Dale Storie
University of Alberta
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Dale Storie.
Annals of Family Medicine | 2012
Darren Lau; Jia Hu; Sumit R. Majumdar; Dale Storie; Sandra Rees; Jeffrey A. Johnson
PURPOSE Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rates remain below national targets. We systematically reviewed the effectiveness of quality improvement interventions for increasing the rates of influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations among community-dwelling adults. METHODS We included randomized and nonrandomized studies with a concurrent control group. We estimated pooled odds ratios using random effects models, and used the Downs and Black tool to assess the quality of included studies. RESULTS Most studies involved elderly primary care patients. Interventions were associated with improvements in the rates of any vaccination (111 comparisons in 77 studies, pooled odds ratio [OR] = 1.61, 95% CI, 1.49-1.75), and influenza (93 comparisons, 65 studies, OR = 1.46, 95% CI, 1.35-1.57) and pneumococcal (58 comparisons, 35 studies, OR = 2.01, 95% CI, 1.72-2.3) vaccinations. Interventions that appeared effective were patient financial incentives (influenza only), audit and feedback (influenza only), clinician reminders, clinician financial incentives (influenza only), team change, patient outreach, delivery site changes (influenza only), clinician education (pneumococcus only), and case management (pneumococcus only). Patient outreach was more effective if personal contact was involved. Team changes were more effective where nurses administered influenza vaccinations independently. Heterogeneity in some pooled odds ratios was high, however, and funnel plots showed signs of potential publication bias. Study quality varied but was not associated with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Quality improvement interventions, especially those that assign vaccination responsibilities to nonphysician personnel or that activate patients through personal contact, can modestly improve vaccination rates in community-dwelling adults. To meet national policy targets, more-potent interventions should be developed and evaluated.
American Journal of Kidney Diseases | 2014
Ben Wong; Maliha Muneer; Natasha Wiebe; Dale Storie; Sabin Shurraw; Neesh Pannu; Scott Klarenbach; Alexa Grudzinski; Gihad Nesrallah; Robert P. Pauly
BACKGROUNDnThe buttonhole technique is an alternative method of cannulating the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) in hemodialysis (HD), frequently used for home HD patients. However, the balance of risks and benefits of the buttonhole compared with the rope-ladder technique is uncertain.nnnSTUDY DESIGNnA systematic review of randomized trials and observational studies (case reports, case series, studies without a control group, non-English studies, and abstracts were excluded).nnnSETTING & POPULATIONnHD patients (both in-center conventional HD and home HD) using an AVF for vascular access.nnnSELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIESnWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBM Reviews, and CINAHL from the earliest date in the databases to March 2014 for studies comparing clinical outcomes of the buttonhole versus rope-ladder technique.nnnINTERVENTIONnButtonhole versus rope-ladder cannulation technique.nnnOUTCOMESnThe primary outcomes of interest were patient-reported cannulation pain and rates of AVF-related local and systemic infections. Secondary outcomes included access survival, intervention, hospitalization, and mortality, as well as hematoma and aneurysm formation, time to hemostasis, and all-cause hospitalization and mortality.nnnRESULTSnOf 1,044 identified citations, 23 studies were selected for inclusion. There was equivocal evidence with respect to cannulation pain: pooled observational studies yielded a statistical reduction in pain with buttonhole cannulation (standardized mean difference,xa0-0.76 [95%CI,xa0-1.38 toxa0-0.15] standard deviations), but no difference in cannulation pain was found among randomized controlled trials (standardized mean difference, 0.34 [95%CI,xa0-0.76 to 1.43] standard deviations). Buttonhole, as compared to rope-ladder, technique appeared to be associated with increased risk of local and systemic infections.nnnLIMITATIONSnOverall poor quality and substantial heterogeneity among studies precluded pooling of most outcomes.nnnCONCLUSIONSnEvidence does not support the preferential use of buttonhole over rope-ladder cannulation in either facility-based conventional HD or home HD. This does not preclude buttonhole cannulation as being appropriate for some patients with difficult-to-access AVFs.
Journal of Neuroimaging | 2014
Maher Saqqur; Georgios Tsivgoulis; Francois Nicoli; David Školoudík; Vijay K. Sharma; Vincent Larrue; Jürgen Eggers; Fabienne Perren; Paris Charalampidis; Dale Storie; Ashfaq Shuaib; Andrei V. Alexandrov
To assess the evidence on the safety and efficacy of sonothrombolysis in acute stroke.
