggressive mimicry was lost once, in Paracyrba, which has replaced one highly specialized predation strategy with another (hunting mosquitoes). In contrast to the evolution of divergent behaviour, eyes with similarly high spatial acuity and ultrastructural design evolved convergently in the Salticoida and in Portia.