Daisa Silva Ribeiro David

Banff 07 Classification of Renal Allograft Pathology: Updates and Future Directions

The 9th Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology was held in La Coruna, Spain on June 23–29, 2007. A total of 235 pathologists, clinicians and scientists met to address unsolved issues in transplantation and adapt the Banff schema for renal allograft rejection in response to emerging data and technologies. The outcome of the consensus discussions on renal pathology is provided in this article. Major updates from the 2007 Banff Conference were: inclusion of peritubular capillaritis grading, C4d scoring, interpretation of C4d deposition without morphological evidence of active rejection, application of the Banff criteria to zero‐time and protocol biopsies and introduction of a new scoring for total interstitial inflammation (ti‐score). In addition, emerging research data led to the establishment of collaborative working groups addressing issues like isolated ‘v’ lesion and incorporation of omics‐technologies, paving the way for future combination of graft biopsy and molecular parameters within the Banff process.

Banff 2013 Meeting Report: Inclusion of C4d‐Negative Antibody‐Mediated Rejection and Antibody‐Associated Arterial Lesions

The 12th Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology was held in Comandatuba, Brazil, from August 19–23, 2013, and was preceded by a 2‐day Latin American Symposium on Transplant Immunobiology and Immunopathology. The meeting was highlighted by the presentation of the findings of several working groups formed at the 2009 and 2011 Banff meetings to: (1) establish consensus criteria for diagnosing antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR) in the presence and absence of detectable C4d deposition; (2) develop consensus definitions and thresholds for glomerulitis (g score) and chronic glomerulopathy (cg score), associated with improved inter‐observer agreement and correlation with clinical, molecular and serological data; (3) determine whether isolated lesions of intimal arteritis (“isolated v”) represent acute rejection similar to intimal arteritis in the presence of tubulointerstitial inflammation; (4) compare different methodologies for evaluating interstitial fibrosis and for performing/evaluating implantation biopsies of renal allografts with regard to reproducibility and prediction of subsequent graft function; and (5) define clinically and prognostically significant morphologic criteria for subclassifying polyoma virus nephropathy. The key outcome of the 2013 conference is defining criteria for diagnosis of C4d‐negative ABMR and respective modification of the Banff classification. In addition, three new Banff Working Groups were initiated.

Banff 2013 meeting report

The 12th Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology was held in Comandatuba, Brazil, from August 19–23, 2013, and was preceded by a 2‐day Latin American Symposium on Transplant Immunobiology and Immunopathology. The meeting was highlighted by the presentation of the findings of several working groups formed at the 2009 and 2011 Banff meetings to: (1) establish consensus criteria for diagnosing antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR) in the presence and absence of detectable C4d deposition; (2) develop consensus definitions and thresholds for glomerulitis (g score) and chronic glomerulopathy (cg score), associated with improved inter‐observer agreement and correlation with clinical, molecular and serological data; (3) determine whether isolated lesions of intimal arteritis (“isolated v”) represent acute rejection similar to intimal arteritis in the presence of tubulointerstitial inflammation; (4) compare different methodologies for evaluating interstitial fibrosis and for performing/evaluating implantation biopsies of renal allografts with regard to reproducibility and prediction of subsequent graft function; and (5) define clinically and prognostically significant morphologic criteria for subclassifying polyoma virus nephropathy. The key outcome of the 2013 conference is defining criteria for diagnosis of C4d‐negative ABMR and respective modification of the Banff classification. In addition, three new Banff Working Groups were initiated.

C4d-Positive Chronic Rejection : A Frequent Entity With a Poor Outcome

Background. Chronic rejection (CR) is an important cause of kidney graft loss. Some studies have suggested the role of antibodies mediating chronic graft dysfunction. In this context, C4d identification is an important tool to evaluate antibody-mediated rejection. Method. This is a retrospective study that analyzed 80 patients with histological diagnosis of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) according Banff 97 and no evidence of transplant glomerulopathy. These patients had renal biopsies available for C4d immunoperoxidase staining at the time of diagnosis. Cases were reclassified by the presence of C4d in peritubular capillaries. Results. C4d was negative in 30 cases (37.5%) and positive in 50 (62.5%). C4d+ group had more female and highly sensitized patients (PRA) at transplant. All variables were similar between C4d- and C4d+ cases at diagnosis time, but more C4d+ patients presented proteinuria (>0.3 g/L). Patients were submitted to various immunosuppression regimens after the CAN diagnosis. Four years after the diagnosis, death-censored graft survival was 87% for C4d- and 50% for C4d+ (P=0.002). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, C4d+, PRA>10%, and vascular intimal proliferation were the variables that present higher relative risk for graft loss. Conclusion. These data indicate that C4d positive chronic rejection is very common, associated with proteinuria, and has a poor outcome. A larger study is warranted to identify which immunosuppressive regimen may modify the poor course of this entity.