PLOS ONE | 2014
Mohammed S. Osman; Christian Pagnoux; Donna M Dryden; Dale Storie; Elaine Yacyshyn
Background Giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasus arteritis (TAA) are large vessel vasculitides (LVV) for which corticosteroids (CS) are the mainstay for treatment. In patients with LVV unable to tolerate CS, biological agents have been used with variable effectiveness. Objective To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of biological agents in patients with LVV. Methods We searched 5 electronic databases (inception to October 2012) and conference abstracts with no language restrictions. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Our protocol was registered in PROSPERO. Results We included 25 studies (3 RCTs and 22 case series with ≥2 cases). 95 GCA and 98 TAA patients received biological agents. The RCTs using anti-TNF agents (infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab) did not suggest a benefit in GCA. GCA patients receiving tocilizumab, in case series, achieved remission (19 patients) and reduction of corticosteroid dose (mean difference, –16.55 mg/day (95% CI: –26.24, –6.86)). In case series, 75 patients with refractory TAA treated with infliximab discontinued CS 32% of the time. Remission was variably defined and the studies were clinically heterogeneous which precluded further analysis. Conclusion This systematic review demonstrated a weak evidence base on which to assess the effectiveness of biological treatment in LVV. Evidence from RCTs suggests that anti-TNF agents are not effective for remission or reduction of CS use. Tocilizumab and infliximab may be effective in the management of LVV and refractory TAA, respectively, although the evidence comes from case series. Future analytical studies are needed to confirm these findings.
The Scientific World Journal | 2013
Sayf Gazala; Jean-Sébastien Pelletier; Dale Storie; Jeffrey A. Johnson; Demetrios J. Kutsogiannis; Eric L.R. Bédard
The main objective of this review was to systematically review, assess, and report on the studies that have assessed health related quality of life (HRQOL) after VATS and thoracotomy for resection of lung cancer. We performed a systematic review of six databases. The Downs and Black tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Five studies were included. In general, patients undergoing VATS have a better HRQOL when compared to thoracotomy; however, there was a high risk of bias in the included studies. The consistent use of a lung cancer specific questionnaire for measuring HRQOL after surgery is encouraged.
American Journal of Kidney Diseases | 2017
Ben Wong; David Collister; Maliha Muneer; Dale Storie; Mark Courtney; Anita Lloyd; Sandra Campbell; Robert P. Pauly
BACKGROUNDnOwing to its longer treatment duration-up to 8 hours per dialysis treatment-in-center thrice-weekly nocturnal hemodialysis (HD) is receiving greater attention. To better understand the evidence for in-center nocturnal HD, we sought to systematically review the literature to determine the effects of in-center nocturnal HD versus conventional HD on clinically relevant outcomes.nnnSTUDY DESIGNnWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews (EBMR), Web of Science, and Scopus from the earliest date in the database to Novemberxa02016.nnnSETTING & POPULATIONnAdults receiving in-center nocturnal HD compared with those receiving conventional HD.nnnSELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIESnAll quasi-experimental and observational studies were considered; randomized trials were sought but not found.nnnPREDICTORnNocturnal vs conventional in-center HD.nnnOUTCOMESnIndexes of blood pressure and left ventricular hypertrophy, markers of anemia, measures of bone mineral metabolism, nutrition, quality of life, sleep quality, episodes of intradialytic hypotension, hospitalization, and mortality.nnnRESULTSnOf 2,086 identified citations, 21 met the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 1,165 in-center nocturnal HD patients and 15,865 conventional HD patients. Although there was substantial heterogeneity in reporting of outcomes, we pooled data for measures of blood pressure, anemia, and mineral metabolism. Though heterogeneity was generally high, in-center nocturnal HD was associated with improved systolic blood pressure (-3.18 [95% CI,xa0-5.58 toxa0-0.78) mm Hg, increased hemoglobin levels (0.53 [95% CI, 0.11-0.94] g/dL), and lower serum phosphate levels (-0.97 [95% CI,xa0-1.48 toxa0-0.46] mg/dL).nnnLIMITATIONSnNo randomized trials have been conducted to address the clinical effects of in-center nocturnal HD. The quality of the observational literature contributing to the results of this review was generally poor to moderate. Confounded outcomes are a significant concern. Publication bias and outcome reporting bias remain possibilities.nnnCONCLUSIONSnRelative to conventional HD, in-center nocturnal HD was associated with improvements in several clinically relevant outcomes. Other benefits may not have been detected due to small sample sizes of included studies; no prespecified outcome was worse with in-center nocturnal HD.