Introduction of mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporin reduction in children with chronic transplant nephropathy.

Abstract: Chronic transplant nephropathy (CTN) is the most important cause of kidney graft dysfunction. Studies in adult populations have reported a beneficial effect of non‐nephrotoxic mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on graft function in this setting. However, few studies were reported in children in this setting. We therefore reviewed the charts/medical records of renal transplanted patients < 18 yr of age at a single center who had switched from azathioprine to MMF as a result of progressive loss in graft function, for which vascular, infectious, and urological causes were excluded. Serum creatinine (SCr) and calculated creatinine clearance were compared prior to and after MMF introduction. Thirteen patients (nine male/four female), followed‐up for 59.3 ± 35.4 months after transplantation, were analyzed. Age at MMF introduction was 14.2 ± 3.6 yr. In 11 patients a previous biopsy had shown features of CTN and four patients also presented signs of chronic cyclosporin A (CsA) nephrotoxicity. MMF was started at a dose of 1211 ± 351 mg/day, and the CsA dose was decreased from 6.69 ± 3.15 mg/kg/day 6 months before MMF to 4.8 ± 2.3 mg/kg/day at the time of MMF introduction. CsA was withdrawn in four patients. The median (25–75%) SCr value increased from 1.60 mg/dL (range 1.3 to 1.87 mg/dL) 6 months before MMF to 2.2 mg/dL (range 1.87–2.32 mg/dL) when MMF was introduced. Six months after introduction of MMF, the SCr level had decreased to 1.5 mg/dL (range 1.2–1.8 mg/dL) and remained stable until the last follow‐up (17.5 ± 9.2 months after MMF was started). A similar pattern occured with calculated SCr clearance. There were no acute rejections after changes in immunosuppression. The safety of MMF was also analyzed and in only one patient was the drug stopped as a result of intractable diarrhea. These findings suggest that MMF is sufficiently powerful to allow a decrease/withdrawal of CsA without the burden of acute rejection in a pediatric population with CTN.

Banff Histopathological Consensus Criteria for Preimplantation Kidney Biopsies.

The Banff working group on preimplantation biopsy was established to develop consensus criteria (best practice guidelines) for the interpretation of preimplantation kidney biopsies. Digitally scanned slides were used (i) to evaluate interobserver variability of histopathologic findings, comparing frozen sections with formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded tissue of wedge and needle core biopsies, and (ii) to correlate consensus histopathologic findings with graft outcome in a cohort of biopsies from international medical centers. Intraclass correlations (ICCs) and univariable and multivariable statistical analyses were performed. Good to fair reproducibility was observed in semiquantitative scores for percentage of glomerulosclerosis, arterial intimal fibrosis and interstitial fibrosis on frozen wedge biopsies. Evaluation of frozen wedge and core biopsies was comparable for number of glomeruli, but needle biopsies showed worse ICCs for glomerulosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. A consensus evaluation form is provided to help standardize the reporting of histopathologic lesions in donor biopsies. It should be recognized that histologic parameters may not correlate with graft outcome in studies based on organs deemed to be acceptable after careful clinical assessment. Significant limitations remain in the assessment of implantation biopsies.

Patologia do transplante renal: achados morfológicos principais e como laudar as biópsias

Renal transplant has reached remarkable and growing rates of success since its introduction; nowadays it is a widely used replacement therapy. Renal allograft biopsies are increasingly more frequent in the routine of pathology laboratories, whose histological findings are varied. This paper results from the expertise of the members of the Kidney Club of Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia, and presents a general overview of renal allograft pathology, focusing on the current Banff classification, its main categories and cases of difficult diagnosis.

The impact of pretransplant donor-specific antibodies on graft outcome in renal transplantation: a six-year follow-up study

OBJECTIVE: The significance of pretransplant, donor-specific antibodies on long-term patient outcomes is a subject of debate. This study evaluated the impact and the presence or absence of donor-specific antibodies after kidney transplantation on short- and long-term graft outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed the frequency and dynamics of pretransplant donor-specific antibodies following renal transplantation from a randomized trial that was conducted from 2002 to 2004 and correlated these findings with patient outcomes through 2009. Transplants were performed against a complement-dependent T- and B-negative crossmatch. Pre- and posttransplant sera were available from 94 of the 118 patients (80%). Antibodies were detected using a solid-phase (Luminex®), single-bead assay, and all tests were performed simultaneously. RESULTS: Sixteen patients exhibited pretransplant donor-specific antibodies, but only 3 of these patients (19%) developed antibody-mediated rejection and 2 of them experienced early graft losses. Excluding these 2 losses, 6 of 14 patients exhibited donor-specific antibodies at the final follow-up exam, whereas 8 of these patients (57%) exhibited complete clearance of the donor-specific antibodies. Five other patients developed “de novo” posttransplant donor-specific antibodies. Death-censored graft survival was similar in patients with pretransplant donor-specific and non-donor-specific antibodies after a mean follow-up period of 70 months. CONCLUSION: Pretransplant donor-specific antibodies with a negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch are associated with a risk for the development of antibody-mediated rejection, although survival rates are similar when patients transpose the first months after receiving the graft. Our data also suggest that early posttransplant donor-specific antibody monitoring should increase knowledge of antibody dynamics and their impact on long-term graft outcome.

Dynamics of anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies after renal transplantation and their impact on graft outcome.

The purpose of this study was to sequentially monitor anti‐HLA antibodies and correlate the results with antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR), graft survival (GS), and graft function (GF). We collected sera from 111 kidney transplant recipients on transplant days 0, 7, 14, 30, 60, 90, 180, and 360 and analyzed PRA levels by ELISA. DSAs were analyzed by single‐antigen beads in rejecting kidneys. At pre‐transplant, 79.3% of the patients were non‐sensitized (PRA = 0%) and 20.7% were sensitized (PRA > 1%). After transplant, patients were grouped by PRA profile: no anti‐HLA antibodies pre‐ or post‐transplant (group HLApre−/post−; n = 80); de novo anti‐HLA antibodies post‐transplant (group HLApre−/post+; n = 8); sensitized pre‐transplant/increased PRA post‐transplant (group HLApre+/post↑; n = 9); and sensitized pre‐transplant/decreased PRA post‐transplant (group HLApre+/post↓; n = 14). De novo anti‐HLA antibodies were detected at 7–180 d. In sensitized patients, PRA levels changed within the first 30 d post‐transplant. Incidence of AMR was higher in HLApre−/post+ and HLApre+/post↑ than in HLApre−/post−, and HLApre+/post↓ (p < 0.001) groups. One‐yr death‐censored GS was 36% in group HLApre+/post↑, compared with 98%, 88% and 100% in groups HLApre−/post−, HLApre−/post+, and HLApre+/post↓, respectively (p < 0.001). Excluding first‐year graft losses, GF and GS were similar among the groups. In conclusion, post‐transplant antibody monitoring can identify recipients at higher risk of AMR.

C4d staining in post-reperfusion renal biopsy is not useful for the early detection of antibody-mediated rejection when CDC crossmatching is negative

BACKGROUND Sensitized patients (pts) may develop acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) due to preformed donor-specific antibodies, undetected by pre-transplant complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatch (XM). We hypothesized that C4d staining in 1-h post-reperfusion biopsies (1-h Bx) could detect early complement activation in the renal allograft due to preformed donor-specific antibodies. METHODS To test this hypothesis, renal transplants (n = 229) performed between June 2005 and December 2007 were entered into a prospective study of 1-h Bx and stained for C4d by immunofluorescence. Transplants were performed against a negative T-cell CDC-XM with the exception of three cases with a positive B-cell XM. RESULTS All 229 1-h Bx stained negative for C4d. Fourteen pts (6%) developed AMR. None of the 14 protocol 1-h Bx stained positive for C4d in peritubular capillaries (PTC). However, all indication biopsies-that diagnosed AMR-performed at a median of 8 days after transplantation stained for C4d in PTC. CONCLUSIONS These data show that C4d staining in 1-h Bx is, in general, not useful for the early detection of AMR when CDC-XM is negative.