Language and Literacy | 2012
Margaret Mackey; Leslie Vermeer; Dale Storie; Elizabeth DeBlois
This article reports on a 2006 survey of texts used in Grade 10 English language arts classes in Edmonton, Alberta.xa0 The survey uses the same instrument as a previous 1996 survey and provides comparative data from a section of the same pool as participated in 1996.xa0 In terms of the most popular titles, there has been very little change during that decade.xa0 To Kill a Mockingbird and Romeo and Juliet continue to be the most widely taught texts by a considerable margin.xa0 Texts taught in only one class show more variability.xa0 Reasons for the striking constancy of the title list are considered.
Medical Teacher | 2016
Rabia Ahmed; Ameer Farooq; Dale Storie; Lisa Hartling; Anna E. Oswald
Abstract Background/purpose: There is a growing desire for health professions educators to generate high-quality education research; yet, few of them encounter the training to do so. In response, health professions faculties have increasingly been devoting resources to provide members with the skills necessary for education research. The form and impact of these efforts have not been reviewed, though such a synthesis could be useful for practice. The objectives of this systematic review were to (1) identify interventions aimed at building capacity for education research among health professions clinical educators and (2) review the outcomes of these interventions. Methodology: We developed a systematic review protocol based on our pilot scoping search. This protocol underwent peer review and was prospectively registered with the Best Evidence Medical Education Collaboration. Based on this protocol, we conducted a comprehensive search of health professions’ databases and related grey literature. Systematic methods were applied: two independent reviewers completed title screening and full text review for inclusion, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment. Studies were included if they reported outcomes for interventions designed to increase capacity for health professions clinical educators to conduct education research. We conducted a qualitative synthesis of the evidence which included detailed reporting of intervention characteristics and outcomes. Results: Our search returned 14, 149 results, 241 of which were retained after title and abstract screening, and 30 of which met inclusion criteria after full text review. Seven groups of interventions were identified, the most frequent being teaching scholars programs (nu2009=u200910), health professions education fellowships (nu2009=u20093) or master’s programs (nu2009=u20094). The most commonly measured outcome was change related to enhanced scholarly outputs (grants, papers, abstracts, and presentations) post-intervention. Unfortunately, most of the included studies lacked detailed description of the intervention and were of low to moderate quality with post-test only design. Discussion/conclusions: This review demonstrates that various interventions can have a positive impact on the ability of health professions clinical educators to conduct education research. We note several key elements of the interventions including: (1) protected time, (2) mentorship and/or collaboration, (3) departmental and institutional commitment and leadership, and (4) financial support. Through our analysis we describe the complexities around evaluating clinical educators’ health professions research activities and the interventions used to promote education research. While improved study quality would allow more detailed understanding and evaluation of these key features, we are able to provide recommendations for potential strategies for improving participation in and quality of health professions education research based on this analysis.
Health Information and Libraries Journal | 2012
Trish Chatterley; Dale Storie; Thane Chambers; Jeanette Buckingham; Ali Shiri; Marlene Dorgan
BACKGROUNDnHealthcare practitioners in Alberta and across Canada have varying levels of access to information resources depending on their institutional and professional affiliations, yet access to current health information is critical for all.nnnOBJECTIVESnTo determine what information resources and services are provided by Albertan and Canadian professional health associations to their members.nnnMETHODSnRepresentatives of professional colleges and associations were interviewed regarding information resources and services offered to members and perceptions of their members information needs.nnnRESULTSnNational-level associations are more likely to provide resources than provincial ones. There is a clear distinction between colleges and associations in terms of information offered: colleges provide regulatory information, while associations are responsible for provision of clinical information resources. Only half of the associations interviewed provide members with access to licensed databases, with cost being a major barrier.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThere is considerable variation in the number of electronic resources and the levels of information support provided by professional health associations in Alberta and Canada. Access and usage vary among the health professions. National licensing of resources or creation of a portal linking to freely available alternatives are potential options for increasing access and awareness.
Archive | 2014
Chuck Humphrey; Dale Storie; Neil MacGregor; Natasha Nunn; Tricia Jenkins; Trish Chatterley; Weiwei Shi; Kendall Roark; Umar Qasim; Geoffrey Harder
This tool has been adapted from an open source Ruby on Rails application developed by the Digital Curation Centre in the U.K (https://dmponline.dcc.ac.uk), and it will be hosted on local servers at the University of Alberta. The tool will be open to anyone to use. ! The tool guides users through a customized set of questions based on institutional or funding requirements. Initially, the tool will include generic data management planning questions, but new question templates can be added or adapted as needed. ! After creating an account and logging in, users will be able to create a new plan. They choose a funding agency and institution (if applicable), and then are presented with a customized question form based on their choices.